EIC NAS review Charge-2 What are the capabilities of other facilities, existing and planned, domestic and abroad, to address the science opportunities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update from NSAC NuPECC Long Range Planning Meeting Susan J. Seestrom NSAC Chair U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science.
Advertisements

Joakim Nystrand, Universitetet i Bergen Evalueringsmøte Oslo Physics with ALICE Joakim Nystrand Institutt for Fysikk og Teknologi, Universitetet.
First results from the ATLAS experiment at the LHC
Longitudinal Spin at RHIC 29 th Winter Workshop on Nuclear Dynamics February 7, 2013 Cameron McKinney.
Probing Nucleon Structure at an Electron Ion Collider Long Range Plan Joint Town Meeting on QCD Temple University, Philadelphia September 14, /14/141LRP.
Physics with Polarized Beams at an Electron Ion Collider EIC International Users Meeting Stony Brook University Stony Brook, New York June 24-27, 2014.
The RHIC Physics Program 1 A versitile facility making it possible to study many aspects of the strong force: condensed QCD matter and its phase structure.
Forward-Backward Correlations in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions Aaron Swindell, Morehouse College REU 2006: Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University.
Diffractive DIS with E e =70GeV and E p =7TeV at the LHeC For general physics aim and sketch of machine design, see plenary talk of E. Perez … … what could.
The Science of an EIC Nuclear Science Goals: How do we understand the visible matter in our universe in terms of the fundamental quarks and gluons of QCD?
Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions: Recent Results from RHIC David Hardtke LBNL.
Working Group on e-p Physics A. Bruell, E. Sichtermann, W. Vogelsang, C. Weiss Antje Bruell, JLab EIC meeting, Hampton, May Goals of this parallel.
E.C. Aschenauer arXiv: & This is us !!! protons, neutrons electrons increase beam energy beam energy Quarks and Gluons m Proton.
1 ALICE Status Orlando Villalobos Baillie University of Birmingham NuPECC Meeting Edinburgh 10 th October 2014.
Output from this Series of Workshops: A science vision for the RHIC future 1.Provide a science case for the future RHIC program that makes clear its importance.
Jefferson Lab Status Hall A collaboration Dec. 16, 2013 R. D. McKeown Deputy Director For Science.
New States of Matter and RHIC Outstanding questions about strongly interacting matter: How does matter behave at very high temperature and/or density?
9/17/20151 Probing the Dense Medium in Cold Nuclei -- Gluon Saturation at small-x Bowen Xiao (CCNU) Feng Yuan (LBNL)
Future Opportunities at an Electron-Ion Collider Oleg Eyser Brookhaven National Laboratory.
1 Nov. 15 QM2006 Shanghai J.H. Lee (BNL) Nuclear Induced Particle Suppression at Large-x F at RHIC J.H. Lee Physics Department Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Working Group C: Hadronic Final States David Milstead The University of Liverpool Review of Experiments 27 experiment and 11 theory contributions.
Brookhaven Science Associates The Future of RHIC Quark Matter 2005, Budapest Samuel Aronson, BNL August 8, 2005 ► Past & present – ► Near-term.
Experimental Approach to Nuclear Quark Distributions (Rolf Ent – EIC /15/04) One of two tag-team presentations to show why an EIC is optimal to access.
Parton Model & Parton Dynamics Huan Z Huang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California, Los Angeles Department of Engineering Physics.
Deliverablesobservables what we learn requirementscomments/competition HP13 (2015) Test unique QCD predictions for relations between single-transverse.
Nu Xu1/16STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nov. 12 – 17, 2010, BNL, USA STAR Experiment at RHIC: - Physics Programs - Management Issues Nu Xu.
High Energy Nuclear Physics and the Nature of Matter Outstanding questions about strongly interacting matter: How does matter behave at very high temperature.
