From: The Pfam protein families database

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Figure 1. Example TFBSshape analysis of DNA shape preferences for an Hnf4a TF dataset from UniPROBE. (A) Heat map showing predicted MGW profiles for individual.

Advertisements

Fig. 1. Genomic structure of the csd gene in A

Fig. 1. Significant clusters in the amygdala and dlPFC, four-way interaction effect (group by valence by temperature by time), small volume corrected.

Figure 1. RISC activity in BYL. ( A ) Quantity of AGO1 protein in BYL

Figure 1. AsCpf1 and LbCpf1-mediated gene editing in human cells

Figure 1. An example of an original simulation film used during the 1960s to 1990s to plan radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma, with field borders marked.

Fig. 1. — The life cycle of S. papillosus. (A) The life cycle of S

Figure 3: MetaLIMS sample input.

Figure 1 An overview of the study design.

Figure 2. The graphic integration of CNAs with altered expression genes in lung AD and SCC. The red lines represent the amplification regions for CNA and.

From: Learning by Working in Big Cities

From: THE FALLACIES OF PATENT-HOLDUP THEORY

Fig. 1. Trial structure for the experimental task.

Fig. 1 Nodes in a conceptual knowledge graph

Figure 1: Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema as indicated by the arrows. From: Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema after successful.

From: DynaMIT: the dynamic motif integration toolkit

Figure 3. Graphical summary of the main functions of web interface.

Figure 1. Example of a template search of expression data: screenshot of the ‘SpellDataSet→SpellScore→Genes’ template showing the SpellExpression Score.

Figure 2. Number of SNPs detected from empirical ddRAD-Seq analysis

FIG. 1.— Correlation of RPKM between (A) 1,509 TE families estimated from B73–104 and the in silico data with 5 outliers indicated in gray; (B) 1,514 TE.

Figure 2. Temperature-entropy diagram and the flow resistances of the power plant model of Figure 1. From: Thermodynamic optimization of a triple-shaft.

Figure 4. (A) A schematic representation from constructs that include modifications in Flag-TDP-12xQ/N. TDP-12xQ/N F4/L (F147, 149, 229, 231/L); TDP-12xQ/N.

From: Introducing the PRIDE Archive RESTful web services

Figure 1 The branches of NJ phylogenies calculated from the main genomic ORFs of (A) 240 isolates of PVY and (B) 103 of the isolates that showed no significant.

Fig. 1. RUbioSeq pipelines for exome variant detection and BS-Seq analyses. Dark gray boxes correspond to the main steps of the pipelines. Light gray boxes.

Figure 1. The flow chart illustrates the construction process of anti-CRISPRdb, and the information that users can obtain from anti-CRISPRdb. From: Anti-CRISPRdb:

Figure 3. Schematic of the parameters to assess junctions in SpliceMap

Figure 1. Complete work-flow of the Scasat

Figure 2. Workflow of MethMotif Batch Query

Figure 1. The number of unique PDB, UniProt and Pfam accessions represented in the MemProtMD database over time. A selection of landmark structures are.

Figure 3. Schematic representation of co-expression networks for BipA, SidD, and Erg11 encoding genes. Genes are represented by circles, with positive.

Figure 4. (A) Scatterplot of RPC4 T statistic (between TP0 and TP36) for the indicated groups of isolated tRNA genes (RPC4 peak only, n = 35; RPC4 + H3K4me3.

Figure 1. Circular taxonomy tree based on the species that were sequenced in our study. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1. Overview of the workflow of NetworkAnalyst 3.0.

Figure 1. Effect of random T/A→dU/A substitutions on transcription by T7 RNAP using a 321 bp DNA transcription template ... Figure 1. Effect of random.

Figure 1. Position and number of NLS improves genome editing by AsCas12a, LbCas12a and FnoCas12a. (A) General schematic ... Figure 1. Position and number.

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of CSN and NDM construction and our statistic model. (A) CSN and NDM construction. (i) ... Figure 1. Schematic illustration.

Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected numbers of exon boundaries aligning to boundaries of domain and disorder ... Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected.

Figure 1. autoMLST workflow depicting placement and de novo mode

Figure 1. The 12 species in this study and details of the improved G4-seq method. (A) Phylogenetic representation of ... Figure 1. The 12 species in this.

Point estimates with ... Point estimates with 95% CI. HR: hip replacement; KR: knee replacement. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.

FIGURE 1 Participant flow diagram. Exercise Counseling Clinic (ECC).

Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α protein with Blast-Search and PhyML+SMS ‘One click’ workflow. (A) NGPhylogeny.fr ... Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α.

Figure 1 Nelson-Aalen estimates of the cumulative incidence rates for patients on versus off IST. ON = optic neuritis; ... Figure 1 Nelson-Aalen estimates.

FIGURE 1 Study consort diagram

Figure 1. Illustration of DGR systems and their prediction using myDGR

Figure 1. The pipeline of Aggrescan3D 2.0 server.

Figure 1. Prediction result for birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 (PDB: 1bv1), as obtained by comparison to the cherry ... Figure 1. Prediction result for.

Figure 1. Using Voronoi tessellation to define contacts

Figure 1. PaintOmics 3 workflow diagram

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of solar energy and coal-fired power generation system. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1. Uncertainty reduction, value creation, and appropriation in two case studies. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.

Figure 1. (A) Architecture of Doc2Hpo. (B) Interactive user interface

Figure 1. MERMAID web server interface (Start page, Parameter page): MERMAID provides two ways to submit a protein ... Figure 1. MERMAID web server interface.

Figure 1. Yvis platform overview

Figure 1. The framework of NetGO with seven steps

Figure 1. Workflow of the HawkDock server that is divided into three major steps: (i) input of unbound or bound protein ... Figure 1. Workflow of the HawkDock.

