Respectful Classrooms using the Community of Inquiry Approach

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 A Socratic seminar is a form of discussion created by Socrates in fifth century B.C.  He believed that the best way for students to learn was by developing.
Advertisements

Socratic Seminars. We will end the year with an in-class discussion project called Socratic Seminars. We will use our class novel to get ideas for discussion.
Across the Curriculum West Jacksonville Elementary A. Bright and L. Derby.
1 AVID’s mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students for college readiness and success in a global society. Socratic Seminar Trainer’s.
Congenerative Dialogues: A Tool For Change in the Science Classroom By Michele Dixon.
NSW Curriculum and Learning Innovation Centre Draft Senior Secondary Curriculum ENGLISH May, 2012.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Have you implemented “Number Talks” in your classroom? What are the pros? What are the cons? Any suggestions?????
Teacher-Librarian Supported Inquiry-Based Learning
Meeting the needs of diverse learners k-6. Carol Ann Tomilson  Its not a strategy but a total way of thinking about learners, teaching and learning.
CREATING A CLASSROOM COMMUNITY: INQUIRY AND DIALOGUE 2 March 2010.
The literacy initiative (The reading and writing boost)
Module 1: Developing 21 st Century Skills Module 2: Learning Computer Basics and the Internet Module 3: Fostering Critical Thinking and Collaboration Module.
“The Lady or the Tiger” Discussion Levels of Questioning Take Notes!!
Christchurch New Zealand October 2009 Integrating new technologies to empower learning and transform leadership.
Invisible Socrates Socratic Teaching and the Absent Teacher Annie Webster Assessment for ‘First Steps in to Learning and Teaching’ February 2015 Oxford.
Guided Reading at Milton Court Presentation for parents Monday 1 st February 2016.
Socratic Seminar Overview Levels of Questioning. What is a Socratic Seminar A teaching strategy to encourage students to engage in critical thinking,
Socratic Seminars – The Basics
Principles of teaching, Learning and Assessment
Spelling and beyond – Curriculum
Going Deeper with Academic Talk
From Science Standards to Classroom Instruction (K‐5)
Hello and welcome to today’s training.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Investigating Cognitive Complexity
PLC Question 1: What do we expect all students to learn?
Socratic Seminar Alexis fisher.
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners
Associate Teacher Meeting 16 June 2009
Be ready to check 90 seconds after the bell.
Building and Assessing Oral Proficiency in the English Classroom
Reading Between the Lines
Pam O’Leary, Guidance Counsellor and ethical education teacher
Formative assessment through class discussion
What Digital Resources Are Available to Support STEM?
Inquiry learning How do we support inquiry learning?
Department of Special Education
Make Some Space Incorporating Specialist Teachers Into the PYP Planner
ALM 25th London Boundaries and bridges: adults learning mathematics in a fractured world How effective questioning and discussion can help to remove.
Accountable Talk with English learners
Socratic Seminar This PowerPoint is meant to be used with either teachers or students schoolwide to assist in implementing Socratic Seminar. It is written.
Cornell Notes.
An Overview of the ACE Collaborative for Curriculum & Instruction
Introduction to Socratic Seminars
Cornell Notes.
Problem Solving Activities
Teachers as “Activators of Learning” and “Evaluators of Impact”
It’s Good to Talk – Developing Group Work in English
Discussion round table
Small Group Discussions
Respectful Classrooms using the Community of Inquiry Approach
Guided Reading at Kemsley
For further school friendly materials visit
Socratic Seminar.
ONLINE vs. F-to-F DISCUSSION
EFFECTIVE QUESTIONING
Facing Inclusion by Co-Teaching
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Q uality uestioning Henrico County Public Schools
Getting Kids to Talk Math!
Cornell Notes.
It’s that word again – Differentiation!
Key Elements of Class Meetings
Digital Identity 1. Question
ONLINE vs. F-TO-F DISCUSSION
Parent Interactions: September
Socratic seminar Session #2.
Philosophy for Children 1 (P4C)
Design Thinking in the Learning Commons Patricia Baker Ottawa Catholic
Exploring the Instructional Shifts Inherent in the 2020 CAS
Presentation transcript:

Respectful Classrooms using the Community of Inquiry Approach a presentation by Lorelei Siegloff B.A. (Hons), B.VA. (Hons) M.Teach. The South Australian Philosophy in Education Association

Activity: Community of Inquiry Ensure you have your name tag on! Sit in your group Say hi 

“What changed in Australian law after Sep 11 and was it reasonable or unreasonable?”

