Blind area specification from Doros MD

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Heat load due to e-cloud in the HL-LHC triplets G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo 19th HiLumi WP2 Task Leader Meeting - 18 October 2013 Many thanks to: H.Bartosik,
Advertisements

Update on Q1 TAS REGION (18 to 22m), layouts. D. Brethoux, M. Lazzaroni, F. Sanchez Galan, WP8 meeting1.
Study of the Luminosity of LHeC, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel CERN June F. Willeke, DESY.
Design Considerations LHC hadron beams: E p =7 TeV E A =E e  Z/A Luminosity O (10 33 ) cm -2 s -1 with Beam Power 100 MW (wall plug) Integrated e ± p.
1 IR Vacuum M. Sullivan MAC Review Jan , 2006 M. Sullivan for the Machine Advisory Committee Review January 18-20, 2006 IR Vacuum.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
Brain Gestorme: Status of the LHeC Ring-Ring / Linac- Ring Basic Parameters I appologise to talk about things you already know...
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
BPMs and HOM-BPMs for the XFEL Linac N. Baboi for the BPM and the HOM teams (DESY, CEA-Saclay, SLAC, FNAL, Cockroft/Daresbury) XFEL Linac Review Meeting,
07-JUL-2003LEADE / JW1 Satellite bunches in the LHC Satellite “definition” Satellite luminosity Satellite detection & tolerances J. Wenninger AB/OP.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
12th HL-LHC Parameter and Layout Committee meeting.
Debuncher Stochastic Cooling Paul Derwent March 3, 2016.
TAS-Q1 Status & what if exercise Etude [HL-LHC] TAS-Q1.
Shielding the 140 mm option F. Cerutti, L.S. Esposito on behalf of CERN FLUKA team.
BRANs at HL-LHC Sune Jakobsen (BE-BI-PM) 1st HL-LHC WP13 Project Meeting
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
1 NBI Rh. Jones (CERN - AB/BDI) CNGS Target Area Beam Position Monitors OUTLINE 1.Recap of Requirements & Layout 2.Monitor Candidates -Secondary.
E. Todesco LAYOUT FOR INTERACTION REGIONS IN HI LUMI LHC E. Todesco CERN, Geneva Switzerland Acknowledgements: B. Dalena, M. Giovannozzi, R. De Maria,
The LHC Beam Position System Ad-hoc Working Group on LHC Experiment-Machine Parameter and Signal Exchange 26 th March 2002 Rhodri Jones (SL/BI)
Linear optics - I Low beta* at injection –Reduction of injection could potentially reduce time to collisions and allow for a more relaxed ramp&squeeze,
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Fabio Follin Delphine Jacquet For the LHC operation team
Y.Papaphilippou Thanks to
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
Operating IP8 at high luminosity in the HL-LHC era
Francesco Cerutti, Andrea Tsinganis WP10 Energy deposition & R2E
Beam Energy & Intensity: One bunch during full cycle
SLHC –PP WP6 LHC IR Upgrade - Phase I.
M.Fitterer, A.Patapenka, A.Valishev (FNAL)
TAXS and TAXN ABSORBERS - OVERVIEW
TANB Integration – LS2 BLM Relocation Proposal C4R8 and C4L8
HL-LHC Aperture Update
- STT LAYOUT - SECTOR F SECTOR A SECTOR B SECTOR E SECTOR D SECTOR C
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
IPBPM test results at the LINAC end
WP3 status Interaction Region design
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Long Shutdown for the LHC: Vacuum Beam Pipes
IP, crab cavity alignment and orbit control
Accelerator and Experiment Interface Session: LS2, LS3
Follow-up of HL-LHC Annual meeting
Β*-reach in 2017 R. Bruce, S. Redaelli, R. De Maria, M. Giovannozzi, A. Mereghetti, D. Mirarchi Acknowledgement: collimation and optics teams, BE/ABP,
Machine lay-out September 2015
LHC Emittance Measurements and Preservation
DEBRIS IMPACT IN THE TAS-TRIPLET-D1 REGION
WP3 meeting Aug 21, 2015 V1.1 RECAP Francesco Cerutti.
Week 46 Week 46: Machine coordinators: Roger Bailey – Gianluigi Arduini Main aims of the week: Stable beams with ions Scheduled stop for ion source refill.
Wednesday /Thursday 09-11:00 Verification of the LSS6 interlocked BPMs: took longer to fill due to some problems with RF cavities in the PS. In the mean.
CEPC-SppC Accelerator CDR Copmpletion at the end of 2017
Wednesday Morning 8: :30 end of fill study - octupole polarity inversion (Elias, Tatiana, Alexey, Georges, …): Goal: study the effect of the.
Thursday 17th May 01:11 Fill #2633 dump in squeeze arc circulator load channel Ad1B 03:16 Fill #2644 Stable beams, lumi 5.2e33 cm-2s-1 04:38 Dumped by.
Luminosity measurement at LHC (The machine point of view)
Tuesday 9th November 10:02 Fill beams dumped
HL-LHC operations with LHCb at high luminosity
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
BCM Overview Placement such that system is sensitive to all types of beam accidents. => 2 independent subsystems Halo losses inside the Pixel volume ie.
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Triplet corrector layout and strength specifications
Friday 28 October 2011.
Thursday
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018.
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
LS 1 start date 12th June Schedule Extension 2012 run Extension of 2012 run approved by the DG on 3rd July 2012.
HL-LHC HEL BPM.
HL-LHCV1.4 (BI) R. De Maria WP13 meeting 3/9/2018.
L. Gentini, M. Giovannozzi, M. Gonzalez, M. Krupa, H. Mainaud Durand,
Option 1: Reduced FF Quad Apertures
Presentation transcript:

