State Strategies to Support Local Wellness Policies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Number of High School Graduates: National
Advertisements

Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2004 CONFERENCE, MOBILE, AL OCTOBER 09-11, 2004 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
Division of Students with Disabilities and English Language Learners May 2012 Developing High Quality IEPs Ensuring each student has access to their least.
School Wellness Policies School Nutrition Association.
Sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education as a component of the National Cooperative Education Statistics.
Birth Defects Tracking and Prevention: Too Many States Are Not Making the Grade Presentation by The Trust for America’s Health February 20, 2002.
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
U.S. Civil War Map On a current map of the U.S. identify and label the Union States, the Confederate States, and U.S. territories. Create a map key and.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. Title I - Part A In a nutshell….a primer.
This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,
1 National Healthy Start Association, Inc. Prepared for Secretary Advisory Committee on Infant Mortality January 2008 Historical Overview of the Healthy.
Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Grant Program Tate Gould, Program Officer US Department of Education.
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
1 Overview: The Federation of State Beef Councils.
Welcome to Wellness: Putting School Nutrition Legislation into Practice.
Sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education as a component of the National Cooperative Education Statistics.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
Vonda Fekete Nutrition Education and School Nutrition Programs Supervisor.
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
Annual Report. Submission of UCEDD Annual Report DD Act: required each center to submit annual report to the Secretary (ADD) DD Act: required each center.
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov 2009 NASCSP Annual Conference Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective September 16, 2009.
P OLICY & C ULTURE ECS 154 October 22, 2008 Ano Lobb.
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
Local Wellness Policy THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Office of Elementary, Middle, Secondary and Continuing Education School Operations and Management.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.
US MAP TEST Practice
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
Sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education as a component of the National Cooperative Education Statistics.
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
The Power of Promotion The Role of Public Affairs in Nutrition Programs Amanda D. Heitkamp | Public Affairs Specialist USDA, Food and Nutrition Service.
An innovative response to complex state and federal regulations for school wellness policies Amanda Philyaw Perez, MPH 1, Martha M. Phillips, PhD, MPH,
Elevate your local wellness policy Action for Healthy Kids Utah (AFHK)
1st Hour2nd Hour3rd Hour Day #1 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5.
NEADA Winter Meeting February 28, 2017.
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (CCSSM):
Table 2.1: Number of Community Hospitals,(1) 1994 – 2014
The United States Song Wee Sing America.
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
Chart 6. 12: Impact of Community Hospitals on U. S
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1992 – 2012
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
GLD Org Chart February 2008.
Membership Update July 13, 2016.
Table 2.1: Number of Community Hospitals,(1) 1981 – 2005
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1987 – 2007
State Adoption of Uniform State Test
The States How many states are in the United States?
State Adoption of NMLS ESB
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Regions of the United States
Hunger is a 'silent crisis' in the USA
DO NOW: TAKE OUT ANY FORMS OR PAPERS YOU NEED TO TURN IN
What is the BOG? Grassroots vehicle
Self-Reported Obesity Among U.S. Adults in 2012
Overview: The Federation of State Beef Councils
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
WASHINGTON MAINE MONTANA VERMONT NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MICHIGAN
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
Accomack County Wellness Policy Updates for Teachers: Fundraisers and Celebrations
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
Percent of adults aged 18 years and older who have obesity †
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Presentation transcript:

State Strategies to Support Local Wellness Policies Colin Pekruhn, MPP Project Associate National Association of State Boards of Education Center for Safe & Healthy Schools

Section 204 of Child Nutrition & WIC Act of 2004 Requires LEAs to adopt local wellness policies that include: Goals for nutrition education, physical activity, and other school based activities to promote student wellness; Nutrition guidelines for all foods available on each school campus during the school day with the objectives of promoting student health and reducing childhood obesity;

Section 204 An assurance that guidelines for reimbursable school meals shall not be less restrictive than regulations and guidance issued by the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture; and A plan for measuring the implementation of the local wellness policy, including the designation of one or more person within the LEA or at each school charged with operational responsibility of ensuring compliance with the policy.

Purpose & Methodology What are states doing to support to creation and implementation of local wellness policies? Examined state laws, policies, and agency guidance documents and resources that specifically support Section 204 requirements.

