SAHS Advanced Placement Program Evaluation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mt. Diablo Unified School District
Advertisements

Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
Educator Evaluations Education Accountability Summit August 26-28,
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50
Presented by Dr. Kristan Rodriguez, Assistant Superintendent of Schools Follow the Path of DDM Development in Chelmsford.
NEW TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS CONNECTING TEACHER PERFORMANCE to ACADEMIC PROGRESS.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
1 PROPOSED REORGANIZATION STUDENT SERVICES DIRECTOR DOVER, SHERBORN, AND DOVER-SHERBORN REGIONAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS WINTER, 2012.
Smaller Learning Communities Director Deborah Coco Advanced Placement Initiative Director ChanTam Trinh High School Graduation Initiative Director John.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
Charles Pack Jr. WorkKeys and KeyTrain Help Make The Academy of Careers and Technology A West Virginia Exemplary School.
Update on Virginia’s Growth Measure Deborah L. Jonas, Ph.D. Executive Director for Research and Strategic Planning Virginia Department of Education July-August.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Talent Development Initiative: Cate Reed Allison McCarthy Education Committee February 8th, 2011.
The Middle States Accreditation Process Schreiber High School.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
District Strategic Technology Committee. Purposes Submit technology bridge plan to MDE by June 30 (original) Evaluate current resources of the district,
West Central Community School District Performance Document: Formative Evaluation Tool By John Johnson ortheast Iowa Charter School Northeast Charter School.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
High Schools That Work An evidence-based design for improving the nation’s schools and raising student achievement.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
SELF-ASSESSMENT SURVEY: TRADEWINDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Superintendent Report September 22, Ground rules  Every challenge is real & unique  The experts are in the room  We absolutely can find solutions.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
SAT, End of Course, SAT, End of Course, & Advanced Placement RESULTS2014 October 14, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent Dr. Kevin O’Gorman, Associate.
Office of Service Quality
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
It’s more than an exam… It’s an experience
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
World’s Best Workforce (WBWF)
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Department of Political Science & Sociology North South University
New York State Education Department CTE Updates
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Alaska Superintendents Association Fall Meeting 2016
Courtney Mills Principal, Midlands Middle College
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Close Reading and Instructional Rounds
District Improvement Plan June 26, 2017
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
A System of Assessments for College and Career Readiness For the Anaheim Union High School District Prepared and presented by Dr. Paul Sevillano, Assistant.
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
NAEP and PSAT Last updated: 08/20/09.
Mississippi Succeeds Madison County Business League & Foundation
Sustaining and building on the excellence of LCPS
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Continuous Improvement/eProve Regional Trainings
Data-Based Decision Making
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
Essential Questions What are the ramifications of continued identification under the ESEA Accountability Act? What do we need to do to get our school.
Local District G ENGLISH LEARNER / CCR REVIEW FINDINGS
NAEP and PSAT Last updated: 08/20/09.
Superintendent’s Goals October 20, 2015
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Mississippi Succeeds Unprecedented Achievement, Unlimited Potential
Presentation transcript:

SAHS Advanced Placement Program Evaluation Education-Personnel Committee July 12, 2007

District Goal From October 18, 2006 E-P Meeting 5. The Sunshine Area School District will develop and pilot a system of program evaluation. The Superintendent will assist district administrators, building administrators and teacher-leaders in the process of evaluating and reporting on a major academic program (Advanced Placement) that will include: interrogation of program data, development of specific performance goals, and the use of a standardized evaluation format.

Practically… Program evaluation provides a specific answer to the question, “How do we know if the program or operating system is being successful or meeting its stated purpose?”

When is Program Evaluation Most Useful When the significant time, material and human costs of planning the evaluation, setting the standards, collecting the data, engaging in data analysis, drawing conclusions, writing reports, and presenting findings are outweighed by the increased organizational efficiency or success gained by the evaluation.

The 4 T’s Needed for Successful Program Evaluation Training of program evaluators so that they can develop a scientific evaluation plan Time to develop goals, questions and criteria Trust among all stakeholders that the evaluation’s intended purpose is indeed the purpose Technology to ease the data collection and analysis

Why Advanced Placement as the Area for Program Evaluation? AP is a key part of the overall SAHS program and high school reform effort potential benefits to the organization will outweigh the evaluation costs Large amounts of data and data measures The 4 T’s exist in the SASD

The AP Evaluation Process…. The Advanced Placement Program Evaluation Team (APPET) was formed. The team met monthly and included: Department Coordinators in Science, Math, English, Social Studies and Guidance High School Principal Assistant Superintendent

Learning Curve The APPET learned about national trends in Advanced Placement and AP issues The APPET learned about Program Evaluation. The APPET studied in depth the history and achievement of the AP program at the SAHS

The Key AP Questions…. Question #1—Does the SAHS provide an adequate number of AP courses?

The Key AP Questions… Question #2—Does the SAHS Advanced Placement program involve all of the potentially-qualified students?

The Key AP Questions… Question #3—Are specific benchmarks and/or goals for the SAHS students’ AP participation and achievement known by all of the stakeholders and used for program improvement?

Does the SAHS Provide an Adequate Number of AP Courses? EVALUATION: Yes. The most nationally-prevalent AP courses are offered in all of the SAHS’s departments. FOR 07-08: Implement AP American Government and maintain AP Physics courses; Continue monitoring trends in AP offerings STANDARD: Deliver all AP courses, with College Board-approved syllabi, as described in the SAHS Program of Studies

Does the SAHS Advanced Placement program involve all of the potentially-qualified students? EVALUATION: No. Students largely self-select their participation. Identification and recruitment efforts are inconsistent. A definition of “potentially-qualified,” and a baseline level of “potentially-qualified students,” must be developed and disseminated to stakeholders.

All potentially-qualified students? (cont.) FOR 07-08: Develop a data-driven definition of potentially-qualified by incorporating ranges from successful AP students’ PSAT score profiles and PSSA cut scores. Set annual school AP participation goal—yearly increase in number and percentage. Execute needed training of AP teachers.

In 07-08 (Cont.) Departments set participation goals in their own subject areas Create and circulate Introduction to the SAHS Advanced Placement Program publication. Make AP Program structure and goals a part of the orientation process when students transition to the SAHS

In 07-08 (Cont.) Vertical teaming—designate “pre-AP” and pathway courses that naturally lead to AP courses Use Grade 8 PSSA data to recruit high performing freshmen into AP courses during their Sophomore year.

In 07-08 (Cont.) Administer PSAT to all 10th and 11th grade students to create expanded list of students with AP potential. Expand recruitment accordingly. Budget permitting, execute a reliable graduate survey to develop longitudinal data related to the effectiveness of SAHS AP programs.

Are Benchmarks/Goals for SAHS students’ AP participation known and used for improvement? EVALUATION: No. A standard measure, goal setting procedure, and reporting system are needed. FOR 07-08: Establish the College Board AP Equity and Excellence Index (EEI) and Graduate Survey Data (if available) as the numerical bases for program performance

Benchmarks /Goals (cont.) Establish EEI trend line of AP student performance in 2006 and 2007 Establish annual EEI improvement as a building and department goal Investigate improved use of scheduling and time to complement AP participation and achievement goals.

Immediate Steps…. Solidify 2007-2008 Advanced Placement Goals with SAHS Administrators, Department Coordinators and AP Teachers. Provide updates to the Superintendent/Board on progress made on goals.