Prioritizing Online Course Preparedness Using PACE Matrix

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tips for Integrating Guide to Reference Into Your Teaching December 3, 2009.
Advertisements

Group Work on Indicators Objective: To develop a list of priority indicators (both results and process) for each intervention point for further refinement.
Developing an Outcomes Assessment Plan. Part One: Asking a Meaningful Question OA is not hard science as we are doing it. Data that you collect is only.
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses Steve Benton, Ph.D. Senior Research Officer IDEA Emeritus Professor, Kansas State.
Chapter 4 Design Approaches and Methods
Assessing Learning for Classroom Success Friday, February 16, :00-3:00.
Technical Writing for Researchers and Graduate Students Spring 2003 Lincoln Campus Instructor: Deborah Derrick.
Leading the Learning The Role of the Instructional Leadership Team ESC, West Instructional Directors July 30, 2014.
The ADDIE Instructional Design Process
Analyzing and Improving College Teaching: Here’s an IDEA Alan C. Lacy, Associate Dean College of Applied Science and Technology Illinois State University.
Crisis and Risk Communication Course Development Update Damon Coppola June 7, 2011.
IPortfolio assignment Mandatory Unit evidence. Centres may use some or all of these activities or some of their own devising to help candidates complete.
1 Integrating Google Apps for Education to Business English Student Trainees’ On-the-Job Training English Reports Asst.Prof. Phunsuk Kannarik.
Revising instructional materials
LISA HOLMES INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN. The process of creating an effective learning experience that takes into consideration: what needs to be learned what.
Unit 2 Selecting Texts Worth Reading Produced under U.S. Department of Education Contract No. ED-VAE-13-C-0066, with StandardsWork, Inc. and Subcontractor,
1 © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter Seven Choosing to Read Actively.
Ohio’s Assessment Future The Common Core & Its Impact on Student Assessment Evidence by Jim Lloyd Source doc: The Common Core and the Future of Student.
Chapter 7 Lauren Glover. To effectively integrate technology in teaching, teachers must utilize: Content knowledge Pedagogical knowledge Technological.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public ITE PC v4.0 Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4: Basics of Preventive Maintenance and Troubleshooting IT.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Teaching Excellence Project funded by CELT Teaching Economics through Innovative Content and Effective Teaching Methods Necati Aydin,
QUESTION NOT AT ALL RARELY SOME- TIMES INSTRUCTIONS: For each question, circle the # in the column that most applies. OFTEN VERY OFTEN 1. Are the tasks.
Performance Based Assessments References T able of Contents Formative Assessments Page 3 Page # Other Assessment Methods Page 6 Summative Assessments.
Using Blackboard for blended learning Delivering the Geography curriculum at Kingston College This talk will give an overview of the assessment features.
Exam and Test Preparation Exam preparation happens all term, starting with the skills we have been discussing: –Paying special attention to the syllabus.
1 System for Administration, Training, and Educational Resources for NASA Training Evaluations.
Increasing Success Rates in Online Learning Kathy Coleman, Chattahoochee Technical College.
The Virginia Community College System's Commonwealth Course for General Biology Repository Of Biology Learning Objects For Instructors.
OUCC 2015 Inspiring Innovation Core Student Skills through Online Modules Lillian Chumbley May 5, 2015.
Measuring and Improving Child and Family Outcomes Conference New Orleans, Sept 19-21, 2011 Using the Child Outcomes Measurement System (COMS) Self-Assessment.
Chapter 12: Strategy Cards Michele Nunnelley ED751A 27 October 2015 For Differentiated Instruction.
IDEA STUDENT EVALUATION REPORTS Insight Improvement Impact ® Using IDEA as a Tool for Reflection about Your Teaching Raritan Valley Community College January.
Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Presenter : Ching-ting Lin 2007/1/9CSL ICE.NTNU1 Considerations for Developing Evaluations of Online Courses Achtemeier,
Scaffolding Cognitive Coaching Reciprocal Teaching Think-Alouds.
PRESENTED TO: ISW FACILITATOR’S CONFERENCE JUNE, 2009 PRESENTED BY: MARIE KRBAVAC MARJORIE CONTENTI SAIT POLYTECHNIC Using Technology to Enhance ISW Delivery.
Dr. Marciano B. Melchor University of Ha’il, KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA May 2013.
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
Measuring Impact Guide
Classroom teaching observation tools
Scrum and TargetProcess
The ADDIE Instructional Design Process
Game Design, Development, and Technology
Assessing Students' Understanding of the Scientific Process Amy Marion, Department of Biology, New Mexico State University Abstract The primary goal of.
Is the Flipped Classroom a Flop?
EXTENSIVE READING PART 1.
How to Study for Finals- What DOES It Look Like?
Grand Rapids Community College Faculty Evaluation System
General Education Assessment
ELT. General Supervision
OEI ONLINE COURSE EXCHANGE
Peer Evaluation of Teammates
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Reviewing your final digital product
Conceptual and Factual Questions
UBT Project Prioritization Matrix
Reading Strategies in the classroom
Sarah Lucchesi Learning Services Librarian
Selecting a Solution Path
Developing a Plan for Identifying Local Needs and Resources
Selecting a Solution Path
H. Implementation Plan.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
Developing a Plan for Identifying Local Needs and Resources
Lesson 3 Consumer Science
UBT Project Prioritization Matrix
Split-Block Class Schedule at Yorktown High School
Choose the best soltution Design Process Presentation Name Course Name
Towson University Store
Tests are given for 4 primary reasons.
Presentation transcript:

Prioritizing Online Course Preparedness Using PACE Matrix Instructions for using the PACE Prioritization Matrix for your online course   Purpose: A PACE matrix helps you prioritize the tasks and preparations you will need to complete to be prepared to teach your online course. Determine your track. If you do not know the answers to these questions ask your department or use Track 3. Is your online course already developed? Was your course designed to meet quality standards? If no, use Track 3. If yes, go to next question. Was your course designed with the intention that different faculty would be teaching it? If yes, use Track 1. Was your course designed with the intention that a specific faculty would teach it? If yes, use Track 2. 1. Create a Task List. Determine some common tasks that need to be completed to fully prepare your online course. Some of these tasks may have been completed previously by another instructor or a course designer. Therefore you will only need to evaluate or review them. Number all the ideas, however the number does not indicate priority. There are some suggested tasks pre-populated on following pages. 2. Determine what your definitions are for Difficult and Easy Implementation Effort and High and Low Anticipated Benefit.    3. Use the PACE Prioritization Matrix and the Task List to add tasks to your matrix. Draw in the numbered circles into the Matrix where you think they should go on the Matrix according to Effort and Benefit. 4. Use the Matrix to guide your preparedness. Priority – These tasks have the highest anticipated benefit and are the easiest to implement. These should be implemented first.   Action – These tasks have slightly lower benefit but are still relatively easy to implement. These should occur as a follow-up after the P tasks have been implemented. Consider – After P and A tasks have been implemented review the tasks that were in the Consideration area. You can decide whether the difficulty encountered with implementation is worth the benefit. Eliminate – These tasks should be eliminated because their low benefit is not worth the high cost in effort. This PACE Prioritization Matrix was adapted from The Karen Martin Group, Inc. The matrix is a LEAN engineering tool developed to increase efficiency. LEAN principles were originally created by Toyota. facdev.niu.edu/onlineteaching

Ease of Implementation Prioritizing Online Course Preparedness Using PACE Matrix Track 1: Multiple Faculty Delivery / ​ Best Practice Course Development​ Content Structure 2 11 Easy 6 21 Priority 22 16 1 7 12 14 23 3 Action 13 8 24 28 Ease of Implementation 15 27 Instructional Approaches 4 Priority – These tasks have the highest anticipated benefit and are the easiest to implement. These should be implemented first.   Action – These tasks have slightly lower benefit but are still relatively easy to implement. These should occur as a follow-up after the P tasks have been implemented. Consider – After P and A tasks have been implemented review the tasks that were in the Consideration area. You can decide whether the difficulty encountered with implementation is worth the benefit. Eliminate – These tasks should be eliminated because their low benefit is not worth the high cost in effort. Consider 25 18 5 17 26 Eliminate Difficult High Anticipated Benefit Low 9 10 19 20 29 30

Track 2:Single Faculty Delivery / ​ Best Practice Course Development​ Prioritizing Online Course Preparedness Using PACE Matrix Track 2:Single Faculty Delivery / ​ Best Practice Course Development​ Content Structure 2 11 1 Easy 6 Priority 12 14 13 15 7 16 21 3 Action 22 17 27 24 4 18 25 Ease of Implementation 8 23 5 Instructional Approaches Priority – These tasks have the highest anticipated benefit and are the easiest to implement. These should be implemented first.   Action – These tasks have slightly lower benefit but are still relatively easy to implement. These should occur as a follow-up after the P tasks have been implemented. Consider – After P and A tasks have been implemented review the tasks that were in the Consideration area. You can decide whether the difficulty encountered with implementation is worth the benefit. Eliminate – These tasks should be eliminated because their low benefit is not worth the high cost in effort. 28 Consider 26 Eliminate Difficult High Anticipated Benefit Low 9 10 19 20 29 30

Track 3: Single Faculty Delivery / ​ Organic Course Development​ Prioritizing Online Course Preparedness Using PACE Matrix Track 3: Single Faculty Delivery / ​ Organic Course Development​ Content Structure Easy 1 6 7 21 Priority 16 3 2 15 11 Action 23 13 28 12 24 4 14 8 Ease of Implementation 5 27 22 Instructional Approaches Priority – These tasks have the highest anticipated benefit and are the easiest to implement. These should be implemented first.   Action – These tasks have slightly lower benefit but are still relatively easy to implement. These should occur as a follow-up after the P tasks have been implemented. Consider – After P and A tasks have been implemented review the tasks that were in the Consideration area. You can decide whether the difficulty encountered with implementation is worth the benefit. Eliminate – These tasks should be eliminated because their low benefit is not worth the high cost in effort. 17 Consider 25 18 26 Eliminate Difficult High Anticipated Benefit Low 9 10 19 20 29 30