Cynthia Holcomb Education Specialist

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Florida Department of Education Sally Sanders Science Curriculum Specialist.
Advertisements

Curriculum Council – May 2012 Presented by Lannon Heflin For more information,
JUSD Common Core Priority Standards for ELA. SEE THE “BIG PICTURE” FIRST.
TEKS Revisions and the End of Course Exams Tom Wurst March 25, 2010.
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
An Overview of the Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) January 25, 2014 FREMONT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Educate Challenge Inspire.
Governing Board & Advisory Committee on College Readiness Special Joint Session College- and Career-Ready Determination Policy and Policy-Level Performance.
Background HB 3, 81st Texas Legislature, 2009, amended the TEC, §39.023, to include changes to graduation requirements effective September 1, 2009 As a.
Science Update Texas Regional Collaboratives March 4, 2008.
COMMON CORE GEORGIA PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Mike Royal Vice Chair, State Board of Education January 9, 2015.
Developing a Common Language about Curriculum Academy 2012.
New Beginnings for CTE in Texas. HB 809 Dissemination of information regarding employment opportunities to secondary school students Effective: September.
Tools for Instruction and Assessment for the Maryland College- and Career-Ready Standards Time to Revisit Tools that will Inform Instruction.
Texas Education Agency 2009 Social Studies Update July 22, 2009 Brenda Tingle Julie Brelsford Dr. Rosemary Morrow.
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Florida Department of Education Bureau of School Improvement Office of Curriculum Support.
1 Updates to Texas Administrative Code 1TAC 206 Jeff Kline, Statewide Accessibility Coordinator Texas Department of Information Resources February 8, 2012.
What do all these letters mean? Jefferson Elementary Wichita Falls ISD February 7, 2013.
Polk County Public Schools through Strategic Plan.
TEA Curriculum Update CREST CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 COPYRIGHT © TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
OVERVIEW OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS (CCSS): Focus on English, Language Arts & Literacy Presented by Jane Cook to the East Hartford High School.
Overview of Mathematics Standards Development TEXAS: 2010 – 2014 JANE F. SCHIELACK TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY.
Common Core State Standards Common Core State Standards State Board of Education October 22, 2009.
Revision of Initial and Continued Approval Standard Guidelines for Educational Leadership Programs Presentation to FAPEL Winter Meeting Tallahassee, FL.
2012 Instructional Materials Process for Bridge Year Drew Hinds and Paula Merritt Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation Oregon Department of.
1 Draft Content Standards for High School Mathematics Helen Maguire for Paul Hibbard Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation Oregon Department.
An Introduction to Virginia’s Standards of Learning, Assessments, and Related Resources Provided by the Virginia Department of Education Dr. Linda Wallinger.
Language Arts Standards Revision ESU #3 Writing Extravaganza September 16 th, 2008.
“ Public education is open to all children - no matter their ability, heritage, or economic background. It is the promise of our future ” Denise Juneau,
Curriculum Directors Meeting February 24, 2016.
Publisher Orientation October  State Board of Education Adoption Process  Open-Source Textbooks ◦ University Developed ◦ State Developed  Commissioner’s.
Understanding the New Math TEKS RME Research to Practice Conference February 28, 2014.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K–12 Overview Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division. Joanna.
THE 2016 CACREP STANDARDS REVISION PROCESS LAST CALL FOR FEEDBACK.
Overview of Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects The Common Core State Standards.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
TEA Updates Agenda SBOE Update Science TEKS Streamlining TxAIR Update 5-8 Academies, Part 2 PAEMST.
Subject specialist mentoring on the DET
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Achieving a Common Core
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
ACA Intermediate March 23, 2017
Assessing ELLs with STAARTM
T-TESS and District Connections
Pennsylvania Standards & Common Core
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Unpacking the New CTE TEKS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Welcome to the Linguistic Instructional Alignment Guide Training
Oregon Social Sciences Instructional Materials Criteria Committee
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) &
School Year Update.
Oregon Process Meeting February 15, 2013 Drew Hinds and Paula Merritt
Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue
District Improvement plan
Commission on Teacher Credentialing
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Assigning Courses to Disciplines: Curriculum Opportunities
Superintendent Goals Update MAY 7, 2013
Physical Education Academic Content Standards
Common Core State Standards: A Statewide Dialogue
Understanding by Design
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Minnesota’s Academic Standards
Statewide Accountability
International Studies Charter School
Informal document GRSG
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Preparing for upgrade Dr Alex Mermikides 1.
Presentation transcript:

Cynthia Holcomb Education Specialist Process for the Streamlining of Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) Cynthia Holcomb Education Specialist

Proposed Approval of Process for Streamlining Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) January 29, 2016 ITEM #8 COMMITTEE OF THE FULL BOARD: ACTION STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION: ACTION SUMMARY: This item provides the opportunity for the committee to review and approve a process to be used by the board in streamlining the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) for science and social studies. Why? Feedback from educators about the lack of time to deeply teach process and content skills.

Prior history: In 2009, the SBOE directive was to reduce the number of TEKS and to clarify broad phrases and big ideas that don’t provide the guidance teachers need to prepare aligned instruction. Those TEKS were adopted to be effective August 4, 2009; amended to be effective August 24, 2010

First For Steps (abridged) Step 1: Texas Education Agency (TEA) staff notifies public of review process Step 2: State Board of Education (SBOE) members make SBOE TEKS streamlining committee nominations. (The application for committees should be posted this week.  Each board member is responsible for nominating committee members from the applicant pool. ) Step 3: TEA notifies SBOE members of the placement of nominees "by the agreed upon deadline." Step 4: TEA creates a survey for the SBOE’s review and input and then collects information via survey from educators.

Step 5: The charge to the TEKS streamlining committees based on survey feedback: to begin by determining "an estimate of" the amount of time necessary for students to develop mastery of the content in the current standards;

to only delete or reduce the scope of the student expectations; (Testimony included concerns about student expectations that were primarily math-based instead of science) not to move content or student expectations from one grade level or course to another;

not to add content or student expectations; to look for student expectations that are duplicated in another course or grade level and eliminate unnecessary duplication; (Testimony included concerns about the importance of spiraling or scaffolding content; a key-word search is not effective in determining if content is redundant.)

to use the current TEKS as the foundation document; to consider the general course of study, not what might be covered in an Advanced Placement course; to consider and maintain appropriate College and Career Readiness Standards (CCRS);

to ensure recommendations are in compliance with all related statutes; to provide justification for all suggested recommendations; to track all revisions to show what has been deleted or simplified; (Testimony included the need to reword some of the TEKS for clarification purposes)

to ensure that the remaining student expectations are content driven; (Testimony included concerns over this language; we want clarification that this does not mean the removal or reduction of process skills.)

to carefully consider “an estimate of” the amount of time necessary for students to develop mastery of the content and ensure that all remaining student expectations reasonably can be taught within the amount of time typically allotted for the subject or course prior to the end of the school year or a state end-of-course assessment required by TEC, §39.023, as applicable. (Testimony included that schools often use science classes for things such as drug education, bullying prevention, sex education, TELPAS)

Any and all official documents must be left with TEA staff Any and all official documents must be left with TEA staff. Copies of working drafts may be kept for a committee member’s personal use between meetings, but may not be distributed to others "outside of the committee".

creating TEKS streamlining committees providing testimony Steps 7-19 involve: creating TEKS streamlining committees providing testimony public hearings comment periods making amendments first and second readings final adoptions

Next steps: Have teachers discuss and document their ideas about the time needed to teach the science TEKS. Have teachers discuss and document the TEKS they think need to be deleted or reduced, and why. Have teachers discuss and document which TEKS need clarification or simplification, and why. Look for the application for committees should be posted this week.