MC Digi for Large Angle Vetoes

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Electronics Simulation in the Photon Transport Monte Carlo Preamp model Receiver/discriminator circuit CAFÉ driver circuit model Examples Summary January.
Advertisements

LAV front-end board test
M. Palm, CERN1 Performance test of ACEM-detector (Aluminum Cathode Electron Multiplier) Marcus Palm AB-ATB-EA.
DAQ WS03 Sept 2006Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Report on FEE for PID o Reminder o TOF o EMCAL o Summary Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting Apr, 16, 2008.
Requirements to RICH FEE Serguei Sadovsky IHEP, Protvino CBM meeting GSI, 10 March 2005.
Studies on Module 0 HAC V. Fascianelli, V. Kozhuharov, M. Martini, T. Spadaro, D. Tagnani.
Report on SiPM Tests SiPM as a alternative photo detector to replace PMT. Qauntify basic characteristics Measure Energy, Timing resolution Develop simulation.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
1 Alessandra Casale Università degli Studi di Genova INFN Sezione Genova FT-Cal Prototype Simulations.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
RICH 2004, Playa del Carmen, Mexico, December 1 st, The BTeV RICH front end electronics Marina Artuso For the RICH Group M. Artuso, S. Blusk, C.
Status of Beam loss Monitoring on CTF3 Results of Tests on LINAC and PETS as R&D for TBL Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Thibaut Lefevre CERN CTF3.
LAV Software Status Emanuele Leonardi – Tommaso Spadaro Photon Veto WG meeting – 2015/03/24.
Preliminary Results of the Beetle Readout for the MaPMTs  Part 1: as presented on  Achievements since last LHCb week  Common Mode correction.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 23 March 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
1 New TOT design for the LAV F.E. electronics M. Raggi, P. Valente G. Corradi, D. Tagnani LNF electronic service TDAQ Working Group 29/05/2009.
08-June-2006 / Mayda M. VelascoCALOR Chicago1 Initial Calibration for the CMS Hadronic Calorimeter Barrel Mayda M. Velasco Northwestern University.
Update on final LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
Abort Gap Monitoring Randy Thurman-Keup 6 / 8 / 2004 LARP Meeting.
TELL1 high rate Birmingham Karim Massri University of Birmingham CEDAR WG Meeting – CERN – 26/03/2012.
PMT gain check at Indiana University. Test setup inside dark box LED white paper PMT # JT0298 channel #2 (per HPK numbering) OTHER CHANNELS MASKED WITH.
FIT (Fast Interaction Trigger) detector development for ALICE experiment at LHC (CREN) Institute for Nuclear Research (INR RAS) National Research Nuclear.
Test beam preliminary results D. Di Filippo, P. Massarotti, T. Spadaro.
Optical Receivers Theory and Operation
LAV status report for the NA62 LAV working group Preliminary test beam results Future activities Progress on simulation A. Antonelli INFN-LNF SPSC meeting.
FEE card validation M. Raggi, T. Spadaro. The problem Validate FEE production – threshold determination at < 1mV accuracy – comparator time effects: Overdrive.
Status of the PSD upgrade - Status of the PSD cooling and temperature stabilization system - MAPD gain monitoring system - PSD readout upgrade F.Guber,
Proposal of a digital-analog RPC front-end for synchronous density particle measure for DHCAL application R.Cardarelli and R.Santonico INFN and University.
Photon Transport Monte Carlo September 27, 2004 Matthew Jones/Riei IshizikiPurdue University Overview Physical processes PMT and electronics response Some.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
R&D status of the very front end ASIC Tilecal week (7 October 2011) François Vazeille Jacques Lecoq, Nicolas Pillet, Laurent Royer and Irakli Minashvili.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
FWD Meeting, Torino, June 16th, News from Cracow on the forward tracking J. Smyrski Institute of Physics UJ Tests of CARIOCA and LUMICAL preamplifiers.
Performance of 1600-pixel MPPC for the GLD Calorimeter Readout Jan. 30(Tue.) Korea-Japan Joint Shinshu Univ. Takashi Maeda ( Univ. of Tsukuba)
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Assessment of the Čerenkov light produced by a PbWO 4 crystal by means of the study of the time structure of the signal N. Akchurin 1, L. Berntzon 1, A.
Forward Tagger Calorimeter Prototype tests at Jlab: report CLAS12 Workshop February 22, 2012 A. Celentano.
PreShower Characterisations
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
Ultra fast SF57 based SAC M. Raggi Sapienza Università di Roma
Development of a Pulse Shape Discrimination IC
The KLOE calorimeter front end electronics
Analog FE circuitry simulation
MoNA detector physics How to detect neutrons. Thomas Baumann NSCL.
Scintillation Detectors
PSD Front-End-Electronics A.Ivashkin, V.Marin (INR, Moscow)
L. Ratti, M. Manghisoni Università degli Studi di Pavia INFN Pavia
TOF CALIBRATION DATABASE
EMC Electronics and Trigger Review and Trigger Plan
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Front-end electronic system for large area photomultipliers readout
Christophe Beigbeder/ ETD PID meeting
LHCb calorimeter main features
Directional Optical Module Integration
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Deng Ziyan Jan 10-12, 2006 BESIII Collaboration Meeting
BESIII EMC electronics
Времяпролетный детектор PANDA
High Rate Photon Irradiation Test with an 8-Plane TRT Sector Prototype
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
Development of hybrid photomultiplier for Hyper-Kamiokande
Performance test of ACEM-detector (Aluminum Cathode Electron Multiplier) Marcus Palm AB-ATB-EA M. Palm, CERN.
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
BESIII TOF Digitization
Status Report on MCP PET Simulation
The Ohio State University USCMS EMU Meeting, FNAL, Oct. 29, 2004
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Presentation transcript:

MC Digi for Large Angle Vetoes V. Palladino, T. Spadaro

MC Digi for Large Angle Vetoes Detailed PMT simulation needed to assess efficiency @ low-energy Include and correctly treat: Gain fluctuations Optical g’s path fluctuations Signal generation Time over threshold FEE Signal (mV) N photo electrons 8.0 MC input parameters: Gain at operation point G = 1.1 ×106 1st dynode collection eff. e1 = 0.85 Intra-dynode collection eff. ed = 0.98 1st dynode time fluctuations dT1 = 0.5 ns Intra-dynode time fluctuations dTd = 0.8 ns 6.4 4 4.8 3 3.2 2 1.6 1 Time (ns) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 2

MC Digi: Data/MC agreement Data/MC agreement comparing MIP muons and using test beam data Further tests in progress Data MC Evts/0.5 pC Integrated charge (pC) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 3

MC Digi: effect of cable Cable effect correctly reproduced in standalone simulation Whether or not it has to be inserted in official code is under scrutiny MIP signal Reminder, total cable length: small LAV’s: 6.15 m, 7.15 m, intermediate LAV’s: 8.5 m, big LAV’s: >~10 m Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 4

MC Digi: Data/MC agreement Data/MC comparing test beam data to MIP muons, varying (nominal) threshold for data For MC use: 290 pF PMT capacitance, 10 mV threshold, 3 mV hysteresis MC Data Integrated charge (pC) Time over threshold (ns) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 5

MC Digi: Data/MC agreement For MC use: 290 pF PMT capacitance, 10 mV threshold, 3 mV hysteresis Data/MC agreement: looking in detail, not really satisfying MC Data Integrated charge (pC) Time over threshold (ns) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 6

Characterization of ToT curve: CPMT For MC, study dependence of Q(ToT) on PMT capacitance MC, CPMT = 200 pF Integrated charge (pC) MC, CPMT = 300 pF MC default, CPMT = 250 pF, Vthr = 10 mV, Vhyst = 3 mV ToT (ns) Below ~ 8pC, leading time contribution significant For large signals, trailing time contribution dominates Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 7

