Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

On-the-job Evaluation of Principals Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. Delaware SAELP Director Wallace Foundation National Conference October 25-28, 2006.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Overarching Question Who does the thinking? Therefore, who does the learning and growing?
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION1. 2 When teachers succeed, students succeed. Research has proven that no school-level factor matters more to.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements Day 2: Evidence 9/3/2015PBevan, D.ED.
Educator Evaluation Goal Setting Webinar March 14, 2013.
Welcome to... Doing Teacher Evaluation Right: 5 Critical Elements 9/9/2015PBevan, D.ED.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Avon Grove School District October 2009
2016 NC Teacher Working Conditions Survey Results
Lynne Griffith-Jones Superintendent of Human Resources
The New Educator Evaluation System
The New Educator Evaluation System
Results Based Professional Learning Communities
Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process
Duncanville ISD Curriculum Update
Wethersfield Teacher Evaluation and Support Plan
Teacher Evaluation Process
TOPS TSA MD
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
The New Educator Evaluation System
What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Evaluating Principals Making a Fuzzy Process More Clear
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
COMPETENCIES & STANDARDS
State Board of Education Progress Update
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Teacher Evaluation Process
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Strategic Plan: Tri-Cities High School
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Twenty Questions Competency 10.
Teacher Evaluation Process Training
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Using data for instructional decision-making
Unfilled Positions FWEA Meeting March 18, 2019.
Jaeliza Morales CUR/516 Dr. Mary Poe
Making Middle Grades Work
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
HOW TO CONDUCT EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM OBSERVATIONS
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016

The Opportunity Reflection on self learning and student learning is articulated and organized. Collaboration is encouraged and rewarded. Professionals are accountable for themselves, yet supported by colleagues. Conferencing builds relationships and spurs standards-driven instruction. Collaboration and conferencing improve school climate and family and community involvement in students’ learning.

Student Learning Goals Each Student Learning Goal will: Have two data points Be rigorous Be comparable across classrooms

New Emphasis Policy 5310, Section 13.7 The determination of goals shall be based on the identified needs of the students, which shall include a consideration of gaps in performance. All teachers in grades Kindergarten through 3rd grade shall include a goal to address increasing students’ reading proficiency.

Student Learning Goal Requirements S.M.A.R.T What is being taught? How will it be measured? Is it attainable? What is the relevance of the goal? Is it time bound? Rigorous Considering the context of the classroom are the targets rigorous? Are the measures used rigorous? Comparable Are the strategies used able to be successfully replicated in another WV Across Classroom school? Are the measures used able to be successfully replicated in another WV school? Two Points in Time What is the baseline? What two measures will be used and when will they be taken to determine growth?

SMART Process for Student Learning Goals SPECIFIC The outcome is clear; intensity of focus is on students Measurable Measurable with assessment process or tool; can be counted or can be seen Achievable Teachers and school have necessary training and necessary resources to achieve Results-Oriented Results center on increased student learning Timed Specific date set to achieve goal

Student Learning Goals and Teacher Practice Foster more effective use of baseline data in planning instruction. Shift the concept of achievement to individual student growth. Increase early awareness of individual students, promoting personalized learning. Stimulates searches for the best instructional strategies to meet individual needs. Provide evidence-based collaboration; teacher to teacher and teacher to principal.

Observation Cycle Evaluators record data on Observation form. Educators complete Evidence form. Evaluators conduct conference within 10 days of observation.

Evidence-When it Matters Most There is a trust issue between teacher and evaluator. There is a disagreement between teacher and evaluator on performance issues. A principal perceives a teacher has demonstrated an element, but wants evidence. A teacher self-reflects as “distinguished.”

Types of Observation Evidence Verbatim scripting of teacher or student comments: “Could one person from each table collect materials?” Non-evaluative statements of observed teacher or student behavior: The teacher stands by the door, greeting students as they enter. Numeric information about time, student participation, resource use, etc.: Three students of the eighteen offer nearly all the comments during discussion. An observed aspect of the environment: The assignment is on the board for students to do while roll is being taken.

Mediational Questions Mediational questions help the colleague… Hypothesize what might happen Analyze what worked or didn’t Imagine possibilities Compare and Contrast what was planned with what ensued Extrapolate from one situation to another Evaluate the impact

Positive Feedback Catch them doing it right! Be specific. Be immediate. Share the source. Create a positive influence. Create winners.

Corrective Feedback Specific Avoid anger Immediate information Understanding Negative influences Follow-ups Catch them doing it right!

Counselor Evaluation Summary Self-Reflection-by Oct. 1. Initial Goal Setting Meeting-by Nov. 1. Midyear Process Monitoring-by Jan. 1. Year-End evaluation-by June 15.

Counselor Goals Two goals targeted at performance: 1. Resulting from the Self-Reflection 2. Student Impact Goal Due in system Nov. 1

Principal’s Evaluation Self-Reflection Meeting with Supervisor Goal Setting Standards Rubrics Levels of Performance Evidence Collecting Focused Support Plan and Corrective Action Plan Summative Rating

Goal Setting One must address student learning and 1. Have two data points 2. Be rigorous 3. Be comparable across schools The second must be derived from the self-reflection based on the WV Leadership Standards

Goals Mutually established with supervisor Aligned with the school’s strategic plan Written no later than November 1

Summative Rating Principals receive a rating on each of the 11 standards There is no reference to the survey in the summative rating Standard 10 is a measurement of school growth(5%) and also a measurement of the goals set by the principal (15%) Standard 11 must meet standard

Professional Support and Central Office Personnel Process Mutually established goals by November 1 Establish responsibilities and performance characteristics Receive a written evaluation a minimum of one time per year

Coaches Make an objective assessment of the performance of each coach Ensure that quality coaching is provided to student Professional and interpersonal relations coaching and related observations

Coaches 2 observations (minimum) per evaluation Minimum of one evaluation per contract period is required each year.

Who can evaluate coaches? Principals, assistant principals or athletic directors who hold administrative certificates according to WV code 18A-2-12 The evaluation conference is held within the four week period at the end of each sport’s season as defined by the WVSSAC.