European Court of Auditors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
Advertisements

Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
Management verifications Franck Sébert European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
European Union Cohesion Policy
27th Conference of EU Paying Agency Directors Oviedo, Spain April 2010 MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL UNDER REG. 1290/2005 AND THE IMPROVEMENT FOR THE NEW.
1 Community Budget and Agricultural Policy Reform: The Tony Blair Proposal A German Point of View Ulrich Koester University of Kiel Germany.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
Sodexo.com Group Internal Audit. page 2 helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and.
Execution of annual budgets : recommendations for regional and local authorities Axel Volkery Senior Fellow and Head Environmental.
Evidence-based scientific and technical support Cooperation with policy Directorates-General Sharing its know-how with the Member.
30. Conference of Directors of EU Paying Agencies Workshop1: The possibilities for optimizing the processes of implementation of direct payments Agency.
37 th Conference of the Directors of Paying Agencies Riga, 6-8 May 2015 Christina Borchmann Director Directorate J: Audit of Agricultural Expenditure Directorate.
WORKSHOP ON SIMPLIFICATION - HORIZONTAL ISSUES Heber McMahon Principal Officer Finance Division, Ireland.
Office of the Auditor General of Canada The State of Program Evaluation in the Canadian Federal Government Glenn Wheeler Director, Results Measurement.
| | Seite 1 Basic Principles of Insurance Supervision Duties and Operation of a Supervisory Authority under Coordinated European Legislation.
Audit of Public Procurement
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Control and Audit Nicholas Martyn.
M. ANGELA JIMENEZ 1 UNIT 5. REGULATION OF EXTERNAL AUDIT IFAC AND E.C.
Overview report of a series of FVO fact- finding missions and audits carried out in 2012 and 2013 in order to evaluate the systems put in place to give.
How does the ECA assess Member States’ internal control systems? Workshop on Audit/Evaluation of Public Internal Financial Control Systems (PIFC) Ankara,
Romanian Court of Accounts years of existence.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 6 – 8 November 2006 EUROSAI - Prague Léon KIRSCH European Court of Auditors Audit of the Single Payment Scheme ( SPS) (Systems.
Grosu-Axenti Diana Financial Inspection Director Financial Inspection vs External & Internal audit in Republic of Moldova.
Rigsrevisionen The National Audit Office of Denmark.
7 November 2006VI Eurosai Training Event - Prague1 Auditing EU funds – National SAI experiences Jan van den Bos – Netherlands Court of Audit.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 6 – 8 November 2006 EUROSAI - Prague Léon KIRSCH European Court of Auditors Audit of the Single Payment Scheme ( SPS) (Systems.
Key Players in EU Policy Making § The COMMISSION ( in principle independent) – Has sole right of proposal § The COUNCIL OF MINISTERS ( the member states.
Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 providing for Minimum Criteria for Environmental Inspections in the Member.
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
Committee on Budgetary Control 22 January 2008 DAS 2006 European Court of Auditors.
Errors in rural development spending 7 May 2015 Presentation by Robert MARKUS Head of Unit European Court of Auditors.
Revised AQTF Standards for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February August 2006.
Workshop 1 – Implementation of the new CAP Michael Cooper Director – UK Co-ordinating Body 12 September 2012.
Structural Funds in Ireland Structural Funds in Ireland Financial control & audit - Financial control & audit - ERDF & Cohesion Fund operations Dermot.
PIC EU-28 Conference Paris, 26 – 27 November 2015 PIC An EU Approach Assurance Maps An Introductory workshop Nathan Paget United Kingdom.
The role of National Audit Institutions in the audit of EU funds An EU perspective by Irena Petruškevičienė, Member of the European Court of Auditors Vilnius,
Revised Quality Assurance Arrangements for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February 2006 September 2006.
Introduction to Compliance Auditing
Administrative burdens in EU agriculture: an evidence base CAP Simplification Expert Group 24 April 2007 Jenny McInnes Department for Environment Food.
Conference on the simplification of the Common Agricultural Policy
Internal Control Principles
Structural Funds Financial Management and Control, Romania
Leader ECA audit findings and possible simplification
Experiences of Audits of the European Commission in the Region of Saxony-Anhalt Mechthild v. Maydell Head of the Audit Authority for the Region of Saxony-Anhalt.
20 October 2015 Compliance audit Reporting.
PEMPAL Internal Control Working Group– 45th IACOP Meeting
Internal control - the IA perspective
Jerónimo MIRÓN Regional Head for Rural Cadastre Granada (Spain)
Current budgetary and regulatory position of the CAP
Protection of the EU budget
Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources July 18, 2018
years of existence.
Panel discussion: Organising internal audit system and performing audit engagements Ciaran SPILLANE, Principal Advisor, Internal Audit Service of the.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture - A2
Control framework and Audit of European Structural and Investment Funds Visit of the Finance and Constitution Committee of the Scottish Parliament Brussels,
Role of Industry Self-regulation in Phytosanitary Compliance
Market support measures
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE
The European Anti-Corruption Report
Commission Regulation (EC)
Conference on the simplification of the Common Agricultural Policy
Finalisation of study report
Jean-Pierre Garitte Skopje 8 April 2019
Good practices for risk assessment and control activities
ECA Special Report No 4/2014 Integration of EU water
Point 6 - CAP reform elements for discussion
ECA Quality Control Arrangements
Finalisation of study report
Presentation transcript:

European Court of Auditors 2/20/2018 European Court of Auditors Internet : “http://www.eca.eu.int”

Internal Control System 2/20/2018 Integrated Administration and Control System IACS The audit of IACS Internal Control System Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Content PART 1 : IACS PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Subject Audit objectives and criteria Audit field and risks Audit approach Implementation Main audit findings PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Objectives Audit scope Sampling Audit resources Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

The audit subject What does IACS do ? Why was IACS introduced ? 2/20/2018 The audit subject What does IACS do ? Why was IACS introduced ? How does IACS work ? What are the main features ? Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

2/20/2018 IACS What does it do ? IACS is the main control system over payments to farmers Over 6 million aid applications are processed at Member state level under IACS throughout the EU, for over €25 billion in 2000, representing about 64% of CAP payments By 2004, over 80% of CAP payments will be covered, as more schemes are included under IACS and as direct payments increase after the Agenda 2000 reform Arable crops is the biggest scheme (€16 billion) followed by premiums for beef (€4 billion) EAGGF payments to farmers Over 6 million aid applications are processed at Member state level under IACS throughout the EU, for over €25 billion in 2000, representing about 64% of CAP payments By 2004, over 80% of CAP payments will be covered, as more schemes are included under IACS and as direct payments increase after the Agenda 2000 reform Arable crops is the biggest scheme (€16 billion) followed by premiums for beef (€4 billion) Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

EAGGF expenditure covered by IACS in % 2/20/2018 EAGGF expenditure covered by IACS in % Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

IACS Member States’ Shares 2/20/2018 IACS Member States’ Shares Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Measures covered by IACS in 2001 (1/2) Measures fully included in IACS: billion € Area aid for arable crops: 16.9 Premiums for beef and veal 3.7 Aid for sheep meat and goat meat 1.4 Extensification 0.9 Other 0.3 Total 23.2 Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Measures covered by IACS in 1999 (2/2) Measures for which agricultural parcels have to be cross checked with other measures in IACS: billion € Production aid for olive oil 2.5 Agri-environmental measures 2.0 Premiums for tabacco 1.0 Less favoured areas 0.9 Aid for cotton 0.7 Other 1.8 Total 8.9 Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Measures covered by IACS in the future Wine Tomatoes Processed citrus fruits Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

IACS Why and when was it introduced ? The 1992 reform of the Common Agricultural Policy shifted emphasis away from price support mechanisms, and significantly increased the level of direct payments to farmers. This multiplied the number of payments and schemes to be administered, and was the reason why IACS was created. IACS was established by Council Regulation 3508/92. The implementing rules were provided for by Commission Regulation 3887/92(revised by Commission regulation 2419/2001) Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

2/20/2018 IACS How does it work ? There are 5 elements of IACS to be established by Member States a computerised database; a land parcel identification system; an animal identification and registration system; aid applications; an integrated control system. Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

IACS Main Features: The computerised database (1 of 5) The database should record data from aid applications for each agricultural holding for at least three years. The database may be decentralised, as long as the systems are compatible. In practice, there are often several systems and organisations involved, depending on the Member State’s administrative structure. The database is essential for: payment processing, cross checking, application of sanctions (including retroactive sanctions), management information... Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

