PFC Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Washington Department
Advertisements

LENTIC SYSTEMS ASSESSING FUNCTIONALITY LENTIC SYSTEMS.
Riparian Proper Functioning Condition A process for assessment A defined condition A starting point A common language An interdisciplinary team approach.
Step 4: Complete PFC assessment §17 questions about attributes and processes §Reminder – PFC based on: l Water (hydrology), l Vegetation, and l Soil &
Vegetation Soil, Landscape Hydrology Process for Assessing Proper Functioning Condition Vegetation Items.
LENTIC CHECKLIST. NATURAL RIPARIAN RESOURCES LENTIC CHECKLIST HYDROLOGIC.
Wetland and Riparian Mapping in Montana Karen Newlon, Montana Natural Heritage Program Helena, MT Montana Wetland Council University of Montana-Missoula.
Project Collaboration In 1999, as a result of several years of monitoring of neotropical migratory birds such as the willow flycatcher, Jim Steele from.
Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Landscape/Soil Water.
WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Module 7, part C – Assessment.
Wetlands Important and often unappreciated lands..
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
Biological Objectives Tied to Physical Processes Dr. William Trush Scott McBain Arcata, CA.
Chapter 10 Wetlands. I. What determines a Wetland? A. The nature and properties of wetlands varies widely in Texas and worldwide, wetlands are typically.
Overview of Watershed Systems
Range Practices 1 Objectives and Range Practices under FRPA & Objectives & Objectives The Focus is on Results.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
PFC Assessment Approach & Definitions Creeks and Communities.
SPRNCA: Maintaining Riparian/Wetland Function. What does that mean today? Isn’t SPRNCA already “protected and enhanced?” When will it be “good enough”?
Watershed Assessment and River Restoration Strategies
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® 2012 Changes to Stream Mitigation Procedures and Guidelines Mike Moxey USACE, Mobile District IRT Chair May.
Watershed Assessment and Diagnosis of Condition for August 20, 2007 Joe Magner and Greg Johnson MPCA.
Step 1: Assess Riparian Resource Function Using PFC §1d. Complete PFC assessment l 17 questions about attributes and processes l Reminder – PFC based on:
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Natural Riparian Resources Water Landscape & SoilVegetation.
Channel Modification Washington Dept. Forestry, 2004, Channel Modification Techniques Katie Halvorson.
1c. Determine Reach Potential 1b. Review Existing Information & Delineate & Stratify Reaches 1a. Identify Assessment Area & Assemble ID Team 1d. Complete.
Assessing Riparian Function YOUR remarkable RIPARIAN.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
1 CREEKS & COMMUNITIES & RIPARIAN PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION Introduction.
Riparian Proper Functioning Condition A process for assessment A defined condition A starting point A common language An interdisciplinary team approach.
Claytor Lake Debris Study. Hydro Environmental Services of Kleinschmidt Associates  Shoreline Management Plans (SMP)  Aquatic & Terrestrial Habitat.
WATERSHED INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT Module 7, part A – Issues and Description.
Mission, Brender, and Yaksum Creeks Habitat Conditions Low flows and associated high temperatures affect distribution and abundance of native species.
Understanding Creeks, Rivers, and Riparian Areas.
1 Objectives 1. Why quantitative data? 2. Relationship to attributes and indicators 3. Accuracy and precision of qualitative and quantitative indicators.
ASSESSING PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION for LENTIC AREAS Introduction
Bear Creek OR 1976 Bear Creek OR Burro Creek AZ 1981 Burro Creek AZ 2000.
RIPARIAN PROPER FUNCTIONING CONDITION A Tool for Integrating the Fundamental Sciences into Collaborative Decision-Making.
SUMMARY. Summary Instructions After the checklist is filled out and rationale documented, the ID Team discusses the responses, reads the category definitions.
CREEKS & COMMUNITIES Laura Van Riper – Social Scientist National Riparian Service Team.
Riparian Areas: Functions and Conditions Authors: Gene Surber, MSU Extension Natural Resources Specialist Bob Ehrhart, Research Specialist, RWRP, Univ.
Importance of low-flow and high- flow characteristics to restoration of riparian vegetation along rivers in arid south-western United States Stromberg.
Habitat Mapping of High Level Indicators at Multiple Scales for Fish and Wildlife.
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
Definitions.
Natural Riparian Resources Erosion/Deposition Water Vegetation.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Clearing and Site Preparation and Site.
Environmental Flow Instream Flow “Environmental flow” is the term for the amount of water needed in a watercourse to maintain healthy, natural ecosystems.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
Coordinated Resource Management Planning (CRMP) Who, What, Where, Why, When ?? So What ??
DELAWARE NATIONAL ESTUARINE RESEARCH RESERVE Promoting stewardship of the nation’s coastal areas through science and education …
Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Landscape/Soil Water.
BLM Standards & Guidelines
FUNCTIONALITY of LENTIC SYSTEMS
Restoring Montane Meadow Systems for Ecosystem Services
Section 1: What Is an Ecosystem?
Rebecca Tharme Riverfutures Limited – UK
Section 1: What Is an Ecosystem?
Rangeland Principles (Rem 151)
Restoring Montane Meadow Systems for Ecosystem Services
Chapter 6 Section 1.
PFC Introduction.
LENTIC CHECKLIST.
LENTIC GEOMORPHOLOGY.
Freshwater Systems = <1 % of Earth’s total water!
Earth’s Fresh Water.
Springsnail Conservation in Nevada and the Great Basin
Riparian and Wetland Ecosystems
Presentation transcript:

PFC Introduction

3/13/2018 Although definitions abound, riparian areas are noticeable by their distinct vegetation found in areas where water flows or collects.

Riparian Proper Functioning Condition 3/13/2018 Riparian Proper Functioning Condition A process for assessment A defined condition A starting point A common language An interdisciplinary team approach Explain how the Riparian PFC class can meet most if not all of these expectations because PFC is A process for assessment helps people focus on the physical functioning of riparian systems. PFC is also a defined condition that meets certain expectations important for handling even the forces of moving water. PFC provides a starting point for assessment to which can be added any other data that is useful or needed and a starting point for physical functions that often causes systems to get better even through floods and droughts. The approach provides a common language for people from different disciplines and different walks of life to discuss the diversity and complexities of riparian areas and their management. It accomplishes all this by using an interdisciplinary team approach as exemplified by the Nevada PFC Training Cadre or Creeks and Communities Team.

PFC has: Had more peer review than most assessment methods Used for over 20 years, Training by State Teams, and Tool for developing a common vocabulary.

Revision of TR 1737-15 – Version 2 Expand on Pre-Work and Stratification Potential is described in detail “Capability,” is removed “Altered potential” guidelines helps users evaluate how human alterations affect potential. Include Observational Indicators/ Examples New science, change & clarification of assessment item wording, more detail Updated quantitative procedures

Appendix B provides a list of possible quantitative techniques for stream assessment. Calibration where answers are uncertain Accurately and precisely monitor change in a particular attribute. Burton et al. (2011) provides a “PFC Validation Table” in the MIM data analysis module For 16 of 17 Items Quantitative metrics for PFC Items Measurements (References) Interpretation, Notes

The PFC Assessment Tool Requires an interdisciplinary (ID) team Vegetation Hydrology Soils Biology Landowner or Permittee can add history and management Local, on-the-ground experience in interpreting quantitative sampling techniques that support the PFC assessment. TR 1737-15 (1998) page 1: PFC is a qualitative assessment based on quantitative science. The PFC assessment is intended to be performed by an interdisciplinary team with local, on-the-ground experience in the kind of quantitative sampling techniques that support the PFC checklist. TR1737-9 (1993, revised 1998) page 2: “The team should include specialists in vegetation, soils, and hydrology. A biologist also needs to be involved because of the high fish and wildlife values associated with riparian-wetland areas.” [Panguitch Creek, Dixie National Forest, UT 6/21/2000. Interdisciplinary team.]

An ID Team needs to: Review existing documents. Determine attributes and processes key to area being assessed. Determine potential or altered potential for the site. Determine a “functional rating”. Provide written comments on all items unless N/A.

NV Creeks and Communities Team – Most Active 3/13/2018 Sherm Swanson, Range w/wildlife, hydro, soils Kent McAdoo, Wildlife and Range Chuck Petersen, Range Carol Evans, Fisheries John McCann, Hydrology Doug Merkler, Soils Bob Hall, Geomorphology Water Quality Sarah Peterson, Hydrology Robin Wignall, Hydrology Mark Coca, Range Jerry Annis, Ranch management Pat Coffin, Fisheries John Cobourn, Hydrology The most active partners in the Nevada Cadre come from a variety of disciplines --

NV Creeks and Communities Team 3/13/2018 NV Creeks and Communities Team Sherm Swanson, UNR Coop. Extension, Coordinator Kent McAdoo, UNR Coop. Extension John McCann, US Forest Service Carol Evans, BLM Chuck Petersen, NRCS Bob Hall, EPA Connie Lee, NV Dept of Wildlife Desi Zamudio, Private Citizen Jerry Annis, Rancher Jeff Jesch, Hillside Des. and Cons. Conservation District Robin Wignall, US Forest Service Sarah Petersen, BLM Mark Coca, BLM Beth Wood, BLM Steve Foster, UNR Coop. Extension John Cobourn, UNR Coop. Extension Alan Genet, NV Dept of Wildlife And the Cadre represents a diversity of agencies and other entities. This is not a process that only applies to one agency’s lands and not to just public lands. The language and approach can be used throughout the watershed.

