The HYpertension in the Very Elderly Trial

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of the ADVANCE Trial Sapna N. Patel UCSF Pharm. D. Candidate 2008 Preceptor Dr. Craig S. Stern March 28, 2008.
Advertisements

K Fox, W Remme, C Daly, M Bertrand, R Ferrari, M Simoons On behalf of the EUROPA investigators. The diabetic sub study of.
Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-Term Use Evaluation Results
Overcoming the challenge of blood pressure control in prediabetic and diabetic patients: PICASSO T2D Study Efficacy and tolerability of fixed dose combination.
Hypertension in the Elderly
Results of Monotherapy in ALLHAT: On-treatment Analyses ALLHAT Outcomes for participants who received no step-up drugs.
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Hypertension in the Elderly - Its Different From in the Young From in the Young Physiology Physiology HYVET Trial Results HYVET Trial Results Managing.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
CARU The HY pertension in the V ery E lderly T rial – latest data Stephen Jackson Professor of Clinical Gerontology King’s Health Partners.
Monocyte damaged endothelium macrophage foam cell lipid thrombocytes plaque oxidative stress smooth muscle cells 4 5 Gaviraghi et al., 1998 Lacidipine:
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
Beckett N, Peters R, Tuomilehto J, et al. Immediate and late benefits of treating very elderly people with hypertension: results from active treatment.
Baseline characteristics. Patient flow Completed Completed Perindopril Placebo Randomised Not randomised Registered.
Heart rate in heart failure: Heart rate in heart failure: risk marker or risk factor? A subanalysis of the SHIFT trial on behalf of the Investigators M.
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Safety. 2 Potential CV protection pathways of SGLT2i Diab Vasc Dis Res Mar;12(2):
Early Eplerenone Treatment in Patients with Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction without Heart Failure REMINDER* Gilles Montalescot, Bertram Pitt,
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
The MICRO-HOPE. Microalbuminuria, Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Reference Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation.
Are the European Practice Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension (2007) adapted to the old and the frail? Anette Hylen
Sudden cardiac death risk factor identification in hypertensive patients PH GACON 2, F.PILLON 1, F SUBTIL 3 1 UMR CNRS Service de Pharmacologie.
The HYpertension in the Very Elderly Trial
Results from ASCOT-BPLA: Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial–Blood Pressure Lowering Arm VBWG.
Powered by Infomedica Infomedica Conference Coverage* of 26 th European Meeting on Hypertension and Cardiovascular Protection Paris (France), June 10-13,
Cardiovascular Disease and Antihypertensives The RENAAL Trial Reference Brunner BM, and the RENAAL study group. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular.
Summary of “A randomized trial of standard versus intensive blood-pressure control” The SPRINT Research Group, NEJM, DOI: /NEJMoa Downloaded.
Powered by Infomedica Infomedica Conference Coverage* of 26 th European Meeting on Hypertension and Cardiovascular Protection Paris (France), June 10-13,
Antonio Coca, MD, PhD, FRCP, FESC
Dr John Cox Diabetes in Primary Care Conference Cork
An analysis of 22,672 patients from the CLARIFY registry
Nephrology Journal Club The SPRINT Trial Parker Gregg
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Title slide.
*Imperial College London
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness results
Blood Pressure and Age in Controlling Hypertension
From ESH 2016 | POS 7D: Jan Rosa, MD
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
United States Preventive Services Task Force: Recommendations for ABPM
Triglycerides Cholesterol HDL-C or N NIDDM N or or N IDDM.
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
PS Sever, PM Rothwell, SC Howard, JE Dobson, B Dahlöf,
CANTOS: The Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Cardiovascular risk factors: are they useful screening tests?
Teaching Tool: Blood Pressure Classification
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
on behalf of the ASCOT Investigators *Imperial College London, UK
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The results of the SHARP trial
Determinants of new onset diabetes among hypertensive patients randomised in the ASCOT-BPLA Trial Dr Ajay K Gupta International Centre for Circulatory.
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) Principal Results
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
MK-0954 PN948 NOT APPROVED FOR USE (date)
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
Table of Contents Why Do We Treat Hypertension? Recommendation 5
ARISE Trial Aggressive Reduction of Inflammation Stops Events
Entry, Randomization, and Follow-up of Patients in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial Of the 461 patients who did not meet the protocol criteria,
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
The results of the SHARP trial
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
An ACCORD BP sub-analysis HR: 1.06; 95%CI: ; P=0.61
Presentation transcript:

