Test and Integration Current State

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EGC 2005, CrossGrid technical achievements, Amsterdam, Feb. 16th, 2005 WP2-3 New Generation Environment for Grid Interactive MPI Applications M igrating.
Advertisements

CROSSGRID WP41 Valencia Testbed Site: IFIC (Instituto de Física Corpuscular) CSIC-Valencia ICMoL (Instituto de Ciencia Molecular) UV-Valencia 28/08/2002.
Cracow Grid Workshop, November 5-6, 2001 Towards the CrossGrid Architecture Marian Bubak, Marek Garbacz, Maciej Malawski, and Katarzyna Zając.
The CrossGrid project Juha Alatalo Timo Koivusalo.
27-29 September 2002CrossGrid Workshop LINZ1 USE CASES (Task 3.5 Test and Integration) Santiago González de la Hoz CrossGrid Workshop at Linz,
Task 3.5 Tests and Integration ( Wp3 kick-off meeting, Poznan, 29 th -30 th January 2002 Santiago González de la.
DataGrid Kimmo Soikkeli Ilkka Sormunen. What is DataGrid? DataGrid is a project that aims to enable access to geographically distributed computing power.
Cracow Grid Workshop, November 5-6, 2001 Overview of the CrossGrid Project Marian Bubak Institute of Computer Science & ACC CYFRONET AGH, Kraków, Poland.
TAT Cracow Grid Workshop, October 27 – 29, 2003 Marian Bubak, Michal Turala and the CrossGrid Collaboration CrossGrid in Its Halfway:
5 March 2002 DG PARIS Jesus Marco CSIC IFCA(Santander) Development of GRID environment for interactive applications J.Marco (CSIC) DATAGRID WP6 MEETING.
The SAM-Grid Fabric Services Gabriele Garzoglio (for the SAM-Grid team) Computing Division Fermilab.
GRACE Project IST EGAAP meeting – Den Haag, 25/11/2004 Giuseppe Sisto – Telecom Italia Lab.
5 November 2001F Harris GridPP Edinburgh 1 WP8 status for validating Testbed1 and middleware F Harris(LHCb/Oxford)
Workload Management WP Status and next steps Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
Poznan July-2003 CrossGrid Task 3.3 CrossGrid Task 3.3 Grid Monitoring Trinity College Dublin (TCD, AC14 – CR11) Brian Coghlan, Stuart Kenny, David O’Callaghan.
Nightly Releases and Testing Alexander Undrus Atlas SW week, May
Crossgrid kick-off meeting, Cracow, March 2002 Santiago González de la Hoz, IFIC1 Task 3.5 Test and Integration (
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE SA1: Cookbook (DSA1.7) Ian Bird CERN 18 January 2006.
Grid Workload Management & Condor Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
DataGrid WP1 Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova. WP1 (Grid Workload Management) Objective of the first DataGrid workpackage is (according to the project "Technical.
Grid Workload Management Massimo Sgaravatto INFN Padova.
Resource Brokering in the PROGRESS Project Juliusz Pukacki Grid Resource Management Workshop, October 2003.
November SC06 Tampa F.Fanzago CRAB a user-friendly tool for CMS distributed analysis Federica Fanzago INFN-PADOVA for CRAB team.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
GLite – An Outsider’s View Stephen Burke RAL. January 31 st 2005gLite overview Introduction A personal view of the current situation –Asked to be provocative!
JRA Execution Plan 13 January JRA1 Execution Plan Frédéric Hemmer EGEE Middleware Manager EGEE is proposed as a project funded by the European.
