Demonstrating Program Viability and Sound Success Strategies for Degree Granting Institutions May 3, 2017.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
Advertisements

What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Campus Improvement Plans
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator Best Practices: Program Review TCUs Chief Academic Officers Annual Meeting.
PCTIA Accreditation WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE APPLYING FOR ACCREDITATION.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
SEM Planning Model.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
Preparing for the On-site Evaluation: Strategies for Success November 5, 2009.
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
NCATE Standard 6 Governance and Resources: Debunking the Myths AACTE/NCATE Workshop Arlington, VA April 2008 Linda Bradley James Madison University
2012 Regional Assessment Workshops Session 2 Dr. Maryellen Cosgrove, Dean School of Business, Education, Health and Wellness Gainesville State University.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Middle States Steering Committee Overview of Standards March 20, 2008.
Fifth Year Report and Substantive Change Processes Presented by Dr. Belle S. Wheelan, President SACS Commission on Colleges April 29, 2009.
ADVISORY COUNCILS Department of Education Bureau of Career and Technical Education.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
Accreditation Visit: OMG! What if they ask me a question?? Accreditation Tri-Chairs: Kelly Irwin Ginni May Don Palm Fall 2015.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
What Your Program Needs to Know about Learning Outcomes Assessment at UGA.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Research Student Supervision – Update 2012 Dr Ann Hartley.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Session E Preparing an Effective Response for Commission Consideration / Commission Actions.
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Övergripande org. illustration
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness
Session D: The Accreditation Process.
Workshop 1 Self-Assessment Committee (SAC)
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
Alternative Education Programs
Curriculum and Accreditation
California Community Colleges
Teaching Excellence Development Fund
Sam Houston State University
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
ACCJC Standards Adopted june 2014.
SCHEV Strategic Plan Priorities
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Office of the University Provost & the Graduate College Present:
February 21-22, 2018.
Sam Houston State University
Fort Valley State University
Coastal Bend College’s Quality Enhancement Plan
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

Demonstrating Program Viability and Sound Success Strategies for Degree Granting Institutions May 3, 2017

Presented on behalf of the Program Review Committee Dr Presented on behalf of the Program Review Committee Dr. Julie Basler ACCSC School Commissioner Chair of Program Review Committee

Planning a New Degree Beginning the Process The Conversation Begins: A New Degree? Reasons for the New Degree How a School Decides on the Degree Area Internal vs. External Reasons for the New Degree Realistic Work Commitment from a School Realistic Time Frame

Planning a New Degree-Consider the Standards Section II (A) (2), Substantive Standards Explain in detail the reason or basis for offering of the proposed degree program Be specific here about why this program needs to be at a degree level Consider a program level review (compare to other programs in your area and other programs across the nation) How will your community be impacted by this degree? How is your proposed program different from similar programs? How is the curriculum different in the degree program besides adding general education?

Planning a New Degree-Consider the Standards Section II (A) (2), Substantive Standards Explain how the curriculum is consistent with the mission of the school and the school’s goals and objectives Does the proposed program align with the school’s mission and goals? How is the proposed program consistent with the mission? How will the proposed program be included in IAIP measurements? Short term vs. long term planning

Planning a New Degree-Consider the Standards Section II (A) (2), Substantive Standards Provide a detailed justification as to how completing this degree would benefit students If this program is currently offered at the certificate level, how does a degree enhance the student’s ability for employment? What’s the difference between the same or similar program (certificate vs. degree) How does completing a degree impact gainful employment? Consider the ratio of the cost for the program vs. entry level salary

Reason for Offering Program Curriculum Consistent with Mission Benefit to Students Planning can NOT occur in an administrative vacuum. Involve the people at your school. Take the application questions and consider writing them into interrogatives. Example: Describe how the school…… How do we prove that we can…….

