David Freedman Claranet

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why do current IP semantics cause scaling issues? −Today, “addressing follows topology,” which limits route aggregation compactness −Overloaded IP address.
Advertisements

1 © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc. Integrated-ISIS Route Leaking.
Overview of draft-ietf-sidr-roa-format-01.txt Matt Lepinski BBN Technologies.
BGP.
1 Interdomain Routing Protocols. 2 Autonomous Systems An autonomous system (AS) is a region of the Internet that is administered by a single entity and.
Changed made by MF on 29/10/04 Delete Change Add –All slides Obtained Geoff Huston’s review – done on 26/10/2004 Obtained Doc Team’s proof read - done.
Presented By: Hanping Feng Configuring BGP With Cisco IOS Software (Part 1)
Feb 12, 2008CS573: Network Protocols and Standards1 Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Network Protocols and Standards Winter
Mod 9 – IP Addressing Part 2 CIS151 Paul Morris MHCC.
Better by a HAIR: Hardware-Amenable Internet Routing Brent Mochizuki University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Joint work with: Firat Kiyak (Illinois)
Ch.9 – IP Addressing Part 2 CCNA 1 version 3.1 Rick Graziani Spring 2005.
IETF81 Secure IDR Rollup – TREX Workshop 2011 David Freedman, Claranet.
Real-Time BGP Data Access 1 Mikhail Strizhov Colorado State University.
CS 3700 Networks and Distributed Systems Inter Domain Routing (It’s all about the Money) Revised 8/20/15.
João Damas. APRICOT 2002, March 2002, Bangkok. 1 Extending RPSL: IPv6, multicast, … Presented by João Damas RIPE NCC.
Lecture 4: BGP Presentations Lab information H/W update.
© 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. A_BGP_Confed BGP Confederations.
BGP4 - Border Gateway Protocol. Autonomous Systems Routers under a single administrative control are grouped into autonomous systems Identified by a 16.
Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) W.lilakiatsakun. BGP Basics (1) BGP is the protocol which is used to make core routing decisions on the Internet It involves.
More on Internet Routing A large portion of this lecture material comes from BGP tutorial given by Philip Smith from Cisco (ftp://ftp- eng.cisco.com/pfs/seminars/APRICOT2004.
02/01/2006USC/ISI1 Updates on Routing Experiments Cyber DEfense Technology Experimental Research (DETER) Network Evaluation Methods for Internet Security.
1 Open Source Routing BoF - Summary BoF was held on Monday 18:00 – 19:00 Martin Winter / David Lamparter OpenSourceRouting.org RIPE65 / Routing WG Ondrej.
BGP in practice Sabri Berisha What The Hack 2005.
CSCI-1680 Network Layer: Inter-domain Routing Based partly on lecture notes by Rob Sherwood, David Mazières, Phil Levis, Rodrigo Fonseca John Jannotti.
GoBGP Open Source BGP implementation
4 Byte AS Number Update Geoff Huston August 2008.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 BGP Prefix Origin Validation State Extended Community draft-pmohapat-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-00.
Meet the Falcons Ciprian Marginean Aris Lambrianidis
Route Selection Using Policy Controls
RPKI implementation experiences in the LAC Region Carlos M. Martínez – Arturo Servín LACSEC 2012 – LACNIC XVIII.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Autonomous System Numbers How to describe Routing Policy.
© 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. BGP v3.2—1-1 Course Introduction.
© 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. BGP v3.2—3-1 Route Selection Using Policy Controls Using Multihomed BGP Networks.
APNIC IPv6 Allocation Update IPv6 SIG APNIC 14, Kitakyushu, Japan 4 September 2002.
Aut-num object Denis Walker Business Analyst RIPE NCC Database Team.
Covering Prefixes Outbound Route Filter for BGP-4 draft-bonica-l3vpn-orf-covering-prefixes-01 H. Jeng, l. Jalil, R. Bonica, Y. Rekhter, K. Patel, L. Yong.
Doing Don’ts: Modifying BGP Attributes within an Autonomous System Luca Cittadini, Stefano Vissicchio, Giuseppe Di Battista Università degli Studi RomaTre.
AS Numbers - Again Geoff Huston APNIC October 2009
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. All rights reserved Internal DP MP-BGP for IPv6 原理 ISSUE 1.0.
BGP extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery in a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-pce-bgp-disco-attribute-03.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI R&D Labs,
CS 3700 Networks and Distributed Systems
Large BGP Communities & Shutdown Communication.
LISP Implementation Report
Boarder Gateway Protocol (BGP)
Large BGP Communities draft-snijders-grow-large-communities-usage-00
CS 3700 Networks and Distributed Systems
PCAP BGP Parser RIPE 73, Madrid Christoph Dietzel, Tobias Hannaske
Non optimal routing caused by incompatibility of 32-bit ASN with the old router software. KazRENA case study.
BGP Routing Policies.
Non optimal routing caused by incompatibility of 32-bit ASN with the old router software. KazRENA case study.
Recent BGP Innovations for Operational Challenges
Chapter 2: Static Routing
AfriNIC Transition Plan
KRNIC Member Workshop November 2001 Seoul, Korea
draft-mohanty-bess-ebgp-dmz-00 IETF 101, London
Geoff Huston APNIC August 2009
CSCI-1680 Network Layer: Inter-domain Routing
Extending MPLS/BGP VPNs to End-Systems
IPv6 Address Allocation APNIC
EVPN Interworking with IPVPN
An Update on BGP Support for 4-byte ASN
RIPE October 2005 Geoff Huston APNIC
Export BGP community information in IPFIX draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-01.txt Zhenqiang Li Rong Gu China Mobile Jie Dong Huawei Technologies.
CSCI-1680 Network Layer: Inter-domain Routing
4-Byte AS number registry Policy Proposal [LACNIC Proposal ]
BGP-Based SPF IETF 98, Chicago
PCAP BGP Parser RIPE 73, Madrid Christoph Dietzel, Tobias Hannaske
EVPN Interworking with IPVPN
prop-025-v001 Proposal on IPv6 IRR service at APNIC
Validating MANRS of a network
Presentation transcript:

David Freedman david.freedman@uk.clara.net Claranet Large BGP Communities Not so David Freedman david.freedman@uk.clara.net Claranet 19/01/2017 UKNOF36, London

In brief. BGP Communities Attribute (RFC 1997, Aug 1996) Designed for Internet Broad support in BGP implementations. 32 bits, commonly expressed as “16-bit ASN : 16-bit VALUE” No space for ASN32  BGP Extended Communities Attribute (RFC 4360, Feb 2006) Designed for L2/3VPN Limited support in BGP implementations, slow adoption in newcomers. 64 bits, commonly expressed as “8/16-bit TYPE : 48/56-bit VALUE” The VALUE further expressed in subsequent extensions RFC5668 (Oct 2009) specifies an ASN32 TYPE subsequent value of “32-bit ASN : 16-bit VALUE” – Not ideal  19/01/2017 UKNOF36, London

So what other options for ASN32 users? Flexible Communities Attribute (draft-lange-flexible-bgp-communities, Dec 2002) Complex expression, essentially “16-bit TYPE: 32-bit ASN : up-to-2040-bit VALUE” No consensus or implementations. Wide Communities Attribute (draft-ietf-idr-wide-bgp-communities, Jul 2010) Extremely complex expression, “kitchen sink” approach, 16 bit LENGTH -> up to 65KB VALUE! Large Communities Attribute (draft-ietf-idr-large-community, Sep 2016) Simple (by comparison) expression, “32-bit ASN : 32-bit VALUE1 : 32-bit VALUE2” Consensus, (from both operators, and the IETF), implementations (both commercial and open source), and accepted to be published as an RFC (currently awaiting a number). 19/01/2017 UKNOF36, London

