REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Martin Landray and Louise Bowman on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP)
Advertisements

Protecting the heart and the kidney: Implications from the SHARP trial Dr. Christina Reith University of Oxford United Kingdom.
The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) Colin Baigent, Martin Landray on behalf of the SHARP Investigators Disclosure: SHARP was.
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
HPS2-THRIVE: Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events Jane Armitage on behalf of the THRIVE Collaborative Group Financial Disclosure:
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
The efFects of Pharmacological management of lipids in patients with CKD Andrew Monson FY1 18/9/14.
Economic evaluation of MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group University of Oxford UK.
Lancet : doi: /S (08)60104-X Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from.
Lipid-Modulating Effects of Evacetrapib, a Novel CETP Inhibitor, Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination with the Most Commonly-Used Statins SJ.
 High density lipoproteins (HDL) protect against cardiovascular disease  A novel mechanism for raising HDL levels is to inhibit a protein known as CETP.
BackgroundBackground HDL-C levels are inversely related to CV event rates. HDL-C levels are inversely related to CV event rates. Torcetrapib, a cholesteryl.
Comparison of the Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis for Two High Efficacy Statin Regimens with Different HDL Effects: SATURN Study Results SJ Nicholls,
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study Increased risk of CHD death due to prior disease: Myocardial infarction or other coronary heart disease; Occlusive.
Incremental Decrease in Clinical Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Trial IDEAL Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific.
André Lamy Population Health Research Institute Hamilton Health Sciences McMaster University Hamilton, CANADA on behalf of the CORONARY Investigators Disclosures.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior cerebrovascular disease.
Statins The AURORA Trial Reference Fellstrom BC. Rosuvastatin and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360. A.
CETP inhibition: Where are we now? Prof. John Kastelein Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from participants in 26 randomised trials Lancet 2010;
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
The SPRINT Research Group
US cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in 20,536 people at different levels of vascular disease risk: randomised placebo-controlled trial UK Medical Research.
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Title slide.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Reducing Adverse Outcomes after ACS in Patients with Diabetes Goals
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness results
European Society of Cardiology 2017 Clinical Trial Update I
Economic evaluation of MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Update on Clinical Trials with Novel CETP Inhibitors to Raise HDL: Where are We Today? H. Bryan Brewer, Jr. Washington Cardiovascular Associates Washington.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
Effects of Anacetrapib on the Incidence of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus and on Vascular Events in People With Diabetes Louise Bowman & Martin Landray on.
Reduction in Total Cardiovascular Events with the PCSK9 Inhibitor Evolocumab in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease in the FOURIER Trial Sabina A. Murphy,
LDL Cholesterol Lowering with Evolocumab and Outcomes in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights from the FOURIER Trial Marc P. Bonaca, Patrice.
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Volume 388, Issue 10059, Pages (November 2016)
PS Sever, PM Rothwell, SC Howard, JE Dobson, B Dahlöf,
HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk Epidemiological evidence
Senior Medical Director, Cardiovascular
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
ASCEND Randomized placebo-controlled trial of aspirin 100 mg daily in 15,480 patients with diabetes and no baseline cardiovascular disease Jane Armitage.
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Inhibitors
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
Volume 388, Issue 10059, Pages (November 2016)
The following slides highlight a report on a presentation at the Late-breaking Trials Session and a Satellite Symposium of the American Heart Association.
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The results of the SHARP trial
Statins Evaluation in Coronary procedUres and REvascularization
Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes.
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Updates in Cardiovascular Medicine
Screening, Lipid Stabilization, and Placebo Run-in
ELIGIBILITY: MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
These slides highlight a presentation from a Special Session of the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials sessions during the American College of Cardiology 2005.
The Heart Rhythm Society Meeting Presented by Dr. Johan De Sutter
The results of the SHARP trial
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Presentation transcript:

REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Martin Landray and Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS 3 / TIMI 55 - REVEAL Collaborative Group Funded by MSD, British Heart Foundation, Medical Research Council Designed, conducted and analysed independently of the funders University of Oxford is the trial sponsor

