OSEP Project Director’s Conference August 1, 2016 Carol Quirk

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructional Decision Making
Advertisements

Response to Intervention: A Different Look
Kansas Multi-Tiered System of Support. Curriculum Assessment Instruction.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is Screening?
National Center on Response to Intervention TRAINING OF TRAINERS Response to Intervention Implementer Series.
National Center on Response to Intervention Sara Prewett, The National Center on RTI The University of Kansas RTI Scheduling.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series IDEA and the Multi-level Prevention System.
Family-School Partnerships: Strategies Leading to Positive Student Outcomes Martha Blue-Banning University of Kansas Grace Francis University.
The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.
Response to Intervention: The new Road to Ensuring Student Success January, 2011 PISD.
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is a Multi-level Prevention System?
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is Progress Monitoring?
Response to Intervention A quick review to guide the work of NH’s RtI Task Force Sandy Plocharczyk Raina Chick Co Chairs, NH RtI Task Force October 24,
An Introduction to Intensive Intervention Lou Danielson, Ph.D. Center Director October 2012.
SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
The present publication was developed under grant X from the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. The views.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-based Reading Instruction Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
SWIFT Center Policy Alignment Influence on Building Capacity and Sustainability in Schoolwide Transformation Jenny Stonemeier, TASH.
Iowa Department of Education Differentiated Accountability Healthy Indicators STATEWIDE DATA CONFERENCE AUGUST 10, 2015.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
Keystone Educational Consulting Dr. Ashlea Rineer-Hershey Dr. Richael Barger-Anderson.
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Part 2: Assisting Students Struggling with Reading: Multi-Tier System of Supports H325A
Introduction to Strong Educator Support System.
What IS RtI?. National RtI Model “Response to Intervention” –Born out of Reauthorization of Special Ed Law (IDEA 2004) Two Models of RtI: –Problem-Solving.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Progress Monitoring National Center on Response to Intervention.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
National Center on Intensive Intervention Overview and Resources April 8, 2014 This document was produced under U.S. Department of Education, Office of.
Fidelity: Maximizing the Effectiveness of Tier 2 September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development.
Integrating Academics (RtI) and Behavior (PBIS) Virginia Department of Education Office of Student Services Dr. Cynthia A. Cave February 2014.
Dial-in: Passcode: RTI/Multi-Tiered Models of Intervention PLC Movement Between Tiers of Intervention & Implications for Special.
Site Name Data Snapshots Date. Slide 12 swiftschools.org WHY? Data Snapshots engage education leaders in a concentrated analysis of what they do, how.
Dr. Marty Hougen, CEEDAR Center
Creating a Coherent MTSS for All: Baltimore City and SWIFT
School Psychologists in Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: A Discussion of Roles, Challenges, and Successes Elena Diamond, Lewis & Clark College Angela Whalen,
School Climate Transformation Grants SEA Session October
Resource Mapping & Matching
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Supporting the Whole Child
Welcome PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING TASKS WHILE WAITING FOR THE CLASS TO BEGIN: Rate your knowledge of the MTSS process using the colored dot. Rate.
Documented District Support Needs
Current Issues Related to MTSS for Academic and Behavior Difficulties: Building Capacity to Implement PBIS District Wide at All Three Tiers OSEP conference.
Office of Special Education
Hello. Welcome to “What Does it Really Take
MTSS implementation: Perspectives from the National Center on Intensive Intervention Allison Gandhi, Ed.D. American Institutes for Research.
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Universal Design for Learning
PBIS Leadership Forum October 7, 2016
Site Name Design Date.
Site Name Visioning Date.
CDE MTSS Overview Slides
PBIS PRACTICES.
Response To Instruction
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Site Name Priorities DATE.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
Welcome to the NJTSS Early Reading Project!
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
MTSS Universal Tier 1 Training Day 1: Foundations of MTSS
From “Talking the Talk” to “Walking the Walk:” RI’s Engagement Story
Presentation transcript:

OSEP Project Director’s Conference August 1, 2016 Carol Quirk MTSS: Current Issues OSEP Project Director’s Conference August 1, 2016 Carol Quirk

Master slide you can use

ALL Children - ONE System Continuum of Interventions/Supports 1. DEFINITION ALL Children - ONE System Continuum of Interventions/Supports Based on RESEARCH Selected for students using performance DATA MATCHED to targeted skill(s) Regularly monitored (more often for students receiving tiered interventions) ADJUSTED based on progress Implemented with FIDELITY (measured) In addition to core curriculum

2. CORE INSTRUCTION ALL Children - ONE System Continuum of Interventions/Supports >5% + Tier 3 >15% + Tier 2 85% Tier 1 only Too many students receiving advanced tier interventions = need to improve Tier 1

TIERED INSTRUCTION that is based on principals of Universal Design for Learning UDL

TIERED INSTRUCTION that is Differentiated Based on Student Need (including Specially Designed Instruction) Differentiated

TIERED INSTRUCTION that integrates supports for both academic & behavioral Needs Integrated

ALL Children - ONE System Continuum of Interventions/Supports 2. DATA USE ALL Children - ONE System Continuum of Interventions/Supports Universal Screening Fall / Winter / Spring Formative Assessment Data-review for planning Differentiated instruction/behavior supports Match to tiered interventions Progress monitoring Every 2 – 4 weeks Tier 2 Weekly Tier 3 Fidelity of Implementation Walk through/checklist

3. CAPACITY ALL Children - ONE System Continuum of Interventions/Supports MTSS Components Instruction/Interventions Data Use for Decisions INDIVIDUAL Knowledge Skills Experience TECHNICAL Policy Resources Guidance ORGANIZATIONAL Vision/Leadership Staff Training/Coaching Data Systems Adapted from: Heineman & Sugai, PBIS Leadership Forum, Oct. 2015

Master slide you can use

SWIFT Fidelity Integrity Assessment (SWIFT-FIA) 3.1 Our School has a school-wide system to promote academic success for all students, and responds with additional support for students who do not demonstrate success. Main idea: An appropriate and effective Multi-tiered System of Support (MTSS) for Reading and Math is essential to prevent academic failure and provide opportunities for all students to receive an equitable education

Collaborate Use data to make instructional decisions Build effective Tier 1 instruction Build Tier 2 and 3 interventions in response to student performance

All Students One System Continuum of Support

SWIFT Center produced the data for this presentation under U. S SWIFT Center produced the data for this presentation under U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs Grant No. H326Y120005. OSEP Project Officers Grace Zamora Durán and Tina Diamond served as the project officers.  The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the Department of Education.  No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service or enterprise mentioned in this publication is intended or should be inferred.  This product is public domain.  Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. Please cite as: Quirk, C. MTSS current issues. Presented at the OSEP Project Directors Meeting. Washington DC. August, 2016.