Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northern Arizona University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alternative Assessments for Musicians Marshall Chasin, AuD., M.Sc., Reg. CASLPO, Aud(C) Musicians’ Clinics of Canada.
Advertisements

Associations between Obesity and Depression by Race/Ethnicity and Education among Women: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,
HEARING CONSERVATION Protecting Employees From Noise Hazards.
This article and any supplementary material should be cited as follows: Wilson RH, McArdle R. Characteristics of audiometric 4,000 Hz notch (744,553 veterans)
Musicians and Hearing Loss: Comparison to a non-noise exposed population Incidence and Risk Factors Shanda Brashears-Morlet 1, Michael Santucci 2, Thierry.
Hearing Standard Threshold Shift
Sean D. Kristjansson Andrew C. Heath Andrey P. Anokhin Substance Use Among Older Adolescents: A Latent Class Analysis.
Exploring Multiple Dimensions of Asthma Disparities Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Kirsti Bocskay, PhD, MPH Office of Epidemiology.
PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY BALASUBRAMANIAN THIAGARAJAN DRTBALU'S OTOLARYNGOLOGY ONLINE.
Properties and Detection of Sound
Audiometric Characteristics of Children and Adults
KATE LAMB, M.S. CANDIDATE REBECCA CROWELL, AU.D. CCC-A, FACULTY SPONSOR DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION SCIENCES AND DISORDERS STUDENT RESEARCH COLLOQUIUM.
1 ISE Ch. 24 Chapter 24: Hearing and Noise Defining and understanding noise & its effects  complex problem  not always intuitive  critical for.
Noise Induced Hearing Loss
Noise induced hearing loss Predisposing factors: Predisposing factors: Drug use (aspirin) Drug use (aspirin) Gender Gender Cause: Exposure to noise Cause:
  Three categories generally describe Hearing Loss:  Type of Hearing Loss  Degree of Hearing Loss  Configuration of Hearing Loss  It is important.
JENNIFER SAYLOR, PHD, RN, ANCS-BC UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE SEPTEMBER 14, 2012 Essentials of Complex Data Analysis Utilizing National Survey.
Teens and Noise Exposure Carol Rousseau, Au.D., CCC-A Rochester Hearing and Speech Center 21 May 2010.
ARC 507: Environmental Control III (Acoustics and Noise Control) Department of Architecture, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria ARC 507:
Transitions in Conjoint Alcohol and Tobacco Use among Adolescents Kristina M. Jackson University of Missouri, Columbia & Missouri Alcoholism Research Center.
Stephen Nkansah-Amankra, PhD, MPH, MA 1, Abdoulaye Diedhiou, MD, PHD, H.L.K. Agbanu, MPhil, Curtis Harrod, MPH, Ashish Dhawan, MD, MSPH 1 University of.
Attitudes of Speech-Language Pathology/Audiology Students Toward Noise in Youth Culture Lillian Law, B.A., Adrienne Rubinstein, Ph.D. CUNY AuD Program,
Valerie L. Trollinger, D.M.E. Kutztown University of Pennsylvania Kutztown, PA Robert T. Sataloff, M.D., D.M.A., F.A.C.S. Drexel University College of.
Linical & Experimental Audiology 1 Otoacoustic Emissions in Monitoring NIHL for Professional Musicians: A 2-Year Follow-up Study Annual NHCA Conference,
Trends in HIV-Related Risk Behaviors Among U.S. Adolescents: Is Progress Stalling? Laura Kann, Ph.D. Lexi Balaji, Ph.D. Richard Lowry, M.D. Nancy Brener,
What Factors Influence Early Sexual Debut amongst Youth: Comparative Evidence from Nigeria and India ICASA 2011 Babatunde.O, Temitope.F, Imoisili.A, Alabi.F.
