INVESTIGATION OF NON-EVAPORABLE GETTER FILMS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RHIC electron cloud and vacuum pressure rise characteristics P.He, H.C.Hseuh, W.Fischer, U.Iriso, D.Gassner, J.Gullotta, R.Lee, L.Smart, D.Trbojevic, L.F.Wang.
Advertisements

Upgrade Plan of KEKB Vacuum system Pre-kickoff KEK1 Y. Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group Contents Challenges for vacuum system Designs for.
11-13/10/2007 ILC BDS Kick-Off Meeting, SLAC, US 1 BDS Vacuum System Dr. Oleg B. Malyshev ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
8 th January, 2007 European Linear Collider Workshop, DL, UK ILC DR Vacuum System Progress in ECLOUD Task (Goal 7) for the ILC DR Dr. Oleg B. Malyshev.
L.B. Begrambekov Plasma Physics Department, Moscow Engineering and Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia Peculiarities, Sources and Driving Forces of.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Leif Eriksson 10/11/99 NLC BD VACUUM Thermal Outgassing Rate for Various Beam Line Materials.
How e-cloud effect affects the ILC DR Vacuum System Dr. Oleg B. Malyshev ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
1 NEG films: recent R&D progress Paolo Chiggiato (for the EST-SM-DA section) Vacuum Issues of the LHCb Vertex Detector 28 November NEG films: choice.
Low SEY Engineered Surface for Electron Cloud Mitigation
Holger Kollmus - VBE-UHV 1 SIS100_1 ERDA Measurements ERDA – Measurements: Understanding of Ion Beam-Loss Induced Desorption.
LHC VACUUM SYSTEM: 2012 REVIEW AND 2014 OUTLOOK G. Lanza, V. Baglin, G. Bregliozzi, J.M. Jimenez EVIAN 2012.
Vacuum, Surfaces & Coatings Group Technology Department Vacuum tests for CLIC module prototypes 6 November 2013 C. Garion2 Outline: Reminder: specification.
E-CLOUD VACUUM OBSERVATIONS AND FORECAST IN THE LHC Vacuum Surfaces Coatings Group 03/07/2011 G. Bregliozzi On behalf of VSC Group with the contributions.
Vacuum system in the main Linacs C. Garion CERN/TE/VSC CLIC09 workshop, October.
John Amann – ILC Mechanical Engineering 11/13/06
26-28 August 2008 Final EUROTeV Scientific Workshop, Uppsala University, Sweden 1 ILC DR vacuum system related problems and solutions Oleg B. Malyshev.
30/05-03/06/2007 LCWS2007 and ILC2007, DESY Hamburg Germany Vacuum System Specifications What needs to be specified in Vacuum Specification for ICL Damping.
Vacuum and mechanical design of ILC DR O. B. Malyshev ASTeC Vacuum Science Group, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK Low Emittance Ring Workshop
13/09/2005Vacuum Systems for Synchrotron Light Sources Workshop, Barcelona, Spain 1 Gas Flow Modelling in Design of the Vacuum System for of the Synchrotron.
18-20/12/2007 ILC Damping Ring R&D Mini-workshop, KEK, Japan Vacuum Design vs. e-cloud Oleg B. Malyshev ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
ACADEMIC COLLABORATION ON VACUUM SCIENCE JOHN COLLIGON SURFACE COATINGS AND CHARACTERISATION GROUP DALTON RESEARCH INSTITUTE MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY.
20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop 1 INVESTIGATION OF NON- EVAPORABLE GETTER FILMS O. B. Malyshev, K.J. Middleman, A. Hannah and.
Vacuum Fundamentals 1 atmosphere = 760 mm Hg = kPa 1 torr = 1 mm Hg vacuum range pressure range low 760 ~ 25 torr medium 25~ high ~ 10.
P. Spiller, SIS18upgrade, Peter Spiller GSI, Darmstadt Kick off Meeting - EU Construction DIRAC Phase SIS18 upgrade.
Vacuum Fundamentals 1 atmosphere = 760 mm Hg = kPa 1 torr = 1 mm Hg vacuum range pressure range low 760 ~ 25 torr medium 25~ high ~ 10.
Introduction Current and proposed linear colliders, energy recovery linacs and light sources require high quality electron sources. In particular, low-emittance.
SuperKEKB Vacuum System - for the positron ring - Y. Suetsugu KEKB Vacuum Group Outline Design and production status of key components Beam pipes for arc.