The HYpertension in the Very Elderly Trial N. Beckett, R. Peters, A. Fletcher, C. Bulpitt on behalf of the HYVET committees and investigators ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00122811

Disclosure Information The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial – main results Disclosure Information… The following relationships exist related to this presentation: Dr . Nigel Beckett MD University Salaries supported by Dr. Ruth Peters PhD Servier/British Heart Foundation Prof Astrid Fletcher PhD No Support Prof Christopher Bulpitt MD Imperial College Consultancy fees supported by Servier

Blood Pressure & The Very Elderly (aged 80 or more) Epidemiologic population studies suggest better survival with higher levels of blood pressure Worse survival reported in hypertensives with SBP levels below 140 mmHg (Oates et al. 2007) Clinical trials recruited too few. Meta-analysis (n=1670) (Gueyffier et al. 1997) 36% reduction in the risk of stroke (BENEFIT) 14% (p=0.05) increase in total mortality (RISK) Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET) pilot results (n=1273) similar to meta-analysis (Bulpitt et al. 2003)

Target blood pressure 150/80 mmHg The Trial: International, multi-centre, randomised double-blind placebo controlled Inclusion Criteria: Exclusion Criteria: Aged 80 or more, Standing SBP < 140mmHg Systolic BP; 160 -199mmHg Stroke in last 6 months + diastolic BP; <110 mmHg, Dementia Informed consent Need daily nursing care Primary Endpoint: All strokes (fatal and non-fatal) Target blood pressure 150/80 mmHg

Statistical Analysis Numbers based on a 35% reduction in all strokes α= 0.01 ß=0.1 Stroke event rate of 40/1000 10,500 years of follow-up required 3 interim analyses planned Stopped at 2nd as decrease in stroke and all-cause mortality Independent Steering, Ethics and Data Monitoring Committees Independent Endpoints Committee (blinded evaluation) ITT and PP analyses Other main trial endpoints: total mortality, cardiovascular mortality, cardiac mortality, stroke mortality, heart failure

3845 randomised; Western Europe (86) Eastern Europe (2144), China (1526), Australasia (19), Tunisia (70) At end of trial; 1882 still in double blind, 17 vital status not known, 220 in open follow-up

Baseline data Placebo (n= 1912) Active (n= 1933) Age (years) 83.5 83.6 Female 60.3% 60.7% Blood Pressure: Sitting SBP (mmHg) 173.0 Sitting DBP (mmHg) 90.8 Orthostatic Hypotension‡ 8.8% 7.9% Isolated Systolic Hypertension 32.6% 32.3% ‡ Fall in SBP ≥ 20mmHg and/or fall in DBP ≥ 10mmHg

Baseline Data (Previous Cardiovascular History) Placebo (%) Active Cardiovascular disease 12.0 11.5 Known Hypertension 89.9 Anti-hypertensive treatment 65.1 64.2 Stroke 6.9 6.7 Myocardial Infarction 3.2 3.1 Heart Failure 2.9

(Cardiovascular Risk factors) Baseline data (Cardiovascular Risk factors) Placebo Active Current smoker 6.6% 6.4% Diabetes (Known DM/ DM treatment/glucose>11.1mmo/l) 6.9% 6.8% Total cholesterol (mmol/l) 5.3 HDL Cholesterol (mmol/l) 1.35 Serum Creatinine (μmol/l) 89.2 88.6 Uric acid (µmol/l) 279 280 Body Mass Index (kg/m2) 24.7

Blood pressure separation 15 mmHg Median follow-up 1.8 years 6 mmHg

All stroke (30% reduction) Placebo P=0.055 Indapamide SR ±perindopril Placebo IndapamideSR ±perindopril

