Luca Colombera, Nigel P. Mountney, William D. McCaffrey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Is Seismic Facies Analysis?
Advertisements

Structural Analysis Lecture 10 SLIDE 1
Practical Sequence Stratigraphy
GE Sedimentary processes and products
Optimum Allocation of Discharged Pollutant Loads from Nonpoint Sources in a Watershed using GIS Alok Kumar Laboratory of Water Resources Engineering Division.
Seismic Stratigraphy EPS 444
GE Sedimentary processes and products
Carbonate coasts as complex systems: A Case Study from Andros Island, Bahamas Gene Rankey and Brigitte Vlaswinkel University of Miami Thanks to sponsors:
Williams Fork Formation Reservoir Characterization at
EROS (Crave & Davy, 2001) “Stochastic model of erosion– sedimentation processes, based on cellular automata, which mimics the natural variability of climatic.
Earth History GEOL 2110 Lecture 7 Fundamentals of Stratigraphy I
GE Sedimentary processes and products Lecture 1. Depositional controls Geoff Corner Department of Geology University of Tromsø 2006 Literature: -
Applications of Scaling to Regional Flood Analysis Brent M. Troutman U.S. Geological Survey.
3 DAYS AGENDA : 12th. MAY - 14th. MAY 2014 COST : NOK ,- / person ( 11 participants, from / to : Bordeaux city FRANCE) GUIDE : Hugues FENIES ORGANISING.
Professor Chris Kendall
CSDMS Community Surface Dynamics Modeling System Dr. James Syvitski, Director NSF Workshop: Community Sedimentary Model for Carbonate Systems Hosted by:
Depositional Environments, Facies, Facies Models and Paleogeograpy Geologic History in Three Dimensions.
Seismic Reflection Data: what it is, how it can be used, & an application at Elk Hills, CA - Hudec and Martin, 2004.
Remote Mapping of River Channel Morphology March 9, 2003 Carl J. Legleiter Geography Department University of California Santa Barbara.
1 Source-to-Sink in the Stratigraphic Record Capturing the Long-Term, Deep-Time Evolution of Sedimentary Systems Stephan A. Graham  Stanford University.
Specifying a Purpose, Research Questions or Hypothesis
Combined Geological Modelling and Flow Simulation J. Florian Wellmann, Lynn Reid, Klaus Regenauer-Lieb and the Western Australian Geothermal Centre of.
Eindhoven Technische Universiteit Introduction: What is design? A short presentation about it’s essentials.
Habitat Restoration Division Coastal Program Partner For Wildlife Program Schoolyard Habitats Chesapeake Bay Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
GRQ Ltd. – Oct DTI Spindrift bidding. slide 1 Investigation of fracture & fault populations in analogue outcrops for use in the Spindrift subsurface.
Fluvial Architecture Knowledge Transfer System (FAKTS): database interrogation through SQL queries Luca Colombera, Nigel P. Mountney Fluvial & Eolian Research.
Response of river systems to tectonic deformation Chris Paola* St Anthony Falls Lab University of Minnesota * On behalf of the experimental stratigraphy.
A quantitative comparative study to investigate aggradation rate as a predictor of fluvial architecture: implications for fluvial sequence stratigraphy.
Numerical models of landscape evolution Mikaël ATTAL Marsyandi valley, Himalayas, Nepal Acknowledgements: Jérôme Lavé, Peter van der Beek and other scientists.
Wetlands Investigation Utilizing GIS and Remote Sensing Technology for Lucas County, Ohio: a hybrid analysis. Nathan Torbick Spring 2003 Update on current.
Meandering Stream. Floodplain Definitions Topographic: first flat surface found along the river above the bankfull channel; Geomorphic: landform composed.
1 RPSEA Project – Facies probabilities from seismic data in Mamm Creek Field Reinaldo J Michelena Kevin Godbey Patricia E Rodrigues Mike Uland April 6,
Use of a relational database for the classification of fluvial sedimentary systems and the interpretation and prediction of fluvial architecture Luca Colombera,
Indications of an Underground “River” beneath the Amazon River: Inferences from Results of Geothermal Studies Elizabeth Tavares Pimentel-UFAM/ON Supervisor:
Vlaswinkel & Rankey, 2003 Annual Review CSL Morphometrics and scaling of tidal creek networks, Florida and Bahamas: Implications for facies distribution.
Fluvial & Eolian Research Group – University of Leeds
Classification: Statoil Internal Status: Draft Rezonation of the Åre Formation Heidrun Field, Norwegian Sea Arve Næss (1), Camilla Thrana (1), Mali Brekken.
Tao Zhao and Kurt J. Marfurt University of Oklahoma
SCRF 2012 Erosion in Surface-based Modeling Using Tank Experiment Data Siyao Xu, Andre Jung, Tapan Mukerji, Jef Caers.
The Tools of Subsurface Analysis
Joel Ben-Awuah. Questions to Answer What do you understand about pseudo-well? When to apply pseudo-well? What are the uncertainties in reservoir modeling?
Modeling Controls on Fluvial Architecture from Outcrop Alexandre Turner Fluvial Architecture: The three dimensional geometry, proportion, and spatial distribution.
A Framework and Methods for Characterizing Uncertainty in Geologic Maps Donald A. Keefer Illinois State Geological Survey.
NTG vs. Reservoir Connectivity
SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION
Luca Colombera, Nigel P. Mountney, William D. McCaffrey
What are the main sites of sediment accumulation on the globe?
Department of Geology and Geological Engineering
Depositional Response to Structurally-Generated Topography in Deep Water Thrust Belts: Comparison of the Grès d'Annot Basin (Southeast France) with Modern.
Seismic Stratigraphy – identifying the seismic sequence
John H. Shaw and Andreas Plesch, Harvard University
Sheila Trampush and Liz Hajek
Marcell Lux, hydrogeologist engineer
Teaching Geomorphology in the Field
Combining statistical rock physics and sedimentology to reduce uncertainty in seismic reservoir characterization Per Åge Avseth Norsk Hydro Research Centre.
Systems Tracts and Sequence Stratigraphic Surfaces
Better Characterizing Uncertainty in Geologic Paleoflood Analyses
Morphodynamic and Sediment Tracers in One-Dimension
Jili Qu Department of Environmental and Architectural College
Establishing Patterns Correlation from Time Lapse Seismic
Modeling sub-seismic depositional lobes using spatial statistics
Overview of Models & Modeling Concepts
Céline Scheidt, Pejman Tahmasebi and Jef Caers
Understanding Multi-Environment Trials
Siyao Xu Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences (EEES)
Geog 380 Watershed Analysis Digital Terrain Analysis and Geomorphology
Inferred Lithology - Prediction
Controls on marginal marine and nonmarine stratigraphic architecture:
Siyao Xu, Andre Jung Tapan Mukerji and Jef Caers
Alluvial Architecture of the Springhill Mines and Ragged Reef Formations: Fluvial Reservoir Characteristics Linked to Paleogeomorphology Michael C. Rygel,
Presentation transcript:

A comparative study for assessing the influence of controls on large-scale fluvial architecture Luca Colombera, Nigel P. Mountney, William D. McCaffrey Fluvial & Eolian Research Group – University of Leeds

Overview Creation of a relational database for the digitization of fluvial sedimentary architecture: the Fluvial Architecture Knowledge Transfer System (FAKTS) Quantitative characterization of fluvial architecture applicable to: quantitative physical-stratigraphy studies develop quantitative synthetic depositional models derive constraints on subsurface predictions identify modern and ancient reservoir analogues

Approach to DB design FAKTS conceptual and logical schemes The sedimentary and geomorphic architecture of preserved ancient successions and modern rivers is translated into the database schema by subdividing it into geological objects – common to the stratigraphic and geomorphic realms – which belong to different scales of observation nested in a hierarchical fashion. FAKTS conceptual and logical schemes after Colombera et al. (2012)

Data definition – entry – classification Method Data definition – entry – classification Segmentation of fluvial architecture into geometrically-defined channel-complex and floodplain depositional elements. Channel-complexes are distinguished on the basis of criteria based on the recognition of geometrical changes and interdigitation of floodplain deposits – geologically-significant surfaces can also be considered. Floodplain elements are then defined as geometrical packages laterally or vertically neighbouring channel complexes. Kjemperud et al. (2008) Labourdette (2011)

Method LIMITATIONS common lack of 3D control; source works having variable cut-offs of size of smallest mappable units; necessity to include also summary data (e.g. channel-complex W/T scatterplot); simplistic qualitative classification in proximal- distal framework; subset attributes referring to average conditions through time, even over different time scales. Kjemperud et al. (2008) Labourdette (2011)

Architectural characterization DATABASE OUTPUT GEOMETRIES PROPORTIONS TRANSITIONS Output applied to study of: stacking patterns static connectivity channel spacing

COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF ARCHITECTURAL STYLES Architectural characterization COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF ARCHITECTURAL STYLES Example channel-complex geometrical characterization of individual FAKTS case studies: width thickness W/T aspect ratio

Aggradation rates and stacking patterns Applications/1 Aggradation rates and stacking patterns Bridge & Leeder (1979) Dalrymple (2001) Bryant et al. (1995) Wright & Marriott (1993) Assessing the role of basin-wide aggradation rate as a control on fluvial architecture and as predictor of channel connectivity

Aggradation rates and stacking patterns Applications/1 Aggradation rates and stacking patterns AR vs. cT Pearson r = 0.90 Results do not support the LAB model of fluvial architecture

BASIN CLIMATE and CHANNEL-BODY GEOMETRIES Applications/2 BASIN CLIMATE and CHANNEL-BODY GEOMETRIES Investigation of: (i) channel-complex geometries for different basin climate types and (ii) geometrical changes in response to relative variations in basin humidity After Tooth (2000)

SIGNATURE OF CHANNEL PATTERNS Applications/3 SIGNATURE OF CHANNEL PATTERNS

SIGNATURE OF DRAINAGE PATTERNS Applications/4 SIGNATURE OF DRAINAGE PATTERNS Fielding et al. (2012) Information on proximal to distal evolution still necessitates data from several systems for comparison.

Conclusions The FAKTS database permits quantitative comparative studies of large-scale fluvial architecture applicable to the determination of the signature of controlling factors and system variables on channel and floodplain organization; Other FAKTS applications include: the development of quantitative facies models; the derivation of constraints on borehole correlations; the derivation of constraints on stochastic simulations of fluvial architecture; the identification of modern and ancient reservoir analogues; the comparison of the geomorphic organization of modern rivers with preserved stratigraphic architecture.

Thank you for your attention We thank our sponsors