Figure 2. Result page of a Primer3Plus Cloning run showing the left and right primers in blue and yellow. The included ... Figure 2. Result page of a Primer3Plus.

Fig. 1. —Synteny analysis of melon chromosome 1 (brown) and cucumber chromosome 7 (green) based on melon-cucumber ... Fig. 1. —Synteny analysis of melon.

Figure 1. SQL schema used by RetroRules

Figure 1 Genetic results. No case had more than one diagnostic result

Figure 1. The overlap between Ensembl/GENCODE, RefSeq and UniProtKB genes. The number of genes classified as coding in ... Figure 1. The overlap between.

Figure 1. Optimization of the variant calling algorithm, ADIScan1, by tangential conversion of read depth ratios ... Figure 1. Optimization of the variant.

Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations for coronary artery disease plotted across all chromosomes. Associations added ... Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations.

Figure 1. Crystal structures of Rim1

Figure 1 Mechanisms of mitral regurgitation.

Fig. 1. —GO categories enriched in gene families showing high or low omega (dN/dS) values for Pneumocystis jirovecii. ... Fig. 1. —GO categories enriched.

Figure 1. Removal of the 2B subdomain activates Rep monomer unwinding

Figure 2. Model adequacy results for the two empirical data sets, West African Ebola, and 2009 H1N1 influenza. The ... Figure 2. Model adequacy results.

Fig. 2. Genetic differentiation among populations and individuals

Presentation transcript:

From: The Pfam protein families database Figure 1. New Pfam features since release 24.0. (A) The Pfam-A family page for Avidin (PF01382), showing the embedded contents of the associated Wikipedia article. The ‘infobox’ is highlighted. (B) The ‘sunburst’ representation of the tree showing the species distribution of the Pfam-A family Peptidase_M10 (PF00413). (C) The PfamAlyzer applet, showing the results of searching for all architectures that include the domains IMPDH and CBS. The PfamAlyzer applet allows querying of Pfam for proteins with particular domains, domain combinations or architectures. From: The Pfam protein families database Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;40(D1):D290-D301. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1065 Nucleic Acids Res | © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Oxford University Press.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

From: The Pfam protein families database Figure 4. Distribution of sequence gathering (GA) thresholds and of corresponding E-values. (A) Distribution of sequence GAs for all Pfam-A families. Note that intervals are such that, for example, ‘25–26’ translates into 25 ≤ sequence GA(bits) < 26. (B) Same as the histogram in panel (A), with log10(E-values) in place of GAs. E-values are calculated from GAs according to the following formula: E = N × exp[−λ·(x − τ)], where x is the bit score GA, λ and τ are parameters derived from the HMM model (λ is the slope parameter, τ is the location parameter) and N is the database size (in this case the size of UniProtKB) (22). (C) Box-plot of all Pfam families’ GAs (left side; median = 22.1, 25th percentile = 20.8, 75th percentile = 25.0), and for all families excluding those where both sequence and domain thresholds equal 25.0 or 27.0 (right side; median = 21.2, 25th percentile = 20.6, 75th percentile = 22.8). (D) Same as (C) with log10(E-values) in place of GAs. E-values calculated as in panel (B). Left side: median = 0.096, 25th percentile = 0.012, 75th percentile = 0.24. Right side: median = 0.18, 25th percentile = 0.057, 75th percentile = 0.27. Note that values reported here for median and percentiles are for E-values and not log10(E-values). From: The Pfam protein families database Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;40(D1):D290-D301. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1065 Nucleic Acids Res | © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Oxford University Press.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

From: The Pfam protein families database Figure 2. Pfam users in the world. A world map showing the usage of Pfam website at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, UK. Usage statistics were obtained from our Google Urchin tracking database and plotted using the Google map API. Circle size is proportional to number of visits from each country for those with >5000 visits. Countries contributing <5000 visits are all shown with the same sized marker. Data refer to the period between 1 and 30 June 2011. From: The Pfam protein families database Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;40(D1):D290-D301. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1065 Nucleic Acids Res | © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Oxford University Press.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

From: The Pfam protein families database Figure 3. Heat map showing sequence gathering threshold (GA) changes between Pfam releases 24.0 and 26.0. Yellow squares represent high density; red squares represent low density. Squares on the diagonal correspond to GAs that are unchanged; squares in the region above the diagonal are GAs that have increased; and squares below the diagonal are GAs that have decreased. For the sake of clarity, we chose to show a zoomed-in version of the complete plot, which also includes a number of points outside of the range seen here. The plot was created using R (21). From: The Pfam protein families database Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;40(D1):D290-D301. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1065 Nucleic Acids Res | © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Oxford University Press.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

From: The Pfam protein families database Figure 5. DUF families’ statistics. (A) Comparison between number of DUFs added (blue) and number of DUFs renamed or otherwise removed (red) since Pfam 22.0 (data shown for releases 23.0–26.0, as indicated by labels on the graph). (B) Number of PIR representative clusters of genomes (23) in DUF families. We used Representative Proteomes version 2.0, comprising a total of 671 clusters for a 35% membership cut-off. (C) Co-occurrence between DUFs and other families. The term ‘architecture’ refers to a combination of families occurring within the same protein sequence. Note that we only considered architectures with at least five member sequences. (D) DUF families and protein structure. ‘Families that have structure’ means that a PDB structure is available for a member of the family; ‘families in a clan that has structure’ means that a PDB structure is available for a member of the same clan. From: The Pfam protein families database Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;40(D1):D290-D301. doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1065 Nucleic Acids Res | © The Author(s) 2011. Published by Oxford University Press.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.