V. Paramonov, on behalf INR team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Front End Test Stand Collaboration ELECTROMAGNETIC DESIGN OF A RFQ FOR THE FRONT END TEST STAND AT RAL A. Kurup, A. Letchford The RAL front end test.
Advertisements

Tom Powers Practical Aspects of SRF Cavity Testing and Operations SRF Workshop 2011 Tutorial Session.
PETS components and waveguide connections CLIC Workshop 2007 David Carrillo.
Waveguides Rectangular Waveguides TEM, TE and TM waves
Yury CHESNOKOV Crystal Collimation workshop, March 7, 2005 CALIBRATION of CMS CALORIMETERS with LHC PROTON BEAM DEFLECTED BY CRYSTAL CALIBRATION of CMS.
Internship for young academic teachers (CAS/36/POKL) CERN X-XII 2014 Zuzanna Krawczyk This work has been supported by the European Union in the framework.
SRF Results and Requirements Internal MLC Review Matthias Liepe1.
Lecture 18 Chapter XI Propagation and Coupling of Modes in Optical Dielectric Waveguides – Periodic Waveguides Highlights (a) Periodic (corrugated) WG.
Lecture 6.
201 MHz NC RF Cavity R&D for Muon Cooling Channels
Zenghai Li SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory LHC-CC13 CERN, December 9-11, 2013 HOM Coupler Optimization & RF Modeling.
TD24 R05 N1 after high-power test analysis plans A. Degiovanni, M. Aicheler, N. Mouriz Irazabal, A.T. Perez Fontenla, R. Wegner CLIC RF Structure Development.
DTL: Basic Considerations M. Comunian & F. Grespan Thanks to J. Stovall, for the help!
X-Band RF Structure and Beam Dynamics Workshop, December 2008 CERN experience with 12 GHz high power waveguide components Igor Syratchev (CERN)
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
704MHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL July 8, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  July 8, 2015.
Anders Sunesson RF Group ESS Accelerator Division
Synchronization Andrew Hutton Slava Derbenev Yuhong Zhang.
PROPOSAL G.I.A.F. (HYBRID GUN AT HIGH FREQUENCY) INFN-LNF – UNIVERSITY OF ROME “LA SAPIENZA”- UCLA D. Alesini (T), M. Ferrario (R), A. Gallo (T),
Development of the Room Temperature CH-DTL in the frame of the HIPPI-CARE Project Gianluigi Clemente,
Revised SPL-study work-plan W. Weingarten 3 May 20101SPL Cavity WG Meeting.
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
1.3GHz Input Coupler for ILC
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
2.1 GHz Warm RF Cavity for LEReC Binping Xiao Collider-Accelerator Department, BNL June 15, 2015 LEReC Warm Cavity Review Meeting  June 15, 2015.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
ESS Medium Beta Cavity Prototypes Manufacturing HALF CELLS RESULTS SUMMARY Six medium beta cavities will be manufactured for the Elliptical Cavities Cryomodule.
The Design and Analysis of Multi-megawatt Distributed Single Pole Double Throw (SPDT) Microwave Switches Sami G. Tantawi, and Mikhail I. Petelin Stanford.
Beam Dynamics in the ESS Linac Under the Influence of Monopole and Dipole HOMs A.Farricker 1, R.M.Jones 1, R.Ainsworth 2 and S.Molloy 3 1 The University.
CHARGES TO THE ESAC The External Scientific Advisory Committee for the HIPPI JRA inside CARE has been nominated to analyse the work done and planned in.
Synchronization Issues in MEIC Andrew Hutton, Slava Derbenev and Yuhong Zhang MEIC Ion Complex Design Mini-Workshop Jan. 27 & 28, 2011.
ESGARD – OMIA 10 & 11/09/2007 JRA on Sc cavities and Cryomodule for a Pulsed proton Linac Motivation Work Packages Partners & resources R. Garoby for S.
BINP geometry (= cavity inner dimensions which define the boundary) is based on CERN geometry (as of August 4, 2008) with some adjustments made in order.
Accelerating structure prototypes for 2011 (proposal) A.Grudiev 6/07/11.
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
EKT 441 MICROWAVE COMMUNICATIONS
C/S band RF deflector for post interaction longitudinal phase space optimization (D. Alesini)
STATUS OF THE NC BUNCHING RFQ (Sub-task: SC-RFQ) Antonio Palmieri INFN-LNL.
Introduction to the effort on C-ADS accelerator physics and review charges Jingyu Tang For the Joint IHEP-IMP group on the C-ADS Accelerator Physics International.
Advancements on RF systems D. Alesini (LNF-INFN) Quinto Meeting Generale Collaborazione LI2FE, Frascati 15-16/03/2011.
Review of Alignment Tolerances for LCLS-II SC Linac Arun Saini, N. Solyak Fermilab 27 th April 2016, LCLS-II Accelerator Physics Meeting.
A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016.
Deflecting structures development for XFEL and PITZ TDS Valentin Paramonov, INR, Moscow on behalf joint group L. Kravchuk 1, A.Anisimov 3, D. Denisenko.
LCWS11 WG4 Fully featured accelerating structure engineering design
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Present and possible future schemes for hadron therapy linacs Alberto Degiovanni for the ADAM team HG2017 Workshop , Valencia.
XFEL beamline loads and HOM coupler for CW
General Design of C-ADS Accelerator Physics
For Discussion Possible Beam Dynamics Issues in ILC downstream of Damping Ring LCWS2015 K. Kubo.
Physics design on the main linac
Microwave Engineering by David M. Pozar Ch. 4.1 ~ 4 / 4.6
TaCo Tuner-adjustable waveguide Coupler
NC Accelerator Structures
LHC Crab Cavity Conceptual Design at SLAC
Preliminary injector linac design
Physics design on Injector-1 RFQ
Large Booster and Collider Ring
F.Marcellini, D.Alesini, A.Ghigo
CEPC injector high field S-band accelerating structure design and R&D
Part2: Cavities and Structures
Update of CLIC accelerating structure design
CEPC RF Power Sources System
RF modes for plasma processing
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Part2: Cavities and Structures
SC ISOL Linac of KoRIA Tae-Sun Park (SKKU).
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Physics Design on Injector I
Studies on orbit corrections
Presentation transcript:

