Co Chair Executive Committee EMANATE on behalf of co-authors

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ACTIVE Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
Advertisements

ROCKET-AF Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial.
JOURNAL REVIEW Newer Antithrombotics in AF 1 Dr Ranjith MP Senior Resident Department of Cardiology Government Medical college Kozhikode.
Newer Anticoagulants Drug Class Nicole N. Nguyen, PharmD Senior Clinical Pharmacist Health Care Services October 16, 2013.
Standard Medical Therapy TRA 40 mg mg/d TRA 40 mg mg/d Placebo EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp for RI/urgent coronary revasc. 1  EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp.
CLINICAL CASES.
Nuovi Anticoagulanti orali: dai criteri di scelta all’esperienza sul campo RIVAROXABAN Dr. Elisabetta Toso SOC Cardiologia Ospedale Cardinal Massaia -
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran vs. Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation - Japanese population in the RE-LY ® - Shinya Goto, MD., PhD. Tokai.
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
AF and NOACs An UPDATE JULY 2014
The GARFIELD Registry is funded by an unrestricted research grant from Bayer Pharma AG Case discussion The patient caught between.
Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation An Expert Commentary With Michael D. Ezekowitz, MD, PhD A Clinical Context Report.
Manufacturer: Daiichi Sankyo FDA Approval Date: 01/08/2015
Jim Hoehns, Pharm.D.. Edoxaban Oral factor Xa inhibitor Bioavailability: 62% Tmax: 1-2 hrs Elimination: 50% renal Half-life: 9-11 hours.
Randomized Evaluation of Long- term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Risk of Stroke.
  Warfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban Target
Bridging Oral Anticoagulation with Low Molecular Weight Heparin: Experience in 367 Patients with Renal Insufficiency Heyder Omran, Giso von der Recke,
How Much AF is Too Much AF? Do I Initiate Anticoagulation Based on AF Detected on Device Monitoring? Kenneth W. Mahaffey, MD, FACC Professor of Medicine,
UK/CVS (1) | February 2013 Emerging technologies for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation UK/CVS (1) | Date of preparation: February 2013.
Atrial Fibrillation Management Past, Present and Future
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Guillaume Pare MD Genetic determinants of dabigatran plasma levels and their relation to bleeding On behalf of RE-LY Genetics: Guillaume Pare MD, Niclas.
Presented by Renato D. Lopes, MD, PhD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, USA for the ARISTOTLE investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban.
Long-Term Tolerability of Ticagrelor for Secondary Prevention: Insights from PEGASUS-TIMI 54 Trial Marc P. Bonaca, MD, MPH on behalf of the PEGASUS-TIMI.
WarfarinApixaban Primary outcome: major/clinically relevant bleeding (through 6 months) Secondary objective: Death, MI, stroke, stent thrombosis Randomize.
The Case for Rate Control: In the Management of Atrial Fibrillation Charles W. Clogston, M.D. Cardiologist CHI St. Vincent Heart Clinic Arkansas April.
Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Manesh R. Patel, M.D., Kenneth W. Mahaffey, M.D., Jyotsna Garg, M.S., Guohua Pan, Ph.D.,
Manesh R. Patel, M.D., Kenneth W. Mahaffey, M.D., Jyotsna Garg, M.S., Guohua Pan, Ph.D., Daniel E. Singer, M.D., Werner Hacke, M.D., Ph.D., Gunter Breithardt,
Review on NOACs Studies DR. KOUROSH SADEGHI TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.
1 Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation R3 Dae Ho Kim / Prof. Jin Bae Kim N Engl J Med 2011; DOI: Manesh R. Patel, M.D.,
Comparison of Dabigatran and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart DiseaseClinical Perspective by Michael D. Ezekowitz, Rangadham.
Digoxin And Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Heart Failure: Does Serum Digoxin Concentration Matter? Renato D. Lopes, MD,
C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D. Harvard Medical School
Case 66 year old male with PMH of HTN, DM, ESRD on renal replacement TIW, stroke in 2011 with right side residual weakness, atrial fibrillation, currently.
Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
The efficacy and safety of oral Rivaroxaban in patients with permanent inferior vena cava filter: a pilot case-control study Lobastov K., Barinov V.,
CRT 2017: Putting LAA closure in the age of DOACs into perspective
Harvard Medical School C. Michael Gibson, M.S., M.D.
Heart Valve Thrombosis & Neuro-Outcomes
Exploring Factors Associated with Preferential Prescribing of Apixaban Over Warfarin in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Scott McColgana,
David R. Holmes, Jr., M.D. Mayo Clinic, Rochester
A Comparison of RE-LY and ROCKET AF Trial Designs and Outcomes
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran vs
ARCTIC-INTERRUPTION 2-year- Versus 1year Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After DES implantation The randomized ARCTIC-Interruption Study JP Collet.
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
Management of atrial fibrillation. Patterns of Atrial Fibrillation.
Management of AF­related stroke
The EUROMAX trial is supported by The Medicines Company
on behalf of the RE-DUAL PCI Steering Committee and Investigators
The ANTARCTIC investigators
Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY
Novel oral anticoagulants in comparison with warfarin
Click here for title Click here for subtitle
Late Follow-Up from the PARTNER Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry
ACTIVE A Effects of Addition of Clopidogrel to Aspirin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation who are Unsuitable for Vitamin K Antagonists.
Digoxin And Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Heart Failure: Does Serum Digoxin Concentration Matter? Renato D. Lopes, MD,
A DIGITAL, END-TO-END, NATIONWIDE, PRAGMATIC TRIAL OF SCREENING FOR UNDIAGNOSED ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: PRIMARY RESULTS OF THE mSToPS TRIAL Steven R. Steinhubl,
NOACS: Emerging data in ACS/IHD
Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Patients With AF and HF
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
MK-0954 PN948 NOT APPROVED FOR USE (date)
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Switching Emphasis from stroke prevention to stroke and hemorrhage prevention. Michael D. Ezekowitz, MBChB, DPhil, FACC,
Which NOAC and When for Stroke Prevention in AF?
Five-Year Outcomes after Randomization to Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Final Results of The PARTNER 1 Trial Michael J. Mack, MD.
Apixaban vs VKA and Aspirin vs Placebo in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and ACS/PCI: The AUGUSTUS Trial Renato D. Lopes, MD, PhD on behalf of the.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
Gianluigi Savarese et al. JCHF 2016;4:
Presenter Disclosure Information
Stephan Windecker on behalf of the AUGUSTUS Investigators
Presentation transcript:

Co Chair Executive Committee EMANATE on behalf of co-authors Apixaban versus Heparin/Vitamin K Antagonist in Anticoagulation-naïve Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Scheduled for Cardioversion: The EMANATE Trial Michael D. Ezekowitz, Professor, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA and Lankenau Heart Center, Wynnewood, PA and Bryn Mawr Hospital, Bryn Mawr, PA; Co Chair Executive Committee EMANATE on behalf of co-authors Charles V. Pollack, Jonathan L. Halperin, Richard D. England, Sandra VanPelt Nguyen, Judith Spahr, Maria Sudworth, Nilo Cater, Andrei Breazna, Jonas Oldgren, Paulus Kirchhof, for the EMANATE investigators

Disclosures Michael D. Ezekowitz has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Armetheon, Pfizer, Sanofi, Bristol- Myers Squibb, Portola, Daiichi-Sankyo, Medtronic, Johnson & Johnson, and Janssen Scientific Affairs; grant support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co-PI PETRO, RE-LY, X-VeRT, EMANATE; Executive Committee ENSURE-AF, ENGAGE-AF.

Background The goal of anticoagulation in the setting of cardioversion is to prevent stroke and systemic embolism without causing bleeding. Post hoc analyses of cardioversions in the RE-LY, ARISTOTLE, ROCKET-AF and ENGAGE-AF trials found low event rates .1-4 A limitation was the prolonged period of pre-cardioversion anticoagulation. To evaluate more immediate cardioversion , prospective trials comparing rivaroxaban (X-VeRT)5 and edoxaban (ENSURE-AF)6 against heparin/VKA in patients undergoing cardioversion found comparable efficacy and safety with low event rates. 1. Nagarakanti R, Ezekowitz M, et al. Circulation. 2011;123:131-136. 2. Flaker G, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1082-1087. 3. Piccini JP, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1998-2006. 4. Plitt A, et al. Clin Cardiol. 2016;39:345-346. 5. Cappato R, Ezekowitz M, et al. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:3346-3355. 6. Goette A, et al. Lancet. 2016;388:1995-2003.

Objectives of EMANATE To prospectively compare the outcomes of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, and clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding in patients with < 48 hrs anticoagulation who were randomized to apixaban or heparin/VKA in an open-label trial with blinded endpoint adjudication. To gain insight into the role of image guidance. To assess the value of a loading dose of apixaban in patients rapidly transitioned to cardioversion.

Key Eligibility Criteria Key Inclusion Criteria Key Exclusion Criteria §Anticoagulation-naïve patients with AF ( <48 hours of parenteral and/or oral anticoagulation) indicated for cardioversion. §Contraindications to apixaban or heparin/VKA §Mitral stenosis or previous valve surgery §Other conditions requiring anticoagulation §Dual antiplatelet therapy

Study Design If not cardioverted follow up was 90 days Treatment begins If cardioverted follow up was 30+/- 7 days Cardioversion Apixaban 5.0 mg twice daily (2.5 mg BID if down-titrated) Screening/ randomization 1:1 Heparin/VKA (usual care) Imaging

Apixaban Loading Dose Option In patients randomized to apixaban, cardioversion could be performed 2 hours after a loading dose of 10 mg (reduced to 5 mg if 2 of the following present: age ≥ 80, weight ≤ 60 kg, serum creatinine ≥ 1.5 mg/dl [133 micromol/L).

