University of Management & Technology, Lahore Welcome to the Honorable Members of 10th QEC Meeting of Private Sector Universities University of Management & Technology, Lahore

Agenda of the Meeting Progress Review & Strategy for Completing targets of assessment year 2015-16 Best practices in assessment process.

SARs Submitted to HEC Sr.No. Department / School Program Description 1 School of Business & Economics BBA 2 MBA 3 School of Professional Advancement Masters in Banking and Finance 4 Institute of Audit & Accountancy Masters in Commerce (M. Com) 5 Bachelors in Commerce 6 BS – Accounting 7 Department of Electrical Engineering BS – Electrical Engineering 8 Department of Social Sciences & Humanities BS – Social Sciences with Majors in Psychology

SARs Submitted to HEC Sr.No. Department Program Description 9 School of Social Sciences & Humanities MS - Education 10 MS – Applied Linguistics 11 School of Textile & Design Bachelors in Fashion Design 12 School of Business & Economics MS - Management 13 Institute of Islamic Banking MS – Islamic Banking & Finance 14 Institute of Applied Sciences BS Aviation Management 15 BS Aircraft Maintenance & Technology 16 Bachelors of Textile & Technology Management 17 MS Textiles

Sr.No. Department / School Program Description 18 School of Social Sciences & Humanities MA - English 19 School of Science & Technology BS - CS 20 BS - SE

Conducting Evaluation Surveys Following Surveys have been completed: Teacher’s Evaluation Course Evaluation Faculty Course Review Report Faculty Survey Faculty Resume Alumni Survey Employer Survey Survey of Graduating Students

Remedial Measures taken on the basis of feedbacks Tripping of Multimedia projectors during power shut downs for which a Generator has been installed in order to avoid tripping during power shut downs. Establishment of Media Labs in the new building. Previously we were conducting labs in consultation with different media chanels

Remedial Measures taken on the basis of feedbacks Provision of proper lockers for equipment for architecture students. Calibration of instrument before practicals.

Impact /Outcomes of Evaluation Role of QEC in improving the quality of education is now better understood. Awareness and sensitivity regarding Quality and the Quality Assurance measures is increasing amongst the stakeholders. Sense of accountability and responsibility (amongst university management, faculty members, and students) has begun to improve. Faculty development programs have been initiated for capacity building.

Best practices in Assessment Process. Adoption of Scorecard system based upon number of Publications by the department right from the inception of MS programs to date Conducting Regular Quality Council Meeting to determine the effectiveness of Assessment processes Accreditation by different accreditation councils like NBEAC,NCEAC,NEACTE and SAQS etc.

Category A: Proposal Approved by BASAR Conducted Doctoral Program Assessments of all the programs offered by various Schools / Institutes. Category A: Proposal Approved by BASAR Category B: Comprehensive Qualified and Proposal under Development Category C: Course Work Completed and Comprehensive Awaited Category D: Course Work Regular and Satisfactory Performance Category E: Course Work Irregular or Unsatisfactory performance Category F: Dropped out during Course work Category G: Dropped out after Passing Comprehensive but before BASAR Category H: Total Admitted Category I: Passed Out

Program Assessments at MS / M.Phil Level Developed the systems for Program Assessments based on Alumni feedback. Conducted program assessments of MS Management, MS Applied Linguistics and MS Education. 35 Program Manuals of all MS / M. Phil and Ph. D programs have been prepared in consultation with relevant CODs.

Program Brief Program Mission Statement Program Objectives Rationale of the Program Learning Outcomes Program Structure Road Map of the Program Career Prospects Course outlines of individual Course Eligibility/ Admission Criteria Assessment & Evaluation of Courses Degree Awarding Criteria List of Faculty Members List of Research Publications Scheme of Study Course Outlines of Individual Course(s)

