The CarbonNet Project POSTER B MMV Certification

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Focus of Industry Lecture 1 Exploration Refining Production
Advertisements

The Basics of Prospecting
Overview of Seismic Interpretation
Solution of Benchmark Problems for CO 2 Storage Min Jin, Gillian Pickup and Eric Mackay Heriot-Watt University Institute of Petroleum Engineering.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Figure 1: High-level workflow for the assessment of potential interaction of CO 2 geological storage with other basin resources,
Introduction to Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center, Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson School of Geosciences, The.
Geologic Storage of CO 2 : Leakage Pathways and Environmental Risks Michael A. Celia, Catherine A. Peters, and Stefan Bachu Princeton University and Alberta.
Geological Sequestration of C Carbon Sequestration in Sedimentary Basins Module 4: Sleipner Project Maurice Dusseault Department of Earth Sciences University.
Earth Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
CO 2 Capture and Storage (CCS). Contents The Need for CO 2 Capture and Storage 4 Reliance on Fossil Fuels 5 Largest CO 2 Emitters 7 Addressing the Challenge.
TTI CO2 Sequestration in Geologic Formations Terralog Technologies USA, Inc. BP Hydrogen Energy CO2 Project.
Seismic Stratigraphy EPS 444
Technical options for placement of CO 2 in the maritime area  by Paul Freund
HYDROCARBON PETROLEUM SYSTEM
INFLUENCE OF CAPILLARY PRESSURE ON CO 2 STORAGE AND MONITORING Juan E. Santos Work in collaboration with: G. B. Savioli (IGPUBA), L. A. Macias (IGPUBA),
Carbon Storage. Presentation titlePage 2 Overview of Geological Storage.
NewTec International Exploration and Production Support NewTec International BV. is specialized in geological advice and training for exploration and.
10 years of SLEIPNER CO2 Storage
CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery and Storage in Reservoirs
PERSIAN GULF OIL BY WILL CAMARDA ESS 315. Location  The majority of the Persian Gulf Oil Fields are located in the Persian Gulf Basin  Located between.
PESGB North Sea Special Conference Session
Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) with CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in Western North Dakota Zhengwen Zeng and Peng Pei Department of Geology and.
Evaluation of a bedrock aquitard for regional- and local-scale groundwater flow Kenneth R. Bradbury, Madeline B. Gotkowitz, and David J. Hart Wisconsin.
Guided by 3D seismic data, property modeling for the depleted reservoir was extended downward to the sparsely drilled deep saline aquifer. The geologic.
Petroleum Engineering Presented by : Mostafa Khojamli November
National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad.
Sedimentology & Stratigraphy:
1 CO 2 from capture to storage Gérard FRIES Executive Vice-President Institut Français du Pétrole.
09.35 Task 1: Overall monitoring objectives. Andy Chadwick, BGS (10 mins) 1.
Improved Recovery Demonstration for Williston Basin Carbonates DE-FC22-93BC14984 Luff Exploration Company Mark Sippel, Consulting Engineer.
Forum for Reservoir Characterisation, Reservoir Engineering and Exploration Technology Cooperation Officially opened by Jens Stoltenberg 17. November 1995.
Greenhouse Gas Mitigation & CO 2 Storage Prof. Jenn-Tai Liang Chemical & Petroleum Engineering Department The University of Kansas.
HSE Screening Risk Assessment (SRA) for Geologic CO 2 Sequestration Curtis M. Oldenburg Earth Sciences Division WESTCARB Meeting Portland, OR October 27-28,
Lab 5: Exploring for Petroleum Key Q: How is petroleum found?
OIL AND GOVERNANCE State-owned Enterprises and the World Energy Supply GEMBA 11.
GEOLOGIST / GEOPHYSICIST (Intern / Full-time) At BP, we use leading-edge technology to supply energy—primarily oil and gas—to meet the growing world demand.
Luff Exploration Company Mark Sippel, Consulting Engineer
INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE (IPCC) The IPCC on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Heleen de Coninck (IPCC WG III on Mitigation) DEFRA/IRADe.