PFC is designed to: Be used to assess physical function of perennial & intermittent streams Be used on most stream & river systems Be used by an experienced interdisciplinary team Provide consistent approach for assessing physical function of riparian areas

PFC is designed to: Help establish, focus, & prioritize management, monitoring, & restoration activities Provide a focused and effective foundation for determining resource values & developing management goals Communicate fundamental riparian concepts

PFC is: Used to describe both the assessment process & on-the-ground condition. A minimum level or starting point for riparian area stability and sustained function. A qualitative assessment based on quantitative science.

PFC is not designed to: Assess the function of ephemeral systems Be completed without an ID team Assess specific resource values or be the sole method for assessing the health of the aquatic or terrestrial components of a riparian area

PFC is not designed to: Assess functions where human alterations created artificial channel conditions. Normally equate to desired condition. Replace watershed analysis.

PFC is not: A long-term monitoring tool. A replacement for quantitative inventory or monitoring. PFC complements more detailed methods by providing context to synthesize data and communicate results.

PFC cannot: Provide more than strong clues as to actual habitat condition for plants & animals. Eliminate the need for more intensive inventory & monitoring protocols. A non-functioning physical condition will not provide quality habitat conditions, except for early seral species habitat requirements for certain plants and animals. A pfc would either be providing quality habitat conditions, or would be moving in that direction if recovery is allowed to continue. A riparian area that is FAR would likely lose any habitat that exists in a high-flow event. Needed to validate that riparian area recovery is indeed moving toward or has achieved desired condition or simply to establish what the existing habitat quality is.

Watersheds Capture, Store & Safely Release Water 3/13/2018 Watersheds Capture, Store & Safely Release Water The job of a watershed is to capture, store, and safely release the water from precipitation. Think of a sponge in the bottom of a sink. This is critically important to riparian plants, fish, and wildlife. For our western lands, precipitation is not constant, regular, or even very predictable, with variable dry seasons that overlap the hottest part of the year when riparian areas experience maximum evaporation and transpiration. The alluvial aquifer of the riparian area performs this duty best when it functions properly. However, streams and floodplains vary widely in their ability to store water as illustrated by this labeling of different stream types.

RIPARIAN AREAS UPLAND RIPARIAN 3/13/2018 A form of wetland transition between aquatic and adjacent upland areas Exhibit vegetation or physical characteristics of permanent surface or subsurface water LAND ADJACENT to PERENNIAL or INTERMITTENT STREAMS, SPRINGS, SEEPS, PONDS, ETC. Riparian areas vary from the wetness of the aquatic ecosystem to the dryness of the adjacent upland. They also vary across a wide variety of water features, each with characteristic energies, forces, soils, flora, and fauna. The surface and subsurface water makes them special and obvious because of the unique vegetation structure that it supports. UPLAND RIPARIAN

STREAM TYPES PERENNIAL - a stream that flows continuously 3/13/2018 STREAM TYPES PERENNIAL - a stream that flows continuously INTERMITTENT OR SEASONAL - a stream that flows only at certain times of the year EPHEMERAL - a stream that flows only in direct response to precipitation INTERUPTED – a stream that flows below the surface in certain areas Perennial and intermittent or seasonal streams provide water for periods long enough to grow the species that we collectively call riparian vegetation. Many of theses species adapted for life in saturated soils have special features to withstand the flow forces of these high energy environments. Plants with dense root systems that bind soils, the flexibility to bend in a flood and spring back provide roughness again in the next flood, or that produce woody debris that provides the reinforcing structure of some stream bottoms may not grow along ephemeral streams. This assessment approach is tested for perennial and intermittent streams where these plants do their work.

3/13/2018 This stream is high up in the mountains and it tumbles over big rocks. Riparian vegetation is present, but is not the major stability factor. Because PFC is rated for the potential of each area, considerations for this area should be quite different from systems elsewhere on the mountain or further down the valley. PFC?

3/13/2018 Here too we have rocks and riparian vegetation. For its setting does it meet the definition for pfc? PFC?

3/13/2018 This system dominated by woody riparian shrubs has yet another potential. Does it have the structure it needs to function? PFC?

3/13/2018 Beavers played a keystone species role in the formation of many valley bottoms. By damming streams and capturing sediment, they helped form the floodplains and determined the soils and future plant communities. Big changes happen when unstable dams wash out. PFC?