TENORM Disposal Options in North Dakota

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NORM Training Shauna Landsberger MSPH Graham George, President
Advertisements

Certification of Compliance By Evita Lagard
 Regulated under the Atomic Energy Act ◦ Low concentrations of source, byproduct and special nuclear material ◦ Accelerator produced material ◦ Generally.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
What do Workers in the Field Need to Know About NORM/TENORM
2009 ENVIRONMENTAL SEMINAR Boat Bottom Pressure Washing Requirements & General Permit for the Discharge of Stormwater Associated with Industrial Activity.
Low-Level Waste Advisory Committee Meeting October 2, 2014 TENORM Study Update 3 rd Quarter Tom Corbett, Governor E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary.
The Role of Health Physicists in Uranium Site Cleanups Alisha Stallard, Environmental Health Physicist Radioactive Materials Division Texas Commission.
Overview & Management of NORM in Saudi Aramco
Environmental Health and Safety Radiation Control and Radiological Services.
Bapetco NORM Control Case Study IDENTIFY ASSESS CONTROL & RECOVERY.
WORKER SAFETY Radionuclides Web Cast August 4, 2004 Loren W. Setlow Office of Radiation and Indoor Air
NEI Issues & Current Events George Oliver June 22, th Annual RETS – REMP Workshop South Bend, Indiana.
Material Disposition Planning Olga Ligeti Radiation Protection Department MARCH 24, 2009.
TENORM North Dakota’s Journey to Rulemaking. BEGINNINGS 2013Oil industry is on the move – 200+ rigs operating capable of 20,000 feet or more – 167 Billion.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
Government of Western Australia Department of Mines and Petroleum Please read this before using presentation This presentation is based on content presented.
OAS Meeting August 2012 Jennifer Opila (CO) and David Allard (PA)
Early Stakeholder Outreach Oil & Gas Waste Draft Conceptual Rules Aaron Shear June 12, 2015.
October Mary Louise Hendrickson Solid Waste Section – Technical Lead
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
An Alternative Disposal Method for Activated PCB Capacitors N.M. Brachmann F.R. Brumwell S.W. Butala S.Y. Chen J.-J. Cheng Presented at the DOE Accelerator.
1 Moab Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) Project Site LTS&M Planning LTS&M Conference Grand Junction, CO November 16, 2010 Donald Metzler U.S.
1 A Consultancy on management of large amounts of radioactive waste after an emergency situation ~ Experience on aftermath of Fukushima Daiichi NPS accident.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
TENORM Radiation Safety From Oil and Gas Production
Corrective Action Program: Working with Your Local Agency to Solve Local Problems James Clay County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health Site.
Argonne National Laboratory Experience and Perspectives on Environmental Remediation Karen P. Smith Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory.
Think safe. Act safe. Be safe. LEHR Site Annual Soil Management Plan Training Sue Fields, Environmental Health & Safety Sept,
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections Gerald A. Schlapper, PhD, PE, CHP Health Physicist Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Region I.
Regulations Under Revision Hazardous Waste
Utah Division of Radiation Control
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Spring 2016 Meeting – Park City, UT
LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTE FORUM--FALL 2014 MEETING
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
CRCPD SR-N Suggested Regulations Part N: TENORM Rules Task Force
C.B. Harto, K.P. Smith, S. Kamboj, and J.J. Quinn
Safe Drinking Water Act , CCL and Perchlorate
PAG Manual Revision Update and Next Steps
by John Mitchell, Director Division of Environment
Hydraulic Fracturing in Virginia
Update on EPA Regulatory and Guidance Activities
TENORM Study Update Presented by Rich Janati on behalf of Dave Allard
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Updating the NRC’s Alternative Disposal Request Guidance Document
The Relative Risk From Oilfield NORM
Colorado: Current Waste Disposal Approaches and Challenges
Waste Asphalt Shingles & Dealing with Sham Recyclers
Solid Waste Handling Standards
Illinois Emergency Management Agency
TENORM in Municipal Solid Waste Landfills: Assessing the Risk
Kentucky Lead Workgroup Recommendations
EPA Work in TENORM Philip Egidi U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
TOPICAL TRAINING SESSION TENORM
Georgia Update Jeff Cown Land Protection Branch
Water Quality Rulemaking in Response to S.L
Gasunie is one of the biggest gas infrastructure companies in Europe
AFPC Policy Protect its personnel, contractors,3rd parties and the environment against the hazards of exposure to ionizing radiation due to AFPC activities.
Ruth E. McBurney, CHP CRCPD NCRP
Low-Level Radioactive Waste Forum Fall 2017 Meeting – Alexandria, VA
Regulation of TENORM from Oil and Gas Operations
Wastes from Oil & Gas Extraction Activities - All wastes prohibited by comprehensive ordinances passed by 49 CT towns & cities & 5 NY County Legislatures.
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Municipal Solid Wastes
Chesterfield Neighborhood Coal Ash Update January 9th, 2019
Senator Dance Town Hall Coal Ash Update December 5, 2018
Exempt and Low Activity Radioactive Waste Disposal
the path less traveled Termination of Post Closure Care
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Presentation transcript:

TENORM Disposal Options in North Dakota Alexandria, VA April 2015

Lower Member 11,000 feet down Oil found at all levels on this diagram

How much oil in North Dakota? 2013 Assessment Oil – 7.4 billion barrels (42 gallons/barrel) Natural gas – 6.7 trillion cubic feet Natural gas liquids – 0.53 billion barrels 193 drilling rigs operating capable of 20,000 ft. depth

AS of December, 2014 1,227,344 barrels/day produced 1,508,510 million cubic feet of natural gas/day 12,124 producing wells Estimated that there will be 50,000 – 70,000 producing wells when this is finished. Estimated to continue for more than 20 years February 2015 rig count 137 (lowest since July 2010) Drilling has begun about 125 miles to the southeast of current activity for natural gas with one well complete finding gas as expected 750 wells waiting on completion services (fracking)

Hydraulic Fracturing Already developed easy oil Oil flows easily without fracking Unconventional Reserves Reservoirs are tight Uneconomic to produce w/o fracking Must create a path for oil to flow

Fracking Process Much of the flowback water is reused in the next well, but must be filtered before it can be used again. (This is one of the problems facing North Dakota) The produced water is taken to a Permitted Salt Water Disposal Well to be pumped down hole at 5,ooo+ feet. This water must be filtered so the disposal well does not get plugged up. These suspended materials contain Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM).

Filter Socks!

June 1, 2014 Leak Tight containers required Must have a Solid Waste Haulers permit Drivers must have HAZMAT endorsement Each company must supply a letter to the Department stating the name of the individual responsible for the radiation safety program Must submit quarterly load reports Must be registered with the ND Secretary of State Must have a Radioactive Material Haulers license

NORM Some of the radioisotopes found in the soils of North Dakota are: Radium-226 Radium-228 Lead-210 Potassium-40

A Small Sample from North Dakota Nearly 150 Illegal Oil Waste Dumps” – AP “Filter Sock Mess Could Lead to Enforcement Action” – Bismarck Tribune “Watford City Struggles with Radioactive Oil Waste” – Billings Gazette “Strange Byproduct of Fracking Boom: Radioactive Socks” – Forbes “Officials, Operator to Meet in Filter Socks Probe” – KX News

Trailers with stored socks

2-20 yard roll off containers

Background Measurements Early work done in 1984-1986 by USEPA-ORP out of Las Vegas and North Dakota Department of Health regarding background radiation levels EPA 520-1-86-013 “Report on the Survey of Abandoned Uraniferous Lignite Mines in Southwestern North Dakota” Work was done in western North Dakota as part of the UMTRA program Background levels for Ra-226 found to be 4.2 pCi/gm during this work (1.4 – 9.7 pCi/gram) Origination of 5 pCi limit for disposal in North Dakota

