Test Monitoring Center Report to the Mack Test Surveillance Panel

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LTMS TF SS May 11,  235 data entries ◦ 160 chartable tests  Five test laboratories (A, B, D, F, G) ◦ 35 test stands  2 stands only had one ref.
Advertisements

Problem Determination Your mind is your most important tool!
Confidence Intervals about a Population Proportion
Formulae For each severity adjustment entity, X i = i th test result in original units in end-of-test order T i = i th test result in appropriate units.
Mack T12 Engine Test Update
Mack T-12 Precision Matrix Preliminary Analyses Presented to T-12 Task Force October 11, 2005 Jim Rutherford (510)
Session Peering Protocol over SOAP I-D ( draft-ietf-drinks-spp-over-soap-01) draft-ietf-drinks-spp-over-soap-01 0 Presenter: Vikas Bhatia (On behalf of.
1 The Second Addition of LTMS (Theoretical Sneak Peak for the VG) VG SP: May 2010.
Parliamentary Procedure
Mack T-12 Pre-Matrix Data Analyses Version 3 Presented to T-12 Task Force March 17, 2005 Jim Rutherford (510)
JACTest Monitoring Center Test Monitoring Center Report to the Mack Test Surveillance Panel June 17, 2002 Montreal.
© The Lubrizol Corporation 2006, all rights reserved Case Study: Sequence IIIG Phos Retention at 20 Hours Presented to ESCIT February 2007 San Antonio,
ISM Test Development Task Force Report June 21, 2004.
Enhancements to IIIG LTMS By: Todd Dvorak
C13 LTMS discussion Follow-up to San Antonio O&H meeting Elisa Santos November 29 th, 2005.
JACTest Monitoring Center T-10 PB Ad Hoc Task Force Report to the Mack Test Surveillance Panel September 10, 2004 Richmond, VA.
© Chevron 2008 ASTM PCEOCP VID Matrix Design and Funding Subgroup April 25, 2008 Teleconference.
ASTM TECHNICAL GUIDANCE COMMITTEE Semi-Annual Report Presented by William A. Buscher III Updated March 6, 2016.
IllinoisJobLink.com Training Video Creating a Resume Copyright © 2015, America’s Job Link Alliance–Technical Support (AJLA–TS) All rights reserved. This.
InnoSys Park Brake Tool Master Control Panel Screens Revision A, 12Dec /12/20071.
Spring Hill Assembly1 InnoSys Park Brake Tool Master Control Panel Screens 1 3-Mar-2008.
Parliamentary Procedure Definition Definition  Correct rules for conducting or running a successful meeting 3 goals of Parliamentary Procedure 3 goals.
Parliamentary Procedure. Definition Correct rules for conducting or running a successful meeting.
Topics Graduation and End of Term or Course
Mack T-11Severity Jim Rutherford
LTMS Version 2 Sequence VID Example
Control Charts Definition:
Tracking Students Throughout the Scholarship Season
India’s Comments on EPPR (Part-B2)
Technical Guidance Committee Report
Formulae For each severity adjustment entity,
Discussion items SVD mechanics session.
Agenda Introduction and membership
Assumption of normality
Draw up tables to display data clearly Should
Test Monitoring Center Report to the Mack Test Surveillance Panel
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
LTMS Task Force Statistics Subgroup Report to Joint LTMS Open Forum
Caterpillar C13 Test Matrix Update
Test Monitoring Center Report to the Mack Test Surveillance Panel
Punch items for LTMS Version 2 Surveillance Panel Consideration
Parliamentary Procedure
Formatting Paragraphs
EMIS 8374 Node Splitting updated 27 January 2004
Percentage Yield Friday, 30 November 2018Friday, 30 November 2018
Specification on float equipment
Compliance Open Webinar
First 8 slides are what was presented in San Fransisco…
Instruction encoding We’ve already seen some important aspects of processor design. A datapath contains an ALU, registers and memory. Programmers and compilers.
Scottish Improvement Skills
Some Design Recommendations For ASAP Studies
TGs Montreal Closing Report
Review of Chapter 3 Examining Relationships
Brainstorming & Project Management
Coordinate Operations Standard
OAKS Online Science & Optional Social Sciences
Contractor Sourcing Application (CSA) Training
TG 360 SP0 169 UPDATE Summary of TG 360 Status
Compliance Open Webinar
TGn Chair’s Status Update
WESEF Judging.
Boundary value problems:
Chapter 2, Section 3 Slope.
2nd Edition: 2019 Winter Standards Meeting
AuthorAID Workshop on Research Writing
802.11F Meeting Report March 2002 Month 1998 doc.: IEEE /xxx
Linear sequences A linear sequence is a list of numbers that have a common difference between each number in the list. Finding the rule that can extend.
Bell Ringer: Jan. 7, 2019 Which of the following is equivalent to (2x - 6y) + (8x - 5y)? F. 6x + y G. 10x - 11y H. 7x + 2y J. 8x - 5y K. 2x + 6y.
[Ballot code, contract number] [Project title]
Presentation transcript:

Test Monitoring Center Report to the Mack Test Surveillance Panel January 23, 2007 San Antonio, TX

Reference Oil Testing Summary T-8 Test Activity Very Low 1 calibrated lab 2 calibrated stands Issue: Lab(s) now without reference oil!!

