Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Exploiting VERITAS Timing Information J. Holder a for the VERITAS Collaboration b a) School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, UK b) For full.
Advertisements

CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Introduction This project used cosmic rays to test a prototype Minimum Bias Trigger Scintillator (MBTS) that will be used in the ATLAS experiment at CERN.
Hybrid Extensive Air Shower Detector Array at the University of Puebla to Study Cosmic Rays O. MARTINEZ, H. SALAZAR, L. VILLASEÑOR * + Grupo de Estudiantes.
Preshower 15/03/2005 P.Kokkas Preshower September Run Data Analysis P. Kokkas.
Prototype of the Daya Bay Neutrino Detector Wang Zhimin IHEP, Daya Bay.
Status of Ultra-low Energy HPGe Detector for low-mass WIMP search Li Xin (Tsinghua University) KIMS collaboration Oct.22nd, 2005.
Kay Graf University of Erlangen for the ANTARES Collaboration 13th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics Moscow, August 23 – 29, 2007 Acoustic.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
RF background, analysis of MTA data & implications for MICE Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Collaboration Meeting – Analysis session, October.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
1 The Study of D and B Meson Semi- leptonic Decay Contributions to the Non-photonic Electrons Xiaoyan Lin CCNU, China/UCLA for the STAR Collaboration 22.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
Diana Parno – July 22, 2008 January PREx Test Run: Compton Photon Analysis Diana Parno Carnegie Mellon University HAPPEX Collaboration Meeting.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
Annual Modulation Study of Dark Matter Using CsI(Tl) Crystals In KIMS Experiment J.H. Choi (Seoul National University) SUSY2012, Beijing.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Design and optimization of Electromagnetic particle Detectors (EDs) in LHAASO-KM2A Xiangdong Sheng, Jia Liu, Jing Zhao on behalf of the LHAASO collaboration.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
Lead Fluoride Calorimeter for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory October 31 st 2008.
1 Energy loss correction for a crystal calorimeter He Miao Institute of High Energy Physics Beijing, P.R.China.
Hongyu Fu, Trigger group The Monte Carlo for Trigger Design of BES3 Scintillating Fibre BEMC Outline: Introduction to BES3 Scin-fibre BEMC Trigger.
Status and first results of the KASCADE-Grande experiment
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Hadronic interaction studies with the ARGO-YBJ experiment (5,800 m 2 ) 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad ( 
Design for Wide FOV Cherenkov telescope upgrading THE 2 nd WORKSHOP OF IHEP Shoushan Zhang Institute of High Energy Physics.
5 June 2002DAQ System Engineering Requirements 1 DAQ System Requirements DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review David Nygren.
(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
Digitization in EMC simulation Dmytro Melnychuk, Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies, Warsaw, Poland.
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Lingling Ma IHEP China Measurement of Cosmic rays with LHAASO at 10PeV~100PeV 4th Workshop on Air Shower Detection at High Altitude Institute of High Energy.
1 Work report ( ) Haoqi Lu IHEP Neutrino group
Development of UV-sensitive MPPC for upgrade of liquid xenon detector in MEG experiment Daisuke Kaneko, on behalf of the MEG Collaboration µ γ Liquid xenon.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
The photomultiplier tubes selection for KM2A electromagnetic particle detectors (EDs) hou chao IHEP The 2nd workshop of air shower detection at high altitudes.
“Separation of cosmic-ray components in a single water Cherenkov detector" Yasser Jerónimo, Luis Villaseñor IFM-UMSNH X Mexican School of Particles and.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
Monte Carlo methods in spallation experiments Defense of the phD thesis Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
ICARUS T600: low energy electrons
The dynamic range extension system for the LHAASO-WCDA experiment
K+e+γ using OKA detector
FSC status and plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
L.L.Ma for LHAASO collaboration Beijing China
Expectation of Cosmic Ray Energy Spectrum with LHAASO
LHAASO Electronics developments
Institute of High Energy Physics, CAS
Double Beta Decay of 48Ca with CaF2(Eu) - ELEGANT VI -
Panagiotis Kokkas Univ. of Ioannina
Detection of muons at 150 GeV/c with a CMS Preshower Prototype
Mo-92 EC/beta+ search with CaMoO4 crystal at Y2L
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
Upgrade of LXe gamma-ray detector in MEG experiment
MC Simulation and optimization of KM2A
on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration
Status of Neutron flux Analysis in KIMS experiment
Separation of Cosmic-Ray Components in Water Cherenkov Detector
Claudio Bogazzi * - NIKHEF Amsterdam ICRC 2011 – Beijing 13/08/2011
SOS Cerenkov Purpose: provide PID for NA Cerenkov efficiency studies
Estimation of Sensitivity to Gamma Ray point Sources above 30TeV
Atmospheric muons in ANTARES
MPPC for T2K Fine-Grained Detector
The Aperture and Precision of the Auger Observatory
Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration
PERFORMANCE OF THE METAL RADIATION MONITORING SYSTEMS
Trigger operation during 2007 run
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration 2017-07-17 ICRC2017 Calibration and monitoring of LHAASO-KM2A muon detectors with muon decay events Xiong Zuo IHEP, CAS, for the LHAASO Collaboration 2017-07-17