Currently in North Dakota Currently the solid waste disposal limit for TENORM in North Dakota is 5.0 pCi Landfills levy fines of $1,000.00 per filter sock if found in the load presented for disposal TENORM waste (filter socks, sludge, pipe scale, etc) is transported out of state Risk Assessment study currently underway with Argonne National Labs to possibly increase the disposal limits

Argonne National Laboratory Radiological Dose and Risk Assessment of Landfill Disposal of Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (TENORM) in North Dakota

Change in Disposal Limits? Argonne study is final, and the Department of Health has drafted rule changes to permit the disposal of TENORM (50.0 pCi/gram) in Special Waste landfills and large volume Industrial landfills for which a permit modification will be required for existing facilities. Any new landfill would need to submit a complete application as a Special Waste landfill. Oaks Landfill, just across the border in Montana, currently has a disposal limit of 30 pCi/gram. Oaks is used frequently because of the close proximity to the oil fields. Clean Harbors or US Ecology are used as well for waste materials above the 30 pCi/gram limit of Oaks.

North Dakota Proposed Rules CRCPD Part N – modified to include Solid Waste Program North Dakota is licensing those companies that treat TENORM (must have trained RSO) Transfer stations require licensure TENORM transporters are required to be licensed Solid waste permit required Registration with the ND Secretary of State is required Drivers must have HAZMAT endorsement Quarterly load reports are required Standard format used and filed electronically Must have a qualified person responsible for their program

Quarterly Load Report

Rule making process update Rules are in final draft form ready for the following process: Public comment period (ended to March 2, 2015) Public Hearing (3 held across the state) Preparing responses to Public Comments Review by Attorney General (spring 2015) Presented to the North Dakota Health Council (summer 2015) Presented to Legislative Rules Committee (summer 2015) Presented to Legislative Council for publishing (fall 2015) Rules take effect after publishing (fall or winter 2015)

Assessment of TENORM Disposal in North Dakota Industrial Waste and Special Waste Landfills C.B. Harto, K.P. Smith, S. Kamboj, and J.J. Quinn Environmental Science Division Argonne National Laboratory Public Meeting Presentation Williston, Jan. 20 / Bismarck, Jan. 21 / Fargo, Jan. 22

Argonne Has Developed Computer Codes to Assess Radiological Risk The RESRAD code was developed with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy and U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. It is used to develop site-specific guidelines for managing residual radioactive materials: Estimate radiation doses and cancer risks for future site users, Evaluate the effectiveness of various disposal and remediation actions in terms of limiting future radiation exposures, Evaluate uncertainty associated with key site and/or waste parameters, and Establish appropriate cleanup criteria from a risk-based perspective. Argonne also has developed the TSD-DOSE code to evaluate risk from specific treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) activities. Work on RESRAD, which stands for RESidual RADioactivity, has been underway for many years. Development was funded by DOE and NRC The RESRAD code has been adopted by many regulatory agencies to develop site-specific guidelines and limits (e.g., cleanup standards) and evaluate specific disposal and remediation actions. RESRAD includes a family of codes addressing different aspects of radiological contamination. RESRAD = RESidual RADioactivity

Study Objective Support the North Dakota Department of Health’s (NDDH) efforts to update Waste Management Rules regarding TENORM. Provide science-based radiological dose and risk assessment of the disposal of TENORM wastes in permitted Industrial Waste and Special Waste Landfills in North Dakota. Evaluate potential exposures to workers and the general public resulting from TENORM management and disposal, on the basis of available waste characterization data. Considered a number of activities: Oilfield operations (worker exposures from well-site operations), Mismanaged filter socks and proppants (accidental public exposures), Transportation of TENORM to landfills (both drivers and general public exposures), Landfill operations (both workers and general public exposures), and Future use of the property following landfill closure (general public exposures). Based on best available data; did not entail new data collection/sample analysis