Outline of Findings 48 states are actively providing assistance and support to LEAs in support of Section 204 requirements in one or more of the following ways: Additional Accountability Requirements Additional Policy Content Requirements Policy Compliance Checking Resolutions Encouraging Local Policy Action Policy Guidance Materials State-level Advisory Councils Other State Initiatives

Additional Accountability Requirements States with laws or regulations to strengthen accountability provisions of local wellness policies

1. Accountability A. Integration into the General Education Accountability System 3 states: Rhode Island; Arkansas; and South Carolina Kentucky recommends it to districts Example: Rhode Island requires “all [district] strategic plans include strategies to decrease obesity and improve the health and wellness of students and employees through nutrition, PA, health education, and PE. Said strategies shall be submitted… to the Dept.’s of Elementary & Secondary Education and Health.

Potential Benefits - Integration Integration of local wellness policies into their general accountability system can: Assure that schools will address issues of student nutrition and physical activity; Place nutrition and physical activity on equal footing with academic and other high-importance areas; Communicate that the state considers school wellness as being important and imply that school improvement and school health go hand-in-hand; and Encourage schools to take a more active role in promoting professional development for staff in the area of wellness.

1. Accountability B. Requirements Strengthening Local Accountability 10 states: Arkansas; Rhode Island; South Carolina; Florida; Kentucky; New Mexico; Indiana; Tennessee; Alabama; and Mississippi. Example: Florida requires each district to annually review its local wellness policy.

Potential Benefits – Local Accountability Strengthening local accountability of districts in the creation, implementation, and evaluation of local wellness policies can: Involves community in policy process; Allows districts to receive community input; Increases community buy-in into wellness policy; and Raises awareness of student health issues.

1. Accountability C. State Evaluation of Local Policies Nov. 2005 Memo from Director of Child Nutrition at USDA states that state agencies need to provide oversight to determine compliance with Section 204 through on-site visits (e.g. School Meals Initiative Reviews). However, states only required to confirm that wellness policy is in place – no evaluation is required. 8 states do review and evaluate wellness policies: Pennsylvania; Colorado; Maryland; North Carolina; Kansas; New Mexico; New Jersey; and Hawaii.

1. Accountability Example: Kansas Through its NSL Renewal Agreement, requires LEAs to annually complete the online Wellness Policy Builder assessment tool to document their consideration of the state’s School Wellness Policy Guidelines as required by state law. The Department of Education’s Child Nutrition and Wellness staff, through their annual formal review, has officially incorporated monitoring of wellness policy implementation into their protocols. The required written wellness policy implementation plan of each LEA is also evaluated.

Potential Benefits – State Evaluation Active state review and critical evaluation can: Stimulate dialogue between SEA and LEAs in creating and implementing local wellness policies; Give the state a better idea of what is happening at the local level, which in turn informs the SEA of how best to provide technical assistance to local districts; and Allow local districts to draw on state resources to help them develop and implement effective policies that meet their particular needs.

1. Accountability D. Requirements for On-Going Reporting to the State State requires LEA to report on the wellness policy (creation, revisions, implementation, etc.). 5 states: Oklahoma; Kentucky; Tennessee; Nevada; and North Carolina.

Potential Benefits – State Review An on-going process of state monitoring or review is likely to prove beneficial: The SEA can better provide the proper technical assistance based on the actual needs of local schools and districts; and The SEA learns about local success stories resulting from the implementation of local wellness policies that can be shared with other LEAs, who can then reap the benefits of shared experiences and knowledge.

2. Additional Content Requirements States with legislation or regulations that include additional content requirements for local wellness policies

2. Content Requirements 10 states: West Virginia; Arkansas; New Mexico; Nevada; New Jersey; Tennessee; Indiana; Kentucky; Alabama; and Hawaii Example: West Virginia State Board of Education Position Statement refers LEAs to state’s pre-existing minimum standards when developing wellness policies

2. Content Requirements Example: Nevada State Board of Education’s Statewide School Wellness Policy: Sets nutritional standards for foods outside NSLP concerning fat, sodium, sugars, and serving size limits; Prohibits certain foods of MNV during the school day; Requires minimum eating times of at least 15 minutes for breakfast and 20 minutes for lunch; Requires at least 30 minutes of PA per day; and Includes minimum data collection and reporting requirements

Potential Benefits – Content Reqs Additional research-based content standards and requirements can: Augment the minimal federal law and allows the state can set a baseline for all schools; and Increase the likelihood that all students will receive the benefits of a healthy school environment

3. Policy Compliance Checking Some states have implemented a systematic approach to check for compliance with Section 204 (no critical assessment involved): Washington has a checklist for LEAs to complete, confirming adoption of each mandated component of a wellness policy. Florida requires LEAs to submit a copy of their policy to the state. Nebraska required LEAs to submit their policy to the state along with a brief checklist that required the identification of challenges the district faces in implementation.