TERENA 2003, May 21, Zagreb TERENA Networking Conference, 2003 MOBILE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR GRID USERS. TESTBED Miroslaw Kupczyk Rafal.
George Tsouloupas University of Cyprus Task 2.3 GridBench ● 1 st Year Targets ● Background ● Prototype ● Problems and Issues ● What's Next.
LCG EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST LCG PEB, 7 th June 2004 Prototype Middleware Status Update Frédéric Hemmer.
Kraków Kick-off meeting Migrating Desktop General concept Intuitive Grid-user’s work environment independent of a hardware.
DGC Paris WP2 Summary of Discussions and Plans Peter Z. Kunszt And the WP2 team.
CERN, DataGrid PTB, April 10, 2002 CrossGrid – DataGrid Collaboration (Framework) Marian Bubak and Bob Jones.
Interactive European Grid Environment for HEP Application with Real Time Requirements Lukasz Dutka 1, Krzysztof Korcyl 2, Krzysztof Zielinski 1,3, Jacek.
Ariel Garcia DataGrid WP6, Heidelberg, 26 th September 2003 Ariel García CrossGrid testbed status Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft.
BOF at GGF5, Edinburgh, Scotland, July 21-24, 2002 CrossGrid Architecture Marian Bubak and TAT Institute of Computer Science & ACC CYFRONET AGH, Cracow,
Jesus Marco DataGrid WP6, Barcelona, 12 th May 2003 WP4 Status of the CrossGrid Testbed EDG WP6 Meeting, Barcelona Jesús Marco Instituto.
Daniele Spiga PerugiaCMS Italia 14 Feb ’07 Napoli1 CRAB status and next evolution Daniele Spiga University & INFN Perugia On behalf of CRAB Team.
WP1 Status and plans Francesco Prelz, Massimo Sgaravatto 4 th EDG Project Conference Paris, March 6 th, 2002.
INFSO-RI JRA2 Test Management Tools Eva Takacs (4D SOFT) ETICS 2 Final Review Brussels - 11 May 2010.
D.Spiga, L.Servoli, L.Faina INFN & University of Perugia CRAB WorkFlow : CRAB: CMS Remote Analysis Builder A CMS specific tool written in python and developed.
Breaking the frontiers of the Grid R. Graciani EGI TF 2012.
J Jensen / WP5 /RAL UCL 4/5 March 2004 GridPP / DataGrid wrap-up Mass Storage Management J Jensen
Gri2Win: Porting gLite to run under Windows XP Platform
Workload Management Workpackage
Grid2Win Porting of gLite middleware to Windows XP platform
Testbed: Status & Plans
Regional Operations Centres Core infrastructure Centres
SPGrid Status in Ferrara
EGEE Middleware Activities Overview
DataGrid Quality Assurance
SA1 Execution Plan Status and Issues
Andreas Unterkircher CERN Grid Deployment
EO Applications Parallel Session
CREAM Status and Plans Massimo Sgaravatto – INFN Padova
Testbed Software Test Plan Status
WP1 activity, achievements and plans
Testing Activities on the CERT-TB Status report
Gri2Win: Porting gLite to run under Windows XP Platform
LCG middleware and LHC experiments ARDA project
PROCESS - H2020 Project Work Package WP6 JRA3
Monitoring of the infrastructure from the VO perspective
Case Study: Algae Bloom in a Water Reservoir
Report on GLUE activities 5th EU-DataGRID Conference
Porting LCG to IA64 Andreas Unterkircher CERN openlab May 2004
The EU DataGrid Project Tutorial
Wide Area Workload Management Work Package DATAGRID project
Grid Application Programming Environment
Computer Architecture Group U.S.C.
How To Integrate an Application on Grid
gLite The EGEE Middleware Distribution
Presentation transcript:

Test and Integration Current State Santiago González de la Hoz (on behalf of Integration Team) Santiago.Gonzalez@ific.uv.es Instituto de Física Corpuscular Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, CSIC Universitat de València Valencia, SPAIN http://gridportal.fzk.de/websites/crossgrid/iteam/

Overview Goals For this purpose: Implement the second-third tools-services and first application prototypes running on the international CrossGrid testbed For this purpose: A closed collaboration among WP1, WP2, WP3 and WP4 has been achieved (Jesus is leading the whole CrossGrid integration effort). Since integration meeting in Poznan (July 2003) The CrossGrid Integration team was formed. WP2 and WP3 middleware (prototype 1) and a selective applications (prototype 0) were deployed on CrossGrid testbed Integration Team (WP4, WP3, WP2 and WP1) is working to support of WP1 application prototype 1 Production testbed is based on LCG-1 middleware Development testbed based on EDG2.x middleware Now in Nicosia (January 2004): Integration Status middleware Integration among tasks demo Work for next months

Testbed evolution (see Jorge’s talk) Production testbed: From EDG 1.4.11 to LCG-1 LCG-1 is: VDT 1.1.8-9 (Globus 2.2.4) Information System (MDS) Selected software from EDG 2.0 Workload Management System (RB) EDG Data Management (RLS, LRC, …) GLUE Schema 1.1 + LCG extensions RB obtains the list of the existing gatekeepers from the MDS information tree It uses the lcgpbs job manager. Remove the lcgpbs jobmanager and configure a plain pbs jobmanager to be compatible with MPI. Development testbed EDG 2.x release using LCFGng and RH7.3 The functionality of the Globus MDS has been replaced by RGMA

Integration Work (Integration Team) Related task Developer WP4 integrator Status 1.1 Biomedical appl. D. Shamonin A.Tirado Prototyping 1.2 Flooding appl. Branislav Simo J.Astalos Tested at several sites 1.3 HEP application D.Rodriguez, C.Martinez-Rivero, I. González, M. Bluj R.Marco Installed and tested 1.4.a Meteo WAM-COAMPS J. Gajeuski, M. Mogielnicki A.Paddee 1.4.b Meteo SOM A.Cofiño, J.M. Gutierrez R. Marco Tested at CSIC 1.4.c Air Pollution J.Mouriño J. Fontán Tested at CESGA 2.2 MARMOT B.Krammer Installed and tested at CSIC(IFCA) 2.3 GridBench G.Tsouloupas C.Kanellopoulos Installed and tested at AUTH 2.4.a GPM W. Funika P.Nycyk Installed and tested at CYFRONET 2.4.b PPC F.Rivera C.Fernández Installed and tested at CESGA 3.1.a RAS + MD M. Plociennik P.Wolniewicz Installed and tested at PSNC 3.1.b Portal Y.Perros, M. Kokkosoulis J.Marco Partially installed at CSIC (IFCA) 3.2 Scheduler M.A.Senar A.Fernandez, J.Sanchez Prototype tested at CSIC (IFIC) 3.3.a OCM-G R.Wismuller A.Garcia 3.3.b SANTA-G B.Coghlan, S.Kenny M.David, D.O’Callaghan Installed and tested at TCD/LIP 3.3.c Jiro Monitoring K. Balos M.Hardt 3.3.d Global A.Padee 3.4 Data Access Lukasz Dutka S.Gonzalez Installed at CSIC(IFIC)

Integration work Integration Document It is based on the contributions received from integration team people more or less each month. The document covers the following issues: Couple of lines saying what is the software released (including version) Pre-Form points (based in developers guide) Code in CVS and how is organized Compliance of QA rules Packaging granularity Level of autobuild experience Explicit dependency list Test-request (based in test and validation proposed by task 4.4) Documentation: installation/management manual, user manual, development manual Unit test Compatibility with other software Security issues Usability Previously reported issues Plans for demo Status Use of other CrossGrid components Being Updating in Cyprus (Appendix Deliverable D4.6)

Integration between Application and Services&Tools Prototypes Interactive Job Scenario (see S. Beco’s talk) To run interactive job for the simplified X# HEP application X# middleware based on the EDG-2.0.18 plus HEP (Task 1.3) executable Computes a series of histogram for Gaussian Distribution User interacts with the RAS (Task 3.1) via the X# MD (VNC mechanism is put in place in order to allow users to submit jobs and see the histogram) In Cyprus demo, they don’t have a web service that allows the user to submit the interactive job. User launches the interactive submission service using a command line

Integration between Application and Services&Tools Prototypes Application: WP1.1 Interactivity using MD Working in integrating the application on the testbed Submissions of jobs outside Amsterdam cluster: Solver executable needs environment variables to run at other testbed sites

Integration between Application and Services&Tools Prototypes Application: WP1.2 Running without problems with the MD and the Portal (Task 3.1) Integration done with 3.1 (MD) and 3.2 (Scheduling Agent) Demo presents: jobs submission visualization results Integration with their portal based on Jetspeed with new components (workflow, collaborative tools) Problems with job submission (authorities) Data Management lacks some required functionalities???? Integration with Marmot (WP2) is OK Working with MD new version Demo: Marmot + OCM-G (G-PM) + Portal

Integration between Application and Services&Tools Prototypes Application: WP1.3 Running with MPICH-P4, submission time was long Fixed using Replica Manager Submit MPI jobs from the UI to the new EDG-2.x Resource Broker (To show MPICH-G2, in contact with Task 3.2). Testing Santa-G possibilities Integrated with the MD DEMO: Using Replica Manager Inclusion of graphics in Portal

