bKAGRA PSL Design Study

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ILIAS 5-6/11/2004 WG T2 Task T2 (WG 11) AIM: exact definition (theoretical and experimental) of photo-thermal noise PARTICIPANTS INFN (AURIGA group; also.
Advertisements

Cascina, January 25th, Coupling of the IMC length noise into the recombined ITF output Raffaele Flaminio EGO and CNRS/IN2P3 Summary - Recombined.
Present status of the laser system for KAGRA Univ. of Tokyo Mio Lab. Photon Science Center SUZUKI, Ken-ichiro.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v2.
LIGO-G W 1 Increasing the laser power incident on the recycling mirrors Doug Cook and Rick Savage LIGO commissioning meeting Dec. 22, 2003 Ref.
LIGO-G W LIGO II Pre-stabilized Laser System Design Requirements and Conceptual Design David Ottaway, Todd Rutherford, Rick Savage, Peter Veitch,
Performance of the LIGO Pre-stabilized Laser System Rick Savage LIGO Hanford Observatory Ninth Marcel Grossmann Meeting on General Relativity Rome 2000.
Measurement of the laser beam profile at PSL to Mode Cleaner interface for the 40 Meter Prototype Interferometer A table of contents 1. Introduction 1.1.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
GWADW, May 2012, Hawaii D. Friedrich ICRR, The University of Tokyo K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata, T. Mori, S. Kawamura QRPN Experiment with Suspended 20mg Mirrors.
GWADW 2010 in Kyoto, May 19, Development for Observation and Reduction of Radiation Pressure Noise T. Mori, S. Ballmer, K. Agatsuma, S. Sakata,
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
1 Noise sources at high frequency in Virgo E. Tournefier (LAPP-CNRS) ILAS WG1 meeting, Hannover December 12 th,2005 Recycled ITF sensitivities Noise sources.
LIGO- G R Telecon on June, Mach-Zender interferometer to eliminate sidebands of sidebands for Advanced LIGO Osamu Miyakawa, Caltech.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
Intensity Stabilization Servo Plan Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo November 23, 2015.
Pre-stabilized laser (PSL) for AdV Scope of the system Main tasks Requirements Reference solution and status of the design Plans towards completion Technical.
Paolo La Penna Injection optics for Advanced VirgoLSC/VIRGO joint meeting, Cascina, 25/05/ Advanced VIRGO Input optics LIGO-G Z.
Status of the Advanced LIGO PSL development LSC Virgo meeting, Caltech, March 2008 LIGO G Z Benno Willke for the PSL team.
New iKAGRA Configuration Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo 11th KAGRA F2F (University of Tokyo) Feb 6, 2015.
Abstract The Hannover Thermal Noise Experiment V. Leonhardt, L. Ribichini, H. Lück and K. Danzmann Max-Planck- Institut für Gravitationsphysik We measure.
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Status of the Advanced LIGO PSL development LSC meeting, Baton Rouge March 2007 G Z Benno Willke for the PSL team.
1 DC readout for Virgo+? E. Tournefier WG1 meeting, Hannover January 23 rd,2007 DC vs AC readout: technical noises Output mode cleaner for DC readout.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
LIGO-G R DC Detection at the 40m Lab DC Detection Experiment at the 40m Lab Robert Ward for the 40m Lab to the AIC group Livingston LSC meeting.
Ultra-stable, high-power laser systems Patrick Kwee on behalf of AEI Hannover and LZH Advanced detectors session, 26. March 2011 Albert-Einstein-Institut.
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo April 12, 2016JGW-T
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
Local control sensors for iKAGRA payloads and perspective (Optical lever) Kazuhiro Agatsuma 2013/Dec./5 ELiTES meeting at Tokyo1.
Daniel Sigg, Commissioning Meeting, 11/11/16
Possible KAGRA Upgrades
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
First Lessons from the Advanced LIGO Integration Testing
Status of PLL system of ALS
A study of Arm Length Stabilization in KAGRA
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Electronics and Cables around IMC Common Mode Servo Board
Commissioning Progress and Plans
The High Power Light Source for LCGT
J. Kovalik, LIGO Livingston Observatory
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Possible KAGRA Upgrades
Possibility of Upgrading KAGRA
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Present status of the laser system for KAGRA
Flat-Top Beam Profile Cavity Prototype: design and preliminary tests
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Possible KAGRA Upgrades
KAGRA+ Upgrade Plans Yuta Michimura1, Kentaro Komori1
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
bKAGRA PSL EOM Layout ~180W ? to IMC Laser EOM (fPMC, PM) PMC EOM
Summary of Issues for KAGRA+
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Beam Propagation for bKAGRA Phase 1 with flat ETMs
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Intensity Stabilization Servo Plan
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1
Intensity Stabilization Servo Plan
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Presentation transcript:

bKAGRA PSL Design Study April 13, 2018 bKAGRA PSL Design Study Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo

Scope Collect information for bKAGRA PSL Give first proposal for bKAGRA PSL design Start discussion on noises and control loops PMC, FSS, ISS References: - JGW-G1503293, JGW-G1402866 (laser setup) - JGW-T1402349 (iKAGRA PMC) - JGW-G1503515 (bKAGRA PMC) - JGW-T1503330 (FSS modeling) - JGW-D1503389 (ISS plan) - JGW-D1503189 (EOM layout plan) - JGW-T1402332 (beam jitter requirement at PSL) - LIGO-T0900649 (aLIGO PSL Final Design) - N. Ohmae, PhD Thesis (2010)

