Topicality.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
POLICY DEBATE Cross-Examination (CX). POLICY DEBATE  Purpose of policy debate is to compare policies and decide which is best  Affirmative: Supports.
Advertisements

TOPICALITY Where debate begins.
Theory CODI 2014 Lecture. Rules of Debate Debate has surprisingly few rules Time limits and speaking order There must be a winner and loser No outside.
TOPICALITY James Stevenson, with due credit to Mike Hester.
THE IMPORTANCE OF PHRASING Understanding the Resolution.
Matt Gomez Ph.D in Theoretical Objections to Negative and Affirmative argumentation (Bingham Campus) SCFI 2011 THEORY.
By Beth Mendenhall. Introduction Why you should listen Please ask questions.
Introduction to Debate -Negative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L. Husick,
Everyone’s ‘Favorite’ Debate! Topicality. Define the word (or phrase) the Affirmative is not topical under.
Topicality. Our Focus Significance Harms Inherency Topicality Solvency.
Gateway to the Future.  Purpose of a Topic  Topicality in Practice  Topicality on the Space Topic.
Introduction to Debate -Affirmative- To access audio: Skype: freeconferencecallhd and enter # Or call and enter # © L.
Most important things Keep your personal views outside the room Debaters must adapt to you Be honest about your judging experience.
DEBATE FINAL EXAM STUDY GUIDE Spring Debate Final Exam Study Guide Define terms using the answers here; if the answers aren’t complete, use Google.
Selected Teaching-Learning Terms: Working Definitions...
Lincoln Douglas Debate
The Stock Issues of Debate 5 Things Every Debater Needs, and Needs to Know!
 Comes from a series of recorded historical debates that took place between Stephen Douglas and Abraham Lincoln in 1858  Lincoln was arguing that slavery.
Opposition Strategy NCFA Rookie Debate Camp. Agenda ❖ A Brief Word on Trichotomy ❖ Basic Path to Winning ❖ Opposition Strategies by Position* ❖ Quick.
Theory Debating Baxter MDAW  It Really is  There are 4 Components of a Theory Argument  Interp  Violation  Standards  Voting Issue  You.
The Disadvantage Provides an added measure to vote against the affirmative plan and vote for the present system.
Getting Started in CX Debate Julian Erdmann. What is CX debate? Team debate made up by two students from the same school. They will defend either Affirmative.
Chapter 3 Analysis of the Issue. Definition of Terms Define unfamiliar words Define unfamiliar words Define words with multiple meanings Define words.
Debating the case.
Getting it Right and Getting Along! Effective Decision Making for Umpires.
Debate The Essentials Ariail, Robert. “Let the Debates Begin.” 18 Aug orig. published in The State, South Carolina. 26 Sept
Judging Policy Debate Rich Edwards Baylor University July 2013.
TOPICALITY DALLAS URBAN DEBATE ALLIANCE DEBATE CENTER SMU
Counterplans. Counterplan Burdens Competitiveness To be competitive, CP must be: – Mutually exclusive – Net beneficial Topicality – Traditional theory.
POLICY DEBATE. WHAT IS POLICY DEBATE? A structured format for fairly arguing a topic of policy TEAM DEBATE: two teams of two students each 8 speeches.
Topicality “That sounds good. That’s a good skill to have.” –Julia Marshall “Naw. Advantages don’t matter when it comes to Topicality.” –Humza Tahir.
ECO 370 Week 5 DQ 1 Check this A+ tutorial guideline at As you know, we do not have discussion.
Affirmative vs. negative
KRITIKS Melissa Witt.
Chapter Six What Makes a Teacher Effective?
By Jessica Cuddy & Josh Malig, December 2007
Introduction to the Negative
Introduction to Persuasion
Starter Pack - Opening Discussion
LD Debate Study Information
Anger Control Through Body Language
Do Words have Power- Do words have power?
Analyze a problem Conduct research Utilize principles of argumentation
Chapter 18: Supporting Your Views
Options High School with the
Debate.
Hegemony (Heg) Economic, military, and political influence a nation has. It’s America’s street cred Soft Power + Hard Power= Heg Amount of Soft + Amount.
Debate: The Basics.
Debate.
Parenting: Toddlers-teens
Negative Strategies.
The 11 Leadership Principles
Beginning Strategies Novice Debate Henrichsen
Dustin Hurley Medina Valley HS
The 11 Leadership Principles
Debate Terms and Tactics.
Debate What is Debate?.
Format Affirmative Constructive - 5 minutes
Introduction to Policy Debate
ORDER AND PURPOSE OF POLICY SPEECHES
Public Forum Debate.
Informative, Persuasive, and Impromptu Speaking all rolled into one!
Negative Attacks.
Topicality Casey Parsons.
Debate April 12/13.
Theory Casey Parsons.
Thinking like a Policy Debater
Getting To Know Debate:
Debate.
Debates.
Presentation transcript:

Topicality

Warm Up What are the rules of your classroom? Your school? Laws in your town/country? Why do we have rules and laws? What would happen if we didn’t have them? What is a resolution? Why do we have one? What would we do if teams were allowed to debate anything they wanted?

Parts of Topicality A. Definition- this is the word or phrase that the negative is “challenging” the affirmative on in the resolution. The negative provides a carded definition of the word in order to prove that something the affirmative’s plan does not do. B. Violation- a brief explanation of why the affirmative’s plan falls outside of the topic. C. Standards- a set of reasons why the definition provided by the negative should be the preferred definition for the debate round to rely on. D. Voters- reasons why if the Affirmative falls outside of the resolution the judge should vote for the negative.

Sample Topicality A. Definition “Education” is prescribed classroom instruction – not anything one learns through the school’s Administrative policies. Webster’s Webster's 1913 Dictionary - http://www.webster- dictionary.org/definition/education Education (noun): The act or process of educating; the result of educating, as determined by the knowledge skill, or discipline of character, acquired; also, the act or process of training by a prescribed or customary course of study or discipline; as, an education for the bar or the pulpit; he has finished his education. B. Violation: The Affirmative’s plan is about providing school lunches, not about classroom instruction

Sample Topicality C. Standards: Limits – they allow Affs to extend to any aspect of learning that happens to be picked-up in school. Non-classroom Affs like vegan lunches, environmentally- sound garbage disposal or solar powered-schools all “educate” in some manner. Limits are key to preparation and depth of understanding. Ground – they move the topic away from classroom curricular shifts. That’s the heart of the controversy and gets at the nexus question of how we should be learning. They skew Neg fairness and create tiny non-controversial Affs about building fire codes or better interior painting. D. Voters- Topicality is a voter for fairness, education and jurisdiction