Nitrogen Application Modelling & Soil Carbon

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
: A service of the Southeast Climate Consortium C. Fraisse, D. Zierden, and J. Paz Climate Prediction Application Science Workshop Chapel Hill, NC March.
Advertisements

Chapter 9 Normalisation of Field Half-lives
Nitrogen Use it or lose it Emission story Page 111 De Ferrier BCG, Ash Wallace DPI Vic.
Climate change impacts and water in Western Balkan Blaz Kurnik EEA + colleagues from ETC.
Agricultural modelling and assessments in a changing climate
Phosphorus Indices: an Understanding of Upper Mississippi Strategies John A. Lory, Ph.D. Division of Plant Sciences University of Missouri.
Nutrient management issues and initiatives 2013 Deer Industry Conference James Parsons.
Distribution Uniformity in Surface Irrigation Systems and Soil Moisture Monitoring Daniel Munk University of California Cooperative Extension.
Nitrogen pollution mapping at the European level ELPEN meeting, Udine, Italy November 2002 Vincent Delaunay.
Livestock Manure Management – The Basics on Why and How Coordinating Manure Utilization Plans With Crop Rotations Jon Stika, Area Agronomist USDA-NRCS,
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Additional Questions, Resources, and Moving Forward Science questions raised in the development of a science assessment Effect of Conservation Tillage.
OVERSEER® NUTRIENT BUDGETS AND IRRIGATION David Wheeler 1, John Bright 2 1 AgResearch, Hamilton 2 Aqualinc, Christchurch.
Irrigation Application Rate and Production under Centre- pivots Irrigation Application Rate and Production under Centre- pivots Ian McIndoe.
Costs and efficiency of manure application systems Ken Smith, ADAS Wolverhampton, UK Insert image here UNECE Expert Group on Ammonia Abatement, Braunschweig,
Testing New Products 13WMG16 Bill Bowden and Dave Gartner West Midlands Group Crop updates March 7, 2014 Badgingarra.
Cost Analysis of Using Soil Electrical Conductivity Information for Precision Management in Cotton Production J.A. Larson R.K. Roberts B.C. English C.
FOOD A G R I C U L T U R E E N V I R O N N M E N T BIOKENAF – QLK5-CT th technical meeting Madrid, September 2006 X. Nuttens, S. Cadoux.
Integrating Weather and Soil Information With Sensor Data Newell Kitchen USDA ARS Cropping Systems and Water Quality Research Unit Columbia, Missouri.
Agricultural Production Systems Simulator (APSIM) Simulates: v yield of crops, pastures, trees, weeds... v key soil processes (water, N, P, carbon, pH)
Nitrogen Use Efficiency Workshop Canopy Reflectance Signatures: Developing a Crop Need-Based Indicator for Sidedress Application of N Fertilizer to Canola.
Pasture Cropping in the Northern Agricultural Region David Ferris, DAFWA Supporting your success.
Use of Climate Forecast as a Tool to Increase Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Wheat Brenda V. Ortiz 1, Reshmi Sarkar 1, Kip Balkcom 2, Melissa Rodriguez 3,
MARCH 1 Risk Management Why carry out Risk Assessment? l Is the project too risky? l Threat intensity? l Improve decision making l Clarification of terms.
Agriculture and Water Resources Cynthia Rosenzweig and Max Campos AIACC Trieste Project Development Workshop
Schools Property Planning Competition 2013 “Waitara”
Soil Carbon Accounting in the SEEA Kirsty Leslie London Group Meeting Wiesbaden, 30 November - 4 December 2009.
Modelling the optimal phosphate fertiliser and soil management strategy for crops James Heppell August 2014.
Crop Compare Dwight Aakre, Farm Management Specialist Andy Swenson, Farm & Family Resource Management Specialist.
Chapter 3: Soil Sampling And Soil Sensing
Planning Certainty A challenge for Investment April 2014 Tom Chesson – CEO Australian national Irrigators Council Murray Smith – Principal Engineer, Agriculture.
Organic Waste N and P Dynamics Under Dryland Agroecosystems Jim Ippolito and Ken Barbarick USDA-ARS-NWISRL & Colorado State University.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Nitrogen Efficient and effective use of nitrogen in pastures and cropping Ashley Paech, Holbrook Landcare Network.
Peter McInerney Principal 3D-Ag  More than just your production system = Physical, financial and human elements of the farm business AND how they interrelate.
Can deep roots remove the N surplus? Main crops Catch crops Crop sequence Kristian Thorup-Kristensen Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences Plantekongres.
Growing a 6 t crop in the Mallee in a decile 2 year.
Benchmarking yield Why:  Guidance on crop performance over time cf to potential  Give indication of possible soils constraint  Support better understanding.
Sulfur Use in Canola in 2014 by Lisa Castleman Senior Land Services Officer (Cropping) Wagga Wagga.
MODSIM 2015 Modelling Mixed Farming Enterprises using AusFarm Neville Herrmann, Di Mayberry, Zvi Hochman, Neil MacLeod 30 Nov 2015 CSIRO AGRICULTURE.
Tools for Practical Irrigation Scheduling
Components of a Variable Rate Nitrogen Rec
Bill Bowden, Chris Wilkins, WMG February 2017
An Introduction to the Climate Change Explorer Tool: Locally Downscaled GCM Data for Thailand and Vietnam Greater Mekong Sub-region – Core Environment.
GIAV 2016 Annual Meeting Crop Outlook Panel Discussion
ACCURATE AND EFFICIENT USE OF NUTRIENTS ON FARMS FLRC, 2013
Precision Nutrient Management: Grid-Sampling Basis
Fertilizer Decisions Trial Nutrient Responses
Nicolas Tremblay, M.Y. Bouroubi
Program Evaluation Essentials-- Part 2
RESPONSIBLE USE OF RECYCLED ORGANICS FOR CROPPING
Realtime soil tests in the field – Science fiction or just over the horizon?
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Potassium for wheat on sandplain soils
History of Predicting Yield Potential
REVIEW.
Potassium deficiency in local soils – what do we know?
Organic carbon CO2 Surface residues Nutrient rich POC HOC ROC TOC
Section 7.7 Introduction to Inference
Using Soil Moisture and Matric Potential Observations to Identify Subsurface Convergent Flow Pathways Qing Zhu, Henry Lin, and Xiaobo Zhou Dept . Crop.
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
In-Field Soil Sampling
Using an Equine Pasture Evaluation Disk (EPED) to Document Canopy Cover and Evaluate Pasture Improvement Donna Foulk*, Ann Swinker, Marvin Hall, Helene.
All Marketing decisions are designed on the basis of
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
Agricultural Marketing
In-field Experiment.
Components of a Nutrient Management Plan
Soil organic carbon (SOC) can significantly influence key soil functional properties and improve soil quality by increasing water holding capacity, reducing.
Presentation transcript:

