DISTRIBUTION AND INTERNET

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPACT ESTIMATION PROJECT h o r i z o n s c a n n i n g Anti-trust issues in on-line retailing Ed Smith Director Office of Fair Trading The views expressed.
Advertisements

Vertical agreements and competition law Doc. dr. sc. Jasminka Pecotić Kaufman University of Zagreb-Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Law.
Le présent support ne peut être reproduit sans autorisation 1 Legal case « Pierre Fabre Laboratories»  Is it legal to require the permanent presence of.
Mark Abell Partner, Field Fisher Waterhouse LLP, London 5-6 November 2008.
Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine Activity October 2014.
Procedure under the Merger Regulation. Procedure – legal documents The Merger Regulation Art. 4 – notification of concentration Art. 7 – suspension of.
Consumers Online: Privacy, Security and Identity Professor Margaret Jackson and Marita Shelly Presentation to the RMIT Financial Literacy, Banking & Identity.
The e-Commerce Sector Inquiry
E-Commerce: Definition: E-Commerce refers the use of internet and other online services to be engaged in buying and selling of digital and non digital.
ENTELA SHEHAJ Albanian Energy Regulator (ERE) DOES MONITORING METHODOLOGY MATTERS? Electricity Market Monitoring in Albania.
Designing and Managing Integrated Marketing Channels
Unit Place pg. 576.
What the government does A2 Economics and Business Unit 4B By Mrs Hilton for revisionstation.
UNIT F MANAGEMENT OF DISTRIBUTION, PROMOTION, AND SELLING
Vertical Agreements Casework Elisa Holmes Monckton Chambers London 1-2 Raymond Buildings, Gray’s Inn, London, WC1R 5NR, UK +44 (0)20.
Nov/Dec 2003ElectraNet BSP-2 Workshop (khb) 1 EU Telecoms Regulatory Status Governing Legislation Package 2002  Directive 2002/19/EC Access to, and interconnection.
Vertical Restraints: An Introduction
Distribution Management
Case COMP/ – ENI (Abuse of Dominant Position) International Competition Law Dushanka Dovichinska 24 Nov 2010.
International Union of Commercial Agents and Brokers (IUCAB)
Navigating the competition law aspects of franchising 2014 UIA Florence Corinne Khayat.
Vertical Restraints Dr. Patrick Krauskopf Swiss Competition Commission (COMCO) National Training Workshop on Competition Policy and Law organised by CUTS.
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
Implementation of EU Electronic Communication Directives.
Vertical Restraints – Case Work Dr. Patrick Krauskopf Swiss Competition Commission (COMCO) National Training Workshop on Competition Policy and Law organised.
Franchising and Internet. Is it appropirate to apply the same principles which have been established for selective distribution André Lombart CMS DeBacker.
Directory assistance services Retiring the number 12 and replacing it with six-digit numbers beginning with 118 Meet the Press Friday 4 February 2005.
Presentation “Green Investment Schemes – greenhouse gas emissions quotas trading mechanisms in Ukraine according to the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention.
Corporate Social Responsibility 3 Compliance control.
GLOBAL MARKETING Distribution Management. Why A Distribution Strategy? To make the right quantities of the right product or service available at the right.
Competition Enforcement in the Recently Acceded Member States Vertical Agreements Michal Petr Office for the Protection of Competition, Czech Republic.
Slide 1 Recognition of Professional Qualifications in the European Single Market for Services Henri Olivier FEE Secretary General FEE (Fédération des Experts.
FABRIZIO MONCALVO Case analysis. Case Analysis  Where the services of an intermediary, such as an operator of a website, have been used by a third party.
Section What factor could determine legal ownership of goods in the distribution process? A.Country in which the product is produced B.Availability.
Ecommerce Applications 2007/8 E-Commerce Applications UK e-Commerce Regulations.
Fabio Bortolotti Contracts whereby a supplier is granted an area within a department store, shopping mall or other similar organization. A general overview.
EU Business Law: Anticompetitive agreements (Art. 101 TFEU) Dr. Agata Jurkowska-Gomułka.
Sexting in Schools – How do we need to respond. Images or videos generated by children under the age of 18, or of children under the age of 18 that are.
Thomas Kramler DG Competition, European Commission (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European Commission) E-commerce and EU competition.
Channels of Distribution Unit 2, Lesson 3 Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.
Electricity licensing and trading rules in Latvia Mini-Forum, July 3, 2006 Sandija Audzere, Head of Energy Unit, Legal Department Public Utilities Commission.
ROMANIA NATIONAL NATURAL GAS REGULATORY AUTHORITY Public Service Obligations in Romanian Gas Sector Ligia Medrea General Manager – Authorizing, Licensing,
CLAIRE BALDERSON Franchising. What is Franchising? Franchising is a business strategy for getting and keeping customers. Franchising is a marketing system.
European Commission, DG Competition, Policy and Strategy, International Relations 1 New EU Competition Rules for Purchase and Distribution agreements Kris.
Place – Marketing Mix 4.5 The four Ps.
Carl Zwisler Gray Plant Mooty Washington, DC
HOW TO DRAFT CLAUSES WHICH COMPLY WITH REGULATION 330/2010
The IVD Australia Code of Conduct Edition 2.1
Sales promotion via the Internet by companies with a distribution network How to avoid conflicts with the network Marco Hero TIGGES Rechtsanwälte Zollhof.
European Union Law Week 10.
Heading in the wrong direction
FOR MANAGING ONLINE SALES SELECTIVE DISTRIBUTION MODEL
Lear - Laboratorio di economia, antitrust, regolamentazione
Concerted Practices © Łukasz Stępkowski.
PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON SECURITY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT 9 FEBRUARY :00 -11:30 PROCLAMATIONS BY THE PRESIDENT UNDER SECTION 26.
WHAT IS FRANCHISING? THE POINT OF VIEW OF THE USERS
Dr Pınar Akman Associate Professor School of Law, University of Leeds
EU Sports Law and Policy Summer School
Chapter 31 branding, packaging, and labeling Section 31.1 Branding
Horizontal Restraints
Investor protection and MIFID
Fabio Bortolotti Buffa Bortolotti & Mathis, Torino-Milano
Restrictions by object and effect in the digital economy
The EU competition rules on vertical agreements Selective Distribution
Vertical Agreements Casework
Avv. Roberto Panetta LL.M. Ph.D. ISCL Secretary General
Internet sales under the new block exemption regulation
Cross-Debarment Christopher Yukins.
Healthcare regulation: an obstacle to cross-border trade in services
International Trade Center
Presentation transcript:

DISTRIBUTION AND INTERNET The Impact of Internet on Agency, Distributorship and Franchising Agreements 2008 Annual Meeting of the International Distribution Institute 6th and 7th June 2008 Turin - Italy

The Impact of Internet on Agency, Distributorship and Franchising Agreements Marketing products and services through Internet Internet sales by selective distributors and franchisees

decision 07-D-07 rendered on 8.03.2007 A French example : decision 07-D-07 rendered on 8.03.2007 relating to practices implemented in the cosmetic and personal hygiene products sector Facilitation of online sales Undertakings given to withdraw a ban on internet sales Carol XUEREF 6th June 2008

The Conseil de la concurrence decided on its own initiative (ex officio referral) in June 2006 to analyse the lawfulness of the conditions imposed by certain cosmetic product companies (representing 53 % of the French market) for selling their products via the internet.

According to the Conseil de la concurrence, the aforementioned practices breached Article 4 of the EU Commission Regulation n° 2790/1999, which prohibits « the restriction of active or passive sales to end users by members of a selective distribution system operating at the retail level of trade », as well as the Commission’s Guidelines on vertical restraints dated 13th October 2000, which states that « every distributor must be free to use the internet to advertise or to sell products […]. An outright ban on internet or catalogue selling is only admissible if there is an objective justification ».

The companies all resorted to a selective distribution system through which their products were sold via approved distributors (chemists, parapharmacies, special counters at department stores), which were selected for the quality of their retail outlets and the level of staff qualifications required for giving appropriate counselling. As part of the procedure, ten companies committed to change substantially the clauses of their selective distribution contracts for online sales by approved distributors. The aim was to reconcile respect of the brand image, guaranteeing product quality and accessing approved distributors for this medium in light of the specificities of the products and advice necessary to use them.

The ten companies committed to change their behaviour involving the removal of the requirement that their products would be sold exclusively at a physical sales point and thus authorising sales on the internet. The companies, however, subjected the authorisation to distribute their products on the internet to various conditions. For instance, the companies required their distributors (i) to set up a quality website, with a technical design and appearance complying with the brand’s graphic charter, and (ii) to mention on the website the addresses of physical sales points or a permanent access to a hotline, staffed by qualified pharmacists and which guaranteed a response to consumers’ questions within 24 hours.

The quality of the website is a common concern for all the companies, which naturally require the respect of their brand image. In this respect, some of the conditions put forward by the authorities were of concern : requirements to create a website, which is exclusively dedicated to the sale of products which require counselling ; the need to have a payment point reserved for the products, detailed requirements as regards product presentation (description, size and weight of the pictures), compulsory resort to a webcam to visualise the customer, etc..

The manufacturers accepted to simplify the contract clauses, without undermining the respect for the brand image. Alternatives to conditions included for example for the requirement of a dedicated website the substituion of a dedicated page as part of a virtual store. Some companies went even further, in accepting the principle of platform selling under certain conditions.

Conditions relating to hotline availabilities The creation of a hotline via telephone or email offers (or both) and via internet, a personal counselling service given by a chemist. The operating conditions of the system (timetables, maximum time period for reply) were reduced.

Restrictions or limitations on quantities or prices The Conseil de la concurrence believed that the manufacturers’ restrictions on the number of products likely to be purchased via an internet order could restrict parallel trade. It observed that this requirement did not exist for real outlets and stressed that intra-network trade between approved distributors should not be limited. Some of the companies concerned then committed themselves to increase the anticipated quantitative thresholds and others to simplify autorisation mechanisms, notwithstanding, certain fraud involving internet sales.

Referencing of search engines Most companies concerned removed the prohibition to use their corporate name or their brand as a keyword in so called « usual » search engines and a certain number of changes were brought to clauses relating to payment.

The commitments taken by the ten companies lead to the development of online sale of parapharmaceutical products. The consumer are able to compare prices of different brands and also to use more easily intra-brand competition, i.e. competition between different approved distributors for a single brand product.

The proceedings before the Conseil de la concurrence came after two decisions concerning bans on internet selling within selective distribution networks in the watches sector (« Festina » July 2006) and in the hi-fi and home cinema sector (October 2006). In these decisions, the Conseil de la concurrence stated that a supplier can reserve the right to sell online to the members of its network, but cannot prevent those members from using this sale method.