Omni Houston Hotel at Westside

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Advertisements

SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Accelerating All Schools Toward Greatness The New Rhode Island Accountability System.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.
MDE Accountability Update SLIP Conference, January 2016.
Testing Updates Updates New assessments in all areas Grades 3 – 8 ELA/Math Alternate Assessments - Online New Accountability Model Status,
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Title I, Part A & Title III, Part A Changes Under ESSA New Jersey Department of Education The Office of Supplemental.
Omni Houston Hotel at Westside
Performance Wisconsin Student Assessment System
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
Omni Houston Hotel at Westside
Accountability & Assistance Advisory Council Meeting
Stephanie Graff, Chief Accountability Officer
Omni Houston Hotel at Westside
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Assessing Social-Emotional Skills at Scale:
Introduction and Overview
Where Are We Now? ESSA signed into law December 10, 2015
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
American Institutes for Research
Omni Houston Hotel at Westside
2012 Accountability Determinations
Alaska Superintendents Association Fall Meeting 2016
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Mark Baxter Texas Education Agency
House Bill 22 Overview ESC PEIMS Coordinator Summer Training | August 1, 2017 Texas Education Agency | Academics | Performance Reporting.
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Highlights of Utah’s Plan
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Kansas Elementary and Secondary Education Act Advisory Council (ESEA)
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
ESSA School Index Reports
Participation in State Assessments State and Federal Policy
State Accountability Results September 18, 2018
Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) and
NCLB and Title I Schools
Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services
CTE and Accountability: July 2018
Starting Community Conversations
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Somerset Primary Data Report/SBG Information Session
Statewide Accountability
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Phillipsburg Middle School Identification as a School in Need of  Comprehensive Support and Improvement: Starting Community Conversations March.
Strengthening Secondary Indicators under Perkins V
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA):
ESSA accountability & Report Card Proposed regulations
Impact of EL Students and TELPAS Performance on State Accountability
Presentation transcript:

Omni Houston Hotel at Westside SUBTITLE October 20 – 21, 2016 Omni Houston Hotel at Westside Houston, Texas

Working Session: State is tweaking its ratings

Goals for our time together Identify a core set of questions for assessing a current state accountability system Apply those questions to current systems Discuss possibilities for tweaking these systems

Key Questions to Ask Are ratings based largely on measures of student academic achievement and attainment? Are the expectations for performance on the measures ambitious and achievable? Do they expect more progress from groups starting further behind? Does the performance of each group of students matter in the ratings? Is a school’s rating impacted if the school is consistently underperforming for one or more groups of students? Is a school’s rating impacted if fewer than 95% of students—overall or for any group—participate in the assessment?

A few notes as we dig in… These systems can be profoundly complex. We’re not going to dig into every detail, but rather focus on the most important questions. Some of the answers are objective. Others will be subjective. Sometimes the answer is “We need more information.”

Are ratings based largely on measures of student academic achievement and attainment?

Reminder: What does ESSA require? States must annually rate schools based on the following indicators, all of which (except #3) have to be broken down by student group: Academic Achievement a. Proficiency on annual assessments b. May include growth for high schools 2. Other Academic Indicator a. For high schools – graduation rate b. For non-high schools – growth or another valid, reliable, statewide academic indicator 3. Progress toward English language proficiency for English learners 4. Other valid, reliable, comparable and statewide measure of school quality

Are the expectations for performance on the measures ambitious and achievable? Do they expect more progress from groups starting further behind?

Reminder: What does ESSA require? States set long-term goals on at least tests and graduation rates. These goals must be set for all group of students, and must expect more progress from the groups that are further behind.

Does the performance of each group of students matter in the ratings?

Reminder: What does ESSA require? States must rate schools annually based on the performance of all groups of students—students from major racial/ethnic groups, low- income students, students with disabilities, and English learners – on all of the indicators

Is a school’s rating impacted if the school is consistently underperforming for one or more groups of students?

Reminder: What does ESSA require? Ratings must make clear when any group of students—students— students from major racial/ethnic groups, low-income students, students with disabilities, and English learners – is consistently underperforming.

Is a school’s rating impacted if fewer than 95% of students—overall or for any group—participate in the assessment?

Reminder: What does ESSA require? States must provide a clear explanation for how they will factor the 95 percent participation requirement, overall and by student group, into the school accountability system.

Key Questions to Ask Are ratings rating based largely on measures of student academic achievement and attainment? Are the expectations for performance on the measures ambitious and achievable? Does the performance of each group of students matter in the ratings? Is a school’s rating impacted if the school is consistently underperforming for one or more groups of students? Is a school’s rating impacted if fewer than 95% of students—overall or for any group—participate in the assessment?

Another state

Key Questions to Ask Are ratings rating based largely on measures of student academic achievement and attainment? Are the expectations for performance on the measures ambitious and achievable? Do they expect more progress from groups starting further behind? Does the performance of each group of students matter in the ratings? Is a school’s rating impacted if the school is consistently underperforming for one or more groups of students? Is a school’s rating impacted if fewer than 95% of students—overall or for any group—participate in the assessment?