Epidemiology of occupational diseases
Hearing and the Human Ear
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS
NOISE INDUCED HEARING LOSS
Conclusions & Implications
DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS
Nation’s First Collaborative School of Public Health
Clinical Challenges in Identifying Noise-Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) Phenotype for Genetic Association Analysis Presenter Ishan Bhatt, Ph.D., CCC-A.
1University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
Kimberly Jeffries Leonard, Ph.D.
Phenotyping Noise Induced Hearing Loss with Audiometry and DPOAEs
Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Young Adults
Paula Gardiner MD MPH Boston University Medical School
Prevalence of Self-Reported Diabetes and Exposure to Organochlorine Pesticides among Mexican-Americans: Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Mesfin S. Mulatu, Ph.D., M.P.H. The MayaTech Corporation
Regression to Predict Absences on MAP Scores
Texas Pediatric Society Electronic Poster Contest
Rabia Khalaila, RN, MPH, PHD Director, Department of Nursing
Copyright © 2014 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northern Arizona University
Increased Physical Activity And Senior Center Participation
Sexual Imagery & Thinking About Sex
Exercise Adherence in Patients with Diabetes: Evaluating the role of psychosocial factors in managing diabetes Natalie N. Young,1, 2 Jennifer P. Friedberg,1,
Health of Wisconsin: Report Card 2016
Associations between Depression and Obesity: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, Arlene Keddie, Ph.D. Assistant.
Enrique Ramirez1, Julie Morita1
Chapter 1: CKD in the General Population
Table 1: NHBS HET3 Participant Characteristics
National Academy of Neuropsychology
g Prevalence of Hearing Impairment in School Children Results
NIHL Part 2.
Descriptive e-cigarette norms on tobacco attitudes and smoking behavior: The importance of close friends and peers Michael Coleman & William D. Crano.
Ishan Bhatt, PhD, CCC-A, FAAA
HEARING LOSS PREVENTION
Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Normal-Hearing Noise-Exposed Human Ears Tracy Mbuoben, BA, Hannah Tubbs, BS, Ariana Randall, BA, Cassie Hiebert,
Chapter 1: CKD in the General Population
Ishan Bhatt, PhD, CCC-A, FAAA
Tasks for: Confirm Physical Health Status
Occupational Noise Exposure
Who’s cooking? Analysis of food preparation time in the 2003 ATUS
Journal reviews 이승호.
Jay S. Kaufman, PhD, Sam Harper, PhD  The American Journal of Medicine 
Hearing Loss Prevention
Unadjusted and adjusted prevalence estimates of self-reported cancer according to diabetes types among men (A) and women (B) (BRFSS 2009). Unadjusted and.
Presentation transcript:

Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northern Arizona University Risk Factors for a Bilateral 4-6 kHz Notch in US Youth: Data from the NHANES (2005-2010) Ishan Bhatt, PhD, CCC-A, Michael Skelton, AuD, CCC-A & O’neil Guthrie, PhD, CCC-A Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northern Arizona University BACKGROUND Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a permanent hearing loss that remains a hearing health concern despite the implementation of national standards for hearing protection. NIHL is defined as a bilateral audiometric hearing loss at the frequency range between 3000 to 6000 Hz with recovery at 8000 Hz. NIHL slowly develops as a function of continuous or intermittent acoustic exposure and duration (Kirchner et al, 2012). NIHL is a complex disorder which is caused by multiple genes in combination with lifestyle and environmental factors. We identified bilateral audiometric notches at 4000-6000 Hz as an NIHL phenotype to study genetic risk factors in our previous study (Phillips et al., 2015). Demographic and Survey data Tinnitus was considered present if a participant answered positive to: In the past twelve months, have you been bothered by ringing, roaring, or buzzing in your ears or head that lasts for five minutes or more? Sex of the participants was categorized as male and female. Socioeconomic status: low (PIR≤1.3), mid (PIR: 1.4-3.5) and high (PIR > 3.5). Age of participants was categorized in four subgroups: 12-13 years, 14-15 years, 16-17 years, and 18-19 years. Race/ethnicity was re-coded into non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic and other races (including