Total Mortality (21% reduction) Placebo P=0.019 Indapamide SR ±perindopril Placebo IndapamideSR ±perindopril

Fatal Stroke (39% reduction) Placebo Indapamide SR ±perindopril P=0.046 Placebo IndapamideSR ±perindopril

Heart Failure (64% reduction) Placebo P<0.0001 IndapamideSR ±perindopril Placebo IndapamideSR ±perindopril

ITT – Summary HR 95% CI 0.70 (0.49, 1.01) 0.61 (0.38, 0.99) 0.79 (0.65, 0.95) 0.81 (0.62, 1.06) 0.77 (0.60, 1.01) 0.71 (0.42, 1.19) 0.36 (0.22, 0.58) 0.66 (0.53, 0.82) All Stroke Stroke Death All cause mortality NCV/Unknown death CV Death Cardiac Death Heart Failure CV events 2 0.5 0.2 0.1

Per-Protocol HR 95% CI P All stroke - 34% 0.46 - 0.95 0.025 Total mortality - 28% 0.59 - 0.88 0.001 Fatal stroke - 45% 0.33 - 0.93 0.021 Cardiovascular mortality -27% 0.55-0.97 0.029 Heart failure 72% 0.17-0.48 <0.001 Cardiovascular events - 37% 0.51-0.71

Biochemical Changes from Baseline (2 year cohort) In 2 year cohort there were no significant differences between the groups with regard to change in serum…. Potassium Uric acid Glucose Creatinine At 2 years 73.4% on combination treatment in active group (85.2% placebo)

Reported serious adverse events (after randomisation) Safety Reported serious adverse events (after randomisation) 448 in the placebo group vs 358 in active (p=0.001) Only 5 categorised by the local investigator possible SADRs (3 in placebo group, 2 being in active)

Conclusions Antihypertensive treatment based on indapamide (SR) 1.5mg (± perindopril) reduced stroke mortality and total mortality in a very elderly cohort. NNT (2 years) = 94 for stroke and 40 for mortality Large and significant benefit in reduction of heart failure events and for combined endpoint of cardiovascular events Benefits seen early Treatment regime employed was safe

Cautions Subjects recruited generally healthier than those within a general population Benefit from treating systolic pressures less than 160mmHg requires further research Target blood pressure was 150/80 mmHg Benefit from lower targets still needs to be established

Acknowledgements Professor C. Bulpitt (Principal investigator) & Professor A.E. Fletcher (Co-investigator) The HYVET co-ordinating office The members of the HYVET Committees Steering Committee (Dr. T. McCormack, Prof. J. Potter, Prof. B.G. Extremera, Prof. P. Sever, Prof. F. Forette, Assoc. Prof. D. Dumitrascu, Prof. C. Swift, Prof. J. Tuomilehto) End-points Committee (Dr. J. Duggan, Prof. G. Leonetti, Dr. N. Gainsborough, Prof. MC. de Vernejoul, Prof. J. Wang, Dr. V. Stoyanovsky) Data-monitoring Committee (Dr. J. Staessen, Ms. L. Thijs, Dr R. Clarke, Dr K Narkiewicz) Ethics Committee (Prof. R. Fagard, Prof. J. Grimley Evans, Dr. B. Williams) Dementia Diagnosis Committee (Prof. J. Tuomilehto, Dr R. Clarke, Dr I. Walton, Dr C. Ritchie, Dr A. Waldman) All the HYVET investigators All the HYVET national co-ordinators R. Warne/I. Puddey (Australia), H. Celis (Belgium) V. Stoyanovsky (Bulgaria), L. Liu (China), R Antikainen (Finland), F. Forette (France), J. Duggan (Ireland), C.Anderson (New Zealand), T. Grodzicki (Poland), A. Belhani (Tunisia) C. Clara (Portugal), D. Dumitrascu (Romania), Y. Nikitin (Russia), C. Rajkumar (UK) Professor C. Nachev (Steering committee member, National Co-ordinator of Bulgaria and HYVET investigator from 1998 until his death in 2005) The British Heart Foundation The Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier