Advanced Technologies for Attaining and Maintaining DBP Compliance

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disinfectant & Disinfection Byproducts Control and Optimization Case Study of the University of Alaska Fairbanks Water System By Johnny Mendez, P.E., Drinking.
Advertisements

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Streamflow conditions across North Carolina Assessment of hydrologic conditions observed through.
Reducing THM via Aeration: A Case Study November 21, 2013 by Gary Williams, P.E. Jones & Henry Engineers Southeast AWWA District Meeting 1.
Case Study: Disinfection byproducts in a recently constructed public water supply Maria O’Connell, P.E. Kristine Wheeler, P.E. New York State Department.
Disinfection by-products Precursors + oxidant → DBPs DBPs can be reduced by: the precursors (organic materials present in the sourcewater) the reactants.
Antamina Mine Water Management Model Alan Keizur Golder Associates Roberto Manrique Arce Compañia Minera Antamina User Conference 2006 Background The Antamina.
CO ‑ STAR: Colorado Strategy for Arsenic Reduction A Five Phase Compliance Assistance Program 1. Evaluate 2. Sample 3.Engineer4. Finance 5. Implement.
Simultaneous Solutions for Aesthetics and Other Water Quality Problems Stephen Booth, PhD Craig Thompson, PE.
Wastewater Treatment Plants & Bacteria: Strategies for Compliance Chlorine Contact Chambers; Chlorine Mixing and Contact Time for Ct Harris County Wastewater.
District Engineer/Manager
Slide 1 Delta Water Quality: Implications for Utility Compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act Edward G. Means III Sr. Vice President McGuire Environmental.
DISINFECTION BY PRODUCTS IN ALASKAN WATER SYSTEMS by Lee Johnson, P.E. ADEC Drinking Water Program Northern Program
Water Distribution Systems Water Quality Modelling for Civil Engineers 1 Helena M Jetmarova, GWMWater Helena M Jetmarova, GWMWater George J Kastl, MWH.
Hanningfield WTP Essex & Suffolk Water. UK Water Supply Only Companies.
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems  Filtration avoidance criteria  Alternatives to Filtration.
Math for Water Technology MTH 082 (pg. 468)
Water Treatment for NYC Croton Schematic. NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems ä Filtration avoidance criteria ä Alternatives to Filtration.
NYC Filtration Plant for Delaware and Catskill Systems ä Filtration avoidance criteria ä Alternatives to Filtration? ä Where should the plant(s) be located?
Combined Ozonation-Nanofiltration for Drinking Water Treatment B. S
Drinking Water Technical Assistance Water Treatment Plant and Distribution System KY Water and Wastewater Operators Association 57 th Annual Conference.
Effective Use Of Peracetic Acid to Reduce Effluent Disinfection Byproduct in Water Resource Recovery Facilities Isaiah Shapiro, EIT Dimitri Katehis PhD,
Formation and Dissipation of Trihalomethanes during Aquifer Storage and Recovery Operations Jason Pulley City of Salem Public Works.
Operational Evaluation Level Stage 2 D/DBP Rule Compliance Michael W. Deal Compliance Assurance Section Central Office Division of Drinking And Ground.
New Technologies in Wastewater Treatment The Impact to O&M Staff “New Directions in Wastewater Treatment” October 21 st, 2014 Art Nunez Water Reclamation.
1 Full Scale and Pilot Scale Evaluation of Endocrine Disrupting Compound Removal Through WTP Processes Bob Raczko, P.E. United Water.
Assessing Plant DBP Performance Using the DBP-CPE Warren J. Swanson, P.E RMSAWWA/RMWEA Annual Conference Grand Junction, Colorado Schmueser gordon.
