Figure 1. Genomic instability biomarkers in non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate patients and control children. Frequency of MN (a), nucleoplasmic bridges.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From: An open day in the metric space
Advertisements

Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.
Figure 4. The distribution of biology teacher main assignments
Figure 6. Effect of Withaferin A (WA) treatment on leptin-induced signaling in breast cancer cells. A) Immunoblotting for pSTAT3 (Tyr705), total STAT3,
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.
Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.
Fig. 3 Evolutionary game types as a function of relatedness and synergy where each plot is a different social group size. The payoffs used to generate.
Figure 4. Naturally occurring senescent cells from a HER2-expressing patient-derived xenograft secrete IL-6, which is required for tumor growth. A ) A.
Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.
Fig. 3. Quantitative analysis of calcification at the aortic root showing the effect of long-term PD administration of PPi in mice . ( A ) Calcification.
From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution
Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.
Figure 1. Mean recalled time (days) since the start of the last quit attempt by use of stop-smoking medications (SSM) and Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)
Figure 1. Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) isolates by method of initial detection and STEC serotype, Connecticut, 2000–2009. From: Ten-Year.
pSS: primary SS; Scl: scleroderma.
Figure 1. Meta-analysis of prospective biomarker studies examining associations between eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and total, low-, and high-grade prostate.
Figure 3. Examples of tweets classified as ridicule.
Figure 1. Standardized coefficients for the SEM group model for heterosexual males. Latent constructs are shown in ellipses, and observed variables are.
Figure 1. Logos appearing in the choice experiment
Figure 1. Selection of papers.
Fig. 1 Flow chart of study selection
Figure 1. Conceptual model of well-being related to involvement in theatre. From: Theatre Involvement and Well-Being, Age Differences, and Lessons From.
Figure 1. Bevo I, ca. 1920, photographer unknown
Figure 1. VoC conceptual framework linking employment mobility and welfare production regimes From: Complexity in Employment Life Courses in Europe in.
Figure 1. Orthodontic set-up and location of LLLT or placebo-laser
Figure 2 Nonparametric thin-plate spline visualizations of the response surface for each pair of traits. The unbroken line gives the WHR that intersects.
Fig. 1 Flow of ascertainment of cases with incident childhood IgA vasculitis reported by four sources From: Incidence of IgA vasculitis in children estimated.
Figure 2. Illustration of minimum cross-sectional area (a) and measurements for oropharynx and soft palate in sagittal plane (b, c). From: Airway volume.
From: Unmasking Masks in Makkah: Preventing Influenza at Hajj
Figure 1 (A) Chest computed tomography scans of the patient
Fig. 1 Proportion of study participants with ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics by self-rated health. Ideal category of Cardiovascular Health Metrics.
Figure 2. (A) Sézary syndrome patient before treatment
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis in patients
From: Where do we go from here
Figure 1. Overall survival of patients receiving alternative medicine (solid lines) vs conventional cancer treatment (dashed lines). Overall survival of.
Example 14. Schubert, Quartet in G Major, D
Figure 1. Relationship between Log Transfers and Age of Eldest HH Member(a) Bandwidth 0.05(b) Bandwidth 0.1(c) Bandwidth 0.5 From: The Effect of a Transfer.
Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data.
Fig. 1 Selection of patients
Figure 1 Study flowchart.
Fig. 1 Flow diagram of patient selection and study design.
Figure 1 Flow of data processing
Figure 1: Changing American Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage. Mean support for marijuana and same-sex marriage legalization. N=4,079. Source:
From: Estimating the Location of World Wheat Price Discovery
Figure 3. Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal (HPA)-axis functioning moderates crime exposure: regions of significance on X (crime). The lines represent two.
Figure 1. Time of initiation of therapeutic hypothermia according to who initiated it. Note the logarithmic scaling of the vertical axis. From: Initiation.
Figure 1: Time points at which sperm samples were analysed for aneuploidy frequencies in controls and cancer patients From: Sperm aneuploidy frequencies.
Figure 1 Percentage and number of arrivals with YFV check per entry location in Tanzania. Numbers in chart indicate number of arrivals per entry location.
Fig. 2 System flowchart. Each of the four iterations contains two models (SS, and ASA/HSE/CN/ANGLES), for a total of eight LSTM-BRNN based models. The.
NOTE.—Error bars in all figures represent standard errors of the means. From: So Close I Can Almost Sense It: The Interplay between Sensory Imagery and.
