Civic Open Innovation teaching slides proposed by Elena Casprini Supporting Innovation Education Reloaded: Nurturing Skills for the Future. The Open Innovation Teaching Handbook teaching slides proposed by Elena Casprini Alberto Di Minin

Course detail The course may consist of four topics: defining civic open innovation; the role of governments and citizens in civic open innovation; the toolbox for civic open innovation; examples from the world.

Methodology The classes may consist of: Frontal lectures Seminars with experts (e.g. local institutions) Project works

Topic 1: Defining civic open innovation Several definitions (Almirall et al., 2014; Feller et al., 2011; Hilgers and Ihl; 2010; Mergel, 2015) civic open innovation as a part of social open innovation (Chesbrough and Di Minin, 2014) Civic open innovation is applied specifically by the government and governmental institutions It may involve multiple actors (Almirall et al.2014; Feller et al., 2011) It may be applied to different domains (e.g. mobility, education, etc.) (Arnold and Barth, 2012; Feller et al., 2011; Katsonis and Botros, 2015; Lee et al., 2012) Civic open innovation leverages the advances made by digital technology(Katsonis and Botros, 2015)

Topic 2: The role of government and citizens in civic open innovation In Topic 1 we have seen that many actors may be involved in civic open innovation. However, most of the attention has been focused on the role of citizens. Topic 2 looks at the role of government and citizens in civic open innovation and aims at understanding (Almirall et al., 2014; Arnold and Barth, 2012; Hilgers and Ihl, 2010; Lee et al., 2012; Wijnhoven et al., 2015): How citizen involvement may be improved by government; The challenges of providing access to governmental data.

Topic 3: The toolbox for civic open innovation Focus on the tools and approaches that governments may use for pursuing civic open innovation. Examples are linked to (Almirall et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2012; Seltzer and Mahmoudi, 2013; Stamati et al., 2015; Mergel & Desouza, 2013; Mergel, 2015): Hackatons; urban labs; Crowdsourcing. Moreover, attention must be directed towards social media and online platforms (Mergel & Desouza, 2013; Mergel, 2015; Stamati et al., 2015)

Topic 4: Examples from the world Provide in depth case description via analysing the tools/approaches used, the stakeholders involved, the benefits and the costs of having implemented such a kind of tools/approaches. Provide examples from the world (Almirall et al., 2014; Hilgers and Ihl, 2010; Lee et al., 2012; Stamati et al., 2015). In particular, an investigation can be done of the process by which developed and developing countries implement/adopt civic innovation..

References Almirall, E., Lee, M., & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Open innovation requires integrated competition-community ecosystems: Lessons learned from civic open innovation. Business Horizons, 57(3), 391–400. Arnold, M., & Barth, V. (2012). Open innovation in urban energy systems. Energy Efficiency, 5(3), 351–364. Chesbrough, H. and Di Minin, A. (2014). Open Social Innovation. In Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. & West, J. (Eds.), New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Feller, J., Finnegan, P. and Nilsson, O. (2011). Open innovation and public administration: transformational typologies and business model impacts, European Journal of Information Systems, 20, 358-374 Hilgers, D. and Ihl, C. (2010). Citizensourcing: applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. The International Journal of Public Participation, 4(1): 67-88. Katsonis, M. and Botros, A. (2015). Digital government: a primer and professional perspectives. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(1): 42-52. Lee, S.M., Hwang, T. and Choi, D. (2012). Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries. Management Decisions, 50(1), 147-162. Mergel I. (2015). Opening government: designing open innovation processes to collaborate with external problem solvers. Social Science Computer Review, 33(5), 599-612. Mergel, I., & Desouza, K. C. (2013). Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector: Th e Case of Challenge.gov. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 882–890. Seltzer, E. & Mahmoudi, D. (2013). Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: challenges and opportunities for planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 28(1), 3-18. Stamati, T., Papadopoulos, T., & Anagnostopoulos, D. (2015). Social media for openness and accountability in the public sector: cases in the Greek context. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 12–29. Wijnhoven, F., Ehrenhard, M., & Kuhn, J. (2015). Open government objectives and participation motivations. Government Information Quarterly, 32, 30–42.

51 partners from 35 countries

Thank you! The slides are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Unported License. Visit www.oi-net.eu to learn more about the project and download the free book Innovation Education Reloaded: Nurturing Skills for the Future. The Open Innovation Teaching Handbook This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Programme: ERASMUS # 542203-LLP-1-2013-1-FI-ERASMUS-ENW