Cosmology with Strong Lensing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Outline Brief, non-technical introduction to strong (multiple image) lensing Bayesian approach to the reconstruction of lens mass distribution Overview.
Advertisements

ANITA workshop. Jan 2003 Gravitational lensing and the VO Randall Wayth.
Dark energy workshop Copenhagen Aug Why the SNLS ? Questions to be addressed: -Can the intrinsic scatter in the Hubble diagram be further reduced?
Analysis of a New Gravitational Lens FLS Yoon Chan Taak Feb Survey Science Group Workshop
Weak Lensing Tomography Sarah Bridle University College London.
Current Observational Constraints on Dark Energy Chicago, December 2001 Wendy Freedman Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena CA.
H.-W. Rix, Vatican 2003 Gravitational Lensing as a Tool in Cosmology A Brief History of Lensing 1704 Newton (in Optics): „Do not bodies act upon light.
Christophe Alard (IAP), Rémi Cabanac (CFHT), Bernard Fort (IAP), Jean-Paul Kneib (LAS), Raphael Gavazzi (Santa-Barbara), Jean-François Sygnet (IAP), Mireille.
Non-linear matter power spectrum to 1% accuracy between dynamical dark energy models Matt Francis University of Sydney Geraint Lewis (University of Sydney)
Lensing of supernovae by galaxies and galaxy clusters Edvard Mörtsell, Stockholm Jakob Jönsson, Oxford Ariel Goobar; Teresa Riehm, Stockholm.
Optical Scalar Approach to Weak Gravitational Lensing by Thick Lenses Louis Bianchini Mentor: Dr. Thomas Kling Department of Physics, Bridgewater State.
Dark Matter in Galaxies using Einstein Rings Brendon J. Brewer School of Physics, The University of Sydney Supervisor: A/Prof Geraint F. Lewis.
Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology Lecture 12; February
July 7, 2008SLAC Annual Program ReviewPage 1 Future Dark Energy Surveys R. Wechsler Assistant Professor KIPAC.
Dark matter and black holes over cosmic time TOMMASO TREU.
Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology Lecture 13; February
Measuring the local Universe with peculiar velocities of Type Ia Supernovae MPI, August 2006 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics.
On the Distribution of Dark Matter in Clusters of Galaxies David J Sand Chandra Fellows Symposium 2005.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
The SNAP Project at SLAC Phil Marshall SLAC/KIPAC Slide 1.
Type Ia Supernovae on a glass: The bread and butter of peculiar velocities Lunch meeting Aarhus, March 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute.
Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing What did we learn? What can we learn? Henk Hoekstra.
Survey Science Group Workshop 박명구, 한두환 ( 경북대 )
Weak Lensing 3 Tom Kitching. Introduction Scope of the lecture Power Spectra of weak lensing Statistics.
Eric V. Linder (arXiv: v1). Contents I. Introduction II. Measuring time delay distances III. Optimizing Spectroscopic followup IV. Influence.
The future of strong gravitational lensing by galaxy clusters.
What can we learn from galaxy clustering? David Weinberg, Ohio State University Berlind & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 575, 587 Zheng, Tinker, Weinberg, & Berlind.
Complementarity of weak lensing with other probes Lindsay King, Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge University UK.
Constraining Dark Energy with Cluster Strong Lensing Priyamvada Natarajan Yale University Collaborators: Eric Jullo (JPL), Jean-Paul Kneib (OAMP), Anson.
Cosmological studies with Weak Lensing Peak statistics Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Matteo Barnabè Kapteyn Institute – Groningen University Joint Gravitational Lensing and Stellar Dynamics Analysis of Early-Type Galaxies OZ Lens
Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics Great Lakes Cosmology Workshop VIII, June, 1-3, 2007 Probing Dark Energy with Cluster-Galaxy Weak Lensing.
Constraining Cosmology with Peculiar Velocities of Type Ia Supernovae Cosmo 2007 Troels Haugbølle Institute for Physics & Astronomy,
How Standard are Cosmological Standard Candles? Mathew Smith and Collaborators (UCT, ICG, Munich, LCOGT and SDSS-II) SKA Bursary Conference 02/12/2010.
The Structure Formation Cookbook 1. Initial Conditions: A Theory for the Origin of Density Perturbations in the Early Universe Primordial Inflation: initial.
Gravitational Lensing Analysis of CLASH clusters Adi HD 10/2011.
Constraining Cosmography with Cluster Lenses Jean-Paul Kneib Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille.
The effects of the complex mass distribution of clusters on weak lensing cluster surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
10/5/2004New Windows on the Universe Jan Kuijpers Part 1: Gravitation & relativityPart 1: Gravitation & relativity J.A. Peacock, Cosmological Physics,
23 Sep The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun Peking Univ./ CPPM.
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
Measuring the Hubble Constant Using Gravitational Lenses
April 3, 2005 The lens redshift distribution – Constraints on galaxy mass evolution Eran Ofek, Hans-Walter Rix, Dan Maoz (2003)
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun.
Cosmology with Large Optical Cluster Surveys Eduardo Rozo Einstein Fellow University of Chicago Rencontres de Moriond March 14, 2010.
Probing Cosmology with Weak Lensing Effects Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Gravitational Lensing
Brenna Flaugher for the DES Collaboration; DPF Meeting August 27, 2004 Riverside,CA Fermilab, U Illinois, U Chicago, LBNL, CTIO/NOAO 1 Dark Energy and.
Probing dark matter halos at redshifts z=[1,3] with lensing magnification L. Van Waerbeke With H. Hildebrandt (Leiden) J. Ford (UBC) M. Milkeraitis (UBC)
COSMIC MAGNIFICATION the other weak lensing signal Jes Ford UBC graduate student In collaboration with: Ludovic Van Waerbeke COSMOS 2010 Jes Ford Jason.
Mass Profiles of Galaxy Clusters Drew Newman Newman et al. 2009, “The Distribution of Dark Matter Over Three Decades in Radius in the Lensing Cluster Abell.
Measuring Cosmic Shear Sarah Bridle Dept of Physics & Astronomy, UCL What is cosmic shear? Why is it hard to measure? The international competition Overview.
Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett With: Matt Auger, Vasily Belokurov, Phil Marshall and Alex Hall ArXiv:
Bayesian analysis of joint strong gravitational lensing and dynamic galactic mass in SLACS: evidence of line-of-sight contamination Antonio C. C. Guimarães.
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Measuring the Hubble Constant Using Gravitational Lenses
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Cosmology with gravitational lensing
The Dark Energy Survey Probe origin of Cosmic Acceleration:
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Cosmological Constraints from the Double-
Glenn van de Ven Institute for Advanced Study
Advisors: Tom Broadhurst, Yoel Rephaeli
Climate models and uncertainty
Simulations of Gravitational Lensing on High z Supernovae
Some issues in cluster cosmology
The Role of Baryons in Strong Lensing properties of Simulated Clusters
Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and Weak Lensing Cluster Surveys Zuhui Fan Dept. of Astronomy, Peking University.
Galaxy Cluster Mass from Spectroscopic Magnification Measurements
Presentation transcript:

Cosmology with Strong Lensing. Obstacles and Solutions Thomas Collett Based on work with Matt Auger, Vasily Belokurov, Phil Marshall, Alex Hall, Stefan Hilbert, Sherry Suyu, Zach Greene, Tommaso Treu, Chris Fassnacht, Léon Koopmans, Maruša Bradač and Roger Blandford. arXiv: 1203.2758, 1303.6564

What can strong lensing teach us? Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 2 What can strong lensing teach us? Why does the arcs form where they do?

What can strong lensing teach us? Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 3 What can strong lensing teach us? Why does the arcs form where they do? Because of the: Lens mass Source and lens distances Unlensed source position

What can strong lensing teach us? Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 4 What can strong lensing teach us? Why does the arcs form where they do? Because of the: Lens mass Source and lens distances Unlensed source position

What can strong lensing teach us? Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 5 What can strong lensing teach us? Why does the arcs form where they do? Because of the: Lens mass Source and lens distances Unlensed source position

What do we measure? Einstein radius Easy, very Robust. Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 6 What do we measure? Einstein radius Easy, very Robust.

What do we measure? Einstein radius Easy, very Robust. Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 7 What do we measure? Einstein radius Easy, very Robust. Lens Ellipticity

What do we measure? Einstein radius Easy, very Robust. Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 8 What do we measure? Einstein radius Easy, very Robust. Lens Ellipticity Local Density Slope Harder to measure

What has been learnt so far?

The Ellipticity of Mass and Light Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 11 The Ellipticity of Mass and Light Mass and light are well aligned in SLACS (Koopmans+ 2006)

The Ellipticity of Mass and Light Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 12 The Ellipticity of Mass and Light Mass and light are well aligned in SLACS (Koopmans+ 2006) Not as well aligned in SL2S (Gavazzi+ 2012)

ρ=ρ0r-γ' Probing the mass profile of galaxies Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 13 Probing the mass profile of galaxies Combine Einstein Radius with stellar dynamics Fit a power-law: ρ=ρ0r-γ' Lenses are approximately isothermal (γ'=2). (Koopmans+ 2006)

ρ=ρ0r-γ' Probing the mass profile of galaxies Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 14 Probing the mass profile of galaxies Combine Einstein Radius with stellar dynamics Fit a power-law: ρ=ρ0r-γ' Lenses are approximately isothermal (γ'=2). (Koopmans+ 2006) (Auger+ 2010) γ' = 2.078 ± 0.027 with an intrinsic scatter of 0.16 ± 0.02

Multiple Source Planes: Strong constraints on the mass profile Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 15 Multiple Source Planes: Strong constraints on the mass profile γTOT = 1.98 ± 0.02 ± 0.01 OR γDM = 1.7 ± 0.2 Using dynamics and both Einstein radii (Sonnenfeld+ 2012)

Multiple Source Planes: Strong constraints on the mass profile Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 16 Multiple Source Planes: Strong constraints on the mass profile γTOT = 1.98 ± 0.02 ± 0.01 OR γDM = 1.7 ± 0.2 Using dynamics and both Einstein radii (Sonnenfeld+ 2012)

Multiple Source Planes: Strong constraints on the mass profile Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 17 Multiple Source Planes: Strong constraints on the mass profile γTOT = 1.98 ± 0.02 ± 0.01 OR γDM = 1.7 ± 0.2 Using dynamics and both Einstein radii (Sonnenfeld+ 2012)

Multiple Source Planes: Strong constraints on the mass profile Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 18 Multiple Source Planes: Strong constraints on the mass profile γTOT = 1.98 ± 0.02 ± 0.01 OR γDM = 1.7 ± 0.2 Using dynamics and both Einstein radii Vegetti+ 2010 γTOT = 2.2 (Sonnenfeld+ 2012)

The density profile of the Horseshoe Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 19 The density profile of the Horseshoe Dye+ 2010 found γ = 1.96 ± 0.02 Spinello+ 2011 γ = 1.72 ± 0.06 Something (or somebody) is wrong Lenses are not perfect power-laws It's easy to introduce systematics by using an inflexible model

Problem: Power-laws aren't the perfect model Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 20 Problem: Power-laws aren't the perfect model Newman+ 2013

What about probing cosmological distances? Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 21 What about probing cosmological distances? Uncertainty in the mass model makes cosmography hard

What about probing cosmological distances? Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 22 What about probing cosmological distances? Uncertainty in the mass model makes cosmography hard Hubble constant + can add a term for spatial curvature Matter Density Dark Energy Equation of State

Different path lengths Different Shapiro delays Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 23 Time Delays: Different images: Different path lengths Different Shapiro delays Δt ∝ DΔt = (1+ zl) (Dl Ds) / Dls Need to get mass model right! (Suyu+ 2013)

Different path lengths Different Shapiro delays Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 24 Time Delays: Different images: Different path lengths Different Shapiro delays Δt ∝ DΔt = (1+ zl) (Dl Ds) / Dls Need to get mass model right! (Suyu+ 2013)

Multiple Source Planes: Ratio of Einstein Radii: Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 25 Multiple Source Planes: Ratio of Einstein Radii: ηSIS=(Dls1 Ds2) / (Dls2Ds1) (Sonnenfeld+ 2012)

Multiple Source Planes: Ratio of Einstein Radii: Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 26 Multiple Source Planes: Ratio of Einstein Radii: ηSIS=(Dls1 Ds2) / (Dls2Ds1) (Sonnenfeld+ 2012)

Weak lensing by matter along the line of sight Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 27 Weak lensing by matter along the line of sight Isn't as complicated as it looks!

The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 28 The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Overdense dark matter halos cause convergence of rays

The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 29 The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Overdense dark matter halos cause convergence of rays Underdense voids cause divergence of rays

κ = (4πGDlsDl/c2Ds) Σ The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Wrong lens mass Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 30 The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Wrong lens mass Wrong lens slope Wrong time delay distance Convergence proportional to surface mass density κ = (4πGDlsDl/c2Ds) Σ

Magnification-Absolute magnitude degeneracy Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 31 The Mass Sheet Degeneracy Magnification-Absolute magnitude degeneracy Directly relevant to High-z SNe GRBs High redshift galaxies

Ray tracing through simulations Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 32 Ray tracing through simulations

Estimating the Global P(κext) Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 33 Estimating the Global P(κext) Hilbert+ 2010

Estimating individual P(κext) Estimating individual P(κext) Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 34 Estimating individual P(κext) Estimating individual P(κext) (Suyu+ 2010)

Estimating individual P(κext) Estimating individual P(κext) (Suyu+ 2010)

Estimating individual P(κext) Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 36 Estimating individual P(κext) (Suyu+ 2010)

Estimating individual P(κext) Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 37 Estimating individual P(κext) (Suyu+ 2010, Greene+ 2013)

Estimating individual P(κext) Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 38 Estimating individual P(κext) (Greene+ 2013)

Why not try to reconstruct the light cone? Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 39 Why not try to reconstruct the light cone? Can a simple halo prescription capture the convergence?

Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 40

Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 41

How well does the simple model do? Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 42 How well does the simple model do?

Where is the convergence coming from? Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 43 Where is the convergence coming from? zs =1.4

Inferring dark mass from visible mass Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 44 Inferring dark mass from visible mass

Width of the individual P(κext) Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 45 Width of the individual P(κext) Width of ensemble P(κext)

Width of the individual P(κext) Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 46 Width of the individual P(κext) High kappa lines of sight are harder to reconstruct

What if we choose a subset of sightlines? Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 47 What if we choose a subset of sightlines?

What if we choose a subset of sightlines? Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 48 What if we choose a subset of sightlines?

What if the M*-Mh relation in the calibration set is wrong? Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 49 What if the M*-Mh relation in the calibration set is wrong?

Constraining the Mass sheet degeneracy Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 50 Constraining the Mass sheet degeneracy We can estimate the convergence along any line of sight Can use the Millennium Simulation as a calibration Need to be very careful that the simulation is like the real universe Choosing a subset of lines of sight can induce biases

Constraining the slope of the lens density profile Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 51 Constraining the slope of the lens density profile Matt has created some mock lenses using a realistic lens model. I'm analysing them blindly, using a power-law lens model

Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 52

... giving a broken lens model Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 53 If the source model is too limited, the lens model adjusts to try and compensate... ... giving a broken lens model

Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 54

Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 55

Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 56 Preliminary Results Mock ground imaging Sum of 2,3,4,5 Sersic Components for source The recovered lens parameters depends on the allowed source complexity The statistical errors don't seen to represent the real uncertainties.

Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 57 Preliminary Results Mock ground imaging Sum of 2,3,4,5 Sersic Components for source The recovered lens parameters depends on the allowed source complexity The statistical errors don't seen to represent the real uncertainties.

Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 58

Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 59 Pixelated Sources (Suyu+ 2013)

Constraining the lens slope Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 60 Constraining the lens slope Need to be careful with choice of source model If the source model is too simple lens science will be biased If the lens model is too simple source science will be biased Work in progress

Summary Strong Lensing is a powerful cosmological probe Cosmology with Strong Lensing. 61 Summary Strong Lensing is a powerful cosmological probe High precision measurements mean we now have to worry about systematics that were unimportant previously Constraining the mass sheet degeneracy is possible, but needs careful use of simulations Constraining the lens density slope requires carefully chosen source models