USEPA Regulations By Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E. Water/Wastewater Consultant Presented to Entrepreneurs Association of Bari.
Age of Potable Water Impacts on DBP’s and Disinfection Residuals.
Buckhorn Disinfection Byproducts / Backwash Disposal Project Board of Directors Meeting June 14, 2012.
The Stage 2 Disinfection By-Products Rule DoD/EPA State Conference Compliance Track DoD/EPA State Conference Compliance Track Atlanta, GA Atlanta, GA June.
1. Disinfection By-Products: A Historical Perspective Effect of Early Analytical Methodology for Analyzing Trihalomethanes (THMs) –Concentrating processes?
Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule Bruce Macler USEPA Region H Br Cl Bromodichloromethane.
Mississippi State Department of Health
STAGE 2 DISINFECTION BY- PRODUCTS (DBP’S) A GUIDE TO COMPLIANCE 1.
Cottonwood Water & Sanitation DistrictSeptember 2002 Arber Indirect Potable Reuse at Cottonwood Water and Sanitation District Rick Arber, Ben Johnson Richard.
State of Alaska Implementation of MBDP Rules Carrie Bohan Environmental Program Specialist ADEC DW Program.
Denver Water’s Preparation for the Stage 2 Disinfectant By-Product Rule Bruce Hale (DW) Steve Lohman (DW) Arnold Strasser (DW) Edward Koval (B&V)
Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (Stage 1&2 DBPRs) Wyoming Potable Water Age, Lagoon Aeration and Utility Line Replacement Seminar Hosted.
Study on removal of bromate by activated carbon By Weifang Chen.
1,4-Dioxane Occurrence in the Haw River and in Pittsboro Drinking Water Catalina Lopez Velandia, Mei Sun, and Detlef Knappe Pittsboro,
Anion Exchange for Drinking Water Treatment
November 17, 2015 Charting the Future of Water Reuse for the City of Raleigh Sheryl D. Smith, P.E. – CDM Smith Eileen M. Navarrete, P.E., PMP – City of.
NC AWWA-WEA 2015 Annual Conference Monday, November 16, 2015 The Use of Chlorine Dioxide to Reduce TOC at Davidson Water, Inc. Water Treatment Plant.
Disinfection Byproducts and Associated Challenges Resulting from Advanced Treatment Jeff Prevatt Presented by AZ Water Association New Directions in Wastewater.
Effective Removal of Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Using MIEX Ion Exchange Treatment J. Michael Barnes, PE.
Water Treatment: Disinfection Processes Current Technology vs. Alternatives.
Evaluation of Microbiological Risks Associated with Direct Potable Reuse (DPR) Water Microbiology Conference 2016 University of North Carolina May 2016.
Water Filtration Plant Improvements Project Summary
Water System Infrastructure
Maebh A. Grace, Mark G. Healy, Eoghan Clifford
Amherst , MA, Drinking Water System Atkins Water Treatment Plant
Disinfectant & Disinfection Byproducts Control and Optimization
CHLORINOUS ODORS WITHOUT CHLORINE:
ACWA – RECYCLE RESEARCH
Wastewater Surcharge Reduction for Manufacturing Processes
Practical Experiences with UV and Ozone
Outline of Presentation
North Carolina Surface Water Analysis
Jim Flechtner, PE Executive Director April 26, 2018
Pilot testing services and a case study to reduce organics Devendra Borikar, Laura Zettler, Jeff Avedesian, Lindsay Ariss, Luc Léonard, Denis Dolbec,
Unregulated, Emerging DBPs
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Wastewater Facilities Upgrade Project
Successful Strategies for Control of DBp Formation in Arkansas
October 29, 2018 Terry Lauritsen, P.E.
Optimizing Chlorine Flush
Regulation of Disinfection By-Products
Case Study: Lebanon Water Works
Lebanon Water Works National Optimization Goals Case Study - Meeting the Goals at the Lebanon Water Works Company Daren Thompson, MBA, MPM.
Trihalomethanes Removal Evaluation
Presentation transcript:

Advanced Technologies for Attaining and Maintaining DBP Compliance 95TH Annual Conference | November 2015 | Raleigh Convention Center, Raleigh, NC Scott Alpert, PE, PhD Allison Reinert, EIT

Outline Background Case Study 1 Case Study 2 Conclusions

Background Stage 2 D/DBP Rule TTHMs Chloroform Dichlorobromomethane Dibromochloromethane Bromoform HAA5 Monochloroacetic Acid Dichloroacetic Acid Trichloroacetic Acid Monobromoacetic Acid Dibromoacetic Acid DBPs 4 Additional HAAs Not Currently Regulated

Background A Stage 3 DBP regulation may be forthcoming DBPs A Stage 3 DBP regulation may be forthcoming 6 year review of the current D/DBP rules in 2016

“Stage 3” DBP Regulations May Go Beyond TTHMs and HAA5 Background DBPs “Stage 3” DBP Regulations May Go Beyond TTHMs and HAA5

Eastern North Carolina 35 MGD WTP Case Study 1 Eastern North Carolina 35 MGD WTP

Case Study 1 35 MGD run of river WTP The Problem 35 MGD run of river WTP Ozone, super-Ps, BAC, UV, free chlorine Increased bromide in source water, increased TOC concentrations during extreme weather conditions

DBP Compliance Case Study 1 Post Treatment Aeration Manage Water Age The Solution DBP Compliance Online THM Analyzers Manage Water Age Post Treatment Aeration

Case Study 1 The Solution

Online THM Analyzer Results 4 months of data collected Several days of abnormal results (high and low results) Sample carryover after recalibration or check standard Power failures, surges at the facility Influent sample flow 2,558 independent measurements over the 4 months Only 5.3% were abnormal (138 independent measurements) If we exclude when the influent sample flow was accidentally valved off only 1.9% were abnormal (49 independent measurements)

Online THM Analyzer Results Parameter Sampling Interval Average Min Max Raw TOC (mg/L) Daily 7.2 4.4 12.3 CFE TOC (mg/L) 2.4 1.6 3.7 Raw UV254 0.27 0.16 0.43 Finished Prior UV254 0.02 0.001 0.04 Pre Ozone (ppd) 402 165 831 Intermediate Ozone (ppd) 169 70 333 Raw Temperature (°C) 22.9 13.7 28.2 Finished Prior Chlorine (ppd) 196 104 325

Previously Published Models TTHM = 10-1.385*TOC1.098*Cl20.152*Br0.068*Temp0.609*pH1.601*Time0.263

Comprehensive Model Fluorescence Excitation Emission Matrices Coupled with Principal Component Analysis

Comprehensive Model

Post Treatment Aeration Floating aerators installed in two elevated tanks to help high water age areas of distribution system

Post Treatment Aeration Elevated Tank

Piedmont North Carolina 30 MGD WTP Case Study 2 Piedmont North Carolina 30 MGD WTP

Case Study 2 30 MGD reservoir WTP The Problem 30 MGD reservoir WTP Conventional treatment and chloramination Algae and basin maintenance require raw water chlorination Elevated DBPs throughout WTP and in distribution system

Case Study 2 Pilot GAC with raw water chlorination The Solution Pilot GAC with raw water chlorination Improve TOC reduction Maintain current oxidation practices

GAC Installation Carbon Manufacturer Product Name Carbon Source Effective Size (mm) Uniformity Coefficient Pilot Filter EBCT (min) Calgon Filtrasorb 300 Bituminous Coal 0.80-1.0 2.1 10 and 20 Filtrasorb 400 0.55-0.75 1.9 Norit 12 x 40 Lignite 0.65 1.7 Hydrodarco 3000 0.7-0.9 1.6

GAC with Raw Water Oxidation

GAC with Raw Water Oxidation Instantaneous DBPs - TTHMs Approximately 6 months Approximately 4.5 months Approximately 3.5 months Approximately 2 months

Regulated DBP Comparisons Instantaneous DBPs – HAAs Approximately 6 months Approximately 4.5 months Approximately 3.5 months Approximately 2 months

GAC Treated TTHM Speciation Over Time

GAC Treated HAA5 Speciation Over Time

Additional HAAs are Controlled by GAC

GAC Treated Unregulated HAAs Speciation Over Time None None

Conclusions Online THM analyzers can provide valuable information Literature Models and Site Specific Models can assist utilities with compliance Post Treatment Aeration provides polishing for THMs out in the distribution system GAC can assist with DBP compliance Upstream treatment from GAC impacts DBP speciation and performance

Acknowledgements Hazen and Sawyer Allison Reinert Ben Stanford Mark Bishop David Briley Jay Jackson Justin Irving Participating North Carolina Utilities

Questions? Scott Alpert, PE, PhD Hazen and Sawyer salpert@hazenandsawyer.com Allison Reinert, EIT areinert@hazenandsawyer.com