IACS Main Features: The land parcel identification system (2 of 5) This system identifies the location and area of agricultural land parcels and traces their ownership. It may be based on the “cadastre” (Germany, Spain, France), or aerial / satellite photography (Ireland, Portugal, Scotland) i.e. “Geographical Information System”, or official maps (rest of UK). It often includes information about land use (though this is not essential) New requirement: Geographical Information Systems required in all Member States from 2005. The identification system is essential for: payment processing, checking claimed areas, checking duplicate claims for the same parcel, checking claims for ineligible areas, carrying out on the spot inspections... Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

IACS Main Features: The animal identification and registration system (3 of 5) Rules initially provided by Directive 92/102: herd registers and ear tagging. Following BSE, Regulation 820/97: adds requirements for computerised database (Directive 97/12) and animal passports. On the spot inspections of 10%. The system is essential for: checking the apparent eligibility of animals claimed (sex, race, age, identification), checking for duplicate claims, checking ownership... Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

IACS Main Features: Aid application (4 of 5) 2/20/2018 IACS Main Features: Aid application (4 of 5) One area aid application per farmer. Several animal premium applications possible. Basic information on the area / animal claimed, the claimant, relevant supporting information. Aid applications are essential for: providing the basic information on aids claimed... Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

IACS Main Features: The integrated control system (5 of 5) An integrated system of administrative checks and on the spot inspections; Administrative checks: cross checks between farmers claims and parcel / animal identification databases; cross checks between individual farmers claims; checks on eligibility of claimed areas / animals (e.g. eligible for area aid, surface area, eligible age of animal, validity of tag number…); checks to avoid overpayment in case of quota / base area overshoots. On the spot inspections: Risk based; Minimum 5 % for areas; 10% for animals (5% with fully operational database); May use aerial / satellite photography. Sanctions: Complicated sliding scale, depending on rate of over-declaration found; Serious negligence: zero aid; Fraud: zero aid next year too. Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

IACS Overview of principal IACS controls Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Content PART 1 : IACS PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Subject Audit objectives and criteria Audit field and risks Audit approach Implementation Main audit findings PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Objectives Audit scope Sampling Audit resources Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

General Audit Objective: 2/20/2018 General Audit Objective: The audit should check that the five elements of IACS are in place in the Member States and that they enable adequate control of aid applications and effective on the spot controls Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Specific Audit Objectives(1/2) 2/20/2018 Specific Audit Objectives(1/2) EU level Has the Commission independently supervised the timely implementation of IACS by the Member States? Has the Commission assessed the extent to which the objectives of IACS have been attained in an economic and efficient manner and eventually recommended corrective action? Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Specific Audit Objectives(2/2) 2/20/2018 Specific Audit Objectives(2/2) Member States level Have the five elements of IACS been implemented and are the data in the databases complete, valid and updated on time? Are effective administrative controls operating, more specifically using the cross check aiming at avoiding payment for ineligible areas and animals or in case of overshoot of base areas or premium ceilings? Do on the spot controls meet the regulatory requirements and is their impact assured by the appropriate application of risk analysis techniques and of regulatory sanctions? Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Content PART 1 : IACS PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Subject Audit objectives and criteria Audit field and risks Audit approach Implementation Main audit findings PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Objectives Audit scope Sampling Audit resources Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Audit field and risks Audit field 2/20/2018 Audit field and risks Audit field Basic information on the audited system( Measures included, organisation in the Member States, budgetary significance) Audit scope Risks Inherent risks Control risks) Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Content PART 1 : IACS PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Subject Audit objectives and criteria Audit field and risks Audit approach Implementation Main audit findings PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Objectives Audit scope Sampling Audit resources Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Audit approach Information available 2/20/2018 Audit approach Information available General importance in relation with other audits Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Content PART 1 : IACS PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Subject Audit objectives and criteria Audit field and risks Audit approach Implementation Main audit findings PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Objectives Audit scope Sampling Audit resources Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Implementation Member States to be visited Work to be completed 2/20/2018 Implementation Member States to be visited Work to be completed in office EU level Member State level (first and second phase) Audit evidence Resources Planning Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Content PART 1 : IACS PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Subject Audit objectives and criteria Audit field and risks Audit approach Implementation Main audit findings PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Objectives Audit scope Sampling Audit resources Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Weaknesses found at Member State Level Area Aid 2/20/2018 Weaknesses found at Member State Level Area Aid Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Weaknesses found at Member State Level Bovine Premiums 2/20/2018 Weaknesses found at Member State Level Bovine Premiums Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Suckler Cow premium error rates 2/20/2018 Suckler Cow premium error rates Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

