Oil Wells vs. Gas Wells – A Texas perspective

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Western States Oil and Gas Emission Inventories Presentation to Four Corners Joint Air Quality Task Force January 8, 2007.
Advertisements

Railroad Commission of Texas Statewide Rule 32 and Flaring/Venting of Produced Gas Travis Baer, District 01 Engineering Specialist August 2014.
Anne M. Inman, P.E. Air Permits Division September 11, 2012.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS Gas Plants & Refineries Application and Reporting Process Karen Cassidy, Engineering Unit August 2014.
USEPA Petroleum Refinery Enforcement Emerging Issues February 22, 2011.
Oil and Gas Air Quality Authorizations in Texas
Garry Kaufman Deputy Director Colorado Air Pollution Control Division June 6, 2014.
Air Permitting in Louisiana & Texas a guide to compliance requirements presented by: Shonta’ Moore, MS Air Permitting Specialist - Environmental Division.
General Issues & Reporting Guidance Emissions Inventory Workshop
“Partner Experiences” Pioneer Natural Resources, USA Presented by James Meier Processors Technology Transfer Workshop September 23, 2004 Dallas, Texas.
Efficient Pigging of Gathering Lines
EXAMPLE 6 Use polynomial models Petroleum Since 1980, the number W (in thousands) of United States wells producing crude oil and the average daily oil.
Defining the Upstream Oil and Gas Sector: Exploration, Production, and Natural Gas Gathering and Processing Western Climate Initiative – Oil & Gas Collaborative.
Directed Inspection and Maintenance (DI&M) Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Partners Producers Technology Transfer Workshop Devon Energy and EPA’s.
VOC and NO x Rules Related to the Oil and Natural Gas Industries Air Quality Division Bob Gifford Air Quality Specialist, Air Quality Division Presented.
Installing Vapor Recovery Units to Reduce Methane Losses
1 Air Quality: Potential Impacts of Shale Development in Ohio Kevin Crist, PhD Director & Professor, Center for Air Quality Department of Chemical and.
Western Sources and Trends: What do we know about emission sources across the West? WRAP Ozone & NOx in the West meeting November 11, 2009 Santa Fe, NM.
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW) WAQS 2011b Emissions Projections University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) Ramboll-Environ.
Estimate of Air Emissions from Shale Gas Development and Production in North Carolina May 15, 2015 Presented to the Mining and Energy Commission Environmental.
EPA Overreach WATERS OF THE U S METHANE REDUCTION PLAN LEGISLATIVE /REGULATORY FORUM SEPTEMBER 16, 2015.
Railroad Commission of Texas Monthly Production Report (PR) Deborah Davis.
Discovering New Opportunities for Reducing Methane Emissions Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production.
(Thanks to Amnon Bar-Ilan for the origin of most of the Slides)
Estimate of Air Emissions from Shale Gas Development and Production in North Carolina July 8, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission.
Class Description In the class today we will be discussing how to properly file the PR report. The PR report is a monthly report that is filed by the operator.
Non-EGU Point and Area Sources: Review of 2018 Base Case Emissions Projections Stationary Sources Joint Forum Meeting February 1, 2006.
Horizontal Well Artificial Lift Projects Advisory Board Meeting, August 16, 2012 Project-4 Investigation of Multiphase Flow Behavior in Horizontal Oil.
Area Source Emissions Inventory Improvement Update Michael Ege, Emissions Inventory Specialist Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