V. Paramonov, on behalf INR team. Realization of RF input into coupling element of the accelerating cavity. V. Paramonov, on behalf INR team. Institute for Nuclear Research, Moscow

Motivation Accelerating structure of the main part of INR proton linac - 27 four-section Disk And Washer (DAW) cavities, f = 991 MHz, was constructed by INR in house in 80-th. 1 – accelerating sections, 2 – bridge coupling cavities, 3 – RF input, 4- focusing elements, 5 – cooling 2

The first cavity, b=0. 43, 100 MeV, was the first in the line The first cavity, b=0.43, 100 MeV, was the first in the line. Last time the cavity is losing reliability of operation and restricts the average beam power of our linac. We have to replace it and now develop technical proposal. For the single cavity the direct DAW repetition is too expensive. We consider another structures and develop proposal with limitation – the minimal changes in another systems. Such scheme is common for NC hadron linacs. Not usual – bridge coupler from standard rectangular WG – the simplest solution Solved now SCS DAW ACS CDS Ze 100% 96% 98% 85%-107% kc 0.05 0.45 0.05 0.15 Ph, kW/m 8-10 3-4 <60 <30 Vac. cond. 4 1 3 2 HOM 2 night mare 3 1 R/l ~0.7 ~0.7 ~0.7 ~0.37 RF tuning 3-4 1-2 3-4 1-2 after brazing ac nn nn a ? Wat./vac. yes yes yes no! f=const Our choice now is CDS due to smaller transverse dimensions and tolerable another parameters.