Studies of e+A physics at an Electron-Ion Collider Liang Zheng On behalf of the BNL EIC Science Task Force Brookhaven National Lab Institute of Particle.
E.C. Aschenauer & M. Stratmann arXiv: &
General Discussion some general remarks some questions.
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and Ultra-Dense Matter.
A feasibility study for measurements using electroweak probes at the proposed Electron-Ion Collider: Investigating nucleon structure and the fundamental.
CERN Evaluation Meeting, Bergen, April 2009Joakim Nystrand, University of Bergen Future electron-proton and electron-nucleus colliders, eRHIC and.
Report from India Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics XIII Jan 14-20, TIFR, India Naohito Saito RIKEN/ RIKEN BNL Research Center.
QuarkNet 2006 Lets go smash some Atoms! Peripheral Collision:Central Collision Head-On Collision: Largest # of Nucleons Participate Glancing Collision:
EIC — Bring the Glue to Light. Gluons dominate QCD QCD is the fundamental theory that describes structure and interactions in nuclear matter. Without.
The 12 GeV Physics Program at Jefferson Lab R. D. McKeown Jefferson Lab College of William and Mary PTSP 2013 – Charlottesville, VA September 9, 2013.
R.G. Milner2nd EIC Workshop Summary and Outlook science case machine design EIC realization.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Department of Energy Anthony.
Physics Potential of an ep Collider at the VLHC  Why ep? When?  Physics Results from the first ep Collider – HERA  Future ep Physics Priorities  Perturbative.
Implications for LHC pA Run from RHIC Results CGC Glasma Initial Singularity Thermalized sQGP Hadron Gas sQGP Asymptotic.
Nu Xu1/7STAR Analysis Meeting, Junior Meeting, April 16 th, 2012, BNL STAR STAR Experiment Nu Xu - Introduction: Structure of the QCD Matter - Near future.
Forward/p+A Update June 2005 Carl Gagliardi, Mike Leitch, Kirill Tuchin.
QCD Prospects for ATLAS Rainer Stamen Universität Mainz On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration QCD 06 Montpellier, July 3rd 2006.
Transverse Spin Physics with an Electron Ion Collider Oleg Eyser 4 th International Workshop on Transverse Polarisation Phenomena in Hard Processes Chia,
Non-Prompt J/ψ Measurements at STAR Zaochen Ye for the STAR Collaboration University of Illinois at Chicago The STAR Collaboration:
Elliptic flow from initial states of fast nuclei. A.B. Kaidalov ITEP, Moscow (based on papers with K.Boreskov and O.Kancheli) K.Boreskov and O.Kancheli)
Heavy Ions at RHIC RHIC-II and beyond Thomas Ullrich (BNL) QCD at High-T Session QCD Workshop, Washington DC, December 15-16, RHIC program: understanding.
RHIC Update & Future Program
Review of ALICE Experiments
Introduction to pQCD and TMD physics
Nuclear Effects in Hadron Production at HERMES
Open questions in QCD at high parton density: EIC vs LHeC
Explore the new QCD frontier: strong color fields in nuclei
Future lepton scattering facilities
Physics of the EIC Cyrille Marquet Theory Division - CERN.
for the ALICE collaboration University of Tennessee at Knoxville
EIC NAS review Charge-2 What are the capabilities of other facilities, existing and planned, domestic and abroad, to address the science opportunities.
Groupement de Recherche (GDR) QCD
Physics with Nuclei at an Electron-Ion Collider
QCD (Quantum ChromoDynamics)
Heavy-Flavour Physics in Heavy-Ion Collisions
UCLA High Energy & Astro-Particle (HEAP) Seminar
Introduction and Workshop Charge
HERA – LHC workshop Final Meeting March 2005, DESY
Workshops Overview/Goals
of Hadronization in Nuclei
Multiplicity Dependence of Charged Particle, φ Meson and Multi-strange Particle Production in p+p Collisions at
Introduction of Heavy Ion Physics at RHIC
Feedback from the Temple Town Meeting MEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
Presentation transcript:

EIC NAS review Charge-2 What are the capabilities of other facilities, existing and planned, domestic and abroad, to address the science opportunities afforded by an electron-ion collider? What unique scientific role could be played by a domestic electron ion collider facility that is complementary to existing and planned facilities at home and elsewhere?

Slides for Charge-2 These slides were culled from material gathered by EIC UG on Charge-2 for the NAS Committee. The following slides are meant to be complimentary to the material presented by various speakers at the NAS Apr. 19 open meeting. Composition of the slides: Slides 4 & 5: Summary: why polarization, large kinematic coverage, and high luminosity are critical for EIC. Slides 6-8: Main EIC science aims and the role of other facilities existing and planned on those aims. Slides 7 & 8: Areas where EIC can contribute significantly to the main science aims of other facilities. June, 2017 Input to NAS committee

Why Polarization, large kinematic coverage , and Luminosity are critical non-linear dynamic Regime QCD radiation dominated Regime Many-body Regime Few-body/ valence quark Regime x (proton) 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 1 ? large kinematic coverage: access to x and Q2 over a wide range  from large to small x polarized electron and hadron beams: access to spin structure of nucleons and nuclei Spin vehicle to access the spatial and momentum structure of the nucleon in 3d Full specification of initial and final states to probe q-g structure of NN and NNN interaction in light nuclei nuclear beams: accessing the highest gluon densities high luminosity: mapping the spatial and momentum structure of nucleons and nuclei in 3d access to rare probes June, 2017 Input to NAS committee

Why is large kinematic coverage critical: Q2 EIC ideal to probe transition from non-perturbative to perturbative regime connect measurements already existing in different regimes Non-perturbative Regime Perturbative Regime Transition Region EIC RHIC LHC HERMES, COMPASS, JLAB 6 and 12 Q2 HERA high-x 103 104 [GeV2] 10-1 1 10 102 Q2 (GeV2) Probing momentum Asymptotic freedom 2 GeV (1/10) fm) 200 MeV (1 fm) Color Confinement June, 2017 Input to NAS committee

Quark and Gluon Structure in 3D EIC Science Goal How are the sea quarks and gluons, and their spins, distributed in space and momentum inside the nucleon? How do the nucleon properties emerge from them and their interactions? Complementary measurements at other facilities. JLAB 12, COMPASS, HIAF-EIC: Measure at high x and lower Q2 (1D & 3D) LHeC, VHEeP, FCC-eh: Measure at lower x (mainly 1D) LHC, HL-LHC, RHIC; Ultra-peripheral collisions. mostly low Q2~0, but high energy (1D & 3D) Parton distributions using q-q, q-g or g-g interactions (mainly 1D) comment emphasis spin more Other facilities are limited either in kinematic coverage, polarization or 3D measurement capability. They will be able to extend EIC data in certain kinematic regions. HIAF-EIC, LHeC, VHEeP, FCC-eh: Facility concepts June, 2017 Input to NAS committee

Propagation of Color in Cold QCD and Emergence of Hadrons EIC Science Goal How do color-charged quarks and gluons, and colorless jets, interact with a nuclear medium? How do the confined hadronic states emerge from these quarks and gluons? How do the quark-gluon interactions create nuclear binding? Complementary measurements at other facilities. LHC, HL-LHC, RHIC: propagation of color in hot and cold QCD FRIB, ATLAS, FAIR, HIAF and other nuclear structure facilities: Nuclear structure data complements and informs EIC measurements. The EIC science will build a bridge between hot and cold QCD as well as between low energy nuclear structure and quark-gluon structure of nuclei. June, 2017 Input to NAS committee

QCD at Extremes How does a dense nuclear environment affect the quarks and gluons, their correlations, and their interactions? What happens to the gluon density in nuclei? Does it saturate at high energy, giving rise to a gluonic matter with universal properties in all nuclei, even the proton? gluon emission gluon recombination ?=? EIC Physics Goal Complementary measurements at other facilities. LHC, HL-LHC, RHIC: study saturation in pA collisions: UPC, di-hadron correlations, open charm at forward rapidities (lower x)  universality Effects of saturation on ion-ion collisions. LHeC, VHEeP, FCC-eh: Access lower x. EIC studies the transition between a non-saturated and saturated regime with high precision, by making use of a large range of nuclei and spin LHeC, VHEeP, FCC-eh: Facility concepts June, 2017 Input to NAS committee

Physics Beyond the Standard Model Discovery of BSM physics at LHC (or any other energy frontier machine, e.g. FCC, or SppC) means looking for: σSM(PDF(hadron 1), PDF(hadron 2)) ≠ σmeasured The mass reach of the search becomes higher as x1 for the PDFs. Uncertainty in the knowledge of Parton Distribution Functions (PDFs) limits the reach of the search. LHC (or any other similar machine) cannot disentangle PDFs from new physics using its own measurements. Complementary measurements at EIC: EIC will measure PDFs at high-x, moderate-√s (where it is known that physics obeys SM). This will calibrate high-√s high-mass searches at LHC EIC has the potential to considerably extend the discovery reach of the LHC, HL-LHC and other frontier energy machines with a precise measurement of PDFs at high-x. June, 2017 Input to NAS committee

Quark-Gluon Plasma Initial State time Our understanding of fundamental properties of the Glasma, sQGP and Hadron Gas depend on our knowledge of the initial state! Collective phenomena seen in AA, pA, pp collisions  consequence of initial state? EIC: Precision map of quark and gluon structure in 3D June, 2017 Input to NAS committee