TENORM Waste Streams from Oil and Gas Development in North Dakota Produced Water Formation water that is produced along with hydrocarbons. Radionuclides that are mobilized in formation water are brought to the surface in this waste stream. Scale Hard and relatively insoluble deposits that accumulate inside production and processing equipment and on solid debris (e.g., sand grains) that comes in contact with produced water (typically BaSO4 or SrSO4). Radionuclides can co-precipitate with the sulfate scales. Sludge and Filter Cake Solid material including mud, sand, scale, and rust that settles or is filtered out of produced water. It is found in vessels used to store or manage produced water and in filter socks. Filter Socks Disposable filters used for filtering produced water accumulate sludge and filter cake over time which may contain radionuclides Synthetic Proppants Some imported synthetic proppants can contain low concentrations of radionuclides Contaminated Soils and Equipment

Several Different Pathway Analysis Codes Were Used to Support the Radiological Dose Assessments RESRAD Future use of the property following landfill closure RESRAD Build Oilfield operations Mismanaged filter socks and proppants RADTRAN Transportation of TENORM to landfills TSD-DOSE Landfill operations RESRAD Offsite Used to evaluate groundwater transportation of TENORM, including decay

Different Modeling Methodologies Were Used to Evaluate Various Scenarios Well Site Operations and Accidental Public Exposures Dose rates based on average and maximum radionuclide concentrations as presented in available waste characterization data provided by NDDH Landfill Operation and Future Use of Landfill Property Calculated the maximum concentration of radionuclides that could be disposed of in the landfill without resulting in doses greater than 100 mrem/yr for any receptor Transportation-Related Exposures Dose rates based on the maximum concentrations calculated for the landfill disposal option Hydrology Hydrologic modeling evaluated the possible movement of TENORM through the landfill into subsurface groundwater, and through the subsurface to a drinking water well.

Well Site Operations Sensitivity Analysis Results   Maximum Concentration Average Concentration Operations With PPE (mrem/yr) Without (mrem/yr) Mixing hydraulic fracturing fluid 23 30 20 26 Pipe cleaning 127 650 14 390 Storage tank cleaning 70 73 3.8 7.4 Equipment cleaning at gas processing facility 0.012 670 0.0003 18 Sludge treatment 85.8 1.6 15.4 The use of PPE can effectively reduce potential exposures for many workers. Based on maximum concentrations, doses for the equipment cleaning workers could be elevated even if PPE are used. It may be necessary to limit exposure time to keep exposures to these workers below 100mrem/yr.

Accidental Public Exposure Scenarios Exposure Time Over One Year Period Child playing with filter socks 24 hrs Adult exposed to filter socks in a dumpster 40 hrs Child playing in area where synthetic proppant has been dumped on the ground 100 hrs These scenarios are not representative of all possible exposures related to improperly managed filter socks and proppants.

Accidental Public Exposure Assessment Results Scenario  Maximum Concentration   Average Concentration Total Dose (mrem/yr) Filter socks used a toy 0.21 0.051 Filter socks dumped in a dumpster 4.4 0.40 Illegal dumping of proppant on a field 1.4 1.2 For the scenarios modeled, the risks of short term exposure to improperly disposed of filter socks and synthetic proppant are low.

Transportation Risk Assessment Scenarios and Results Receptor Base Case (1,000 Shipments/yr) Maximum Case (2,000 Shipments/yr) Dose (mrem/yr) Routine Conditions   Drivera 20 Individualb 1.6  10-6 3.2  10-6 General populationc 6.5  10-5 1.3  10-4 Accident Conditions 3.6 7.2 a Based on 0.01 mrem/h, 2,000 h/yr. b Estimated dose and risk are very conservative because an individual may not be present for all shipments. c Doses to the collective general population are expressed in units of person- rem/yr. Receptors evaluated: The driver Persons living along the transportation corridor Persons sharing the transportation corridor Persons at stops for refueling or maintenance Persons living near the entrance of the landfill site Risks considered: Risks associated with potential exposure from routine shipments Risks associated with potential exposure from accidental releases Risks associated with vehicle emissions Risks associated with fatal traffic accidents Potential doses associated with transportation of TENORM wastes are very low both for drivers and members of the general public.

