Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
Advertisements

Particle acceleration in plasma By Prof. C. S. Liu Department of Physics, University of Maryland in collaboration with V. K. Tripathi, S. H. Chen, Y. Kuramitsu,
High Intensity Laser Electron Scattering David D. Meyerhofer IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics, Vol. 33, No. 11, November 1997.
Adnan Doyuran a, Joel England a, Chan Joshi b, Pietro Musumeci a, James Rosenzweig a, Sergei Tochitsky b, Gil Travish a, Oliver Williams a a UCLA/Particle.
QCD Evolution Workshop, Jefferson Lab, May 9, 2013 The Angular Momentum of Gauge Fields: The Case of Twisted Photons Andrei Afanasev The George Washington.
Radiation Physics | ELBE | SRF Photo Injector for Electron- Laser Interaction LA 3 NET conference: Laser applications at accelerators, Mallorca,
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
Outline 1.ERL facility for gamma-ray production [A. Valloni] 2.ERL facility - Tracking Simulations [D. Pellegrini] 3.SC magnet quench tests [V. Chetvertkova]
Polarization of light.
The Detector and Interaction Region for a Photon Collider at TESLA
Beijing, Feb 3 rd, 2007 LEPOL 1 Low Energy Positron Polarimetry for the ILC Sabine Riemann (DESY) On behalf of the LEPOL Collaboration.
NEW COMMENTS TO ILC BEAM ENERGY MEASUREMENTS BASED ON SYNCHROTRON RADIATION FROM MAGNETIC SPECTROMETER E.Syresin, B. Zalikhanov-DLNP, JINR R. Makarov-MSU.
Polarimetry at the LC Source Which type of polarimetry, at which energies for LC ? Sabine Riemann (DESY), LEPOL Group International Workshop on Linear.
Compton/Linac based Polarized Positrons Source V. Yakimenko BNL IWLC2010, Geneva, October 18-22, 2010.
Compton based Polarized Positrons Source for ILC V. Yakimenko Brookhaven National Laboratory September 12, 2006 RuPAC 2006, Novosibirsk.
Radius To use a Compton polarimeter, the possible range of the backscattered photons’ energy should be calculated. Applying the laws of conservation of.
Beam Monitoring from Beam Strahlung work by summer students  Gunnar Klämke (U Jena, 01)  Marko Ternick (TU Cottbus, 02)  Magdalena Luz (HU Berlin, 03)
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
and Accelerator Physics
SFLASH  SASE interference setup & optics rough estimation 1d estimation 3d estimation summary.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
Beam Monitoring from Beam Strahlung new work by summer students  Magdalena Luz (HU)  Regina Kwee (HU) Achim Stahl DESY Zeuthen 10.Oct.2003 LumiCal BeamCal.
SPATIAL RESOLUTION OF NON- INVASIVE BEAM PROFILE MONITORBASED ON OPTICAL DIFFRACTION RADIATION A.P. Potylitsyn Tomsk Polytechnic University, , pr.
1 Yuri Shestakov Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics Novosibirsk, Russia Tagging system of almost-real photons for photonuclear experiments at VEPP-3 Moscow,
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
On the possibility of stop mass determination in photon-photon and e + e - collisions at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig.
Capture and Transport Simulations of Positrons in a Compton Scheme Positron Source A. VIVOLI*, A. VARIOLA (LAL / IN2P3-CNRS), R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS)
Radiation from electrons passing through helical undulator or colliding with circularly polarized laser wave V.Strakhovenko Budker Institute of Nuclear.
1 RTML Emittance Measurement Station Yuri Kubyshin (1), Robert Apsimon (2), Hector García (1,2) (1) Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) (2) CERN CLIC.
Conventional source developments (300Hz Linac scheme and the cost, Part-II) Junji Urakawa, KEK PosiPol-2012 at DESY Zeuthen Contents : 0. Short review.
Helical Accelerating Structure with Controllable Beam Emittance S.V. Kuzikov 1, A.A. Vikharev 1, J.L. Hirshfield 2,3 1 Institute of Applied Physics RAS,
Dollan, Laihem, Lohse, Schälicke, Stahl 1 Monte Carlo based studies of polarized positrons source for the International Linear Collider (ILC)
Luminosity at  collider Marco Zanetti (MIT) 1. Intro,  colliders basics Luminosity at  colliders Sapphire simulation Alternative approaches Luminosity.
Photon spectrum and polarization for high conversion coefficient in Compton backscattering process A.P. Potylitsyn 1,2, A.M. Kolchuzhkin 3, M.N. Strikhanov.
04/10/2015PHY 712 Spring Lecture 301 PHY 712 Electrodynamics 9-9:50 AM MWF Olin 103 Plan for Lecture 30: Finish reading Chap. 14 – Radiation from.
Experimental Research of the Diffraction and Vavilov-Cherenkov Radiation Generation in a Teflon Target M.V. Shevelev, G.A. Naumenko, A. P. Potylinsyn,
OPERATED BY STANFORD UNIVERSITY FOR THE U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY 1 Alexander Novokhatski April 13, 2016 Beam Heating due to Coherent Synchrotron Radiation.
Motivation Test of quantum mechanical calculations of synchrotron radiation. Relevant for linear colliders, astrophysical objects like magnetars, heavy.
Polarization Dependence in X-ray Spectroscopy and Scattering
Laser Cooling and Trapping
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Preliminary result of FCC positron source simulation Pavel MARTYSHKIN
The 2nd European Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop
Electron Polarization effects in Compton X/γ-ray Sources
A.P. Potylitsyn, I.S. Tropin Tomsk Polytechnic University,
Progress with Spin Tracking in GEANT4
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
Dr. D. Z. LI & Prof. J. GAO Accelerator Center, IHEP
Other beam-induced background at the IP
Wakefield Accelerator
Gamma-ray bursts from magnetized collisionally heated jets
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Compton effect and ThomX What possible future?
Using a Bessel Light Beam as an Ultra-short Period Helical Undulator
Capture and Transmission of polarized positrons from a Compton Scheme
Polarized Positrons at Jefferson Lab
ERL accelerator review. Parameters for a Compton source
Beam size diagnostics using diffraction radiation
LCLS bunch length monitor utilizing coherent radiation
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
Radiation from charged particles
Val Kostroun and Bruce Dunham
Status of FEL Physics Research Worldwide  Claudio Pellegrini, UCLA April 23, 2002 Review of Basic FEL physical properties and definition of important.
Longitudinal-to-transverse mapping and emittance transfer
Longitudinal-to-transverse mapping and emittance transfer
Plasma acceleration and betatron oscillations
Radiation from charged particles
Antenna Theory By CONSTANTINE A.BALANIS Ch1.4, 2.1~2.2.4 O Yeon Jeong.
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton backscattering process. A. Potylitsyn, D. Neyman Tomsk Polytechnic University, A. Kol’chuzhkin Moscow State Technological University POSIPOL 2012, 4-7 September 2010 DESY Zeuthen