ICFA Workshop, December 9-12, 2003 Andreas Krämer - GSI Darmstadt1 Ion Beam Induced Desorption Yield Measurements at GSI The 13th ICFA Beam Dynamics Mini-Workshop.
2009/1/16-18 ILD09 Seoul 1 Notes for ILD Beam Pipe (Technical Aspect) Y. Suetsugu, KEK Parasitic loss Vacuum pressure profile Some comments for beam pipe.
F. Le Pimpec 1 How DID they make light bulb work ? Bulb Installed in 1901 at the Livermore’s (CA) Fire station. C filament - 4 W ♦ Since 1800 the electric.
Plans for in-situ coating with a robotic mole at BNL Ady Hershcovitch 1, Michael Blaskiewicz 1, Wolfram Fischer 1, H. Joseph Poole 2, Mark Erickson 2,
1 of 30 rjrALBA Workshop, Barcelona, th Sept 2005 The Evolution of Vacuum System Design for Accelerators over 30 years at Daresbury Lab Ron Reid.
1 Vacuum chambers for LHC LSS TS Workshop 2004 Pedro Costa Pinto TS department, MME group Surface Characterization & Coatings Section.
September 17-21, 2007Workshop on ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design, SLAC IR Vacuum Systems first thoughts Oleg Malyshev ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
2007/09/17-21 SLAC IRENG07 1 A Basic Design of IR Vacuum system Y. Suetsugu, KEK Possibility of a pumping system without in-situ baking at z < L*
Outgassing Test and the Getter Specification
THIN FILMS FOR CLIC ELEMENTS Outline Motivation The role of MME-CCS DB and MB transfer lines Main beam Main beam quadrupoles Other issues conclusions CLIC.
E-cloud Remedies and PS2 vacuum design J.M. Jimenez AT Department – Vacuum Group CARE-HHH-APD BEAM’07 Thursday 04 October Session 2: PS2 E-cloud.
Sergio Calatroni TS/MME 1 Reactive sputtering Some references on TiN sputtering models –Berg et al. J. Appl. Phys. 63 (1988) 887 –Larsson Vacuum 39 (1989)
Estimates of residual gas pressure in the LHC Adriana Rossi AT-VAC Workshop on Experimental Conditions and Beam Induced Detector Backgrounds April.
Vacuum assessment for BI equipment TE-VSC. Why do we need to assess BI components 10/6/2015 BI Beam Operational Spare Strategy Workshop No 2 2 The main.
Title Page Design 3 Vacuum considerations for JLEIC beamline and Interaction Region Marcy L. Stutzman.
1 Vacuum in LER and HER. First estimation for the pumping system requirements (part II) A.Variola for B.Mercier, C.Prevost Annecy - Mars 2010.
Task 4.3: Mitigate beam-induced vacuum effects (STFC, CERN) O.B. Malyshev and R. Valizadeh, ASTeC Vacuum Science Group, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK EuroCirCol.
Task 4.3: Mitigate beam-induced vacuum effects (STFC, CERN) O.B. Malyshev and R. Valizadeh, ASTeC Vacuum Science Group, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK EuroCirCol.
2007/09/17 SLAC IRENG07 1 Comment on IR Vacuum system Y. Suetsugu Pumping System without in-situ baking at z < L*
5-7/11/2007 DR KOM ILC2007,CI, Daresbury, UK Vacuum Design Oleg B. Malyshev ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
τ- Charm Vacuum System Preliminary
Vacuum System P. Chiggiato TE-VSC
Vacuum Problems in the ILC Damping Ring
Beam induced desorption
SAES Project: Combination of NEG module and sputter ion pump
Zr-V NEG coatings studied by ESD
G.Bregliozzi - VSC-LBV Section Collimation working group 08/07/02013
Dr. Oleg B. Malyshev Senior Scientist ASTeC Vacuum Science Group
Electron cloud & vacuum pressure observations: 2011 proton run
Ageing of Non-Evaporable Getter (NEG) thin film coatings
CAS 2017 Vacuum simulations
CEPC Vacuum System Dong Haiyi 2017/11/5.
Cryogenic temperature for SPPC
Secondary electron yield of cryogenic surfaces as a function of physisorbed gases Asena Kuzucan TE-VSC-SCC.
STFC Contributions to the FCC Study
Beam Dump outline work plan (UK perspective)
Thermal Outgassing Rate for Various Beam Line Materials
RF Absorption Measurements from Beam Pipe Coatings
CAS 2017 Vacuum simulations
CEPC Vacuum Systems Design Consideration
Vacuum in LER and HER. First estimation for the pumping system requirements A.Variola for B.Mercier, C.Prevost, F.Letellier.
ECLOUD2018 WORKSHOP ELBA, ITALY
Presentation transcript:

INVESTIGATION OF NON-EVAPORABLE GETTER FILMS O. B. Malyshev, K.J. Middleman, A. Hannah and S. Patel ASTeC Vacuum Science Group, STFC Daresbury Laboratory, UK J.S. Colligon, R. Valizadeh and V. Vishnyakov Department of Chemistry, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop

What are usual considerations for vacuum Required pressure P is defined by gas desorption Q in the vessel and effective pumping speed Seff. In a simple case it is P Q U (l/s) Pump, S (l/s) Thermal, photon, electron and ion stimulated desorption 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Usual accelerator vacuum chamber Average pressure depends on vacuum conductance u of the beam vacuum chamber, which depends on the cross section and the length L 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Vacuum chamber with a distributed pump SIP in dipole and quadrupole magnetic field Does not pump when magnets off Requires HV supply Getter strip in LEP at CERN Does not pump Noble gases and CxHy Requires activation 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

NEG coated vacuum chamber Non-Evaporable Getter (NEG) coating magnetron sputtered onto the inner walls recent innovation technique developed at CERN and is an attractive solution for many UHV applications. One such application is in the vacuum systems of particle accelerators that have to be designed so as to provide sufficiently low pressure in the beam pipe during machine operation: NEG film have to be optimised to exhibit low photon, electron and ion stimulated desorption yields and reduce secondary electron emission. Pumping speed and capacity are important parameters for design. There are a number of issues which are still not yet fully understood to engineer, to optimise and to use such coatings. 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Why Do We Want to Coat the Chambers with NEG? Accelerator chambers have limited conductance of a few l/(sm). Especially in the insertion device chambers with gaps of ≤ 10mm. Need 10-10 mbar to reduce Bremsstrahlung radiation  Linear pumping Photons and charged particles will desorb electrons and molecules and impact the lifetime and stability of the beam 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Source of Gas in a Vacuum System Vacuum Subsurface Bulk layers Thermal ,photon, electron or ion stimulated desorption: Molecules diffusing through the bulk material (mainly subsurface layers) of the vacuum chamber, entering the surface and desorbing from it Molecules adsorbed on the surface (initially or after the air venting) and desorbing when vacuum chamber is pumped Outgassing rate depends on many factors: choice of material, cleaning procedure, pumping time, bombardment (irradiation) dose, etc... 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

What NEG coating does Vacuum NEG Subsurface Bulk Coating Layers A pure metal film ~1m thick without contaminants. A barrier for molecules from the bulk of vacuum chamber. A sorbing surface of entire vacuum chamber surface 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Stainless steel vs NEG coated vacuum chamber under SR 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Study and optimising the NEG coatings Collaboration between ASTeC and MMU was set-up Surface science: NEG film deposition (existing and new technologies) NEG film surface analysis with SEM, XPS, RBS, etc. Vacuum science: Pumping properties evaluation Gas dynamics modelling Photon, electron, ion stimulated desorption PEY and SEY Application to accelerator design (coating geometry, pumping scheme, activation procedure, etc.) Gas dynamic model in accelerator beam chamber 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Why Do We Want to Coat the Chambers with NEG?   e-, M  ΔP  , BS e-  e- (SEY), M  ΔP  , and cause multipacting and e-cloud in e+& hadron machine M+  ΔP  , stability NEG coated surface will reduce the surface desorption yields induced by photons , electrons e- and ions M+ provide pumping which in turn minimizing the desorption provide low SEY to suppress multipacting (which reduces electron stimulated desorption flux) and e-cloud 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