IACS Audit Background to the Reliability of IACS inspections Conclusion in 1996 Annual Report (see PE request in the discharge procedure); Conclusion in Special Report n° 19/1998 on BSE; Timeliness: 2nd year after transition period Main control tool for EAGGF expenditure and complicated system; Frequent SOA findings ; Special Report n° 4/2001 Audit of Bovine identification and registration system Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Content PART 1 : IACS PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Subject Audit objectives and criteria Audit field and risks Audit approach Implementation Main audit findings PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Objectives Audit scope Sampling Audit resources Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Reliability of IACS Inspections General Audit Objective: 2/20/2018 Reliability of IACS Inspections General Audit Objective: The audit should assess the reliability of inspections or on the spot controls and the use made by the Commission of the information on these controls made available by the Member States. Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Reliability of IACS Inspections Specific Audit Objectives (1/2) 2/20/2018 Reliability of IACS Inspections Specific Audit Objectives (1/2) EU level Do IACS inspections provide to the Commission the necessary reliable information on legality and regularity of EU expenditure covered by IACS and on the adequate implementation of IACS management procedures? Does EU legislation provide for efficient IACS inspections and uniform application of sanctions provided for under EU legislation? Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Reliability of IACS Inspections Specific Audit Objectives (2/2) 2/20/2018 Reliability of IACS Inspections Specific Audit Objectives (2/2) PA level Do PAs , when selecting holdings, comply with EU legislation and Commission instructions? Are risk analyses efficient? Are the statistics on area aids or animal premiums forwarded to the Commission reliable? Do national control instructions comply with EU legislation? Do national administrative procedures, before payment of EU aid, integrate inspection findings and sanctions as applicable? Do 2001 IACS inspection findings comply with EU legislation and are they reliable? Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Content PART 1 : IACS PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Subject Audit objectives and criteria Audit field and risks Audit approach Implementation Main audit findings PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Objectives Audit scope Sampling Audit resources Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit scope 2/20/2018 Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit scope Commission : legislation, reports (clearance of accounts, certifying bodies, aerial photography or satellite imaging, specific IACS, internal evaluation...), consolidated statistics 15 Paying Agencies in 10 Member States (Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Ireland, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden): systems analysis, internal audit reports, sampling, national instructions, administrative procedures before payment 90 inspection re-performances : 45 for area aid and 45 for animal premiums: Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Content PART 1 : IACS PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Subject Audit objectives and criteria Audit field and risks Audit approach Implementation Main audit findings PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Objectives Audit scope Sampling Audit resources Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Reliability of IACS Inspections Sampling 2/20/2018 Sampling requirements : random and risk based area aid : 5 % (min 4 % risk based & min 1 % random) animal premiums : if 10 % (min 8 % risk based & min 2 % random) if 5 % (min 4 % risk based & min 1 % random) Reference population : aid applications - random sample in 16 Paying Agencies in 10 Member States as selected by MUS for SOA EAGGF excluding Greece (reliability of administrative controls) and United Kingdom (foot and mouth disease) 45 inspections on area aid and 45 inspections on animal premiums MUS sampled Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Content PART 1 : IACS PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Subject Audit objectives and criteria Audit field and risks Audit approach Implementation Main audit findings PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Objectives Audit scope Sampling Audit resources Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Reliability of IACS Inspections Implementation Timing APM adopted on 19septembre 2002 audit missions to Member States : November 2002 to April 2003 SOA Specific appraisal timing for Annual report 2002 Internal delegation between EAGGF Sectors Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Content PART 1 : IACS PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Subject Audit objectives and criteria Audit field and risks Audit approach Implementation Main audit findings PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Objectives Audit scope Sampling Audit resources Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit resources 15 auditors 300 man x weeks (110 in 2002 and 152 in 2003) 80 man x weeks on mission in the Member States (30 in 2002 and 50 in 2003) Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Content PART 1 : IACS PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Subject Audit objectives and criteria Audit field and risks Audit approach Implementation Main audit findings PART 2 : Reliability of IACS Inspections Audit Objectives Audit scope Sampling Audit resources Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Reliability of IACS Inspections Main findings 2/20/2018 Reliability of IACS Inspections Main findings Reliability of on the spot inspections Adequacy of reporting of findings (for SOA or clearance of accounts) Systems weaknesses Interpretation guidelines Commission use of findings Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems

Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 2/20/2018 Third EUROSAI Training Event Prague -May 2003 Evaluation of Internal Control Systems