Large BGP Community Examples RFC 1997 (Current) Large BGP Communities Action 65400:peer-as 2914:65400:peer-as Do not Advertise to peer-as in North America (NTT) 0:peer-as 6667:0:peer-as Do not Announce to Route Server peer-as (AMS-IX) 65520:nnn 2914:65520:nnn Lower Local Preference in Country nnn (NTT) 2914:410 2914:400:10 Route Received From a Peering Partner (NTT) 2914:420 2914:400:20 Route Received From a Customer (NTT) Canonical representation is $ME: $ACTION: $YOU No namespace collisions or use of reserved ASNs Enables operators to use 32-bit ASNs in $ME and $YOU values 19/01/2017 UKNOF36, London

BGP Speaker Implementation Status Software Status Details Arista EOS Planned Feature Requested BUG169446 Cisco IOS XR Engineering Release, rumour has Second Half 2017 cz.nic BIRD ✔ Done! BIRD 1.6.3 (commit) ExaBGP PR482 Juniper Junos OS Second Half 2017 MikroTik RouterOS Won’t Implement Until RFC Feature Requested 2016090522001073 Nokia SR OS Third Quarter 2017 OpenBSD OpenBGPD OpenBSD 6.1 (commit) OSRG GoBGP PR1094 rtbrick Fullstack February 2017 Quagga Patch Provided for 1.1.0 875 Ubiquiti Networks EdgeOS Internal Enhancement Requested VyOS Requested Feature Requested T143 Visit http://largebgpcommunities.net/implementations/ for the Latest Status 19/01/2017 UKNOF36, London

Tools and Ecosystem Implementation Status Software Status Details DE-CIX pbgpp ✔ Done! PR16 FreeBSD tcpdump PR213423 Marco d’Itri zebra-dump-parser PR3 OpenBSD OpenBSD 6.1 (patch) pmacct.net pmacct PR61 RIPE NCC bgpdump Issue 41 tcpdump.org PR543 (commit) Yoshiyuki Yamauchi mrtparse PR13 Wireshark Dissector 18172 (patch) Visit http://largebgpcommunities.net/implementations/ for the Latest Status 19/01/2017 UKNOF36, London

Large BGP Communities Beacon Prefixes Cisco IOS Output (Without Large BGP Communities Support) The following prefixes are announced with AS path 2914_15562$ 192.147.168.0/24 (looking glass) 2001:67c:208c::/48 (looking glass) Large BGP Community: 15562:1:1 route-views>sh ip bgp 192.147.168.0 BGP routing table entry for 192.147.168.0/24, version 98399100 Paths: (39 available, best #30, table default) Not advertised to any peer Refresh Epoch 1 701 2914 15562 137.39.3.55 from 137.39.3.55 (137.39.3.55) Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external unknown transitive attribute: flag 0xE0 type 0x20 length 0xC value 0000 3CCA 0000 0001 0000 0001 rx pathid: 0, tx pathid: 0 BIRD Output (With Large BGP Communities Support) COLOCLUE1 11:06:17 from 94.142.247.3] (100/-) [AS15562i] Type: BGP unicast univ BGP.origin: IGP BGP.as_path: 8283 2914 15562 BGP.next_hop: 94.142.247.3 BGP.med: 0 BGP.local_pref: 100 BGP.community: (2914,410) (2914,1206) (2914,2203) (8283,1) BGP.large_community: (15562, 1, 1) Cisco IOS IPv6 propagation issue: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/5S_zrTTJlfiPx-K1nxRqCGaM7us Huawei route propagation issue: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/aLnjhPEJGmf6LDJtVpPAM80T6xM 19/01/2017 UKNOF36, London

Network Operator To Do List The entire network ecosystem needs to support Large BGP Communities in order to provision, deploy and troubleshoot. Ask your routing vendors and implementers for software support. Cisco: waiting for IOS-XR, but they have no plan for IOS(XE) and NX-OS. Juniper have started already, but only Junos OS is planned. Brocade and Huawei, no commitments, why?? Update your tools and provisioning software Extend your routing policies, and openly publish this information Train your technical staff 19/01/2017 UKNOF36, London

Questions? Visit http://LargeBGPCommunities.net/ for the Latest Info Further questions -> myself or job@ntt.net 19/01/2017 UKNOF36, London