Patient Disposition (ITT Population) Randomized (N=1500) Apixaban (n=753) Heparin/VKA (n=747) Died Lost to Completed Withdrew consent: Withdrew consent, (n=2) follow-up refused follow-up* (n=1) (n=0) (n=736, 97.7%) (n=15, 2.0%) (n=730, 97.7%) Mean Follow-up from randomization to withdrawal was 29 days, range 1-83 days Mean Follow-up from randomization to withdrawal was 23 days, range 1-81 days * No outcome events occurred.

Key Baseline Patient Demographics Apixaban Heparin/VKA All (n=753) 5-mg loading dose (n=11) 10-mg loading dose (n=331) (n=747) Age, years, mean (SD) 64.7 (12.2) 80.5 (7.4) 63.2 (12.2) 64.5 (12.8) Sex, female, n (%) 248 (32.9) 4 (36.4) 123 (37.2) 250 (33.5) Race, white, n (%) 654 (86.9) 10 (90.9) 322 (97.3) 648 (86.7) Weight, kg, mean (SD) 87.9 (20.6) 69.1 (15.5) 90.2 (21.0) 86.3 (19.8) Hypertension, n (%) 496 (65.9) 9 (81.8) 221 (66.8) 481 (64.4) LVEF <40, n (%) 45 (6.0) 21 (6.3) 54 (7.2) Diabetes, n (%) 154 (20.5) 1 (9.1) 75 (22.7) 140 (18.7) CHA2DS2-VASc score, mean (SD) 2.4 (1.7) 4.4 (1.8) 2.3 (1.7) 2.4 (1.7) Creatinine clearance, mL/min, mean (SD) 79.2 (50.6) 41.0 (13.4) 91.7 (52.1) 78.5 (49.0)

Stroke/Systemic Embolic Outcomes Apixaban (events: 0/753) Heparin/VKA (events: 6/747) 0.020 Proportion of patients with stroke/SE 5 ischemic, 1 hemorrhagic stroke with 0 systemic embolic events 0.015 0.010 0.005 P=0.0164 0.000 30 Time to stroke/SE (days) 60 90 Number at risk Apixaban 752 6145 199 55 Heparin/VKA 747 65 231 88 One patient’s adjudicated stroke date was one day prior to randomization; thus at Day 0, only 1499 were at risk for stroke. No patients had SE. ITT population. SE = systemic embolism

Safety Outcomes (Safety Population*, N=1456) Apixaban Total (n=735) Apixaban Loading Dose Subset (n=342) Heparin/VKA Total (n=721) Major bleeds 3 (1) 6 Clinically relevant non-major bleeds 11 (4) 13 *Randomized and received > 1 dose of study medication (by treatment received).

Image-Guided Strategy (n=840) Thrombus-present (First Image) (n=61) complete follow up , no outcome events Apixaban (n=30) Heparin/VKA (n=31) Actual treatment Apixaban (n=29) Heparin/VKA (n=1) Heparin/VKA (n=31) Repeat Imaging was 37 + 9 days (mean +/-!SD) after first image Repeat Imaging was 37 + 14 days(mean +/-1SD ) after first Image 2nd View Thrombus (+) Thrombus (-) No further Thrombus (–) No further imaging (n=11/23) (n=12/23) imaging (n=6) imaging (n=1) (n=8/18) (n=10 /18) (n=13)

Summary and Conclusion EMANATE evaluated patients scheduled for cardioversion. All received < 48 hrs anticoagulation and 61% were not anticoagulated prior to randomization. There were 0 vs 6 strokes in the apixaban vs heparin/VKA group (p=0.0164*), 3 vs 6 major bleeds, 2 vs 1 deaths, and no systemic embolic events in either group. Among 342 patients receiving the loading dose of apixaban, there were 0 strokes, 1 major bleed, and 1 death. Imaging identified left atrial appendage thrombi in 61 patients; all continued anticoagulation. There were no outcome events. Among those with repeat imaging (37 ± 11 days after the initial imaging) thrombi resolved in 52% vs 56% in the apixaban and heparin/VKA groups. Limitation: Like the other prospective cardioversion studies, EMANATE was underpowered. We believe the findings observed in EMANATE support the use of apixaban in patients with AF undergoing cardioversion. *log-rank test

The Executive Committee Acknowledge: EMANATE patients and investigators from Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Romania, Spain, Sweden, and the United States Members of the Data and Safety Monitoring and Endpoint Adjudication Committees Sponsors: Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Editorial assistance from Caudex sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer Pharmaceuticals

BACK UP

Statistical Assumptions Using the ARISTOTLE hypothesis of a non-inferiority margin of 1.38 and accounting for the short follow-up of between 30 and 90 days, and the event rate of 0.75 – 1.00% we estimated that approximately 40,000 patients would have to be recruited to achieve a statistically valid study.