Outline Introduction MC simulation Experiment setup Data selection 1 Introduction 2 MC simulation 3 Experiment setup 4 Data selection 5 Conclusion

P art 1 Introduction

1.1 LHAASO MD array MD 4400 m a.s.l 1171 MDs, ~40000 m2 Effect drawing of LHAASO

1.2 MD unit MD Two prototype muon detectors in Tibet Schematic of LHAASO muon detector 5

1.3 Physical requirements of MD unit Detection efficiency > 95% Signal charge resolution for single muon < 25% Time Resolution < 10 ns Purity of number of muons detected Dynamic range 1-104 muons Signal attenuation in 10 years < 20% Signal charge distribution of vertical muons Performances meet the primary design well; Design and performances of prototype muon detectors of LHAASO-KM2A X. Zuo, et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics 284 Research Section A 789 (2015) 143-149. Normalized NPE of single muon signals varying with time

1.4 Calibration requirements Parameters Requirements Statistical error (experiment data) System error Signal charge of single muon < 1% < 0.3%@50000 events < 0.5% Time offset < 3ns < 0.1ns@50000 events < 2ns A/D ratio ~ 0.4%@50000 events < 0.2% Water absorption length < 15%@100m < 1%@100m@4000 waveforms ~ 11.5%@100m Water level < 2cm ? Calibration accuracy meets the requirement well for each parameter except the water level.

1.5 Calibration of the water level So large area of MD array in tough high-altitude environment; Deeply overburdened by soil; Liquid-level sensor increase the burden on installation, maintenance, cost, DAQ and electronics; On-line muon decay method possess simplicity and convenience.

1.6 Muon decay method Typical life time: 2.2 μs; Michel electron: Eave=37 MeV and Emax =53 MeV; Charge of vertical equivalent muon (VEM)∝ water level; Michel electron deposits all energy in MD; QVEM/Qe is only related to the water level.

P art 2 MC simulation

2 MC simulation R= 97.5%, AL= 150 m; θ~cos6θ, ϕ~0-360˚; E~ energy spectrum of secondary muons; D~109-120 cm; QVEM/Qe~=6.8 (D=120 cm); Probability: 6.5%. Charge distribution of Michel electron (blue line) and VEM (red line) in simulation. QVEM/Qe versus the water level

P art 3 Experiment setup

3 Experiment setup 500 MHz 12-bit FADC; pedestal + time + charge+…. => hit package ; 5 μs waveform per second. Schematic view of MD FEE and DAQ system

P art 4 Data selection

4.1 Selection using waveforms Stopping muon (first) and Michel electron (second); Integral windows: 400-1200 ns and 1400-4500 ns; 3.87 million waveforms in 2 months with D=120 cm; Backgrounds dominant; Other features needed. 5 μs T1/Q1 T2/Q2 Schematic view of candidate decay events Single muon Schematic view of MD FEE and DAQ system

4.2 New statistical variable Statistical variable Tc: mean hitting time of PMT by cluster photons; Tsum - sum of the time intervals; Ncluster - number of photoelectrons (PEs) clusters. Characteristic peak around 50 ns for the data selection. Stopping muon(Q1) Michel electron(Q2) A waveform of muon decay event in simulation Tc distribution of the single pass-through muon (red one) and the Michel electron (blue one) in simulation

4.3 Michel electron events Cut-offs: Q1 < 50 PEs, 20 ns < Tc < 120 ns; Michel electron signal: ~ 10.5 PEs; QVEM/Qe~=6.8 (D=120 cm); Q2 < 25 PEs => Time index ~= 2.2 μs; Event rates: 0.208% (experiment) and 0.199% (simulation). Charge of the second events after several cut-offs Time difference between the first and second event

4.4 Water level experiment D: 120 cm to 112 cm; Qe decreases as the water quality deteriorates. Simulation agree with experiment data; ~ 1.3 cm accuracy for calibration of water level. Charge of VEM signal verses water level Charge of the Michel electron signal verses water level

5 Conclusion The large area of LHAASO MD array would contributes to Υ/p discrimination, primary hadron compositions discrimination and HIM test; All the calibration parameters meet the design requirement; The on-line muon decay method based on waveforms, studied by MC simulation, is presented to calibrate and monitor the water level. The statistical variable Tc has been constructed and suppressed successfully the backgrounds; Qe ~= 0.147 QVEM, QVEM/Qe has a linear correlation with the water level, experiment data validates the simulation.

Thanks!!!