WRAP Workshop Emissions and AQ Modeling – July 29, 2008 IPAMS-WRAP Phase III Oil and Gas Emissions Inventory Development Project Amnon Bar-Ilan, Ron Friesen,
1 WRAP Oil & Gas Phase II Work Plan: 2002 and 2018 Area Source Inventory Improvements and Area Source Controls Evaluation WRAP Stationary Sources Forum.
Producer Partner Reported Opportunities Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers Technology Transfer Workshop ExxonMobil Production Company, American.
2002 Emissions Inventory of Oil and Gas Sources ENVIRON Presentation to the WRAP Stationary Sources Joint Forum May 11, 2005.
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) Options for Completing the 3SAQS Pilot Study University of North Carolina (UNC-IE)
1 Addressing Air Quality Impacts from Oil and Gas Development in Colorado WESTAR Conference October 23, 2008 Rose Waldman Colorado Air Pollution Control.
Natural Gas Data Collection and Estimation Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association June 6, 2010 Dallas, Texas James Kendell, Director, Natural Gas Division.
Production Sector Workshop Introduction to Online Tools Presented by: Heather Wright ERG June 19, 2003 Natural Gas STAR Technology Transfer Workshop New.
WASATCH FRONT EMISSIONS ARE IMPROVING 320 tons/day Source: Utah Division of Air Quality Patrick Barickman, 35% Reduction
Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits Jay Christopher Business Unit Manager, Air & Process Services Trihydro Corporation.
EPA’s Nonpoint Oil and Gas Emission Estimation Tool for the 2014 NEI Regi Oommen and Mike Pring, Eastern Research Group Jennifer Snyder, U.S. EPA.
Samuel Short, Manager Air Permits Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
Air Quality Division Emissions Inventories SAW: May 3, 2016 Page 1 Point Source Emissions Inventories Air Quality Division Susan Wampler May 3,
Area Oil & Gas Tool: Comparison Analysis Oklahoma DEQ Thursday, January 14, 2016.
Improving Oil & Gas Emissions Tool Inputs Using Industry Surveys and Permit Data Mark Gibbs Environmental Programs Manager Emissions Inventory Section.
David Allen Department of Chemical Engineering, and Center for Energy and Environmental Resources University of Texas at Austin Air Emissions from Increased.
Class Synopsis This presentation will summarize the oil and gas well supplements, proration schedule, and online research queries associated with the Well.
Solar Power Applications
National Oil and Gas Emissions Committee Monthly Committee Call
Oil and Gas Production Emission Estimates in the NEI
EPA Oil and Gas VOC Speciation Improvement Efforts
Oil & Gas Growth Projections, Decline Curves, and Emissions Estimates
Improving Area Source Oil and Gas Emissions Estimates
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Natural Gas STAR Program
EPA’S New Source Performance Standard (NSPS)
How Texas Estimates Future Oil and Gas Production
New Oil & Gas NAICS Codes
WESTAR Spring 2008 Park City, UT
National Oil and Gas Tool Update
Methane Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities
Western Air Quality Study (WAQS) Intermountain Data Warehouse (IWDW)
Properties of crude oil
Oil and Gas Sector E&P Reporting Protocol
Saskatchewan Measurement Directive PNG017 DRAFT CHANGES
Natural Gas Coal Crude Oil.
Oil and Gas Sector E&P Reporting Protocol
Graphing Oil and Gas Activity in Texas
Fugitives Wellhead Compression Gathering
Nonpoint Oil and Gas Emission Estimation Tool for the 2017 NEI
Uncertainty vs. Action Our understanding of the winter ozone issue has many gaps. These gaps hinder our ability to solve the problem efficiently and effectively.
Uinta Basin Industry BMPs Stuart Siffring
Presentation transcript:

Oil Wells vs. Gas Wells – A Texas perspective Paige Sprague and Michael Ege Air Quality Division Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) National Oil and Gas Committee May 11, 2017

Overview Where does Texas oil and gas activity data come from? Railroad Commission of Texas (RRC) oil well versus gas well definitions Differences between EPA oil and gas tool and Texas’ oil and gas activity data Comparison of emissions per well (or per barrel of liquids production) for Texas Conclusions

Where does Texas oil and gas activity data come from? Oil and gas operators report production at the lease level to the RRC. Oil and gas production data can be queried from the RRC website at: http://webapps.rrc.state.tx.us/PDQ/generalReportAction.do County-level monthly and annual production data is available in a variety of ways: County-level totals Operator totals Lease-level totals

RRC oil well versus gas well definitions Statutory definition: Based on the gas/oil ratio (GOR) in thousands of cubic feet of gas per barrel of petroleum liquids (MCF/BBL) GOR > 100 MCF/BBL : gas well GOR < 100 MCF/BBL : oil well In practice, additional criteria are applied. For wells with a GOR between 12.5 – 100 MCF/BBL API gravity > 50 : gas well API gravity < 50 : oil well

Differences between EPA oil and gas tool and Texas’ data GOR (MCF/BBL) RRC well type EPA tool well type > 100 Gas 12.5 – 100, API gravity > 50 Oil API gravity < 50 < 12.5 For one subset of wells (GOR between 12.5 and 100 MCF/BBL, with an API gravity > 50), the wells would be classified differently. All other wells would be classified the same.

Differences between EPA oil and gas tool and Texas’ data (cont.) Some gas wells shifted to oil wells based on the GHGRP GOR definition used by ERG About 10% of gas wells were shifted to oil wells (impacts compressor engine emissions) About 95% of condensate was shifted to oil (impacts storage tank and loading loss emissions) HPDI data used for EPA tool double counts some of the oil well data for Texas RRC data is reported at the lease level, not the well level. Oil leases can have multiple wells, which leads to double counting in the HPDI data. Gas leases only have one well, so no double counting of gas well data.

Differences between EPA oil and gas tool and Texas’ data (cont.) Activity data EPA Tool HPDI data original HPDI data adjusted* Texas RRC Oil wells 479,144 246,760 189,706 Crude oil, Mbbls 2,109,061 1,124,263 954,954 Casinghead gas, MMcf 6,458,542 4,209,643 2,072,280 Gas wells 90,070 104,446 Condensate, Mbbls 5,424 144,890 Natural gas, MMcf 4,318,593 6,279,338 *HPDI activity data adjusted to remove effects of double counting of oil well data

Comparison of area source emissions by well type for Texas To compare emissions between well types, Texas statewide emissions by source type were divided by the number of wells (tons per well) or by the amount of production (tons per thousands of barrels). While there are differences in emissions per well (or per production) between different basins in Texas for many sources, statewide averages were used here to simplify the comparisons.

Comparison of VOC emissions by well type for Texas Tons of VOC emissions per thousands of barrels of product: Condensate storage tanks have about 3.55 times the emissions as crude oil storage tanks. Type of source Oil wells Gas wells Crude oil storage tanks 0.40 - Condensate storage tanks 1.42

Comparison of VOC emissions by well type for Texas (cont.) Tons of VOC emissions per well: For sources present at both types of wells, the total emissions are almost the same. However, gas wells have additional emissions: blowdowns and dehydrators (0.66 tons VOC per well total), so the well type is important. Type of source Oil wells Gas wells Pneumatic devices 0.74 0.35 Piping fugitives 0.34 0.48 Pneumatic pumps 0.04 0.31 Total: 1.12 1.14

Comparison of NOX emissions by well type for Texas Tons of NOX emissions per well: Gas wells have over 11 times the NOX emissions as oil wells for these sources. Well type is VERY important for NOX emissions. Type of Source Oil wells Gas wells Wellhead compressor engines - 1.47 Lateral/gathering compressor engines 0.31 Artificial lift engines 0.16 Total: 1.78

Conclusions For the 2014 National Emissions Inventory (NEI), Texas used the RRC activity data to estimate emissions. Texas relies on the RRC to make the determination between oil wells and gas wells (and crude oil versus condensate). Since condensate has higher emissions than crude oil, condensate should not be reclassified as crude oil in the EPA tool. Since the number of gas wells significantly impacts NOX emissions, gas wells should not be reclassified as oil wells in the EPA tool.

Questions?

Contact Information Paige Sprague (512) 239-6732 Paige.Sprague@tceq.texas.gov Michael Ege (512) 239-5706 Michael.Ege@tceq.texas.gov TCEQ area source Web page http://www.tceq.texas.gov/airquality/areasource