Overview of Channel Usage Change

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1176r0 Submission Sep 2013 Reza Hedayat (Cisco Systems) Slide 1 Some Simulation Scenarios for HEW NameAffiliationPhone Reza HedayatCisco.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0804r0 Submission July 2015 TG ax Outdoor Enterprise Scenario and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE / Submission September 2010 James Wang, MediatekSlide 1 Wide Band OBSS Friendly PSMP Date: 2010, September 13 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1034r4 September 2012 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Enhanced scanning procedure for FILS Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1280r1 November 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Traffic priority for random Multi User Uplink OFDMA Date: Slide.
Overall MAC Procedure for WUR
WUR Wakeup Channel Access
UL OFDMA Random Access Control
More Reliable Multicast/Broadcast (MRMB)
Polling for MU Measurements
802.11ax in 2.4 GHz Date: Authors: July 2015
Implementation for Intra-AC Differentiated Services
Considerations for WUR Response
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Harmonizing Multicast/Broadcast Proposals
EHT features for Multi-Band Operation
Traffic priority for random Multi User Uplink OFDMA
Legacy protection mechanism
GAPA - Efficient, More Reliable Multicast
BSS Scanning through Low Power Radio
Limiting Degrees of Freedom for Measurement Requests
WUR MAC Consideration Date: Authors: Nov 2016 Liwen Chu
GroupID Concept for Downlink MU-MIMO Transmission
Enterprise Simulation Scenario
CID#102 - Channel Allocation
Audio and video support by MCCA
EHT features for Multi-Band Operation
GAPA - Efficient, More Reliable Multicast
Complexity of OBSS July 2008 Date: Authors: September 2006
Class-based Contention Periods (CCP) for the n MAC
Consideration of EDCA for WUR Signal
Directed Multicast Service (DMS)
Slot-based Power Save Improvement
AP Power Down Notification
WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
September 2007 doc.: IEEE /2376r0 November 2007
Legacy protection mechanism
Power saving mechanism consideration for ah framework
Legacy protection mechanism
Considerations for WUR Response
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Channel Allocation March 2008 Authors: Date: Month Year
Proposed Overlapping BSS Solution
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
VTS SG PAR Scope Topics Date: Authors: January 2008
Requirements and Implementations for Intra-flow/Intra-AC DiffServ
Possible Enhancement for Broadcast Services over WLAN
Comment resolution on CID 20175
Alternate EDCA Parameter Set
Clarification on Beacon Transmission Rules
Interference Signalling Enhancements
Scheduled Peer Power Save Mode for TDLS
GroupID in VHT-SIG Field
Enterprise Simulation Scenario
Management Enhancement for WLAN
Interference Analysis for Residential Environments
Consideration of EDCA for WUR Signal
Legacy protection mechanism
More Reliable Multicast/Broadcast (MRMB)
WME Overview 7/20/03 doc.: IEEE /678r0 July 2003
Further Consideration for WUR Acknowledgement Indication
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 May, 2016
Proposed amendment to table 7-8
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning
LC MAC submission – follow up
Greenfield protection mechanism
LC MAC submission – follow up
Enhancement of Low Power Medium Access STAs
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Channel Usage Change September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1458r0 Sept 2008 Overview of Channel Usage Change Date: 2008-09-02 Authors: Hart et al (Cisco Systems) Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom Corp.

September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1458r0 Sept 2008 Situation Solving service differentiation for smart phones and laptops (major users of bidirectional voice, video and data) is an important problem. The default EDCA were chosen: To provide service differentiation between management traffic, “voice”, “video”, “best effort” etc To provide 11e best effort traffic with the same level of priority as legacy traffic Hart et al (Cisco Systems) Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom Corp.

September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1458r0 Sept 2008 Problem It turns out that the default EDCA parameters are poorly chosen for dense environments (e.g. enterprise environments) with stringent voice and video QoS requirements. Accordingly, in these environments, EDCA parameters for BE and BK are typically advertised with larger backoffs in order to enable greater service differentiation. Although larger backoffs may appear to waste medium time, experience indicates that this more than pays off for itself in terms of reduced collisions and greater QoS. Presently IBSS (and DLS) STAs cannot take advantage of this prior knowledge Hart et al (Cisco Systems) Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom Corp.

September 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/1458r0 Sept 2008 Solution 08/1095 Send EDCA Parameter Set within Channel Usage frames, and reuse the EDCA Parameter Set sent in probe requests Since this is the same IE as sent in probe requests, it offers IBSS (and DLS) STAs the same right to access the channel as associated clients No reduction in service quality. This could introduce a new DoS attack from fake APs advertising bogus EDCA parameters to degrade nearby IBSS (and DLS) STAs. For this reason it appears as a hint, and IBSS (and DLS) STAs are free to determine the reliability of the hint (e.g. did the hint come from my associated AP?) and to follow or to disregard the hint. Hart et al (Cisco Systems) Joonsuk Kim, Broadcom Corp.