multiracial). Firearms noise exposure was considered positive if a participant answered positively to the question: Have you ever used firearms for target shooting, hunting, or for any other purposes? Work-related noise exposure was defined as positive if a participant answered positively to the question: Have you ever had a job where you were exposed to loud noise for five or more hours a week? Music exposure was defined as positive if a participant identified exposure to loud noise or music for five or more hours per week outside of a job. History of smoking was considered positive if a participant answered positively to any of the following questions: Have you ever tried smoking? or Does anyone smoke at home? RESULTS (continued) Tables: Factors associated with unilateral and bilateral audiometric notches Risk-factors for the audiometric notch: Multinomial logistic regression analysis with audiometric notch as a dependent variable (with 3 levels: no notch, unilateral notch, bilateral notches) and with above listed factors as dependent variables were used to identify the risk-factors of the notch. The analysis revealed that males showed lower prevalence of notches compared to females. Participants with African American ancestry and history of noisy job revealed high odds of bilateral notches. Unilateral notch was associated with age range of 14-15 years, and African American ancestry. Associated Variables Unilateral Notch (Odds Ratio) Male < Females 0.753 (0.618-0.918) African American < European American 0.700 (0.538-0.911) 14-15 years > 18-19 years Associated Variables Bilateral Notch (Odds Ratio) Male < Females 0.585 (0.450-0.761) African American < European American 0.537 (0.376-0.767) Noisy Job > No noisy job 1.836 (1.097-3.074) AIMES OF THE STUDY To study the prevalence of unilateral notch (UN) and bilateral notch (BN) in US youth using the National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2005-2010) database. To evaluate the effect of non-genetic risk factors (i.e. gender, age, ethnicity, family income, work-related noise exposure, recreational acoustic exposure, acoustic exposure just prior to testing, firearm noise exposure, tinnitus and ear canal volume) on the BN. METHODS Audiometric testing was performed by NHANES (2005-10). Data was collected through household interviews followed by a standardized physical examination. Demographic and audiometric databases from NHANES 2005-06, 07-08 and 09-10 were merged. Individuals ranging in age from 12-19 years with bilateral normal otoscopic findings, compliance value ranges from 0.2 to 1.8 cc, and middle ear pressure ranging from -50 to 25 dapa in both ears were considered for further analysis. (Total: 2348 participants) Audiometric Measures Interacoustic model AD226 audiometer with standard TDH-39 headphones were used to measure hearing sensitivity. Testing was conducted according to a modified Hughson Westlake procedure using automatic testing mode. Definition of Audiometric Notch A drop in hearing sensitivity at 4 to 6 kHz of at least 15 dB from the self-referenced previous best threshold in a linear progression of frequencies, with a recovery of at least 5 dB after the notch. DISCUSSION Prevalence of audiometric notch in US youth (16.6%) was higher than its prevalence in college-aged musicians (12%) (Phillips et al, 2015) Almost 42% of the participants showed audiometric notch without reporting a history of a noisy job, music exposure, firearm noise exposure and acoustic exposure before audiometry. Audiometric notch may overestimate NIHL especially when supra-aural transducers are used to measure hearing thresholds (Schlauch & Carney, 2011) Standing waves in the ear canal may be a candidate mechanism leading to higher prevalence of notches in younger children with shorter ear canals. Future research will compare sound pressure levels in the ear canal produced by supra-aural headphones versus insert ear headphones to test the hypothesis that standing waves in the ear canal can cause a notch-like pattern in the absence of noise-induced cochlear damage. RESULTS Prevalence of bilateral notches: 16.6 % (390 participants) Prevalence of unilateral notches: 39% (914 participants) Figure 1: Audiometric Notch Configuration in the NHANES (2005-2010) database: Mean thresholds at 1000-8000 Hz for participants with no notch (blue line) vs. notched audiogram (red line). Error bars: 95% CI