Characterization of ToT curve: Vthr For MC, study dependence of Q(ToT) on FEE threshold voltage MC, Vthr = 11 mV Integrated charge (pC) MC, Vthr = 9 mV MC default, CPMT = 250 pF, Vthr = 10 mV, Vhyst = 3 mV ToT (ns) Uncertainty on nominal threshold, ~ 2mV Sizeable variation: dToT/dVthr ~ 3ns/mV, for low charges Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 8

Characterization of ToT curve: Vhyst For MC, study dependence of Q(ToT) on FEE hysteresis voltage MC, Vhyst = 2 mV Integrated charge (pC) MC, Vhyst = 4 mV MC default, CPMT = 250 pF, Vthr = 10 mV, Vhyst = 3 mV Hysteresis uncertainty ~ several % (to be confirmed) Acting on trailing time only: dToT/dVhyst ~ 1 ns/mV for low Q ToT (ns) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 9

Direct measurement of CPMT Equivalent circuit for the direct measurement of CPMT = 33Ω Transmission line Rx V(t) PMT PMT Divider 33 Ohm resistor introduced to correct for parasitic inductance (ringing) Measure signal V(t) for Rx = 50, 100, 200Ω Fit the time constant t = CPMT (R + Rx) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 10

Direct measurement of CPMT V(t) (mV/0.4 ns) Rx = 50 Ohm Fit with p0 e-t/t time(s) Rx (Ω) Time constant t (ns) CPMT (pF) 50 12.6(2) 152(2) 100 20.4(3) 153(2) 200 36.62(5) 157(2) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 11

Data/MC agreement: old... For MC use: 157 pF PMT capacitance, take into account the 33 Ohm resistor, 9.5 mV threshold, 2 mV hysteresis Data/MC agreement: from the old situation.... MC Data Integrated charge (pC) Time over threshold (ns) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 12

... and present MC Data Integrated charge (pC) For MC use: 157 pF PMT capacitance, take into account the 33 Ohm resistor, 9.5 mV threshold, 2 mV hysteresis Data/MC agreement: now much more satisfying MC Data Integrated charge (pC) Time over threshold (ns) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 13

A first to-do list ToT vs Q curve well reproduced for MIP’s PMT capacitance value confirmed by direct measurement Quantitative check satisfactory Caveats: agreement for extremely low values of ToT to be studied Uncertainty on hysteresis to be determined Cable modifications treated: relevant for biggest LAV’s inserted into digitization code To-do list: check with electron data study of global LAV response new data acquisition campaign for better assessment of data/MC agreement to be tested with known threshold and hysteresis values Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 14

Precise threshold measurement Precisely assess threshold and hysteresis, mandatory for Q vs T reliability Sub-mV total uncertainty needed Tried with a standard approach, such as efficiency profile: measure efficiency as a function of minimum signal voltage Above approach would need clean environment: in presence of a 2-3 mV radiofrequency noise, width of efficiency profile depends on noise Try to overcome this, by measuring crossing times Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 15

Accurate mmt of threshold The idea is to register a signal copy and the LVDS output with a flash ADC The LVDS transition time, TL, can be correlated with the time TS(Vth) expected from signal, assuming a trial value Vth for the threshold As Vth varies, the correct threshold value is found as the one for which the time difference TL-TS is independent of the signal amplitude For this to work, the signal time characteristics have to be preserved as much as possible Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 16

Setup for threshold mmt Input to PMT from Hamamatsu C10196, ultrashort light pulser, 70 ps FWHM Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 17

Setup for threshold mmt Use LeCroy WaveSurfer 44Xs as 2.5 GS/s, 8-bit flash ADC Signal from DC 50 Ohm For the moment, an improper treatment of LVDS output: one polarity to signal, the other grounded via 100 Ohm resistor LVDS in Home made LVDS to LEMO Signal in Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 18

Problems for LVDS signal Due to this treatment, LVDS rise and fall times significantly worsened time over threshold possibly affected: 10-90% time to 1-1.5 ns but rise and fall time correlations expected to be maintained LVDS signal (V) Time (ns) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 19

