Outcomes-Based Funding

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Banks County High School
Advertisements

Overview of Performance Funding Model for Ohio’s Community Colleges
Florida Bright Futures Scholarship Presentation G. Holmes Braddock Sr. High School Mrs. Gomez, Counselor.
TASFAA, Fall 2012 Jane Caldwell Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board.
Jonathan H. Stroble, Senior Manager K-12 Student & School Services.
HOPE Changes DOE Workshop. HOPE Scholarship Basic eligibility requirements: –Unchanged for current seniors College Prep Diploma – 3.0 GPA Career Tech.
State Programs Update & HOPE Changes PROBE Counselor Workshop Thomas Meunier K-12 Student and School Services.
Outcomes-Based Funding: Design Principles and State Examples Outcomes-Based Funding: The Indiana Experience Teresa Lubbers, Indiana Commissioner for Higher.
New State Grant and Scholarship Programs
PAUL TURCOTTE PROGRAM DIRECTOR TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD TO THE TASSCUBO BUDGET COMMITTEE FEBRUARY 2013 Outcomes-Based Funding.
 State Scholarships and Grants  How do students earn it?  How do students keep it?
THECB Legislative Agenda: Aligning Funding with Student Success Proposed Outcomes-Based Funding Model for Public Universities Thursday, March 10, 2011.
Illinois Higher Education FY15 Performance Funding Recommendations IBHE Board Presentation February 4, 2014 Dr. Alan Phillips.
By: Liz Diaz
TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD WEBINAR APRIL 9, 2014 Outcomes-Based Formula Funding for Universities.
Region VII College and Career Readiness Data AVATAR Initiatives.
The Twelve Enhanced Accountability Measures and Six Performance Funding Measures Annual Report to the Board of Trustees Academic Year
Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall 2012 Enrollment & Completion Update Tennessee Higher Education Commission Fall Quarterly Meeting November 15,
ACG, SMART and TEACH Grants Presented by Jennifer Hutchinson Senior Associate Director, UMF.
Guide for College Bound Student Athletes George Mason High School Boys Soccer Program.
Dual Enrollment. First Time in College (FTIC) Board of Governors: Regulation FTIC freshmen are defined as students who have earned a standard high.
Dual Enrollment. First Time in College (FTIC) Board of Governors: Regulation FTIC freshmen are defined as students who have earned a standard high.
The Student Athlete Experience.  Answer the following Questions: ◦ What should I be doing now? ◦ What are the eligibility requirements?  NCAA, NAIA,
Community and Technical Colleges Graduation Report: CBM009 Anissa Wagner Data Analyst, Educational Data Center Strategic Planning and Funding CBM Manual.
Staff Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature.
Faculty Salary Report (CBM008) Uses Average Budgeted Faculty Salaries Salaries reported on fall reports are: doubled, converted to full-time equivalent.
University Academic Advising Center (UAAC) Marilyn Hagerty ACADEMIC POLICIES and Advisement Issues.
March 2014 Regents, Trustees, Coordinating Board Institutions Instructions, $ $ $ $ Suggestions, recommendations Texas Legislature.
March 2014 Regents, Trustees, Coordinating Board Institutions Instructions, $ $ $ $ Suggestions, recommendations Texas Legislature.
Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Data Highlight: Completion CAAP Meeting March 30,
Draft Legislative Recommendations to the 85th Texas Legislature.
Preparing for College Athletics Redlands High School Athletics.
Summer Data Conference – June 6, (2008) National Completion Goals (Lumina’s Big Goal: 60% of those will have an Associate Degree or above.
Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding
Performance Incentive Funding
Faculty Leadership Training
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH
NCAA Eligibility Basics
College Basics Simple descriptions of what you need to know to start the college decision process.
NISD 8th Grade Dual Credit
MOVE ON WHEN READY DUAL ENROLLMENT
CSUMentor Tutorial 2017 – 2018 How To Complete The CSUMentor Undergraduate Online Application Copyright © 2014 XAP Corporation, All Rights Reserved.
FUTURE STUDENTS WEBPAGE NAVIGATION AND STEPS TO ENROLL
Florida Board of Governors Performance & Accountability Committee
Annual Report Georgetown ISD 2016 Accountability Rating:
State Financial Aid Reporting
The Road to College Athletics
Are You Ready for College?
Excelsior Scholarship Program
Operations and Performance of the Virginia Community College System
Defining and Measuring Student Success Dr
Gabriela Borcoman MD, PhD Strategic Planning and Funding
AASFAA Financial Aid Legislative Update
AASFAA Financial Aid Legislative Update
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH
Your Path to the Student-Athlete Experience
Texas Association of Community Colleges
Coordinating Board Updates
HESC UPDATE2018 June 2018.
NCAA Eligibility Center Workshop Stanislaus State Nov
Early Childhood Educators Scholarship jointly administered by: Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care Massachusetts Board of Higher Education.
University of Hawai‘i Community Colleges
Trends in Higher Education Series
Annual Report Public Hearing
Stacey Silverman, PhD Academic Quality and Workforce February 1, 2019
INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH
Annual Report Public Hearing
BUILDING AN EXCELLENT TRANSCRIPT
Presentation transcript:

Outcomes-Based Funding Paul turcotte Program Director Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board To the TASSCUBO Budget committee February 2013

Outcomes-Based Funding – Seven Factors

Outcomes-Based Funding – Factors Defined Total Undergraduate Degrees Total number of Bachelor’s Degrees awarded by an institution in a given year. Time-to-Degree Factor Total Bachelor’s Degrees multiplied by the school’s six-year graduation rate, to incent timely completion. Institutional Mission Factor Degrees divided by Full Time Student Equivalents (FTSEs) and multiplied by 100. This aggregate measure adjusts for part-time and transfer students, providing a common framework for comparing degree productivity among institutions with different missions and student bodies. Cost-to-Degree Factor Degrees weighted using cost-based weights, to compensate for the varying costs associated with differing degree types. Critical Fields Factor Degrees awarded in fields identified as critical workforce needs such as Computer Science, Engineering, Math, Physics, Nursing, Allied Health and Teaching Certificates for Math and Science. At-Risk Factor Degrees awarded to students who meet federal criteria for being at high risk for non-completion. Indicators are being a federal Pell Grant recipient, below national average SAT/ACT score, part-time student, GED recipient, or entering higher education at age 20 or older. Persistence Factor Points awarded for students who complete their 30th, 60th, or 90th hour at the institution, to incentivize the use of effective persistence policies.

Outcomes-Based Funding - Points Funds allocated by weighted points The ratio of an institution’s weighted points to the weighted points earned by all institutions Example Institution Points Percent of Total Points Funding (millions) A 100 25 $75 B 125 31 $93 C 175 44 $132 Total 400 $300

Outcomes-Based Funding - Points Product of the three-year average and weight Critical fields weighted two, all others weighted one Example Factor Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Average Weighted Points Total Undergraduate Degrees 1,000 1,100 1,200 Time-to-Degree 400 450 470 440 Institutional Mission 29 30 31 Cost-to-Degree 2,000 1,900 2,010 1970 Critical Fields 300 350 700 At-Risk 600 680 660 Persistence 3,000 1,500 3,300 2600 Total N/A 7,500

Total Undergraduate Degrees Accountability measure #10 Number of degrees reported on the CBM009 – Graduation Report for the fiscal year Fiscal year 2012 includes fall 2011, spring 2012, and summer 2012 reports Multiple degrees earned by a single student are included Double Majors are counted as a single degree Degrees included Baccalaureate Associate of Applied Science (AAS) Excludes certificates Total Undergraduate Degrees Total number of Bachelor’s Degrees awarded by an institution in a given year.

6-Year Graduation Rate – Accountability measure #9 First-time entering degree-seeking students who enrolled in an minimum of 12 semester credit hours their first fall semester who graduated from the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution after four, five, and six academic years. This metric includes Social Security Number changes submitted on the CBM00N. First-time determined by the first-time student flag on the CBM001. Sources: CBM001, CBM002, CBM009, CBM00N Same Fiscal Year as degrees reported For fiscal year 2012, cohort started in fall 2006 Includes same and other institutions Upper-Level institutions use 3-Year Completion Rate First-time junior level students transferring in who graduated from the same institution or another Texas public or independent institution after three academic years. UT-Brownsville, TAMU-Texarkana, UH-Clear Lake, UH-Victoria, and Sul Ross Rio Grande. New institutions calculated with parent graduation rate TAMU-Central Texas, TAMU-San Antonio, and UNT-Dallas. Example Time-to-Degree Total Bachelor’s Degrees multiplied by the school’s six- year graduation rate To incent timely completion. On this one you might put that it includes SSN changes received up to December 31 (check with Diane) of the final year. Institution Degrees Rate Weighted Points A 9,000 80% 7,200 B 200 30% 60