Using Well Logs (e-logs) in the Petroleum industry Earth Science World.
Risk Assessment for Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 Presented to: West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Sacramento, California September.
RCS Partnerships Annual Meeting Pittsburg December 2007 Gulf Coast Stacked Storage SECARB Phase II Test #1 Susan Hovorka, Tip Meckel, JP Nicot, Fred Wang,
Presentation and review of TTA-report: Exploration and Reservoir Characterisation Summary Background Project Proposal.
Delhi CCS R&D prorities CO 2 geological storage: Road Map, EOR, aquifers, mineral Stuart Haszeldine School of GeoSciences.
LAB 5: Exploring for Petroleum Key Q: How is petroleum found?
CO 2 Storage Challenges to the Iron and Steel Industry John Gale General Manager IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme Steel Institute VDEh Auditorium D ü sseldorf,
Schlumberger Carbon Services Economics & Risk of Scaling Up for Carbon Storage John Tombari Vice President North & South America Schlumberger Carbon Services.
Can Carbon Capture and Storage Clean up Fossil Fuels Geoffrey Thyne Enhanced Oil Recovery Institute University of Wyoming.
Energy and the Environment: Tapping the Potential for Large Volume Storage of Carbon in the Gulf Coast Susan Hovorka Bureau of Economic Geology Jackson.
Recent progress and big ideas on geologic sequestration US/international perspective Susan D. Hovorka Gulf Coast Carbon Center Jackson School of Geosciences.
Recent progress and big ideas on CCS US/international perspective.
NTG vs. Reservoir Connectivity
GSE - Gas Storage Europe1 GSE Investment Workshop “ Physical specificities of gas storage” Brussels, 24 May 2007.
UNCLASSIFIED The CarbonNet Project MMV constraints for shallow-water nearshore storage sites POSTER A Index Map: Location of Gippsland Basin in Victoria,
Chapter 1.  In order to have hydrocarbon to accumulate we need to have sediment basin, High level of organic materials, and temperature/pressure.  Source.
Geologic Sequestration: the Big Picture Estimation of Storage Capacity or How Big is Big Enough Susan Hovorka, Srivatsan Lakshminarasimhan, JP Nicot Gulf.
UNCLASSIFIED Figure 2: MICP data sorted by geological formation for the Gippsland Basin. The cover sequence of Gippsland Limestone has poor seal capacity.
Fast, interactive hydrocarbon systems modelling. Why? – The point of a geometric approach Focuses on first order effects Fast to run Easy to change Easy.
Idar Akervoll, SINTEF Petroleum, Trondheim
Subsurface resources in the Netherlands
Appalachian storage Hub (ASH) project
EuroArray as a significant part of the European Plate Observatory Imaging Europe in 4D by completing the existing infrastructure to enable co-ordinated.
EXPLORATION OPPORTUNITIES IN NAMIBIA
Recent Advances in Well-Based Monitoring of CO2 Sequestration
Regional and local INSAR displacement maps
Diapirs Can Provide Good Traps
by J. D. O. Williams, S. Holloway, and G. A. Williams
Stratigraphic Traps – Sub-Unconformity & Reef
by Jashar Arfai, and Rüdiger Lutz Petroleum Geology Conference
Do deformation bands matter for flow
Presented in The 5th ITB International Geothermal Workshop Thursday, March 31, 2016 ON THE FEASIBILITY OF GEOTHERMAL HEAT PRODUCTION FROM A HOT SEDIMENTARY.
