WG NAN Progress PSAP DB ECC Plenary, gent 3 march 2016 wg nan Chairman Johannes Vallesverd

Organisation map This is how we are organised. Basically there are 4 WGs within ECC. WG NaN is one of them Chaired by me, with assistance of Hege Johnson also from Nkom. I also have two Vice chairs Florin Dragomir, Romania and Liz Greenberg UK. WE have 4 sub comittess or Project teams, namely.... Two Task Forces not mentioned here TF Strategy and TF Security and numbering, last one is chaired by MR Jan Vanniewenheuse (a longstanding charman of NaN, whom I have been so lucky to continue on his stable basis for NaN) . Just for clarity: WE are not a EU body. WE are an independant international organisation with 48 member countries. But we have a good dialouge with the Commission. We do not always agree, but we have mutual respect and a desire to enlighten the discussions as much as possible. The commission can attend our meetings and they do so especially on 112, but also on NP, MNC. Most of our documents are open to the public. ETSI members have observer rights in all PTs. WE have a Liason officer for WG NaN Donatella Chiara Telecom Italia. I anybody is interested in our work please contact me. We are looking forward to this WS, and we would like to complement the commission for taking this onboard with open mind. We have had a good dialouge on the agenda and the interesting speakers. Many internsitng slides today. **slutten Pleasure to co arrange this Workshop together with the Commission

112 background REC/T/SF-1 (1972) Long Term Standardisation of National Numbering Plans – Recommendation on 112 Caller location and international coordination: Very little has been done in EU-countries and in other European countries Before PT ES that is…

Project Team Emergency Services (PT ES) Chairman: Florin Dragomir (Romania) ECC Report 225 Establishing Criteria for the Accuracy and Reliability of the Caller Location Information in support of Emergency Services http://www.erodocdb.dk/Docs/doc98/official/pdf/ECCREP225.PDF ECC Report 193 Emergency Calls in VoIP Environment - Compilation of Recent Studies

Project Team Emergency Services (PT ES) Ongoing work: 112 caller location accuracy A-GNSS (for adoption for public consultation at next WG NaN Meeting (Jurmula, 27-28 April 2016) AML (work item proposal for consideration in Jurmula) DRAFT DRAFT Feasibility Report on PSAP DB (uploaded to ECC to get input) 112 in the DSM Potential future items: Statistics to quantify caller location information Caller location from corporate/private networks

PSAP DB is a DB/directory of some PSAP long numbers PSAB DB PSAP DB is a DB/directory of some PSAP long numbers REC/T/SF-1 (1972) Long Term Standardisation of National Numbering Plans – Recommendation on 112 Use cases (not exhaustive) When travelling and you need to call 112 in order to help an old or young family member at home Incorrect routing of VoIP Effective information between PSAPs internationallly e.g. alerting (Swedish example, thunderstorm) Translation in an emergency situation Accidents at sea Incorrect routing of VoIP calls and calls from corporate networks Footer - add copy here

PSAP DB Feasibility Report structure Introduction and scope Evidence of support from PSAP community Current EENA database Scope of ECO operational activities ECC framework and strategic plan Technical Specifications and Resource commitment Legal issues Impact assesment Annex: EENA letter, VERY early draft for ECC decision, VERY early draft of DB contract Footer - add copy here

PSAP DB Pro Contra Minimal effort - high impact, lives can be saved Core business? ECO is a professional entity with relevant DB experience (EFIS, SEAMCAT, 700MHz repository, ECC Work Programme DB, Doc DB) National circumstances e.g. difficulty to pinpoint one focal PSAP no regulatory responsibilities in the area of 112 and/or PSAPs other natinal considerations WG NaN/PT ES has expertise on the ecom-side of 112 Preference for EU-mandatory rules Many NRAs and ministries holds responsibilities under USD art. 26 DB reduces the negative impact of one harmonised emergency number, as introduced by CEPT In line with a forward looking and innovative ECC Strategic Plan endeavours to foster a spirit of cooperation and collaboration with all stakeholders. study relevant aspects of emergency services communications and provide support and advice to European emergency services stakeholders where appropriate; Over 90 %support in PSAP questionnaire PSAP DB

CEPT coverage map EU: 28 countries CEPT: 48 countries Albania, Andorra, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, San Marino, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom and Vatican. EU: 28 countries CEPT: 48 countries

Thank you!