Going Deeper with Content and Practice

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
California Common Core Standards for Mathematics
Advertisements

© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Constructing an Argument and Critiquing the Reasoning of Others Tennessee.
CCSSM National Professional Development Fraction Domain Sandi Campi, Mississippi Bend AEA Nell Cobb, DePaul University Grade 3.
Effective Math Questioning
Going Deeper with Content and Practice Alanna Mertens ISBE Math Content Area Specialist Content contained is licensed under a Creative.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
K – 12 Common Core California Standards in Mathematics Considerations for English Learners Presented by: Natalie Albrizzio Secondary Math Specialist Ventura.
M ATH C OMMITTEE Mathematical Shifts Mathematical Practices.
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Wake County Public Schools Elementary Mathematics
Math Content Workshop Focus: Progression of Fractions in Grades 3-5
Discourse and Mathematics: Get Connected! Rosann Hollinger and Bernard Rahming Milwaukee Public Schools April 27, 2012 NCTM Annual Meeting Philadelphia.
Writing and Reasoning in Mathematics Constructing Viable Arguments August 22, 2012 Patrick Callahan Co-Director, California Mathematics Project.
Bridging Math Practices Summer Workshop Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Day 3.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics Transitioning to the Common Core.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
K-12 Mathematics Common Core State Standards. Take 5 minutes to read the Introduction. Popcorn out one thing that is confirmed for you.
Phone: cell: Agenda Creating our Learning Community & Norms Setting Personal Goals and Identifying Themes Visualization through.
The Importance of Coherent Lessons in Elementary Mathematics Linda Schoenbrodt, MSDE, Elementary Programs Specialist October, 2014.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
Transitioning to the Common Core: MDTP Written Response Items Bruce Arnold, MDTP Director California Mathematics Council – South Conference November 2,
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Using Assessing and Advancing Questions to Target Essential Understandings.
Standards of Mathematical Practice.
Sunnyside School District
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics What science teachers need to know.
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER © 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Constructing an Argument.
Common Core Math Instructional Shifts. Introduction  Be college and career ready  Greater master through focus and coherence  Aspirations for math.
SOUTH DAKOTA COUNTS LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE Brookings, SD
Going Deeper with Practice and Content Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Alanna Mertens.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades K–5: Focus on Practice Standards.
Iris M. RiggsKelli Wasserman CSUSBMathematics Consultant Orchestrating Discussion: Fractions on the Number Line California Mathematics Conference Palm.
Welcome to Math Night!  Find a seat and fill out a name tag with the following information: Name, track, & grade level  Take some time to visit the chart.
Presented by Heather Sparks, NBCT 2009 Oklahoma Teacher of the Year June 4, 2012.
Secondary Math Olympia School District Fall 2015.
What is Mathematical Argumentation? Madelyn Colonnese (UConn), Sarah Brown (Manchester PS) Megan Staples (UConn) Jillian Cavanna (Michigan State University)
Navigating the Instructional Shifts of the Common Core Learning Standards: Shifting Perspectives – Changing Actions.
Math in Action 2016 Grand Valley State University Saturday, 27 February Debbie Morrow Liaison Librarian – Math & Statistics University.
More Than Mistakes (construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of
Mathematical Practice Standards
Common Core State Standards
5th Grade Math Content Training Session 1
Going Deeper with Practice and Content
K-6 Geometry Progression In Practice
Math 6-8: The Standards in Practice: A Common Core Lesson
subtract within 1000 using strategies based on place value
Core Math Instruction RtI Innovations in Education Conference, Milwaukee, WI October 12-13, 2017.
ISBE Mathematics Foundational Services Training
Heather Brown ISBE SSOS Math Content Area Specialist
Implementing the Common Core Standards
SIP Day Professional Learning Experience created by the
Standards for Mathematical Practice
UNDERSTANDING COMMON CORE MATH
Using Talk Moves to Help Students Engage in the Reasoning of Others
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 4
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 5
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Implementing Common Core Standards in Math
K-6 Geometry Progression In Practice
Fractions A Vertical Look 3-8.
Understanding Tens and Ones
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Common Core State Standards Standards for Mathematical Practice
Reaching Every Student
Welcome to Day Three.
Math Shifts Focus Coherence Rigor
Common Core State Standards Mathematical Practices
Understanding New Expectations for Rigor in Mathematics
Claim 3: Communicating Reasoning
April 25, 2014 SSOS Central Center of Excellence Team Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Going Deeper with Content and Practice Alanna Mertens ISBE Math Content Area Specialist almertens@cps.edu 3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others. Mathematically proficient students understand and use stated assumptions, definitions, and previously established results in constructing arguments. They make conjectures and build a logical progression of statements to explore the truth of their conjectures. They are able to analyze situations by breaking them into cases, and can recognize and use counterexamples. They justify their conclusions, communicate them to others, and respond to the arguments of others. They reason inductively about data, making plausible arguments that take into account the context from which the data arose. Mathematically proficient students are also able to compare the effectiveness of two plausible arguments, distinguish correct logic or reasoning from that which is flawed, and—if there is a flaw in an argument—explain what it is. Elementary students can construct arguments using concrete referents such as objects, drawings, diagrams, and actions. Such arguments can make sense and be correct, even though they are not generalized or made formal until later grades. Later, students learn to determine domains to which an argument applies. Students at all grades can listen or read the arguments of others, decide whether they make sense, and ask useful questions to clarify or improve the arguments. Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Objectives To develop strategies to incorporate the Standards for Mathematical Practice. To explore the K-5 content shifts required by the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. To experience a math activity that blends content and practice standards. Review Objectives. Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Why can’t we be friends? What does good listening look like? What does productive group work look like? Facilitor: Say, “We will be doing some math together today so we need to set some norms for our session.” Pose the questions and chart the answers. Post prominently and refer to Norms chart throughout. Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Standards for Mathematical Practice What do you know about the Standards for Mathematical Practice? The practices are the same for all K-12 students. They define what a “mathematical proficient student” should be able to do. Take a moment to glance over the practice standards. Discuss what teachers know of Math Practices. Distribute the Standards for Mathematical Practice Have them read SMP1- 3 Model Think INK Pair share strategy for discussion of the Standards. Lead a “Think- Ink – Pair –Share” Discussion Think--First ask participants to consider the questions Ink-- Then write their thoughts on paper Pair—Then share with a shoulder partner Share-Then share with the larger group Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Standard for Mathematical Practice 3 Read Practice 3 Make note of some important ideas Be ready to discuss your vision of a great math class that incorporates Mathematical Practice Standard 3. What are the students doing? What is the teacher doing? Discuss what teachers know of Math Practices. Distribute the Standards for Mathematical Practice Have them read SMP1- 3 Model Think INK Pair share strategy for discussion of the Standards. Lead a “Think- Ink – Pair –Share” Discussion Think--First ask participants to consider the questions Ink-- Then write their thoughts on paper Pair—Then share with a shoulder partner Share-Then share with the larger group Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Envision a Common Core Math Class What has to happen before we can have students exhibit Mathematical Practice Standard 3? Introduce the video. This is an 8 minute video of a teacher building a discourse based classroom environment. The blue sentence on the slide is a link to the video. It’s a good idea to pre-load the video to be sure it runs smoothly You will need speakers. http://www.edutopia.org/math-social-activity-cooperative-learning-video?page=2 Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Illinois≠Alaska How does what Mr. Optiz is doing in Alaska relate to Practice Standard 3 here in Illinois? Discuss being intentional about creating a class where Math Practices can happen. Once we have the students engaging in discourse next we need content standards! Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Instructional Shifts Fluency Coherence Focus Deep Understanding Application Dual Intensity www.engageNY.org has a nice shift handout on all the shifts. Think about focus. As teachers of the common core we need to get to deeper understanding and we cannot do that with our current mile wide and inch deep curriculum. Focus: Teachers use the power of the eraser and significantly narrow and deepen the scope of how time and energy is spent in the math classroom. They do so in order to focus deeply on only the concepts that are prioritized in the standards so that students reach strong foundational knowledge and deep conceptual understanding and are able to transfer mathematical skills and understanding across concepts and grades. Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Coherence and Focus Pick a domain heading and trace the flow of learning across the grade levels. What do you notice? What is most surprising? Direct teachers to look at matrix of K-5 clusters Ask: Pick a domain heading and trace the flow of learning across the grade levels. What do you notice? Share ideas…Bring attention to fractions An optional video about fractions is below. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMLZexFH50c Now we are going to look at fractions as an example of fluency, focus and coherence Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Fractions, Fluency and Fun To build fluency we should find ways for students to practice from repeated use through motivational activities… --Joan Barrett Ask teachers to find fluency in their content standards. This is not a building fractions lesson this is for fluency and for MP3 Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