Planning a New Degree-Consider the Standards Section II (A) (2), Substantive Standards Provide a detailed narrative regarding the school’s: Assessment of Program Viability How the Program Meets the Needs of Students and Employees Local Employment Outlook The Need for Training Socioeconomic Factors in the Area that may Affect the Proposed Program’s Outcomes

Justification of the Proposed Degree Program New Program What will be evaluated? What criteria will be used? How is success measured? Available Evidence Assessment of Program Viability Fight the temptation to take existing courses “as is” from a diploma program and reuse them in original form. The question here becomes: Why does a student need to take the same course in a degree program?

Justification of the Proposed Degree Program Program Meets the Needs of Students and Employers Student Needs Training Employer Needs Qualified People Gainfully Employed

Today Future Justification of the Proposed Degree Program Local Employment Outlook Upon Graduation Initial Employment Today 1 Year 3 Years Looking Ahead Future

Justification of the Proposed Degree Program The Need for Training Student Training Community Need What are examples of internal and external resources that might help validate? Internal: individuals from the subject/program area that perhaps work at your school already, student course feedback, connections your faculty and staff have with industry professionals External: Subject-matter specialists, technicians, employers, PAC members, professional societies, local community colleges/universities, trade associations, alumni, and state regulators

Justification of the Proposed Degree Program Socioeconomic Factors that May Affect Program Outcomes IAIP and Strategic Goals Approval process and other requirements Clear SOC Code Identified Employment Trends Overall in Community Importance of Clear Outcomes

Sample Items to Consider for Program Viability An overview to tie proposed program to College mission, the needs of students and community, and the instructional resources the school has or plans to incorporate Program outcomes and program effectiveness

Sample Items to Consider to Program Viability IAIP clear measurements which include new program PAC recommendations that are clear and relevant to the program Timeline of approvals and processes involved that are realistic

Justification of the Proposed Degree Program Questions to Consider: What is expected enrollment? Is the need for this skill set (degree) needed nationally, regionally, in your community? Is the field growing? Staying static? (nationally, regionally, and in your community)

Justification of the Proposed Degree Program Questions to Consider: Tuition vs. entry level salary-is it worth it? Do you have the correct people in place? The correct services ready? Will your school culture support the new program? If yes, how?

Educational Administration infrastructure Educational Administration Dir of Education Program Chair LRS Coordinator Faculty Qualifications Student Services What is Needed? How will this Change Existing Culture? Facilities, Equipment & LRS

Facilities Equipment & LRS infrastructure Program Design Program Design & Development Established process for the design and development of the school’s training Program Length & Organization Appropriate to enable students to acquire skills necessary for initial employment Curriculum Detailed and organized instructional outlines and course syllabi for each program Equipment Comprehensive and reflect occupational practice; sufficient to meet student needs; properly maintained Program Evaluation Systematic and evidence-based process to evaluate and revise curriculum and course content – programmatic outcomes assessment Facilities Equipment & LRS

Facilities Equipment & LRS infrastructure Culture Change Evaluate Curriculum Future Budget Allocations Facilities (Need to Expand) External Help PAC Systematic and evidence-based to evaluate curriculum and content Program Evaluation Facilities Equipment & LRS What’s being measured? What method is being used? When should component be measured? Initiated by? Benchmark or expected level of achievement? Documentation and the findings

Facilities Equipment & LRS infrastructure The Importance of PAC Independent PAC for the new program (very clear and thoughtful review prior to submission) Purpose is to review the established curricula, program materials, equipment, facilities and student achievement in order to provide the institution with an external review of its programs Three (3) representatives from employment community, general education at program conception, and distance education if applicable Two (2) meetings annually, one of which must be held at the institution. To begin, what is needed? Written and detailed minutes are maintained and include a clear and comprehensive description of the review and commentary made by the PAC. Facilities Equipment & LRS

Facilities Equipment & LRS infrastructure Existing Services are Not Enough Services (Fiscal, Physical, Emotional Well-Being) Academic Services and Enhanced Career Services Facilities Equipment & LRS Student Services