NEG coating is a technology for UHV and XHV The CO capacity of the NEG coating is about 1 monolayer for CO and CO2 If pressure during activation is 10-9 mbar, then the amount of molecules hitting the wall is an equivalent of If pressure of NEG-sorbing gases (CO, CO2, H2O) during activation P > ~10-10 mbar => the NEG film is continuously poisoning by these gases => the activation is not full 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

The conditions for NEG film activation To allow NEG film to be activated and not to be poisoned by residual gas molecules for the duration of the experiment: The background pressure due to thermal desorption from uncoated part should be better than 10-11 mbar for CO, CO2, H2O, O2 and N2 NEG film activation must be performed only after the bakeout of the uncoated parts of vacuum chamber, when desorption from uncoated parts of the test system is low the temperature of the test chamber and the NEG coated sample should be maintained independently (separate heaters and air or water cooling). The area and capacity of uncoated parts should be much smaller than NEG coated one to avoid NEG saturation during and after (re-)activation for the duration of time until the gas injection experiment started. No ‘short pressure increase’ can be tolerated after NEG coating activation. ex.: to switching on the gauge and the RGA, by opening or closing a valve, etc. 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Sample deposition Solenoid magnetron deposition Planar magnetron deposition 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Set-up for NEG pumping evaluation Sticking probability  is calculated from pressure measurements during gas injection using the results of TPMC: 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Usual activation procedure 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Reducing of CO, CO2 and H2O pressure in the open geometry set-up: There is an area where temperature changes from the temperature of the NEG coated sample TNEG to the temperature of the rest of vacuum chamber TVC: During the set-up bake-out this are is under-baked During the NEG activation this area temperature is higher than TVC and outgases. It might be the main source of gas. Area with transitional temperature Cooling channel TNEG TVC Test sample with NEG coating 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

ASTeC activation procedure 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Four TiZrV coated cup sample were prepared: NEG film density Four TiZrV coated cup sample were prepared: Cup 1: thin and columnar Cup 2: two times thicker and columnar Cup 3 & 4: dense and thick as Cup 2 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Cap 3 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Comparison of three samples - Thin - Thick - Dense 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

SEM images of films Cup 1 & 2: Cup 3 and 4: columnar dense 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Different combination of Ti, Zr, V and Hf NEG film composition Different combination of Ti, Zr, V and Hf Same deposition parameters Binary, ternary and quadruple alloys 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

TiV binary alloy coating 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Triple alloy coating TiZrV TiHfV 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

TiZrHfV quadruple alloy coating 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Binary alloy coatings: TiV, TiZr, ZrV… 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Ternary alloy coatings 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

TiZrHfV quadruple alloy coating 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Pressure along the arc: Application to ILC Pressure along the arc: inside an aluminium tube: Bakeout at 220C A pump with 200 l/s every 5 m H2, CO and CO2 Inside NEG coated tube Activation at 160-180 C A pump with 20 l/s every 30-40 m H2 and CH4 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Measured results don’t depend on injected gas flow rate. Conclusions New bakeout/activation procedure developed at ASTeC to minimise the NEG film poisoning from uncoated parts. Measured results don’t depend on injected gas flow rate. Columnar NEG structure, required for higher pumping speed and sorption capacity, is formed at higher pressure. Reduced pumping speed and sorption capacity measured for dense films deposited either at lower pressures or by pulsed sputtering. Larger number of element in the target allows reducing the grain size of the film which, in turn, increase the molecule diffusion along grain boundaries and led to a lower activation temperature. All together allows engineering the films with different properties 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev

Future investigations New understanding of physics and chemistry of the NEG coating allows to the next stage: engineering of NEG coating with necessary properties Study dynamic properties of new coatings such as: NEG as low dynamic outgassing NEG as low SEY coating Combination of both Accumulated experience allows Designing vacuum systems of new accelerators considering NEG coating and applying it where it is beneficial (DLS, ILC, NLS, FAIR, CLIC…) Using the NEG coating in the appropriate way. 20-21 January 2009, RAL Joint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Oleg Malyshev