Update on Sirolimus Coated Balloon Technologies

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides PEPCAD II ISR Study Paclitaxel-eluting devices: randomized comparison of the SeQuent™ please.
Advertisements

“Real World”: SVG, De Novo or Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions Chronic Stable Angina, Silent Ischemia, Acute Coronary Syndromes Vessel Diameters:
M.Unverdorben; ACC March 2008 Martin Unverdorben Rotenburg/Fulda, Germany and Richmond, VA, USA Clinical Research Institute, Center for Cardiovascular.
Drug Coated Balloons From Bench to Bedside Service de Radiodiagnostic et Radiologie Interventionnelle Université de Lausanne Salah D. Qanadli, MD, PhD,
3rd CEEGI Advisory Board1 Resolute in the DES era: Indications & Limitations Georgios I. Papaioannou, MD, MPH, FACC, FSCAI Athens Medical Center Cardiac.
1 Michael Dake, MD Research/Research Grants, Clinical Trial Support –W. L. Gore –Cook Medical Consulting Fees/Honoraria –W. L. Gore –Abbott Vascular Equity.
M.Unverdorben; TCT Problem The treatment of stenoses of small coronary arteries (SVD) and of restenoses after stent deployment (ISR) still show.
12-Month Analysis Barry T. Katzen MD, FACR, FACC Founder and Medical Director Baptist Cardiac & Vascular Institute.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial Evaluating a Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon in Patients TReated with Endothelial Progenitor Cell CapTuring Stents for De Novo.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
Boston Scientific Drug eluting stent program A Scientific Approach Identify therapeutic agent Identify appropriate polymer carrier Evaluate a broad range.
A Prospective, Randomized Trial of a Paclitaxel coated Balloon vs. uncoated Balloon Angioplasty in Patients with Drug- Eluting Stent Restenosis PEPCAD-DES.
Final 5 year results from the all-comer COMPARE trial: a prospective randomized comparison between Xience-V and Taxus Liberté TCT 2013 San Francisco Pieter.
November 9, 2015 February 20, 2017 Using real world evidence – industry perspective Pma indication expansion Melissa hasenbank, phd Sr. Clinical Research.
Global Experience with Peripheral DCBs/Stent Studies: C.R. Bard
David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators
Disclosures Runlin Gao has received a research grant
Can Drug-Coated Balloons Work in Synergy with Stent Grafts?
My initial ABSORB experience Assoc. Prof. I. Petrov
The Invatec Program Features and Clinical Trials
Runlin Gao, M.D. On behalf of ABSORB China Investigators
Lutonix® Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon to Treat Obstructive Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Popliteal Arteries Preliminary Six-Month Results from.
DCB for In-Stent Restenosis: Is It Superior to DES?
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
The (Potential) Role of Drug Eluting Balloons in BTK Interventions
THE SCIENCE BEHIND IN.PACTTM Drug Coated Balloon technology: Understand the science behind the latest evidence     FRANCESCO Jatta, Ph.D. IN.PACT.
A Novel Abluminal Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stent as a Treatment Option for Diabetic Patients: Results from an All-Comers Multi-center Study: the En-ABL.
MiStent SES® Program Technology and Clinical Data Update
Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloons for De Novo Lesions
Current Results of Drug Coated Balloons
One DES Eluting Two Drugs: Is it Feasible?
Harmonized Assessment by Randomized Multicenter Study of OrbusNEich’s COMBO StEnt Japan-USA HARMONEE: Primary Report of A Randomized Trial of a Bioabsorbable.
Subhash Banerjee, MD Associate Prof. of Medicine
The Tryton Bifurcation Trial:
Eric J Dippel, MD FACC Davenport, Iowa, USA February 19, 2017
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
Bioresorbable scaffold: the advent of a new era in percutaneous coronary revascularisation Clinical Data Update Ron Waksman, MD, FACC Director, Cardiovascular.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
Drug Eluting Balloons Bodo Cremers, MD
TAXUS IV Trial Slow-rate release polymer-based paclitaxel-eluting stent compared with bare stent in patients with single de novo coronary lesions Presented.
Novolimus Elution from a Biodegradable Polymer Coated Coronary Stent
DES Should be Used as the Default Stent in ACS!
Instent Restenosis and Occlusion: Time for Surgical Revision?
OCT-Guided PCI What needs to be done to establish criteria?
Insights from the IMPERIAL and MAJESTIC SFA Studies
Drug-Coated Balloons in Peripheral Artery Disease
MACE Trial Rationale, Study Design, and Current Status
Preliminary results of the Elutax SV Italian registry
Regulatory Considerations for Coronary Drug Coated Balloons – FDA View
The Biofreedom Surface Etching Polymer-Free DES System
Are we using fewer Covered Stents for SFA Occlusive Disease?
FINAL FIVE-YEAR CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF THE NOBORI2 TRIAL
A Randomized, Prospective, Intercontinental Evaluation of a Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent: the CENTURY II Trial: an Update with 2 Years.
FAIR Trial design: Patients with SFA in-stent restenosis (ISR) were randomized to either a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB) (dose 3.5 μg/mm2) or routine.
REALITY: 8 month results
How and why this study may change my practice ?
Kyoto University Hospital, Japan
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
Presented at ACC 2003 Late Breaking Clinical Trials
SIRIUS: A U.S. Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the SIRolImUS-Eluting Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Lesions Presented at TCT 2002.
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
12-month clinical and 13-month angiographic outcomes from a randomized trial evaluating the Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold vs. metallic drug-eluting.
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Updated 3-Year Meta-Analysis of the TAXUS Clinical Trials Safety and Efficacy Demonstrated in 3,445 Randomized Patients Time allocation for this talk.
Presented at TCT 2006.
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. A. Abazid
TYPHOON Trial Trial to Assess the Use of the Cypher Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Balloon Angioplasty (TYPHOON) Trial Presented at.
Presentation transcript:

Update on Sirolimus Coated Balloon Technologies Robert M. Bersin, MD, FACC, FSCAI Medical Director, Endovascular Services Swedish Medical Center Seattle, Washington

Disclosure Statement of Financial Interest Within the past 12 months, I or my spouse/partner have had a financial interest/arrangement or affiliation with the organization(s) listed below. Robert M. Bersin, MD   Abbott Vascular C, P, SB Ablative Solutions EI Boston Scientific AB, C, EI, P, SB Cook Medical, Inc. C, P Med Alliance SA, AB, EI Medtronic, Inc. C, P Omeros Corp, EI QT Vascular, EI Transverse Medical AB, EI, SO Vatrix Medical EI W.L. Gore C, P Company AB: Advisory Board C: Consulting Relationship EI: Equity Interest GS: Grant Support P: Proctor or Training Course Sponsorships SB: Speakers Bureau SE: Spouse Employee SO: Stock Options or Positions

PACLITAXEL DRUG COATED BALLOONS Current status: All DCBs that have received FDA and CE Mark approval use Paclitaxel as anti-restenotic drug Cell death at target lesion is prominent feature of all Paclitaxel DCBs and has been shown to be dose dependent Virmani et al. EVT Today August 2015;Suppl: 11-15

Drug Coated Balloon – Coronary Devices Company Device Drug Coating / Excipient Drug Dose μg/mm2 CE Aachen Resonance Elutax SV PTX None 2 Yes Bard Lutonix 014 PTCA Polysorbate / Sorbitol No B Braun Sequent Please Iopromide 3 Biotronik Pantera Lux Butyryl-tri-hexyl Citrate Boston Scientific Agent Acetyl-tri-butyl Citrate Cardionovum Restore / Primus Shellac Eucatech Support C Eurocor / Biosensors DIOR/ BioStream Medtronic IN.PACT Falcon Urea 3.5 Minvasys Danubio 2.5 Nano Therapeutics Curex PTCA 2.3

Drug Coated Balloon – Peripheral Devices Company Device Drug Coating / Excipient Drug Dose μg/mm2 CE Aachen Resonance Elutax SV PTX None 2 Yes Balton mcPCB 3 No Bard Lutonix Polysorbate / Sorbitol Bayer-Medrad Cotavance Iopromide Biotronik Passeo-18 Lux Butyryl-tri-hexyl Citrate Boston Scientific Ranger Citrate Ester Cardionovum Legflow Shellac Cook Advance 18 PTX Covidien Stellarex Amphiphilic Polymer Eurocor / Biosensors Freeway / BioPath iVascular Luminor Water Reducer Ester Medtronic IN.PACT Urea 3.5 Meril Mozec Nano-particles Nano Therapeutics Curex PTA 2.3 Vascular Nanotransfer Technologies Nano-encapsulation Surmodics Microcrystalline AngioScore AngioSculpt* TriReme Medical Chocolate Touch* *Scoring Balloons

Sirolimus Drug Coated Balloons Sirolimus offers potential benefits over Paclitaxel: Sirolimus is drug of choice for coronary DES supported by solid clinical based evidence Attribute Sirolimus (or Analogs) Paclitaxel Mode of action Cytostatic Cytotoxic Margin of safety 10’000 fold 100 fold Therapeutic range Wide Narrow Anti-restenotic Yes – lower late lumen loss Yes Anti-inflammatory No Tissue absorption Slow Fast Tissue retention Short Long

Sirolimus Coated Balloon Benefits, Challenges & Solution

Sirolimus Coated Balloon – Benefits Point of no return: cell committed to replication CYTOTOXIC cell dies CYTOSTATIC cell remains viable S phase DNA replication G2 phase Growth and preparation for Mitosis M phase Mitosis G1 phase Growth and preparation for DNA synthesis G0 phase Resting Sirolimus Paclitaxel © M.A. Med Alliance – 2015. Confidential.

Sirolimus Coated Balloon – Benefits All currently available DCBs use Paclitaxel as anti-restenotic drug Sirolimus (rapamycin) offers potential benefits over Paclitaxel: Attribute Sirolimus (or Analogs) Paclitaxel Mode of action Cytostatic Cytotoxic Margin of safety 10’000 fold 100 fold Therapeutic range Wide Narrow © M.A. Med Alliance – 2015. Confidential.

Sirolimus Coated Balloon – Benefits PACLITAXEL 10’000 TOXIC EFFECT 1’000 Concentration (μg/g) Arterial Drug 100 Typical DCB Curve THERAPEUTIC RANGE 10 Typical DES Curve NO EFFECT 1 25 50 75 100 Time (Days) Source: Presentation Granada at CRT 2014. © M.A. Med Alliance – 2015. Confidential.

Sirolimus Coated Balloon – Benefits TOXIC EFFECT 10’000 1’000 THERAPEUTIC RANGE Concentration (μg/g) Arterial Drug 100 Typical DCB Curve 10 Typical DES Curve NO EFFECT 1 25 50 75 100 Time (Days) Source: Presentation Granada at CRT 2014. © M.A. Med Alliance – 2015. Confidential.

Sirolimus Coated Balloon – Challenges All currently available DCBs use Paclitaxel as anti-restenotic drug Sirolimus (rapamycin) offers potential benefits over Paclitaxel: Attribute Sirolimus (or Analogs) Paclitaxel Mode of action Cytostatic Cytotoxic Margin of safety 10’000 fold 100 fold Therapeutic range Wide Narrow Anti-restenotic Yes – lower late lumen loss Yes Anti-inflammatory No Physician reception Positive Controversial Tissue absorption Slow Fast Tissue retention Short Long Source: JACC 2006:47(4);708–14.

Sirolimus Coated Balloons – Challenges Paclitaxel and Sirolimus act differently with tissue: Paclitaxel absorbs quickly and tends to localize in sub-intimal space and partitions significantly in adventitia Sirolimus absorbs slowly and spreads throughout entire artery where it dilutes down to sub-therapeutic levels Sirolimus Paclitaxel Dextran Balloon Surface Drug Coating Endothelium Plaque or Neointima Tunica Media Tunica Adventitia Tissue Binding Capacity (TBC) of labeled dextran, paclitaxel and sirolimus in 0.040-mm-thick bovine internal carotid tissue segments. Source: PNAS 2004:101(25);9463–67.

Sirolimus Coated Balloons – Challenges Enhance tissue absorption Difficult to get sirolimus to enter into arterial tissue within 30 to 180 seconds of balloon dilatation; hence some kind of “instant glue” is required to transfer the drug from the balloon to the tissue efficiently Extend tissue retention Sirolimus must be continuously delivered over time, so some form of “time release mechanism” must be employed to maintain therapeutic levels

Sirolimus Coated Balloons - Landscape Company Product Drug Concentration Delivery Agent Abbott Vascular NA zotarolimus 6-7 μg/mm2 iopromide matrix Caliber Therapeutics Virtue DCB sirolimus nanoparticles 3 mg porous balloon Concept Medical Magic Touch DCB Xtreme Touch DCB 1.3 μg/mm2 3.0 μg/mm2 phospholipid excipient MedAlliance SA Selution DCB 1.0 μg/mm2 CAT-cell adherence technology Sahajanand Medical Technologies sirolimus 0.7 μg/mm2 PLGA/PVP 50-50 coating

Granada J TCT 2015

Granada J TCT 2015

SABRE: Clinical Safety Outomes 12 Months Follow Up Pieter Stella, MD on behalf of SABRE Investigators TCT 2016

Magic Touch Nanolute Technology Bernardo Cortese MD TCT 2016

Magic Touch 12-month Clinical Outcomes ISR Subset (N=167 lesions) MACE (major adverse cardiac events) Value (%) Death 0.00 Myocardial infartction 0.67 TLR 5.33 Total MACE 6.00 NanoluteTM

Med Alliance SELUTION™ Sirolimus DCB Micro-reservoirs made out of biodegradable polymer intermixed with Sirolimus: Controlled and sustained drug release mechanism Maintains therapeutic effect in tissue over long period of time Novel Cell Adherent Technology – CAT™: CAT™ transfer membrane houses and protects micro-reservoirs during balloon insertion, lesion crossing and expansion CAT™ transfer membrane with embedded micro-reservoirs releases from balloon delivery system and adheres to vessel lumen with short balloon inflations Extend tissue retention Sirolimus must be continuously delivered over time, so some form of “time release mechanism” must be employed to maintain therapeutic levels Enhance tissue absorption Difficult to get Sirolimus to enter into arterial tissue within 30 to 180 seconds of balloon dilatation; hence some kind of “instant glue” required to transfer the drug from the balloon to the tissue efficiently

Sirolimus Coated Balloon – Solution Use of micro-reservoirs made out of biodegradable polymer intermixed with Sirolimus Controlled and sustained drug release Long-term distribution of Sirolimus into tissue to maintain therapeutic levels Novel Cell Adherent Technology – CAT™ Minimizes wash-off during insertion, tracking and lesion crossing Optimizes drug transfer to tissue during short-term balloon dilatation

Med Alliance SELUTION™ vs. Competition Medtronic IN.PACT BBraun SEQUENT PLEASE Biotronik PANTERA LUX © M.A. Med Alliance – 2015. Confidential.

Med Alliance SELUTION™ vs. Competition NO FLAKING

Med Alliance SELUTION™ Sirolimus DCB Drug Dispersion Increased tissue transfer and reduced drug loss during procedure Review of skeletal muscle from select territories in addition to coronary bands showed no evidence of skeletal infarction/scarring and/or emboli attributed to PCI No indication of infarction/scarring or distal emboli involving micro-reservoirs in any of tissues assessed (i.e. lung, left and right kidney, liver, spleen and left gastrocnemius muscle) Med Alliance – In vitro test data on file Bard & Medtronic – Presentation J.F. Granada (TCT 2014)

Med Alliance SELUTION™ Sirolimus DCB Arterial Tissue Drug Concentration Sirolimus (RAP) versus Paclitaxel (PAX) Drug Dose per Balloon Size Therapeutic Effect ≥ 1 µg/g Numerous micro-reservoirs coating central surface of artery wall Fields of uniform micro-reservoirs are seen adherent to luminal surface Pre-clinical studies demonstrated feasibility of long-term (up to 60-days) arterial tissue retention of Sirolimus with therapeutic levels having reduced drug dose of 1 ug/mm2 En Face Scanning Electron Microscope at 24 hours Med Alliance – PK Study (2014-004) Medtronic – Presentation R.J. Melder (LINC 2012) Bard – Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 83:132–140 (2014)

Med Alliance SELUTION™ PK Study Source: Med Alliance – PK Study (2014-004) / Bard – Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 83:132–140 (2014) / Medtronic – Presentation Melder (LINC 2012).

Peripheral FIH – SELUTIONTM Fem-Pop Trial To show non-inferiority of SELUTION™ DCB vs. FDA approved DCB in terms of safety and efficacy for treatment of Superficial Femoral (SFA) or Popliteal (PA) Artery lesions Objective Prospective, Multi-Center, Single Blinded, Randomized Controlled N=110 (55 in each arm) Design Angiographic Late Lumen Loss (LLL) by QVA 6 months Primary Endpoint Major Adverse Events (Death, TLR, Thrombosis, Amputation) 6 months Primary Patency – Freedom from CD-TLR and Restenosis by DUS 6, 12 and 24 months Angiographic Binary Restenosis (ABR) by QVA Composite of Freedom from Amputation and Freedom from CD-TVR 12 and 24 months Change of ABI, WIQ and QoL Secondary Endpoints

FIM – Study Design Pre-screening Screening NO Treatment Analysis NO Non-Clinical Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria Pre-screening Clinical and Anatomic Inclusion / Exclusion Criteria Screening Failure (Treat per std practice) Screening Successful Pre-Dilatation? NO Randomized 1:1 SELUTION™ DCB FDA Approved DCB Treatment Analysis Bailout Stenting? NO Primary Endpoint Analysis ITT Analysis Bailout Stenting Analysis © M.A. Med Alliance – 2015. Confidential.

Investigational Device Coronary FIH - SELUTIONTM ISR Trial (incl small vessels & side branches) SELUTION™ Sirolimus Coated Coronory Balloon (S-DCB) Investigational Device Assess safety and efficacy of the MedAlliance sirolimus-eluting micro-reservoirs DCB (SELUTIONTM) in comparison with currently approved paclitaxel DCB in ISR, side-branch bifurcation lesions, and small (≤2.5 mm) vessels Design Proof of efficacy Proof of non-inferiority vs. Paclitaxel DCB Collect data to obtain CE mark approval Other Objectives

Prospective, open label, multi-center RCT with angiographic endpoints SELUTION DSR Prospective, open label, multi-center RCT with angiographic endpoints Patients with CAD with ISR or Bifurcation with side-branch lesion or distal lesions in small vessels Large centres in countries where Paclitaxel DCB are approved and reimbursed SELUTION™ DCB 145 Patients 1:1 randomization Paclitaxel DCB Clinical FU 1 mo 3 mo 9 mo 1 yr 2 yrs Angio FU Optional IVUS FU Primary endpoint: S-DCB superiority for % diameter restenosis vs P-DCB at 9 months Secondary endpoints: LLL at 9 months Primary angiographic EP for each of the 3 groups Device success (in cath lab) Procedure success (at discharge) Freedom from TVF at 360 and 720 days Components of TVF at 360 and 720 days Freedom from angina at 360 and 720 days QOL & Cost-effectiveness at 360 days IVUS determined minimal DSA at 9 months (optional) DAPT: 30 days in both arms (if no stent in main branch for S group)

Sirolimus DCBs Potential to improve patient outcomes Efficacy Sirolimus has lower late lumen loss Nanoparticulate encapsulation provides sustained release of sirolimus – “DES like” but without leaving anything behind Safety Cytostatic sirolimus instead of cytotoxic paclitaxel with higher tissue tolerance Substantially reduced drug dose (especially in case of multiple, longer or overlapping balloons) Reduced wash-off and less harmful to operators Healing Less inhibition of healing in target lesion and in distal tissue beds due to lower drug toxicity and reduced embolization of coating (e.g. potentially better wound healing in CLI patients)