Institutional Mission Degrees same as the first factor Undergraduate Full-time student equivalents (FTSE) – Accountability measure #2 Number of semester credit hours (SCH) reported on the CBM004 – Class Report for the fall of the fiscal year For fiscal year 2012, fall 2011 Includes state funded undergraduate semester credit hours Excludes non-state funded and graduate semester credit hours Undergraduate Semester Credit Hours divided by 15 to convert to FTSE Example Institutional Mission Degrees divided by Full-Time Student Equivalents (FTSEs) and multiplied by 100. This aggregate measure adjusts for part-time and transfer students, providing a common framework for comparing degree productivity among institutions with different missions and student bodies. Degrees SCH FTSE (SCH/15) Weighted Points (Degrees/(FTSE/100)) 4,930 255,000 17,000 29 The stuff in red might need to be smaller.

Relative Weight (Weighted Points) Degrees same as the first factor Cost weights – Upper-Level relative weights for the fiscal year of the degrees. The CIP code reported for each degree on the CBM009 converted to a fund code using Appendix O of the reporting manual The corresponding relative weight is matched to each degree by fund code Weighted Point – Sum of the relative weights Example Cost-to-Degree Degrees weighted using cost-based weights To compensate for the varying costs associated with differing degree types. Degree CIP Code Fund Code Relative Weight (Weighted Points) 01.0802 01 1.69 03.0103 02 2.95 13.1327 14 1.76 Total Weighted Points 6.40

Subset of degrees in the first factor Weighted Points - Degrees with the following CIP codes times 2 Critical Fields Critical Field Degree CIP Code Computer Science 11.xx- Computer and Information Sciences and Support Services Engineering 14.xx - Engineering 15 - Engineering Technologies and Engineering-Related Fields Mathematics 27 .xx - Mathematics and Statistics Physical Sciences 40.xx - Physical Sciences 30.01 - Biological and Physical Sciences Nursing 51.38 - Registered Nursing, Nursing Administration, Nursing Research and Clinical Nursing 51.39 - Practical Nursing, Vocational Nursing and Nursing Assistants Allied Health 51.02 - Communication Disorders Sciences and Services 51.06 - Dental Support Services and Allied Professions 51.07 - Health and Medical Administrative Services 51.08 - Allied Health and Medical Assisting Services 51.09 - Allied Health Diagnostic, Intervention, and Treatment Professions 51.10 - Clinical/Medical Laboratory Science/Research and Allied Professions 51.18 - Ophthalmic and Optometric Support Services and Allied Professions 51.23 - Rehabilitation and Therapeutic Professions 51.26 - Health Aides/Attendants/Orderlies 51.27 - Medical Illustration and Informatics 51.31 - Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Services 51.32 - Bioethics/Medical Ethics 51.33 - Alternative and Complementary Medicine and Medical Systems 51.34 - Alternative and Complementary Medical Support Services Degrees awarded in fields identified as critical workforce needs such as Computer Science, Engineering, Math, Physics, Nursing, Allied Health and Teaching Certificates for Math and Science.

Critical Fields – Teaching Certificates Mathematics and Science teacher certificates as reported by the State Board of Educator Certification (SBEC) Go to www.tea.state. tx.us In the left hand frame, select “State Board for Educator Certification” From the expanded menu, select “Reports, Data, Research” In the left hand frame, select “Interactive Reports” Under the “SBEC Production Reports”, select “Educator/Teacher Production Counts” Enter the dates for the fiscal year (one year lag) Check the “Initial Educator Certificates by Educator Preparation Program Area” At the bottom on the page, select “Continue” On the data webpage, select “Click here to download the data in comma delimited form” Sort the data by Organization and count the certificates issued for the Mathematics and Science certification areas. As of February 1 For the fiscal year 2012 metrics, Certifications reported for 9/1/2010 to 8/31/2011 Certification counts are believe to only appear once teachers are fingerprinted. This causes a considerable delay. Through observation the staff believes lagging these data one fiscal year is the most equitable way to account for the significant majority of certifications for each institution. Mathematics and Science Only Organization reported by SBEC Assumed to be the degree granting institution Points not a subset of first factor, but the certificates reported for the period Two points for each teaching certificate Critical Fields – Teaching Certificates Teaching Certificates for Math and Science.