Presentation transcript:

The CarbonNet Project POSTER B MMV Certification MMV constraints for shallow-water nearshore storage sites Figure 9: Reservoir injectivity for CCS projects worldwide. Injectivity is ultimately controlled by reservoir thickness and permeability. Ideal reservoirs (Type 1) are coloured green, and adequate reservoirs (Type 2) are white. Poor reservoirs (type 3) are red and injection is contraindicated because of risk of fracturing (e.g. In Salah) Figure 10: Reservoir detail. Full 3D geostatic models have been build, using offset and local well data and regional and local geological depositional models. Full CO2 flow simulation has been completed for injection rates up to 5 Mtpa over 25 years (i.e. 125 Mt total injection) Figure 8: Storage concepts. Extensive Figure 12: Middle N. asperus finger- and birdsfoot deltas These sand units underlie the T2 coals and be readily mapped on high quality marine 3D data. Isolated sand stringers have strong amplitudes (orange) while within coal-rich zones, amplitudes are suppressed (grey) when sands are present. CarbonNet storage concepts CarbonNet has shortlisted a suite of three sites with different characteristics – two structural traps, and one aquifer trap. These range in capacity from 25 Mt to 125 Mt and involve storage at a variety of stratigraphic levels (Figure 8). Reservoirs of the Latrobe Group are world class with injectivity of over 100 Darcy-metres (Figure 9). This is comparable to the injectivity of the Utsira formation at the Sleipner site. Excellent aquifer support in this basin allows primary oil recovery of 85% with no water injection. Similar pressure response will allow large-volume injection without any geomechanical issues. The most promising structures have been modelled in detail (Figure 10) and offer storage of Supercritical CO2 at depths of 1000m and greater, beneath intraformational seals (Figure 11). Other sites involve storage beneath the Lakes Entrance Formation – the regional seal proven by decades of petroleum exploration. High quality 3D seismic data (Figure 12) and excellent in-situ examples of modern depositional environments (Figure 13) allow direct imaging of the geological features that form reservoirs and seals (Figure 14). MMV The presence of multiple high-quality seals offers very high storage certainty. The primary method of MMV will be conventional marine 3D seismic to image the top and edges of the plume, within structural closures and along plume migration paths. 3D seismic will deliver confidence in storage, and also act as an above-zone monitoring tool to demonstrate that no part of the CO2 rises above the topseals. This seismic data will be supplemented by strategically-sited monitor wells measuring injection zone and above-zone pressure, temperature, chemistry, and rock physics. Marine MMV will serve as an assurance monitoring tool to demonstrate that no CO2 has reached the marine environment. Certification Det Norske Veritas have certified the CarbonNet Portfolio of three sites against the requirements of Recommended Practice DNV-RP-J203. In addition, the Appraisal Plan for the prioritised site, drafted by Schlumberger Carbon Services, has also been verified against DNV-RP-J203 and against the requirements of Australian legislation. Figure 13: The Mitchell river “silt jetties” The modern-day Mitchell River in the onshore Gippsland Lakes has built a ~ 10 km finger delta down the west side of Jones Bay, from the town of Bairnsdale towards Paynesville, and then eastwards across Lake King. These modern systems are direct analogues of the Latrobe Group depositional system, and are the longest finger deltas outside of the Mississippi region 2 km Figure 11: Plume simulation after ~300 years In structural storage sites, the plume is fully contained within the structural closure at all times and safely trapped below effective seals for 1000+ years (300 year timestep illustrated here) Dr. Nick Hoffman: CarbonNet Geoscience Storage Advisor Figure 14: Middle N. asperus palaeogeography (Traralgon T1/T2) Palaeogeographic interpretation of finger- and birds-foot deltas building into the Seahorse Lagoon. Note raised bog coals in Golden Beach area (enhanced amplitude through tuning), and offset of barrier bar facies along Mulloway lineament. About the Author Dr. Nick Hoffman has over 25 years’ international oil industry experience, including substantial time with BP in Europe, and with BHP in Australia and worldwide. He joined CarbonNet in 2011 as part of the start-up technical team to lead the geoscience evaluation over CarbonNet’s portfolio of nearshore CO2 sequestration targets. He is an expert geophysicist, sequence stratigrapher, and basin geologist with significant experience interpreting depositional environments, structural evolution, and reservoir distribution from 3D and 2D seismic, and from well data. Nick integrates a wide range of basin data to understand the implications for long-term safe CO2 storage. Email: nick.hoffman@ecodev.vic.gov.au The CarbonNet Project CarbonNet is run by the State Government of Victoria, with funding support from the Federal government under the Greenhouse Gas Flagships Programme and from the GCCSI. www.energyandresources.vic.gov.au/carbonnet