Blind area specification from Doros MD R. De Maria, T. Lefevre

Blind area specification from Doros MD 1 2 Traces from Port 1 and Port 2 overlaps in time. Strong correlation between Beam 1 and Beam 2 positions. 12cm 1 2 cogging 3ns/90cm Traces from Port 1 and Port 2 are separated by 3 ns. On average, no observed correlations between Beam 1 and Beam 2 positions. 51cm The LR position should 51 cm far from the closest port or 51+6 = 57 cm from the center of the BPM. Due to the presence of 80 MHz LP filter in the Doros front end, this condition is not too sensitive to changes of bunch lengths. Specification: The central position of the BPM should be outside an area defined by ±57.0 cm from the position of the long range interactions.

HLLHCv1.2 BPM positions BPM BPM [m] LR [#] Delta [m] 1 TAXS-Q1 22.053 6 -0.387 2 Q1b-Q2a 33.193 9 -0.467 3 Q2a-Q2b 43.978 12 -0.902 4 Q2b-Q3a 54.763 15 -1.337 5 Q3b-CP 65.903 18 -1.417 CP-D1 73.619 20 -1.181 7 D1-TAXN 82.089 22 -0.192 Blind area |Delta|<0.57 m Negative Delta BPM is in between IP and LR If Q1 assembly is moved by 183 mm towards the IP, BPM 1 and 2 become effective. In alternative at the expenses of β* reach and further layout changes: Q1 should be moved by 1037 mm towards the arc Q2a should be moved by 1472 mm towards the arc Q2b should be moved by 1907 mm towards the arc Q3a should be moved by 1987 mm towards the arc

From integration studies Option 1: BPM in the experiment with difficult alignment, BPM inside Q1 in blind area but with good alignment. Not yet feasible due to cryogenics and ATLAS openings. Option 2: no BPM in the experiment, BPM outside Q1 with bad alignment and not in blind area. No solution for alignment and leaks. Option 3: BPM in the TAXS with bad alignment and access, BPM inside Q1 good alignment. Option 4: Ls=24 m, degradation of pre-squeeze and squeezed beta*. Option 5: Ls=22.8 m no BPM in experimental area, BPM in Q1 in the good area, well aligned and more reliable, difficult to move Q1 towards the IP. Option 6: Attach TAXS to Q1, mechanically difficult.