Declaration of interests Funding to support the REVEAL trial: MSD (known as Merck in the USA and Canada) British Heart Foundation Medical Research Council Additional support for UK research sites in REVEAL: National Institute for Health Research Other sources of research funding, not directly related to REVEAL: Novartis, Pfizer, Medicines Company, Cancer Research UK Honoraria and consultancy fees: The Clinical Trial Service Unit at the University of Oxford has a staff policy of not accepting honoraria or consultancy fees, either to staff or the institution, directly or indirectly from industry (see www.ctsu.ox.ac.uk)

HPS 3 / TIMI 55 - REVEAL Collaborative Group Steering Committee Principal Investigators: Martin Landray, Louise Bowman Chair & Deputy Chair: Rory Collins, Eugene Braunwald Trial Statistician: Jemma Hopewell Regional representatives: United Kingdom: Jane Armitage, Richard Haynes N America: Christopher Cannon, Stephen Wiviott Scandinavia: Terje Pedersen Other members: Colin Baigent Yiping Chen Shinya Goto Philip Barter Zhengming Chen Alastair Gray China: Lixin Jiang Italy: Aldo Maggioni Germany: Georg Ertl, Christiane Angermann, Christoph Wanner Boby Mihaylova Tamio Teramoto Peter Sleight Jonathan Tobert Non-voting MSD representatives: Robert Blaustein, Paul DeLucca, Gerard van Leijenhorst, Yale Mitchel Data Monitoring Committee Peter Sandercock (Chair) W, DiatvhidmDeaMneytst, hAandnrkews tToontkhine, JmohonrKejetkhshauns, 3Ja0m,0es0N0epubaetrigeenr,tJsonaanthdan Emberson (non- voting) hundreds of clinicians & researchers who made this trial possible.

Background Anacetrapib is a potent inhibitor of Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein (CETP) which doubles HDL-cholesterol and lowers LDL-cholesterol Previous trials of other CETP inhibitors have been stopped after around 2 years of follow-up due to unexpected cardiovascular hazards (torcetrapib) or apparent lack of efficacy (dalcetrapib, evacetrapib) The REVEAL trial assessed the efficacy and safety of adding anacetrapib vs. placebo to effective doses of atorvastatin among patients with established occlusive vascular disease

REVEAL trial design Eligibility: 30,000 patients aged over 50 years with occlusive vascular disease Background statin: Atorvastatin 20 or 80 mg daily (China: 10 or 20 mg) Randomized: Anacetrapib 100 mg daily vs. matching placebo Follow-up: ≥4 years and ≥1900 primary outcomes Primary outcome: Major Coronary Event (i.e. Coronary death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization) REVEAL Collaborative Group. Am Heart J 2017;187:182-90

Baseline demographics Characteristic Total (30449) Age (years) Mean 67 Gender Male 25534 (84%) Female 4915 (16%) Region Europe 15738 (52%) North America 6082 (20%) China 8629 (28%)

Prior disease & blood lipids at randomization (after 8-12 weeks’ treatment with atorvastatin) Characteristic Total (30449) Prior disease Coronary heart disease 26679 (88%) Cerebrovascular disease 6781 (22%) Peripheral arterial disease 2435 (8%) Diabetes mellitus 11320 (37%) Lipids HDL cholesterol LDL cholesterol Non-HDL cholesterol 40 mg/dL 61 mg/dL 92 mg/dL (1.0 mmol/L) (1.6 mmol/L) (2.4 mmol/L)

Follow-up and adherence to treatment Median duration Complete 4.1 years 99.8% Anacetrapib Placebo Adherence at midpoint Randomized treatment* 89.9% 89.7% Study atorvastatin 90.3% Any statin 94.6% 94.7% * No difference in any reason for stopping allocated treatment

Effects of anacetrapib on lipids at trial midpoint Measurement Absolute difference mg/dL SI units Proportional difference HDL cholesterol +43 +1.1 mmol/L 104% Apolipoprotein AI +42 +0.4 g/L 36% LDL cholesterol - Direct (Genzyme) -26 -0.7 mmol/L -41% - Beta-quantification* -11 -0.3 mmol/L -17% Apolipoprotein B -12 -0.1 g/L -18% Non-HDL cholesterol -17 -0.4 mmol/L * measured in a random subset of 2000 participants