4.NF.2 Compare two fractions with different numerators and different denominators, e.g., by creating common denominators or numerators, or by comparing to a benchmark fraction such as 1/2. Recognize that comparisons are valid only when the two fractions refer to the same whole. Record the results of comparisons with symbols >, =, or <, and justify the conclusions, e.g., by using a visual fraction model. Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Roll A Fraction Fold a piece of paper in half the long way. Draw a fraction with a box for the numerator, a box for the denominator and a reject box for each player. Ask participants to find a shoulder partner Distribute paper and 1 die per pair Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Start Rolling! Take turns rolling a die and placing the rolled number in a box on your side of the recording sheet. Once the boxes are filled, decide which player built the greatest fraction. Place the appropriate symbol between the fractions. Play the game several times. What do you notice? Participants should play at least 4 rounds. Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Reflect and Connect Write your strategy for winning. How did you decide which fraction was greater? Who could play this game? What Mathematical Practice Standard(s) were used? Discuss the advantage of having a discourse around math. Partner work means all kids are talking not just a few talking and following directions. MP3 Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Differentiate the Game Look at the content standard for fractions in grades 3,4,5. Look at the content standards for K,1,2 for counting, adding and subtracting. How could you change the game to align to a content standard at your grade level? Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Share and Compare K - Roll a dice to start and end counting 1st - Adding one digit and two digit numbers 2nd - Add and compare whole numbers 3rd - Compare fractions 4th – Add and compare fractions 5th - Multiply and compare fractions All - use sticker dots to create the exact practice each child needs Other ideas Some ways to adapt the game generate all possible fractions that could be made. Kids Could put on number line between zero Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Resources The Illinois State Board of Education Content Area Specialist are here to help! http://isbe.net/ Alanna Mertens almertens@cps.edu Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License

Show participants link to resources. Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License Content contained is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License