Cross-section of Compton scattering of CP laser photons

Geometry of Compton backscattering process collision point

Spin-dependent cross section

Comaprison of both parts of cross-section for different electron energies

Mean collision number per each initial electron/positron. (number of photons per particle) electrons photons

Scheme for production of polarized positrons Number of photons per electron: CLICHE [D. Asher et al. Eur. Phys. J. C., 28 (2003) 27] SAPPHiRE [S. A. Bogacz et. al. arXiv: 1208.2827]

Distribution over the collision number k Blue – Poisson law, red – simulation rezults

Monte – Carlo simulation A random path length and a random energy loss were successively simulated in each collision

Energy distribution of recoil electrons/positrons

Energy distribution of unpolarized beam passed through a light target Curves – gaussian distribution with parameters

Polarization of a final beam

Initial positron energy 50 GeV

Tightly focused laser beam Schematic view of relative location of the electromagnetic field and the wave vector k for a real field of beam. The helical modes with circular polarization. Arrows show instant direction of electric vector and distribution of its phase over the cross-section.

Comparison of longitudinal and radial field components

(linear polarization on) Laser beam fields (linear polarization on) Laser beam with weak focusing Paraxial approximation Tightly focused beam There is no detailed model describing this process.

Electron Bunch : fs / as X-ray Pulse Simulation results [H. Lee et al. New Journ. of Phys. 10(2008) 093024] Electron Bunch : fs / as X-ray Pulse Laser pulse Tight focus Laser Pulse width : 5 fs Wave length : 800 nm Intensity : 2.2Χ1020 W/cm2 Beam waist : 5um Electron bunch Energy : 50 MeV Charge : 1 nC Normalized emittance : 2 mm mrad Bunch length : 14 um Bunch radius : 30 um Electron bunch X-ray This is the interaction geometry. The laser used in this simulation is like this: The e-bunch used in this simulation is like this: This condition for e-beam is nothing special, the one that we can get easily now. The electron beam and laser propagate together and strongly interact at focus, producing x-rays there The effect of non-paraxial high-order fields due to tight focusing turns out to be dramatic. An electron radiates more strongly when the electron is initially located off the laser axis by about the beam waist than when on the laser axis. An enhancement by a factor of 2000 is observed for the focused (w0 = 5μm) laser intensity of 5×10^18 Wcm^−2 compared with a paraxial Gaussian beam case. The longitudinal field (Ez) near the focus plays an important role, greatly changing the radiation pattern.

Effect of longitudinal magnetic field One may expect that near tight focus due to longitudinal magnetic field spin-flip probabilities for both components of unpolarized electron/positron beam will differ: Increasing of radiation intensity(photon multiplicity) plus spin-flip transitions (*) may lead to radiative polarization of a beam as whole.

Rough analogy with pure synchrotron radiation The self – polarization time due to spin-flip transition:

Estimation of positron polarization

Thanks for your attention! Conclusion Even for small mean number of collisions (<k>~1) there is significant contribution of events with k = 2,3… photons from each electron/positron The ordinary multiple Compton – backscattering process (plane – wave approximation) may provide polarization of a part of unpolarized beam Thanks for your attention! Rough estimation of “radiative polarization length” looks as promising A spin – dependent model describing interaction of electrons/positrons with tightly focused laser beam should be developed