Calculation of Maximum Allowable Radium Concentration for TENORM Disposal in the Landfills Calculated for 100 mrem/yr public dose limit Used estimated allowable TENORM concentrations for individual radionuclides Used sum of fraction rule and conservative activity fractions in the waste stream Initial waste characterization data for TENORM waste streams generated by oil and gas production in North Dakota indicate that thorium may be present in the wastes. Establishing a total radium limit that takes into account the levels of thorium that may be present is a conservative approach that ensures potential exposures to workers and the general public are maintained below the recommended annual dose limit. Data on the activity fraction in the waste streams was used to integrate allowable concentrations across radionuclides and obtain a value for the total radium concentration that can be disposed of without the dose in any scenario exceeding 100mrem/yr while taking into account the potential presence of thorium and uncertainty in the activity fractions.

Recommendations Regarding Regulation of the Disposal of TENORM in Landfills To ensure that potential exposures to any landfill worker or member of the general public does not exceed 100 mrem/yr The average concentration of total radium should not exceed 50 pCi/g of total radium provided the following conditions were met: No more than 25,000 tons of TENORM wastes were disposed of in a single landfill per year. The average thorium activity concentration in the waste did not exceed 24 pCi/g. TENORM wastes were covered by at least 2 m (6 ft) of clean cover material.

Two-Part Study Primary – evaluate whether landfills in North Dakota can safely accept any level of TENORM Secondary – evaluate possible TENORM exposure to workers and public even if landfill limit is not changed

Landfill Risk Evaluation Maximum TENORM concentration was back-calculated from a predetermined maximum exposure of 100 mrem/year Sample data is not necessary for these calculations

Worker and Public Risk Evaluation Several worker and public exposure scenarios were evaluated The study did not include any sample collection and analysis Available sample data was used to give a “ballpark” range of potential exposure

Data Limitations Not intended to be a comprehensive study of the full range and variation of TENORM in North Dakota Report acknowledges that sample data is limited Report states that the scenarios are not representative of all possible exposures All real-life situations will be different

Common TENORM Materials Filter socks Pipe and boiler scale Tank sludge and filter cake Lead-210 deposits in natural gas equipment Drill cuttings are not TENORM Soil and rock dug out of a vertical hole Drill cuttings are NORM All samples collected are in the range of natural soil in western North Dakota

North Dakota Proposed Rules Highlights General License To perform routine maintenance and/or decontamination on equipment and facilities controlled by the general licensee. Notification to the Department of Health required within 60 days of becoming subject to the general license.

Highlights continued: Specific License Application is required (fee required) Financial Assurance is required Operating and Emergency procedures manual is required Criminal history background under ND Century Code is required RSO required Applies to all treatment facilities Employee training program is required Registration with ND Secretary of State is required

Proposed Rules Radiation Control Program NDAC Chapter 33-10-23 Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD) has developed suggested state regulations that address TENORM CRCPD Part N is the model used in developing the TENORM rules for North Dakota Rules establish radiation protection standards for TENORM

Licensure required for transporters of TENORM Licensure required for Treatment and Disposal facilities Establish standards for Radiation Protection Establish record keeping requirements Describes financial assurance requirements Establishes Radiation Safety Officer requirements Outlines worker training requirements

Proposed Rules Solid Waste Program NDAC Chapter 33-20-11 Landfill TENORM disposal requirements Maximum 50 pCi/g total Ra-226 + Ra-228 Maximum 25,000 tons per year Covered by 1 foot of non-TENORM waste or daily cover material each day Must be 10 feet below surface of final cover If final cover slope >15%, then final cover must be at least 5 feet thick

Leachate and groundwater monitoring are required Quarterly reporting to the NDDoH Worker training and safety program required Record of notice attached to property deed will indicate volume of TENORM disposed.

QUESTIONS? Dale P. Patrick, MS Radiation Control Program Manager North Dakota Department of Health 701-328-5188 dpatrick@nd.gov