Options (assuming the T-8 must live) T-8 Reference Oil Issue Options (assuming the T-8 must live) Use T-11 as a replacement slow to develop and not much energy so far Voluntarily re-distribute remaining 1004-3 has already been requested success far from certain and can’t be forced Get a different reference oil 1005-2 most likely the best fit

TMC 1005-2 as T-8 Reference Oil Positives Five T-8 test results on 1005 Plenty 1005-2 available Labs would be able to run immediately

TMC 1005-2 as T-8 Reference Oil Negatives Data is old (9 years) Data is on a previous blend Data is incomplete Relative Viscosity (100% Shear) data doesn’t exist Causes problems determining SAs (but not calibration status)

TMC 1005-2 as T-8 Reference Oil Possibilities Targets VI38 (mean & stdev) = 5.85 & 0.72 RV48 (mean & stdev) = 2.09 & 0.15 RV2 - none Control Charts Suggest temporary expansion of Shewhart K to 2.00 until five tests Either suspend or freeze current RV2 SAs

Reference Oil Testing Summary T-11 Test Activity Moderate 5 calibrated labs 6 calibrated stands Oil 820-3 has been introduced More on this in a few moments

T-11 Correction Factors – Soot and MRV T-11 Top Ring Change in May ’05 Total of 34 tests 30 tests on 820-2 4 tests on 820-3 Current CFs were set at 20 tests on new hardware (oil 820-2)

T-11 Correction Factors

T-11 Correction Factors Do we update (and possibly freeze) the correction factors for Soot at 12 cSt and MRV based on 30 tests?

T-11 Reference Oil Update TMC 820-3 has been introduced 4 tests 3 passes, 1 fail (very mild on Soot at 12) TMC will update as data comes in No new tests expected until April

T-11 Reference Oil Update

Reference Oil Testing Summary T-12 Test Activity Low 6 calibrated labs 9 calibrated stands Test targets nearing update (n = 19) Sure to require significant discussion

Mack SP Items for Consideration T-8 & T-11 Fuel Sulfur Measurements QC measurements (not fuel spec sheet) D 129 “or equivalent” (Sept. ’05) not specific enough, undefined D 129, D2622, D 4294, or D 5453 under consideration? if no action, then D 129 only

Mack SP Items for Consideration T-12 Piston Deposits Currently mandatory originally asked for in case C13 was a no-go Mack SP voted to remove (3-1-9) Change generates an Information Letter Negative must be addressed before change is effective

Mack SP Items for Consideration T-11 New Stand Definition (Sect. 11.4) Time limit Currently shown as one year from cal test Conflicts with: Meeting minutes (Feb. ’05) and LTMS doc Suspect clerical error Suggest change to “one year from cal expiration”

Mack SP Items for Consideration T-11 Soot Calculations Soot at 4, 12, and 15 cSt Linear Interpolation NOT specified in Section 11.6

Mack SP Items for Consideration T-11 Soot Calculations Current 11.6 Test Results—The test results are Soot Content at 4 cSt Viscosity Increase (%), Soot Content at 12 cSt Viscosity Increase (%), Soot Content at 15 cSt Viscosity Increase (%), and MRV Viscosity (cP)

Mack SP Items for Consideration T-11 Soot Calculations Suggested Fix 11.6 Test Results—The test results are Soot Content at 4 cSt Viscosity Increase (%), Soot Content at 12 cSt Viscosity Increase (%), Soot Content at 15 cSt Viscosity Increase (%), and MRV Viscosity (cP). 11.6.1 Use linear interpolation for calculating soot contents (at a given viscosity increase), using new oil 90-pass DIN shear viscosity result as the minimum viscosity (sections 10.1.1 and 10.1.5) Renumber following sections as appropriate (11.6.1 to 11.6.2).

T-12 to T-10 Merit Calculation Action Item Update T-12 to T-10 Merit Calculation JAC asked to investigate where this should live Answer: T-12 test method BUT!!! not until ballot clears Sub. B Reports forms already updated