4. Resolutions Encouraging Local Action The Colorado, Nevada, and Utah legislatures passed resolutions urging school districts adopt and implement wellness policies. The Montana, Connecticut, and West Virginia State Boards of Education adopted position statements encouraging districts to adopt and implement local wellness. policies

5. Policy Guidance Materials States that have developed their own wellness policy guidance materials

5. Policy Guidance Materials States have created guidance for LEAs in 4 ways: Summaries of existing state laws and policies Wellness policy assessment tools Wellness policy guides and tool kits Model policies

5A. Summaries of Existing Policies Some states have pre-existing laws and policies that address Section 204 requirements but exist outside of the requirement for local wellness policies. Arizona has a Healthy School Environment Policy and health and physical activity standards; and West Virginia has pre-established rules and regulations concerning nutrition and physical activity that it references in its position statement on wellness policies.

5B. Wellness Policy Assessment Tools Other states have created needs assessment and development instruments for LEAs: Iowa, in conjunction with Iowa State University, has implemented an online web tool for schools to use as a self-assessment when creating wellness policies Virginia, through the Governor’s office, has created an online Nutrition & Physical Activity Scorecard application that encourages competition amongst schools Kansas has created its online Wellness Policy Builder which documents and encourages consideration of the state’s School Wellness Policy Guidelines

5C. Wellness Policy Guides & Toolkits Most states, through their departments of education, agriculture, and/or health have created policy guides or tool kits: Connecticut’s Action Guide for School Nutrition and Physical Activity Policies Colorado’s Local School Wellness Policy: A Step By Step Guide to Implementing P.L. 108-265, Section 204 and Colorado Senate Bill 05-081 Mississippi’s Local School Wellness Policy Guide for Development Ohio’s Healthier Schools: A Brighter Tomorrow

5D. Model Policies States that provide locally-developed model wellness policies

5D. Model Policies At least 19 state departments of education or health offer their own model wellness policies. Many can be used verbatim to satisfy state and federal requirements Some offer additional options for language and topic areas (e.g. vending policies, fundraising, etc.) that policymakers can consider Some provide actual examples of “exemplary” local wellness policies from within and outside the state

Potential Benefits - State Resources Providing quality state resources for policy development and implementation is important: Each state has its own unique policy context Evaluative guidance in the form of online tools, checklists, and other data collection strategies can provide timely and relevant assistance to district personnel Well-researched guidance materials, technical assistance, and supporting policy can all contribute to improving school wellness and creating a healthy learning environment, which in turn leads to better health and academic outcomes for students.

6. State-Level Advisory Councils Several states have formed statewide councils to: Formulate policies; Strategies; Action plans; and Guidance to address childhood obesity and student wellness

State-Level Advisory Councils Delaware has formed a statewide council that will exist until 2011 to, amongst other duties, provide guidance to the state Department of Education and ensure that each school district has a health leadership team per Section 204 requirements Illinois requires the creation of a School Wellness Policy Taskforce to identify barriers to implementing wellness policies, recommend how to reduce the barriers, recommend statewide nutrition standards, and evaluate the effectiveness of the wellness policies

7. Other State Initiatives Indiana, North Dakota, and Vermont are conducting studies of local wellness policies via a voluntary survey of School Wellness Monitors South Dakota and Virginia have made wellness policy submission a requirement for state school health recognitions and awards.

Overview of the States Integrated local wellness policies into the general education accountability system and have additional policy content requirements (3 states). Additional accountability requirements and additional content requirements for local wellness policies (8 states). Additional accountability requirements or additional content requirements for local wellness policies (11 states). Produced guidance materials, passed a resolution, and/or created a state advisory committee. No additional content or accountability requirements (26 states).

Conclusion Given the broad and flexible nature of Section 204, states have an opportunity to: Harness the power of local policy impact Take on a leadership role in promoting school health. These strategies are potential tools to be used in meeting the challenge.

Questions? Colin Pekruhn, MPP Email: ColinP@nasbe.org Phone: 703.684.4000