Schematics RefCav for RefCav modulation for coherent addition & PMC AOM RefCav for RefCav modulation for coherent addition & PMC & FSS (wideband) EOM temp FSS1 PMC PZT OPTIONAL NPRO EOM FI EOM AOM wideband noise eater fiber stretcher PZT temp EOM FI PMC fiber amplifier solid state amplifier ISS2 ISS1 coherent add FSS2 MOD1 MOD2 CARM periscope EOM EOM fIMC, f2 f1, f3 EOM FI IMC power controller delay line FSS3

Concept RefCav after PMC to reduce beam jitter -> wideband EOM after fiber amplifier to avoid phase delay (Another possibility is to put RefCav and wideband EOM both before the fiber amplifiers. In this case, we don’t have to use high power wideband EOM, and RefCav servo stay locked when PMC is unlocked. However, beam jitter might be a problem.) Use PMC auxiliary transmissions for RefCav and ISS to save power Simple, but loss less f1(PM-AM), f2(PM), f3(AM) modulation -> PM-AM switchable for f1 loses some f3 AM, but doesn’t matter much since f3 AM is used only for the lock acquisition Use less EOMs as possible -> use same EOM for coherent addition and PMC servo use same EOM (doubly-resonant) for f2 and IMC use same EOM (doubly-resonant) for f1 and f3

Actual Layout all fit in 4.8 m x 1.5 m bKAGRA PSL table see JGW-D1503484 for the updated layout RefCav f1, f2, f3 modulation PMC laser + high power oscillator periscope The layout for the f1, f2, f3 modulation given here is the one which takes up the most space. We are thinking of using a different layout as given in p.3

Pre-Mode Cleaner bow-tie cavity, aluminum spacer (aLIGO-like) at design phase (see JGW-G1503515) finesse 155 round trip length 2.02 m FSR 150 MHz cavity pole 480 kHz TMS 42 MHz Fused Silica, 1inch dia x 0.25inch thick ROC 3 m T = 80 +/- 20 ppm @ 5.655 AOI (AR: R < 0.1 %) PZT attached 500 mm 100 mm FSR: free spectral range TMS: transverse mode spacing Fused Silica, 1inch dia x 0.25inch thick Flat R = 98 +/- 0.2 % @ 5.655 AOI (AR: R < 0.1 %)

Reference Cavity linear cavity, ULE spacer already made (currently at Kashiwa) including Zerodur support, thermally insulated vacuum can, temperature control Specsheet available from JGW-T1503493 we call it a RefCav or FRC (frequency reference cavity; it stands for fiber ring cavity in iKAGRA!) finesse 3e4 round trip length 2*100 mm FSR 1.5 GHz cavity pole 22 kHz TMS 0.22 GHz Photo from N. Ohmae

RefCav Frequency Stability long term drift should be smaller than ~100 mHz/sec It corresponds to 8.4 kHz/day and the daily drift will be smaller than the arm cavity FSR (50 kHz). So, we can lock the arm cavity at the same fringe every day. this can be achieved by stabilizing the temperature within +/- 1 K at the thermal expansion zero crossing point (this gives < 2e-9 /K of the thermal expansion), and making the temperature drift smaller than 2e-7 K/sec. estimated frequency stability is shown right seismic: 1e-9 (1Hz/freq)**2 m/rtHz vibration sensitivity: 3e-8 vibration isolation: 1x Minus K thermal expansion: 2e-9 cavity temperature: (1Hz/freq) uK/rtHz coating Q: 2500 substrate Q: 1e6 spacer Q: 6e4 coating thickness: 4 um Temperature Seismic Substrate thermal Coating thermal Spacer thermal Calculated by T. Ushiba et al.

Frequency Stabilization Servo Modeling on going See JGW-T1503330 for preliminary result It looks like the current PSL design basically meet the requirements

Intensity Stabilization Servo No modeling yet See JGW-D1503389

Wideband EOM for FSS We will use wideband EOMs before fiber amplifiers as a default plan (suggested by Rana Adhikari and Rick Savage) so, these wideband EOMs will be used for - coherent addition - PMC sidebands - FSS In case phase delay is a problem for FSS, we will put another wideband EOM after solid state amplifier. This wideband EOM should be compatible with high power.

EOM Layout for f1,f2,f3 Modulations Calculation for deciding the layout on going See JGW-D1503189 (we are considering of choosing layout 3) Sideband amplitudes we need f1 PM: J1(0.15) [J1(0.2) at maximum] f1 AM: 0.65*J1(0.15) [optional for DRSE; 65% of PM] f2 PM: J1(0.05) [J1(0.1) at maximum] f3 AM: 0.05 [only used for lock acquisition] Unwanted sidebands f1 harmonics: requirements to be calculated f3 harmonics: requirements to be calculated unwanted f1 AM: requirements to be calculated unwanted f2 AM: requirements to be calculated

Beam Jitter Requirements for PSL periscope mirror displacement/tilt are (see JGW-T1402332 for derivation) We have to design a periscope to meet this requirement

People in Charge Overall layout [Nakano] PMC [Nakano, Michimura, UToyama] RefCav [Michimura?] FSS [Michimura] ISS [UToyama] EOM [Uehara, Shiga, Somiya] Periscope [??]