Cavity scheme Coupling with a slot 1 – accelerating sections (accelerating cells) – 4 units, 2 – bridge couplers (coupling cells) – 3 units, 3- bellows, 4-tuners, 5- end shorts. Total seven cells. In the spectrum there are seven modes and operating one is central. Field direction in adjacent sections (accelerating cells) is opposite. All symptoms of operating p/2 mode! But for a simple p/2 mode the field in coupling cells is zero and RF input is impossible! But it is realized. Moreover, it works! To realize RF input we must have sufficient field strength in this point!

Methodical basement 1 Next AC mode Operating AC Previous AC mode Mode p/2 is from single mode periodical chain of cavities. We have to see wider – periodicity is more complicated and it reflects directly in cavity spectrum. Each mode in accelerating section provides own band in the cavity. Analysis of slot coupled cavities in multi mode approximation was developed. Based on V. Kaljushnij, JTPh, 1978

Now cells are sections and bridge couplers, in which we consider several modes. We can estimate coefficients from numerical simulations for separated elements. Slots: - provide identifiable shift for each mode; - couples all modes inside cell; - couples all modes of the cell with all modes in adjacent cells. But at operating frequency now in the bridge cavity is: There is a mixture, but not zero required component! The method is powerful and helpful…but difficult for simple physical treatment..

L/4 Interaction of modes in the cavity near operating frequency Now we apply scheme to CDS Slot & transition L/4 Structure sections df Regular waveguide WG Yellow curves – even (with respect WG middle plane) modes, blue curves – odd modes, df – is the separation in frequency between modes in sections, L – wavelength in the waveguide. We can interesting with two regions of interaction, 1 or 2, depending on required parity (phasing) of sections.

Changing the slot dimensions and slot vicinity in the transition, we can manage the region of modes interaction, tune for operating frequency and change modes separation in frequency. To select operating frequency we need repeatable specific points at the plot. L=dw Two options for selection are possible: a) – symmetrical positions of side modes with respect operating one; b) – point d2f/dl2=0; The last one corresponds to the minimal field in the regular part of th bridge! We need physical ideas for treatment.

f e,m=f m,e or f e,e = f m,m Methodical basement 2 Let us define period in the total accelerating cavity, and ask cavity to be compensated system. At operating frequency should coincide frequencies of two modes with conjugated parity of field distribution. Section is based on compensated accelerating structures, SCS, DAW, ACS or CDS and already satisfies conditions of compensation. f e,m=f m,e or f e,e = f m,m We have to select required parity (for RF input into bridge), and, playing with last end cell of the section, slot, transition and regular part of bridge coupler, tune period at operating frequency and symmetrical position of side modes. In such treatment the bridge coupler is the part of super-period with accelerating mode and there is no prohibition to the field strength. The physical point – magnetic field at the slot sides is continuous. It is our technical task to extend field into bridge.

Practically for the same Ez strength in the sections, which means practically the same magnetic field at the slot, playing with slot and transition, we can control magnetic field value in the bridge coupler more than in order, providing sufficient value for RF matching. After that detailed analysis pro and contra – what is the best compromise in the field strength.

Summary We physically think in frames of some ideas and models for our description and understanding of physical processes. The level of problem understanding defines our ability to control it. For careful, precise and non-contradictive description of the cavity we have to extend the model for presentation of our accelerating cavity: a)- as periodical system (big period – one section + 2 half brides) the cavity operates in the compensated p mode; b) - the bridge is the part of the big period working in accelerating mode and there is no limitation for the field strength in this part; c) –joint of representation as compensated system and multi mode slot coupled cells provides guide line for application of this bridge together with any compensated structure and correct cavity tuning; d) - technologically the bridge device made from standard WG is the simplest solution as compared to analogues. e) – technical solution for coupling between section and bridge device allows select ratio of fields in sufficiently wide range providing both possibility of RF input and cavity fine tuning.

Thank you for attention! 12