Performance of Quality Enhancement Cell in the eyes of QAA, HEC

Academic Performance of UMT Key Performance Indicators of UMT Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Fall 2012   Spring 2013 Fall 2013 Spring 2014 Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Course material 83.09 83.00 83.39 84.6 85.52 84.27 85.36 Class Teaching 79.94 83.06 83.21 84.17 85.90 85.09 85.66 Class Assessment 79.77 81.67 81.64 81.52 82.06 83.31 83.99 Student Learning 78.21 80.31 80.4 80.67 81.5 82.66 82.93 Resources 68.02 72.35 76.83 77.03 77.63 79.74 78.55 78.50 Grand Percentage 77.81 80.08 81.07 81.16 81.99 83.59 82.78 83.29

School wise satisfaction Level Key Performance Indicators of Schools / Institutes (Average Percentages) School / Institute Course material Class Teaching Class Assessment Student Learning Resources Grand Percentage SCA 91.26 91.00 89.30 87.87 86.49 89.18 ICCS 85.87 86.33 84.91 84.25 83.06 84.88 ICP 91.43 92.21 92.03 89.85 88.51 90.81 IIB 85.31 85.28 83.13 82.99 81.17 83.58 SST 84.46 84.44 55.04 81.85 80.25 77.21 IAS 85.86 85.22 85.74 83.39 75.49 83.14 SPA 82.08 81.13 79.75 77.75 78.78 79.90 SBE 85.15 85.90 78.23 82.15 79.69 82.22 SSSH 88.44 88.71 87.41 86.19 83.90 86.93 STD 85.20 85.79 84.15 84.37 79.08 83.72 SEN 85.66 85.72 84.10 82.42 79.17 83.41 SAP 87.48 87.17 86.16 86.22 83.91 SAS 80.52 77.89 81.57 77.18 72.25 77.88 SGS 85.14 84.48 82.46 73.01 82.06

Department wise Satisfaction Level in case of SBE Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Fall 2015 Finance 83.10 81.00 77.99 Marketing 81.73 85.08 83.02 Skills Development 83.12 78.37 84.91 Quantitative Methods 80.74 82.68 82.42 Management 86.42 80.19 81.79 Economics 81.93 84.12 83.11 Operations and Supply Chain 84.02 81.70 80.80 Information System 82.43 80.90 82.37

Department wise Satisfaction Level in case of SST Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Fall 2015 Informatics & Systems 80.27 83.05 77.24 Computer Sciences 80.25 82.22 76.52

Department wise Satisfaction Level in case of SEN Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Fall 2015 Electrical Engineering 82.71 83.06 84.91 Industrial Engineering 78.86 77.07 76.77 Mechanical Engineering 88.98 84.53 87.95 Energy Engineering 80.82 79.30 83.09 Civil Engineering 86.41 80.52 82.43

Department wise Satisfaction Level in case of SSSH Fall 2014 Spring 2015 Fall 2015 Special Needs Education 90.96 89.86 91.15 Psychology 83.21 83.51 83.47 English Language & Literature 89.89 90.02 87.04 ITC 86.16 85.58 88.53 Education 89.14 89.00 85.65 Sociology 86.57 Media and Communication 80.43 78.31 85.53 Political Science 88.08

Observations / Recommendations Total 30 Resource Persons have been identified having Academic Performance 10% below than University’s Average. Problems in accessing Moodle

Recommendations to Enhance Research Activities at UMT Every Faculty Member must publish at least one Research paper in HEC recognized Journal as a Principal author during a year. Number of travel grants from HEC be increased Every Ph.D. Candidate must publish two research publications in HEC recognized Journal, failing to which the degree will not be awarded.

Every MS Scholar must publish at least one Research paper in HEC recognized Journal before submitting his / her thesis for defense without which no degree will be offered. Every School / Institute offering MS / Ph.D. must start publishing its own Journal in order to promote a healthy Research Culture.

In order to enhance Industry – academia relationship, number of university industrial linkages through (ORICs) be enhanced and such projects be designed in collaboration with each and every School / Institute level. Efforts be made to increase the number of Research Grant from HEC & from other sources like: USAID, JICA, Corporate sector & NGOs etc.

Future Plans Automation of Student’s and other Stakeholder’s feedbacks The best Faculty members of each department and school / institute will be awarded with Best Teacher’s award Continuous training to the Faculty members having academic performance below than 70 %  

Questions & Answers