Time correlation measurements Leading time correlations as a function of trial threshold values For the true value of the threshold, dT should be independent from Vmin Vmin Thanks to Paolo Valente for the animated gif preparation dT (leading) (ns) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 20

Time correlation measurements Rise time correlations as a function of trial threshold values For the true value of the threshold, dT should be independent from Vmin Vmin Thanks to Paolo Valente for the animated gif preparation dT (trailing) (ns) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 21

Time correlation measurements Not exactly true... effect of overdrive-dependent delay at the comparator must be subtracted for dT to be independent on Vmax Reminder: for old (new) voltage at comparator is amplified x5 (x3) wrt original signal Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 22

Correlation factor Correlation factor well suited to evaluate “best” threshold value For leading time, method sensitivity is on the order of 0.2-mV Vle ~ -28.3 mV Correlation factor for leading times Vth (V) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 23

Identification of optimal threshold: Correlation factor well suited to evaluate “best” threshold value For trailing time, method sensitivity is on the order of 0.1-mV Vth(trailing) ~ -30.7 Correlation factor for trailing times Vth (V) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 24

Compare with efficiency profile Evaluation compared with that from efficiency profile e Vmin Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 25

Proposal for threshold validation Work shown able to clarify important points, but for en-mass mmts: To proceed in a reasonable time, need more channels TDC treatment of LVDS must be taken into account One may think: use a 32-channel, 5-GS/s, 8-bit flash-ADC with 1 Vpp at max Include in acquisition together with TDC Above approach would work for old FEE boards, in which each channel has an independent analog copy in output For new FEE’s, analog output are given for 4-fold and 16-fold sums only Proposed solution: pulse individual channels in a round-robin fashion can acquire with few channels of flash-ADC might exploit 4-ch, 12-bit, 2-GS/s V1729 digitizer, presently available Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 26

Logical scheme for fast simulation Particle generation and decay Interactions in LAV volume Energy release, Cerenkov G4 Optical g’s: number, direction of emission, position Transport to the PMT Mimmo’s transport matrix Number, energy of optical photons at PMT cathode Photocathode emission Dynode amplification Signal generation Transmission line FEE: Threshold discrimination This work Leading and trailing times Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 S1 ~10000 SF4 lead crystals used in OPAL e.m. calorimeter we re-use part of the barrel 8 different crystal shapes ρ=5.6 g/cm3, X0=1.5cm,RM=2.6 cm Rearrange crystals in 4 or 5 staggered layers Install rings inside vacuum vessel ~10000 SF4 lead crystals used in OPAL e.m. calorimeter we re-use part of the barrel 8 different crystal shapes ρ=5.6 g/cm3, X0=1.5cm,RM=2.6 cm Rearrange crystals in 4 or 5 staggered layers Install rings inside vacuum vessel ~10000 SF4 lead crystals used in OPAL e.m. calorimeter we re-use part of the barrel 8 different crystal shapes ρ=5.6 g/cm3, X0=1.5cm,RM=2.6 cm Rearrange crystals in 4 or 5 staggered layers Install rings inside vacuum vessel ~10000 SF4 lead crystals used in OPAL e.m. calorimeter we re-use part of the barrel 8 different crystal shapes ρ=5.6 g/cm3, X0=1.5cm,RM=2.6 cm Rearrange crystals in 4 or 5 staggered layers Install rings inside vacuum vessel

MC Digi: effect of cable Cable induces RLC(G) filter C ~ 100 pF/m, L ~ 2.4 10-7 H/m Silver copper steel, R ~ 86Ω/km G varies withω, it is negligible for ω< 150 MHz, where signal lies x x + dx Attenuation |F(ω)| * cable data sheet, typical values for 30 m length ω (MHz) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 S2

MC Digi: effect of cable Cable induces RLC(G) filter C ~ 100 pF/m, L ~ 2.4 10-7 H/m Silver copper steel, R ~ 0.086Ω/m G varies withω, it is negligible for ω< 150 MHz, where signal lies |F(ω)|, MIP signal Fourier transform ω (MHz) Large Angle Veto WG meeting – Mainz – 6/9/2011 S3