What's Next for Emerging Technologies that Support Teaching and Learning? Anastasia (Stacy) Morrone, Dean, Information Technology; Associate Vice President,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNSW Strategic Educational Development Grants
Advertisements

Effective use of Sakai in promoting best practices in teaching and learning.
Project Plan The Development Plan The project plan is one of the first formal documents produced by the project team. It describes  How the project will.
A Foundation for the Future Building blocks for comprehensive connectivity Tracy Schroeder Vice President, Information Services and Technology.
SOAR – Preparing for Launch Task Force Information January 2015.
1 C ode C oordination C ommunity Brad Wheeler & Robert Lowden, Indiana University Portfolios.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
Sara Kim, PhD, Director, Associate Professor Instructional Design and Technology Unit, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine Katherine Wigan, BS, MBA, Senior.
1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.
IPEDS Teaching Institute: An Overview May, 2006 Anthony R. Bichel, Ph.D.
Page 1 Pearson NexText Peter Chapman Vice President - Digital Delivery Services Content Mgmt Services January, 2013 Pearson Confidential.
Reviewer Training Welcome & Introductions Co-Chairs.
March 24, 2010 Integrated Project and Panel Work Plan FY 2010 OIDAP Quarterly Meeting St. Louis, MO Sylvia Karman OIDAP Member & Project Director.
Educational Scholars Program PAS: May 6, 2008 Academic Pediatric Association.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
1 3:00 PM, EST. 2 Don Hewitt Vice President, Business Operations OSEHRA Ramina Toy Program Manager Brad Triebwasser.
2050AP Project WP5: “Conclusions” UPM Madrid 11 de Octubre 2013.
Dr. Kathleen Haynie Haynie Research and Evaluation November 12, 2010.
Clinical Educators Design Team CAEP State Alliance for Clinical Partnership Presented by team members Laurie Henry, University of Kentucky & Nicole Nickens,
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Introductions Patrick J. Burns Elias G. Eldayrie James L. Hilton
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
DRAFT Curriculum Proposal Process: DRAFT
Creating Faculty Evaluation and Mentoring Programs Using Brightspace
Jisc Open Access Dashboard
AQIP Category Two: Meeting Student and Other key stakeholder needs
The assessment process For Administrative units
Remarks on the Tenure and Promotion Process
Harvesting the Benefits of QM Culture for Institutional Accreditation
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Higher Education’s 2016 Top 10 IT Issues: Divest, Reinvest,
Quality on Demand: Innovative Resources for Training and Course Design
Evaluating your Repository
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
CHAPTER 5 Retail Marketing Research Event
Curriculum Development Updates
8/1/2018 © 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks.
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
CIO Council User Experience Strategic Initiative Update
Up2U Training Plan Athens, Up2U Meeting, 23/1/2018 Mary Grammatikou
Sandy Mau, Vice President of Communications, Health2 Resources
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
L6 Entrepreneurship Assignment 2017 – 2018
Kansas Educator Evaluation
Update on iQIES AHFSA 2018 Fall Conference September 24, 2018.
Safer Care Homes Collaborative
Sophia Lafferty-hess | research data manager
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Website Content Management System
Middle States Accreditation Standards and Processes
Annie Bélanger September 2016
Annual Review of Faculty
Identifying Multiple Measures and Defining Significance
Brighton Product Design
Transit Integration and Efficiency Study Transit Advisory Committee
United Nations Statistics Division
IS Risk Management Report (Template)
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Imagining the next generation of online Magic Lantern materials
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
TITLE Business Case YOUR LOGO BUSINESS CASE PRESENTATION 00/00/0000
Credit and Pathways Management Road Ahead Feb – Mar 2018
March 13, 2019 Indiana Primary Health Care Association
Working Group Out-Briefs
Open Educational Resources (OERs)
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Presentation transcript:

What's Next for Emerging Technologies that Support Teaching and Learning? Anastasia (Stacy) Morrone, Dean, Information Technology; Associate Vice President, Learning Technologies, Indiana University‐Purdue University Indianapolis Required – Title Slide October 3, 2012

Indiana University recently launched a two‐year pilot program to assess multiple learning technologies. In this session, we will describe our process for conducting and evaluating the pilots over the next two years.

Poll #1 Replace this slide with poll #1

Next.iu.edu Optional – Agenda Slide – Option 2 Instead of using the agenda template on the previous slide, you also have the option to use this section break template to place sub titles or section breaks within your presentation.

IU launches pilot to explore next-generation learning technologies Optional – Plain White For full screen images and charts. IU launches pilot to explore next-generation learning technologies

Fall 2012 Pilots Optional – Agenda Slide – Option 2 Instead of using the agenda template on the previous slide, you also have the option to use this section break template to place sub titles or section breaks within your presentation.

What needed to happen next? Determine the types of learning technologies that will be considered Develop a process for technical review of piloted tools and systems Develop a process for functional review of piloted tools and systems Develop an evaluation plan

Determine the types of pilots Optional – Agenda Slide – Option 2 Instead of using the agenda template on the previous slide, you also have the option to use this section break template to place sub titles or section breaks within your presentation.

For full screen images and charts. IU's Next Learning Technologies Learning & Teaching Activity Management Assessment, Portfolio, and Analytics Communication, Collaboration and Social Networking eTexts, Open Content, and Repositories Content Creation, Sharing, and Reuse Optional – Plain White For full screen images and charts.

Poll #2 Replace this slide with poll #2

Develop a process for technical review Technical reviews will assess the state, risk and technical viability of the application by reviewing the technology stack, standards, development methodologies and platforms for reliable, serviceable and highly available applications. Optional – Agenda Slide – Option 2 Instead of using the agenda template on the previous slide, you also have the option to use this section break template to place sub titles or section breaks within your presentation.

Technical review criteria Virtualized Interoperable Integral Standards Tooling Scale Availability Usability Licensing Accessibility

Develop a process for functional review An informal/triage review will be conducted for any product being seriously considered for the pilot. A formal review will commence as soon as the pilot has been approved. A template for conducting the functional review will be used. Optional – Agenda Slide – Option 2 Instead of using the agenda template on the previous slide, you also have the option to use this section break template to place sub titles or section breaks within your presentation.

Functional reviews will include: an executive summary offering highlights of the review and a narrative assessment of the overall suitability of the tool/system for its intended purpose(s ) a matrix indicating the degree to which the primary business requirements and specific user needs for the system/tool are met descriptions of the tool/system’s major features, as well as significant strengths and weakness

Develop an evaluation plan The Center for Evaluation and Education Policy (CEEP) at Indiana University is conducting the formal evaluation of the pilots. The research will include faculty and student surveys, student focus groups, and faculty interviews. Optional – Agenda Slide – Option 2 Instead of using the agenda template on the previous slide, you also have the option to use this section break template to place sub titles or section breaks within your presentation.

Evaluation plan deliverables and timeline   Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Refinement of Evaluation Plan Development of instruments and protocol Administration of online student surveys Student focus groups Faculty interviews Administration of online faculty surveys Data analyses Final Report; Discussion of Possible Future Steps/Studies

“Assessment of these technologies and others will enable our students and faculty to evaluate what combinations of institutional, cloud, open source and commercial tools can best serve IU's future," said Brad Wheeler, vice president of IT and CIO at Indiana University.

What's Next for Emerging Technologies that Support Teaching and Learning? Anastasia (Stacy) Morrone amorrone@iu.edu Required – End Slide