Figure 1. Percentage of trainees is represented on the y-axis for each competency/knowledge item represented in the x-axis. Only Poor/Fair (P/F) ratings.
Figure 1. Impact ratings for prospective memory lapses for younger (~age 30), middle-age (~age 50), and older (~age 65) adults. From: Daily Memory Lapses.
Figure 3. Biodistribution of Nickel was measured by using ICP-OES technique in (a) liver, (b) kidneys, (c) brain, (d) spleen, (e) heart, (f) blood, (g)
Figure 6. RRs for clinical cure rates stratified by different diseases
Figure 1. Variance partition for the different phases of bud and cambial phenology in black spruce provenances. From: Synchronisms between bud and cambium.
Figure 1. Samples disposition and testing for human papillomavirus (HPV)–related biomarkers. *Excludes samples that were too hemorrhagic or necrotic for.
Figure 1. Progression-free survival and overall survival for FL/DLBCL patients. From: Clinicobiological features and prognostic impact of diffuse large.
Fig. 5. A GC content and het/nonref-hom ratio relationship for exome regions. B GC content and het/nonref-hom ratio relationship for intron regions. C.
Figure 1. Percentage of participants in each group (holocaust survivors, prewar immigrants, and postwar immigrants) by the main coded strategies. From:
Figure 7 miRNA and mRNA gene expression changes in the Poor Group
Figure 5. Tungiasis: a 21-year-old woman returned from Peru with painful nodules on her toes. From: Illness in Travelers Returned From Brazil: The GeoSentinel.
Figure 2 Map of traveller arrivals to Tanzania and performed checks (arrivals with checks/all arrivals). Change: change of aircraft, no change: no change.
Figure 3. Changes from baseline in activated CD4+ T cells (% CD4+CD25+) during the 52-week intervention period in the.
Figure 1 Experimental workflow and predictive modelling
Figure 1. Plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay workflow, comparison of variant allelic fraction with ... Figure 1. Plasma next-generation sequencing.
(A–B) Images of US ... (A–B) Images of US assessment of both patients who developed peripheral arthritis during vedolizumab treatment undergoing US-guided.
Figure 1. Outer membrane protein profiling of parental strain KJΔDEFΔ5 and its derivative fluoroquinolone-resistant ... Figure 1. Outer membrane protein.
(A) Funduscopy showed retinal haemorrhages (black arrows), retinal exudates ... (A) Funduscopy showed retinal haemorrhages (black arrows), retinal exudates.
Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major trading partners (% of South Korea's total trade in goods) Figure 1: Trade shares of South Korea's major.
Integrated analysis of gene expression and copy number alterations.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. Genomic instability biomarkers in non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate patients and control children. Frequency of MN (a), nucleoplasmic bridges (b) and nuclear buds (c) of clefts and control groups. Arrows point to a micronuclei (d), a nucleopasmic bridge (e) and a nuclear bud (f). Photos captured with 400× magnification. From: Analysis of genome instability biomarkers in children with non-syndromic orofacial clefts Mutagenesis. 2017;32(2):313-321. doi:10.1093/mutage/gew068 Mutagenesis | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Figure 3. Transcriptogram from non-syndromic cleft lip/palate (NSCL/P) patients. Expression NSCL/P patient biopsies (n = 7) and normal individual biopsies (n = 6) were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE42589. The transcriptogram is shown in the centre. Gene position is shown on the x-axis and relative expression is shown on the y-axis. The dotted line represents the normalised control expression average. The solid black line represents the NSCL/P expression average relative to control. Red marks highlight the different expressed peaks (FDR < 0.05). Solid bars represent cluster size and are coloured according to their respective PPI network, shown on the periphery. Networks were functionally characterised by Gene Ontology Biological Process enrichment, as described in the methods section. Values in parenthesis represent the rate of cluster genes belonging to the respective GO term. From: Analysis of genome instability biomarkers in children with non-syndromic orofacial clefts Mutagenesis. 2017;32(2):313-321. doi:10.1093/mutage/gew068 Mutagenesis | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Figure 2. New nuclear morphologies observed in binucleated cells from CBMN assay. Lymphocytes with a circular (a) and horse-shoe (b) nuclei from blood samples of non-syndromic cleft lip/ palate children. Photos captured with 400× magnification. From: Analysis of genome instability biomarkers in children with non-syndromic orofacial clefts Mutagenesis. 2017;32(2):313-321. doi:10.1093/mutage/gew068 Mutagenesis | © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.