Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: Stages of the SOFC system, CHER: compact heat exchange reformer, CI: cathode inlet plenum, CE: cathode exit plenum, AI: anode inlet plenum, AE: anode exit plenum, COMB: combustor, M/C: mixing chamber, HEX: heat exchanger, adopted from Fig. 1 of Ref. [22]. (a) Stage 1: SOFC stack start-up with combustor. (b) Stage 2: initiation of anode fuel line and start to generate electrical power. (c) Stage 3: normal operation.

Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: Configuration of the CHER and flow directions of gases; (a) compact heat exchange reformer (CHER) and flow directions of gases and (b) components of the CHER

Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: Flow direction of both the air and FSM along y-coordinate

Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: The CHER test rig. (a) Schematic diagram, GC: gas chromatography, T: thermocouple. (b) Photo of air heater and controller. (c) Photo of gas heater and steam generator.

Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: CHER inlet pressures of hot air and N2: measured and interpolated. (a) Pressure of hot air at inlet. (b) Pressure of N2 at inlet.

Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: CHER inlet temperatures of hot air and N2: measured and interpolated. (a) Temperature of hot air at inlet. (b) Temperature of N2 at inlet.

Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: Comparison of transient response of CHER when it is operated as heat exchanger without reforming reaction when the measured thermal boundary conditions shown in Figs. 5 and 6 are applied. (a) Exit temperature of hot air side. (b) Exit temperature of cold air side.

Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: Comparison of molar fraction (not including steam) for each species between the experiment and transient simulation for different temperatures

Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: Comparison of molar fraction (not including steam) for each species between the experiment and transient simulation for different SCRs

Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: Comparison of measured temperature with the simulation, where arrows show the flow direction of both the hot air and FSM

Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: Simulated molar fractions of H2 in each control volume along flow direction

Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: Simulated molar fraction of each species at the reformer exit for different FSM mass flow rates when air flow rate is 1 g/s

Date of download: 10/3/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Performance Evaluation of Dynamic Model of Compact Heat Exchange Reformer for High-Temperature Fuel Cell Systems J. Fuel Cell Sci. Technol. 2013;11(1):011006-011006-9. doi:10.1115/1.4025524 Figure Legend: Simulated mass flow rate of H2 at the reformer exit for different FSM mass flow rates