Nitrogen Application Modelling & Soil Carbon Practical Application – a WIP. David Watson

Background Pasture Crop Sequence program - produce a user friendly in-crop nitrogen application calculator for the Vic HRZ with high yield potential. Update, validate existing AgVise calculator Used by AgVise for ~12 years Based on an English model – Jon Midwood Australianised over time Balances N application against target yield & protein It works!

Agronomist survey - Confidential Phone interview What method do you currently use? DSS tools? What is good/bad about it? Do you use deep N soil samples? What depth? What level of confidence that the N decisions maximise yield/quality (protein)?

What method do you currently use? DSS tools? None use any formal tool or model and have little confidence in existing models Range of approaches based on nutrient budgets (20kgN/t) Some estimates of mineralisation Large element of “gut feel” applied to any calculation.

What is good/bad about it? Low level of confidence on mineralisation estimates (for our region) Scepticism about applicability of mineralisation calculations from other regions Some use of soil OC, spring rainfall for min. Some use of NUE factors Little confidence in any method

Do you use deep N soil samples? Why not? Most had moved away from deep N testing-few tests undertaken Results are variable & unreliable Time in getting results Winter access to paddocks with rigs Staff, contractors accessing right paddock (maps). Questioned 60cm on our soils (subsoils) Laborious

What level of confidence that the N decisions maximise yield/quality (protein)? Consensus A little science & a large component of gut feel. Probably not optimising yield/quality Quotes “I tear my hair out every year over N decisions” “Fly by the seat of my pants more often than not” “Major issue for the industry with no clear process/tool available” “The Holy Grail – good luck!”

AgVise calculator In crop ~GS 24/30, canola, wheat (mill/feed), barley (malt/feed). XLS spread sheet Balance sheet approach Soil N, 40cm, drill sample(next day results) + Crop N est + mineralisation est Less losses (vol, denit, leach, runoff) est Graph crop requirement against range of yields

AgVise calculator

Shortcomings to address Validate all crop N requirement assumptions for yield & protein More accurate crop N estimates N loss estimates Residual soil N estimates Mineralisation estimates Easier, quicker soil N sampling & testing

Mineralisation the biggest unknown Soil temp, moisture & carbon Mineralisation profile vs crop demand 5 Industry models/tools from other locations for entire growing season using rf & OC give a large range off values, typically 84-140kgN/ha Take no account of soil temp. APSIM (yield prophet)

APSIM default Carbon settings Lismore, 65 yrs 20-30kg N/ha Too low Something wrong! Soil carbon ?????? Z30 to Maturity Mineralisation kg N/ha

SCaRP data for APSIM 146 sites SW Vic MIR assessment of soil carbon Continuous crop >10yrs Fraction definition similar/same as APSIM Horizons different SCARP 0-30 t/ha Bulk density Particulate OC Humic OC Resistant OC Total OC 1.5 6.43 26.90 12.81 46.14 APSIM settings BiomC HumC InertC 0.97 30.30 24.1 55.36

APSIM - SCaRP Carbon settings ~90kgN/ha

NAPP strategy going forward Use basic AgVise calculator >>>> NAPP Update all components to include Likely distribution (range) of values, esp mineralisation. Explanation of what factors influence range Grower/advisor to use, knowledge, experience & intuition to determine component values - ownership Growers/advisors to determine target yield/quality reflecting attitude to risk.

Industry Review Yield Prophet to include existing SCaRP data where possible Include MIR soil carbon assessment in all Yield Prophet soil characterisations- past & future SCaRP data is available (ref CamN)