Exploratory Research in Corn

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Advertisements

Manure is a Resource Ron Wiederholt Nutrient Management Specialist NDSU Extension Livestock Manure Nutrient Management Series March, 2006.
INTRODUCTION Kenya is a food insecure Economy reliant on rain-fed agriculture(by a factor of 1.6) Key intervention: irrigation Irrigation challenged by.
Long-Term Soil P and K Trends in Relation to Nutrient Removal in Corn-Soybean Rotations Antonio Mallarino Iowa State University Joint Meeting NEC-17, NCERA-13,
Current Nitrogen Fertilization Strategies for Corn in Nebraska Richard Ferguson Bob Caldwell.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Efforts to Improve N Use Efficiency of Corn in Arkansas Highlights of Research in Progress.
FIELD-SCALE N APPLICATION USING CROP REFLECTANCE SENSORS Ken Sudduth and Newell Kitchen USDA-ARS Translating Missouri USDA-ARS Research and Technology.
Morteza Mozaffari Soil Testing and Research Laboratory, Marianna Immediate and Residual Effects of Urea and Pelleted Poultry Manure on Corn and Soil in.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
“Managing Applied Nitrogen on Winter Canola in the Pacific Northwest” Idaho Oil Seed Conference February 12, 2009 Moscow, Idaho Don Wysocki, Tom Chastain,
Triticale For P Removal Brad Brown University of Idaho 2008 Idaho Nutrient Management Conference.
May 15,  Rates – current industry recommendations  Soil and Foliar Applied ◦ Boron, Chlorine, Copper, Zinc ◦ Calcium – Foliar only  NDVI, Soil,
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
1 CANOPY REFLECTANCE (HRWW AND HRSW) IN SOUTH DAKOTA ECONOMIC OPTIMUM NITROGEN RATE FOR HRSW IN SOUTH DAKOTA Nitrogen Use Efficiency Meeting Cheryl Reese*,
Nitrogen Use Efficiency Workshop Canopy Reflectance Signatures: Developing a Crop Need-Based Indicator for Sidedress Application of N Fertilizer to Canola.
Potential for Sensor Based Systems in Corn-Sugar Beet Rotations John A. Lamb Department of Soil, Water, and Climate University of Minnesota – St. Paul.
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Use of By-Plot CV’s for Refining Mid-Season Fertilizer N Rates Daryl Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Use of Alternative Concepts for Determining Preplant and Mid-Season N rates.
Mixed Annual-Perennial Systems: Diversity on Iowa’s Land Matt Liebman Wallace Chair for Sustainable Agriculture Iowa State University.
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
GreenSeeker Sensor Brian Arnall Precision Nutrient Management Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State University.
Current N Fertilization
Enhancing Sorghum Yield and Profitability through Sensor Based N Management Dave Mengel and Drew Tucker Department of Agronomy K-State.
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
N Fertilization in Colorado Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19 th & 20 th Oklahoma State University Raj Khosla Colorado State University May 19.
Demonstration of In-Season Nitrogen Management Strategies for Corn Production John Sawyer John Lundvall Jennifer Hawkins Department of Agronomy Iowa State.
Three Alternative Nitrogen Management Strategies for Cereal Grain Production Brian Arnall Brian Arnall Plant and Soil Sciences Department Oklahoma State.
On-farm Evaluation of Optical Sensor Technology for Variable Rate N Application to Corn in Ontario and Quebec Bao-Luo Ma, and Nicolas Tremblay Eastern.
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Methods to Improve N Fertilization in Virginia Methods to Improve N Fertilization in Virginia Wickham.
Introduction Water quality concerns have led to adoption of Idaho regulations that require livestock producers to manage animal wastes as never before.
Theory of Predicting Crop Response to Non-Limiting Nitrogen.
Drew Tucker and Dave Mengel KSU Agronomy An update on Kansas sensor based N recommendations.
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Laboratory for Agriculture and Environmental Studies Sensor Based Variable Rate N Management in Mid-Atlantic.
Hero Gollany USDA-ARS Pendleton, OR NUE Conference - August 8-10, 2016.
Regional Project Objectives  To evaluate the performance of sensor-based N recommendation algorithms across a wide range of soil and climate conditions.
Economics of Crop Production
Fertility Strategies for Lean Times
Variable Rate Nitrogen
Developing Sidedress N Recommendations for Corn in Central PA
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Nutrient Management: Ways to Save Money, From Simple to High Tech
HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES?
Evaluation of the Yield Potential Based NFOA for Cotton
Brenda V. Ortiz1, Mariana Del Corso1, Gregory Pate2
Crop-based Approach for In-season N Application
Wheat: Harvest and Review of Steps for Good Wheat Management
Evaluation of Pre-Side Dress Nitrate Test for Corn in Minnesota
Sensing Resolution in Corn
Precision Sensing Extension Workshop January 8, 2008
Strategies for Split N Applications for Corn
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Predicting Winter Wheat Grain Yield under Grazed and Non-Grazed Production Systems Jason Lawles.
Annual ASA Meeting, Indianapolis
Precision Agriculture
Objective: To discuss the current regional project and identify improvements needed for conducting future collaborative sensor-based research.
Nitrogen Response Following Corn
Conventional N Management for Oklahoma
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502
HOW CAN WE REDUCE VOLATILIZATION LOSSES?
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.406
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.222
Variability in Corn Response to N Fertilizer along a 1000-ft Hillslope
Wheat Fertility Experiment No.502
In-field Experiment.
Jeff Vetsch and Gyles Randall University of Minnesota
Presentation transcript:

Exploratory Research in Corn and Wheat - Virginia

Previous Virginia Research NDVI Tiller Density 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 500 1000 1500 2000 0.1 0.2 Predicted Yield Index Yield, Mg ha-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 Spring N rates for VA wheat production can be determined using spectral reflectance sensors and applied at a 4-ft2 resolution using commercial equipment

Standard VA Rotation (3 crops in 2 years) No-till Corn Conv.-till Wheat No-till DC Soybean

Objectives Refine current methods of determining variable topdress N rates and incorporate foliar P recommendations into fertilization algorithms for wheat using sensor-based technology Develop a sensor-based N and P fertilization strategy for Virginia corn production Evaluate the benefits of foliar P applications for wheat and corn production

------- lb N / acre ------- Experimental Procedures - Obj. 1 6 site years (2 in each of 3 yr) RCBD; 3 replications TREATMENT STRUCTURE Trt GS 25 N GS 30 N Resolution ------- lb N / acre ------- 1 NONE 2 30 60 FLAT RATE 3 120 4 5 6 NFOA 1 m 7 TILLER 8 TISSUE 13 NFOA3 14 15 NFOA3+PFOA2 16 9 NFOA2 10 11 NFOA2+PFOA1 12 Year 2 Year 3

Experimental Procedures - Obj. 2 12 site years (4 sites in each of 3 yr) Irrigated and non-irrigated Conventional and no till RCBD; 3 replications Preplant N (0 to 240 lb N/acre) Starter N (0 to 70 lb N/acre) Sidedress N (0 to 150 lb N/acre) Plots will be fertilized and harvested using conventional plot equipment

Experimental Procedures - Obj. 2 Spectral measurements collected from canopy at V4, V6, V8, and V10 Chlorophyll and tissue N and P will be measured at same growth stages A PSNT will be conducted for each treatment prior to sidedress N applications at V6

Preliminary Results - Obj. 2 30 60 90 120 150 180 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 NDVI, V8 Yield, bu/acre Dryland, No N Irrigated, No N Dryland, Added N Irrigated, Added N

Foliar P Applications in Virginia Determine from soil test Residual P can carry over from starter application to previous crops P can be banded with wheat crop

PHOSPHORUS RESPONSE Foliar P Application Foliar P No preplant P 90 lb P2O5 -- lb P2O5/acre -- -- bu/acre -- -- bu/acre -- 0 77 90 4 84 90 8 84 93 12 87 98 Preplant P2O5 Tiller Density Grain Yield -- lb/acre -- -- tillers/ft2 -- -- bu/acre -- 0 50 83 30 70 85 60 80 96 90 95 93 120 95 95

Experimental Procedures - Obj. 3 12 site years (4 sites in each of 3 yr) 2 corn and 2 wheat No till Preplant P STP 1/3 STP 2/3 STP Foliar P rates 0, 4, 8, and 12 lb P2O5/acre for wheat (double for corn) Applied at GS30 or V6

Expected Results Virginia producers will have the knowledge required to implement existing variable-rate fertilizer technology into standard cash grain production systems Grain yields will increase by applying nutrients at the resolution where variability exists Nitrogen use efficiency will increase 30 to 50% while soil-applied P fertilizer will be reduced 50 to 100%