Facilities Equipment & LRS infrastructure Learning Resource System Facilities Equipment & LRS Must include all materials that support a student’s educational experience and enhance a school’s educational programs: Libraries Texts Electronic Resources Internet Access May be centralized or decentralized, but must be easily and readily accessible to students

infrastructure Learning Resource System An Institution must have written polices and procedures for the ongoing development of its learning resource system. Managed by Qualified School Personnel with Sufficient Experience Must Include Materials Commensurate with Level of Education Provided: Research Journals & Databases Text & Periodicals Electronic Resource Technologies Integrated into Schools Curriculum Facilities Equipment & LRS Must include all materials that support a student’s educational experience and enhance a school’s educational programs:

Facilities Equipment & LRS infrastructure Class Expert: Just because someone teaches in a certificate program doesn’t mean they are qualified to serve in the degree program Class Manager: New programs require your A team! Bring your very best to build the reputation of the program from the beginning. Meeting Requirements: Meeting requirements is the first step. Selecting experts is the second. Training them to be extraordinary in the classroom is the third step. Facilities Equipment & LRS Faculty Qualifications If faculty information is not available, submitting specific hiring criteria and timelines when faculty will be hired is fine, but be very specific about the ideal candidate for the job.

Facilities Equipment & LRS infrastructure Student Advisement Plans Faculty Development and Improvement Plans Clear and Consistent Outcomes Academic Support Systems in Place Talking with Other Programs About Anticipating What to Encounter “Keep the Plates Spinning”-Don’t Forget Your Other Programs Spreading Faculty and Resources Too Thin Faculty/Student Interaction Facilities Equipment & LRS Faculty Student

Facilities Equipment & LRS infrastructure Management and Administration Student Graduate Support Staff Leadership Facilities Equipment & LRS Sufficient Educational Administration Director of Education Program Head (Lead Faculty, Department Head) Meeting Degree Requirements is Needed, but Experience is Key Clear Organizational Chart Students Want Their Needs Met Now-How to Handle

Facilities Equipment & LRS infrastructure Potential Applicant Enrolled Successful Student Graduate Employed Citizen Admission Requirements Facilities Equipment & LRS Numbers Don‘t Necessarily Equate to Success Admissions Requirements and Procedures-What is the Standard in the Proposed Field? A Clear Outline in a Draft Catalog Presentation

Facilities Equipment & LRS infrastructure Administrative Support Staff Facilities Equipment & LRS Career Services Student Services Financial Aid Admissions A New Degree Requires a Lot of Support When Creating a Proposed Budget-Do you need to consider allocations for additional staff? Do you have a staff that is supportive of the proposed program? Do you have a staff that is trained to work with potential applicants, students, and graduates of the proposed program?

Facilities Equipment & LRS infrastructure Successful Design Successful Externship Externship (if Applicable) Facilities Equipment & LRS Written Training Plan On-Site Evaluation Criteria Supervised and/or Coordinated by Qualified Individual

When it All Comes Together Student Success Employer Needs Program Length Education Resources Faculty Qualifications Recruitment Admissions Student Progress Student Services

Logical Timeline Schools should have their degree applications in at LEAST 60 days prior to the desired implementation date, as staff usually requests additional info, and the Commission’s review and approval process for unrelated degree programs may take additional time

Actions Approve Approve with Onsite Evaluation (all first time and unrelated degree programs) Approve with Stipulations Approve with Program Implementation Enclosure Defer Deny

For more information to enhance your school’s educational experience visit: www.accsc.org/resources There you will find practical guidance for ACCSC institutions through the Monograph Series which includes topics such as: Maximizing Program Advisory Committees Learning Resource Systems Faculty Improvement Planning/Implementation Self Evaluation Processes and Practices Institutional Assessment and Improvement Planning/Implementation

Demonstrating Program Viability and Sound Success Strategies for Degree Granting Institutions May 3, 2017