Integration between Application and Services&Tools Prototypes Application: WP1.4 Atmospheric and Wave models: Integrated with the MD and working to be integrated with Portal Running in four processors in a local cluster. Air pollution: Integrated with the MD (old configuration) Trying integrated the data coming from atmospheric prediction Portal part was integrated for Poznan They have installed their application in Valencia’s testbed and it runs ok. DEMO: They plan use the MD + PPC

Integration between Application and Services&Tools Prototypes WP2 MARMOT: Being integrated with MD Integrated with WP 1.2 (Flooding application) GridBenchmarking: Progress with the GUI in the MD They use applications for performance predictions Benchmarking using different locations Same Kernel as PPC (Vertlq) In contact with Task 3.2 people about MPI jobs (Interested on MPICH-G2) Tutorial ready Being integrated with JIMS Interested in Santa-G

Integration between Application and Services&Tools Prototypes WP2 GP-M (OCM-G): Show monitoring of Flooding applications with GPM tool PPC (Performance Predictions): The GUI on MD is working fine Problem: they need monitoring information at WN Working in this (Discarded NWS solution, waiting for JIMS) Tutorial ready Demo: They will show the tool

Integration between Application and Services&Tools Prototypes WP3 Task 3.1 a) RAS and MD: RAS machine and services installed in Poznan, Lisbon and Nicosia (problems with JSS) MD installed in Pawel’s Laptop (to assure functionality) Medical, Air pollution and Flooding applications used as pilots to present functionality MD presents MPI jobs in distributed environment Interactivity issue is presented by Task 3.1, 3.2 and 1.3 (HEP) Task 3.1 b) Portal: Two portlets added to the portal (job-get-output, job-get-info) Medical, HEP, Flooding and Air pollution applications ready with the portal to be shown in Demo Show the generic portlets with all edg-commands

Integration between Application and Services&Tools Prototypes WP3 Task 3.2: New RB (EDG2.x and the same used in LCG) Ready to work with MPICH-P4 Integrated with RAS and MD Functionality is rather the same as presented in Poznan, the effort was dedicated to make it available under LCG1 and EDG2.x Finishing MPICH-G2 support Training application running HEP Problems related to connectivity of WN’s.

Integration between Application and Services&Tools Prototypes WP3 Task 3.3.4 (Postprocessing, past 3.3 subtask) RPM ready in CVS??? It’s being autobuild Install in two clusters in Warsaw (but it must be installed on all sites driven by the scheduler) The input data are taken from ganglia and iptables modules: But it has to be integrated with infrastructure monitoring tools developed in CrossGrid (Santa-G and Jiro). Work to be done during integration meeting in Cyprus. Task 3.3 OCM-G: Investigating which applications are suitable for monitoring submitted from the MD (MD plug-in to support monitoring) Demo shows integration of quite number of X# elements (MD, APPS, and G-PM)

Integration between Application and Services&Tools Prototypes WP3 SANTA-G: RPM’s available Working on Demo with HEP application and snort tool Santa-G works fine with EDG2.x RGM-A JIMS: It is working in local cluster at Cyfronet RPM’s finished but…. Using web service commercial tool Input to performance predictions has been discussed Task 3.4 Functionality exploited with LCG-1 and EDG2.x They are using four storage systems: (Cyfronet, Lisbon, Slovakia, and Karlsruhe) Working in Integration with MD Demo: Estimation real access cost to these storage systems

Agenda 9:00 Integration Status Demos 10:30 Coffee Break Integration setup at Cyprus (Wei 5’) General description of integration work (Santi, 10’) Testbed support for integration (Jorge, 10’) Repository and tools (Marcus, 10’) Demos 9:30 Flooding (Jan and Bettina, 60’) Marmot + OCM-G + G-PM + Discussion 10:30 Coffee Break 11:00 Medical applications (Alfredo, 30’) 11:30 HEP (Celso, 15’) 11:45 Meteo Part (Carlos,15’) 12:30 Interactivity (Stefano, 30’) 13:00-14:00 Lunch 14:00 GridBenchmarking + JIMS (George, 25’) 14:25 Data Access Optimization (Lukasz, 15’) 14:40 Santa-G ( Stuart, 15’) 14:55 Postprocessing (Adam, 15’) 15:10 MD+Portal (20’) 15:30 Help Desk (Farida, 15’) 15:45 Discussion IST Demo Review