Primary outcome: Major coronary events (Coronary death, myocardial infarction, or coronary revascularization) 15 Anacetrapib 1640 (10.8%) Placebo 1803 (11.8%) Participants with Event (%) Placebo Rate ratio 0.91 (0.85 to 0.97) P=0.004 10 Anacetrapib 5 1 2 Years of Follow-up 3 4

Components of the primary outcome Type of Event Anacetrapib Placebo Rate Ratio (95% CI) P Value (N=15225) (N=15224) no. of participants with events (%) Coronary death Myocardial infarction Coronary death or MI Coronary revascularization Major coronary event 388 (2.5) 669 (4.4) 934 (6.1) 1081 (7.1) 420 (2.8) 769 (5.1) 1048 (6.9) 1201 (7.9) 0.92 (0.80–1.06) 0.87 (0.78–0.96) 0.89 (0.81–0.97) 0.90 (0.83–0.97) 0.91 (0.85–0.97) 0.25 0.007 0.008 0.01 0.004 1640 (10.8) 1803 (11.8) 0.8 1.0 Anacetrapib Better Major coronary event: Coronary death, MI or coronary revascularization 1.2 Placebo Better No significant evidence of differential proportional effects among 23 pre-specified subgroup categories

Proportional reduction in Coronary death or MI vs Proportional reduction in Coronary death or MI vs. absolute reduction in non-HDL cholesterol (derived from published CTT meta-analysis) 35% Proportional risk reduction Statin vs. control >50 mg/dL redn (4 trials) 30% 25% REVEAL 20% Statin vs. control <50 mg/dL redn (17 trials) 15% 10% 5% 0% More vs. less 22 mg/dL redn (5 trials) 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Absolute reduction in non-HDL cholesterol (mg/dL)

Primary & secondary outcomes Type of Event Anacetrapib Placebo Rate Ratio (95% CI) P Value (N=15225) (N=15224) no. of participants with events (%) Coronary death Myocardial infarction Coronary death or MI Coronary revascularization Major coronary event Presumed ischaemic stroke 388 (2.5) 669 (4.4) 934 (6.1) 1081 (7.1) 420 (2.8) 769 (5.1) 1048 (6.9) 1201 (7.9) 0.92 (0.80–1.06) 0.87 (0.78–0.96) 0.89 (0.81–0.97) 0.90 (0.83–0.97) 0.91 (0.85–0.97) 0.99 (0.87–1.12) 0.93 (0.86–1.00) 0.93 (0.88–0.99) 0.25 0.007 0.008 0.01 0.004 1640 (10.8) 1803 (11.8) 485 (3.2) (9.1) 489 (3.2) 1483 (9.7) Major atherosclerotic event 1383 0.05 0.02 Major vascular event 2068 (13.6) 2214 (14.5) 0.8 1.0 1.2 Anacetrapib Better Major coronary event: Coronary death, MI or coronary revascularization Major atherosclerotic event: Coronary death, MI or presumed ischaemic stroke Placebo Better Major vascular event: Coronary death, MI, coronary revascularization or presumed ischaemic stroke

Other clinical assessments Anacetrapib Placebo Difference P New-onset diabetes mellitus 510 (5.3%) 571 (6.0%) -0.6% 0.05 Blood pressure Systolic (mmHg) 132.4 131.7 +0.7 0.002 Diastolic (mmHg) 77.6 77.4 +0.3 0.04 Hypertensive serious adverse events 151 (1.0%) 141 (0.9%) +0.1% 0.56 Kidney disease New-onset eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 1344 (11.5%) 1236 (10.6%) +0.84% Renal failure serious adverse events 169 (1.1%) 146 (1.0%) +0.15% 0.20 No effect on vascular, non--vascular, or all--cause mortality No effect on cancer, liver, muscle, cognitive function, or adverse events

Effects of adding anacetrapib to intensive statin therapy Significant 9% proportional reduction in major coronary events (effect appears to be greater in later years of treatment) Small reduction in risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus No excess of symptomatic side-effects with anacetrapib (levels in adipose tissue rise with continued treatment) No excess of mortality, cancer or other serious adverse events (small increase in BP and small reduction in kidney function) Post-trial follow-up of all consenting participants (off-drug) to assess longer-term efficacy and safety of anacetrapib

Available at www.nejm.org together with supplementary methods, analyses, and detailed tabulations of adverse events