One point for each student awarded degrees in the first measure that meets one or more of the conditions Reported by any institution as a “Pell Grant recipient” in the Financial Aid Database System (FADS) during the last 10 years Earned an SAT or ACT score below the national average Scores reported on the CBM00B – Admissions Report or by the College Board National Averages posted on www.collegeboard.org or www.act.org Part-Time (taking less than 12 hours) when reported as first-time in college on the CBM001 – Student Report General Education Degree (GED) recipients for the last six years Data provided by the Texas Education Agency (TEA) upon request 20 or older by date of birth field on the CBM001 – Student Report when reported as first-time in college At-Risk Degrees awarded to students who meet federal criteria for being at high risk for non-completion. Indicators are being a federal Pell Grant recipient, below average SAT/ACT score, part-time student, GED recipient, or entering higher education at age 20 or older. Student Received Pell Grant Earned a Below Average SAT or ACT Score First-Time in College and Attended less than 12 Received a GED First-Time in College and 20 or Older Weighted Points A Yes 1 B No C

At-Risk – Data Elements CBM009 - Graduation CBM00B - Admissions 2 - Institution Code 3 - Student Identification Number 6 - Date of Birth 24 - Application Year 7 - Degree Conferred 25 - ACT Composite Score 8 - Level of Degree or Certificate Conferred 26 - SAT Combined Score 9 - Major TEA GED Data CBM001 – Student Student Identification Number GED Certification Date SAT and ACT National Averages 5 - Classification www.collegeboard.org www.act.org 9 - Transfer Student or First-Time-in-College 10A - Semester Credit Hour Load, On-Campus 10 - B Semester Credit Hour Load, Off-Campus 13 - Semester 14 - Year 31 - Dual Credit Course Semester Credit Hours CBM00N – Student Number Change 3 - Current Student Identification Number 4 - Current Date of Birth 6 - Prior Student Identification Number 7 - Prior Date of Birth FAD - Financial Aid Database 1B - FICE 1D - Student Social Security Number/ID Number 31A - Federal Pell At-Risk – Data Elements Degrees awarded to students who meet federal criteria for being at high risk for non-completion. Indicators are being a federal Pell Grant recipient, below average SAT/ACT score, part-time student, GED recipient, or entering higher education at age 20 or older.

One point awarded for students successfully completing 30, 60, or 90 hours at the institution as reported on the CBM00S – Student Schedule Report Last five years – FY 2012 includes data from fall 2007 to summer 2012 Successful completion reported as A, B, C, D, or Credit/Passed in 24 Prior to summer 2011, students receiving a failing grade are included in counts All undergraduate students enrolled at the institution College-level hours earned at the institution currently enrolled Exclude hours earned at other institutions Exclude developmental education hours Examples Persistence Points awarded for students who complete their 30th, 60th, or 90th hour at the institution. To incentivize the use of effective persistence policies.   Student Hours Earned at the Institution in prior Fiscal Years Hours Earned at the Institution in current Fiscal Year Total Weighted Points 1 30 2 21 24 45 3 60 4 12 57 5 90 6 75 105 7 120 8 29 74

Persistence – Data Elements CBM001 – Student 2 - Institution Code 3 - Student Identification Number 5 - Classification 6 - Date of birth 18 - Semester CBM00N – Student Number change 3 - Current Student Identification Number 4 - Current Date of Birth 6 - Prior Student Identification Number 7 - Prior Date of Birth Prior to summer 2011 CBM002 – Texas Success Initiative 4 - Reporting period 5 - Year 10A - Semester Credit Hours Completed Summer 2011 and after CBM00S – Student Schedule 10 - Semester Credit Hour Value 19 - Developmental Education Course/Intervention Level (value=0) 24 - Course Grade (value=1, 2, 3, 4, 8) 29 - Semester Persistence – Data Elements Points awarded for students who complete their 30th, 60th, or 90th hour at the institution. To incentivize the use of effective persistence policies.