Part 1: Groups Each group has a few ‘changes’ to evaluate together In groups decide by negotiating a consensus (everyone agrees) If the change that occurred was reasonable or not How reasonable – more or less on the spectrum And why – your group’s justification

Group Rules Kind Patient Inclusive Respectful Only one speaker at a time Inclusive Listening Reflecting Respectful Gentle voices Consensus – Everyone must agree

Part 2: Reporting Back to Class The class sits in a large circle facilitated by the teacher with the spectrum on floor in middle Each group in turn will place their ‘changes’ on a spectrum of reasonableness and explain their reasoning for each placement “changes’ can’t co-exist on the spectrum

No-one else may speak whilst they set out the ‘changes’ (maybe use a talking stick/ball etc.) After each group has finished an open discussion can occur about whether or not others agree with the placement and why Only one person speaks at a time The whole class must negotiate to arrive at a new consensus or the issue stays where it is

Adding complexity... Rework the spectrum from different perspectives; i.e. Political (Pragmatic) Historical (not invested?) Ethical (civil rights/community vs individual) Legal principles (Right/wrong)

Part 3: Review Reflect on the process of negotiating a consensus with the class Students can spend a few minutes writing a personal reflection of their thoughts about the ‘changes’ that occurred

Philosophical Pedagogy: Matthew Lipman Building on Dewey Classroom learning is a social activity in which “questioning, reasoning, connecting, deliberating, challenging, and developing problem-solving techniques” can occur The classroom as “gestalt” (intersubjective knowledge) Community of Inquiry is reflective, democratic, and rigorous It is based in dialogue

Thinking about a unit of SACE work Establishing group norms at the outset How do you do this? Set up class groups that are used in most lessons Teacher established (non-negotiable) Build Community of Inquiry skills across the unit Interweave with AC outcomes & Skills +Blooms Taxonomy + SACE Capabilities/Performance Standards ...

Arc of Skills Development Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Resources PPT Websites Videos Texts Artefacts Skills Negotiation Note taking Reading effectively Knowledge Comprehension Evaluation Critical Analysis Online research Sequencing Application Comparison Values & Ethics Inquiry Understanding Perspectives Investigation Synthesis Formative Activity Intro group activity: reading together More note taking Developing group models Shared timeline Community of Inquiry Activity Group presentations Modelling note taking from video Source analysis of video Classification of notes against a model Shared research time using timeline focus Developing Inquiry questions Assessments Source Analysis Group projects drawn from timelines Textual Inquiry Assessment

Activity: Classification of Notes Against a Model Do you have a model you’re using? (e.g. aspects of a totalitarian state, the intelligence cycle) Have the groups/students developed one? Have they identified it through their reading? Home work reading with note taking A series of white boards/poster papers set out around the room with a heading from each stage in the model Groups work through their notes to find examples of each parts of the model. They then write up the note (with a page ref) on the boards The class has a fixed time to get the notes up into their categories When complete a review process lead by teacher or a student to remove duplicate notes and discuss if they are in the right place in the model.

The Model A lens through which data can be analysed Source analysis model A subject specific model A series of themes

Activity: Developing Inquiry Questions Students discuss possible issues to investigate further drawn from the Community of Inquiry activity Students identify an inquiry action Why, How etc.. Students discuss applying a perspective to their investigation Reasonableness, ethical, just et. How can they measure this perspective?

In Summary It’s all about developing a classroom culture that is; Respectful Inquisitive (with Wonder, per Socrates) Thoughtful And excited about learning as a community. Thanks for your brilliant participation!

Further Resources The SA Philosophy in Education Association sapea.weebly.com fapsa.org.au

References Cam, P. 2013, Philosophy Park: A beginner’s guide to great philosophers and their ideas, Acer Pub. Cam, P. 2006, Twenty Thinking Tools, Acer Pub. Davey Chesters S. 2012, The Socratic Classroom: Reflective Thinking through Collaborative Inquiry, Sense Publishers Lipman, M. 1980, Philosophy in the Classroom, Temple Uni Press Lipman, M. 2003, Thinking in Education (2nd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.