Writing an Effective K Application

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Advertisements

Henry Khachaturian, Ph.D. Extramural Program Policy Officer Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health June 2013.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 2 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
FEBRUARY 7, 2012 SERIES 2, SESSION 3 OF AAPLS – PART 2: POLICY & APPLICATION COMPONENTS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module E:
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
The IGERT Program Preliminary Proposals June 2008 Carol Van Hartesveldt IGERT Program Director IGERT Program Director.
Helping Your Mentees Develop a Competitive K Award Application (K01, K07, K08, K23, K25, K99) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4
Grant Writing1 Grant Writing Lecture What are the major types of grants available in mental health research? What is the process of grant preparation and.
Creating a Research Plan for a Career Development Award Jill Harkavy-Friedman, Ph.D.
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Formulating an important research question Susan Furth, MD, PhD Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research
Grant Writing for Success
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Policy WG NIH policy proposal. Goal: Incorporating global access licensing as one of the additional review criteria Question 1: Should we propose this.
Writing Successful Research Grant Proposals
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
NIH Electronic Grant Proposals (SF 424) K08 – K 23 Grant Applications Individual Career Development Awards Isidro B. Salusky, MD Distinguished Professor.
1 Introduction to Grant Writing Beth Virnig, PhD Haitao Chu, MD, PhD University of Minnesota, School of Public Health December 11, 2013.
COMPONENTS OF A GOOD GRANT PROPOSAL Philip T. LoVerde.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions October 6, 2009.
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat K-Series March 2012 Bioengineering Classroom.
Helping Your Mentees Develop a Competitive K Award Application (K01, K07, K08, K23, K25, K99) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Dept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
Presubmission Proposal Reviews at the College of Nursing (CON) Nancy T. Artinian, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Dean for Research and Professor.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 1 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
Grant writing 101 The Art of Flawless Packaging Scott K. Powers Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology Scott K. Powers Department of Applied.
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS Grant Writing for Success LeShawndra N. Price, Ph.D., NIMH, NIH Henry Khachaturian, Ph.D., OEP/NIH.
Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW: GUIDE FOR REVIEW OF RESTRUCTURED GRANT APPLICATIONS.
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Research Strategy: Approach Frank Sellke, MD Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Brown Medical School Providence RI AATS Grant Course 2011.
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
NIH Update Maria Skinner, OSP Manager (NIH Lead) Laura Johnston, OSP Asst. Director January 7, /7/2016.
NSERC Coach - Dr. Steve Perlman, Dept. of Biology
Writing an Effective K Application
NIH Fellowships Overview
SBIR/STTR Phase 1 Proposal Guidance
Grant Writing for Success
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Career Development Plan: the cornerstone of the K award
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Research and Grant Writing
Grant Writing Information Session
What Reviewers look for NIH F30-33(FELLOWSHIP) GRANTS
Writing an Effective K Application
The NSF Grant Review Process: Some Practical Tips
Grant Writing for Success
Research Project Grant (RPG) Retreat R-series
How to Write a Successful NIH Career Development Award (K Award)
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
Writing that First Research Grant
Preparing Research Proposals for NSF and NIH April 20, 2018
Dr. Lani (Chi Chi) Zimmerman, UNMC Dr. Bill Mahoney, IS&T
BU Career Development Grant Writing Course- Session 3, Approach
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
K R Investigator Research Question
K Awards: Writing the Career Award Development Plan
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Writing an Effective K Application
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Writing a Successful Career Development (K) Award. Paula Gregory, PhD
Writing an Effective K Application
Writing an Effective Grant Application
Presentation transcript:

Writing an Effective K Application Henry Khachaturian, Ph.D. Training Program Policy Officer Division of Biomedical Research Workforce OEP, OER, NIH hk11b@nih.gov

“Anatomy” of Grant Process Researcher Idea Institution Program Staff Program Announcement or RFA Mentor(s) Grant Application (R01, R03, R21, K01, K08, etc.) Revision DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos $ National Advisory Council CSR Referral and Review Program Staff

Timeline for K Applications Review: Jun/July Oct/Nov Feb/Mar Receipt Date: Feb 12 (Mar 12) Jun 12 (Jul 12) Oct 12 (Nov 12) Council: October January May Award Date: December April July DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Writing an Effective K Application Develop a Strategy Plan Your Application Application Requirement Review Criteria DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Develop a Strategy (1 of 2) Assess your career situation and needs. Find an experienced mentor(s) and collaborators Asses the field and the competition. See what is being funded by NIH: Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) What are your strengths and weaknesses? Can you fill in any gaps with collaborators or consultants? Find out what resources and support your organization has and what additional support you will need DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Develop a Strategy (2 of 2) Is there an added value to your receiving a K award? Why not another funding mechanisms? Give yourself plenty of time to write the application, probably three to six months Know your organization's key contacts and internal procedures for electronic application Call an NIH Program Officer to discuss you research training needs and career development plans DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Start Early The general rule of thumb for a K award is to start at least 3 months prior to the application due date Notify your referees early on and give them plenty of time to submit letters of reference At least a month before you want to apply, you'll need to get an NIH Commons account You will also need to know who is your organization's Authorized Organizational Representative (AOR) DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Plan Your Application Coordinate the application with your mentor’s schedule … K application is a collaboration between you and your mentor Make sure your planning and feedback are adequate by putting together your own review committee After you've settled on a project, draft a short description of your specific aims and discuss these with the committee DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Don't Propose Too Much Sharpen the focus of your application … avoid an “over-ambitious” project or one that looks a lot like an R01 grant! Your hypothesis should be provable and aims doable with the resources you are requesting Make sure the scale of your hypothesis and aims fits your request of time and resources Reviewers will quickly pick up on how well matched your research and career development objectives are DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Application Requirements Candidate Qualifications, Career Goals and Objectives Mentor(s), Collaborators, and Consultants Institution’s Environment and Commitment to the Candidate Specific Aims Research Strategy DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

A Few Tips as You Write Make Life Easy for Reviewers: Write clearly and concisely Guide the reviewers with graphics as much as possible Label all materials clearly Edit and proof Know These Review Problems and Solutions: Write a compelling argument for why your career will be enhanced by receiving a K award Write to the non-expert in the field DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Candidate’s Qualifications Biographical Sketch: Personal Statement: Your research experience and other qualifications for this K award Research Support: Your/colleagues accomplishments attesting to qualifications of the research team Candidate’s Background: Coordinate with information in the Biographical Sketch, e.g., research and/or clinical training experience that has prepared you for the K award DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Career Goals and Objectives Explain any new or enhanced research skills you will gain as a result of the K award Stress other activities that will enhance your research career, e.g., courses, techniques If you have changed research direction, discuss reasons for the change, and justify how it will help you to develop your research career Always provide a career development timeline, including plans to apply for subsequent grant support DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Mentor(s), Collaborators, Consultants Each mentor must explain how he/she will contribute to the development of the candidate. Discuss the research and also other activities, e.g., seminars, scientific meetings, presentations Document the sources and amounts of anticipated support for the candidate’s research project Discuss plans for transitioning the candidate to the independent investigator stage by the end of the K award Provide details for any previous experience as a mentor DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Institution’s Environment & Commitment Document a strong, well-established research program related to the candidate's interests Experienced faculty, facilities and resources available for the candidate Opportunities for intellectual interactions, e.g., journal clubs, seminars, and presentations Commitment to the candidate’s career development independent of the K award Agree to provide adequate office and lab space, time and support to the candidate for the period of K award DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Specific Aims of the Project Provide a clear statement of each aim’s objectives, for example: To test a stated hypothesis To create a novel design To solve a specific problem To challenge an existing paradigm To address a critical barrier to progress in the field To develop new technology DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

A few Tips on the Hypothesis (1/2) The research component of a K application should be driven by strong hypotheses rather than advances in technology. Generally, a research project should ask questions that prove or disprove a hypothesis rather than use a method to search for a problem or simply collect information. However, sometimes applied research is also important to discover basic biology or develop or use a new technology. You should develop a focused hypothesis that increases understanding of an important biologic process and is based on previous research. DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

A few Tips on the Hypothesis (2/2) Make sure your idea is not too broad. Your hypothesis must be provable during your 3 to 5 year award with the level of resources you are requesting. Demonstrate how your project fits in your field. Make this explicit. Remember, methods are the means for performing your experiments. Your experimental results will prove or disprove your hypothesis. If you have more than one hypothesis, choose the better one. DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Research Strategy (1 of 3) Significance: Provide an explanation of the importance of the problem you are trying to study Explain how your proposed study will improve scientific knowledge, technical capability, or clinical practice in one or more fields Discuss how existing concepts, methods, technologies, treatments, or interventions may be impacted if the proposed aims are achieved DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Research Strategy (2 of 3) Innovation: Provide an explanation on how your proposed research project may challenge current research or clinical practice paradigms Describe and fully discuss any novel theoretical concepts, approaches, methodologies, or interventions that may be developed or used Describe any advantage over existing approaches, methodologies, instrumentation, or interventions DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Research Strategy (3 of 3) Approach: Describe the methodology and analyses to be used to accomplish the specific aims of the project. Discuss potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success anticipated to achieve the aims For early stages of development, describe strategies to establish feasibility and manage high-risk aspects of the proposed work DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Responsible Conduct of Research Discuss the five components outlined in the NIH Policy: (1) Format, (1) Subject Matter, (3) Faculty Participation, (4) Duration, and (5) Frequency Is the plan appropriate for your career stage, and will it enhance your understanding of ethical issues related to research? Document any prior participation in RCR training and/or propose plans to receive additional instruction DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Career Award Review Criteria (1 of 5) Scored Review Criteria: Candidate Career Development Plan, Goals and Objectives Research Plan Mentor(s), Consultants(s), Collaborator(s) Environment and Institutional Commitment to the Candidate DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Career Award Review Criteria (2 of 5) Candidate: Research, academic and/or clinical record Commitment and potential to develop as an independent and productive researcher Quality of the letters of reference Career Development Plan, Goals and Objectives: Contribute substantially to the scientific development of candidate Content, scope, phasing, and duration of the plan in the context of prior experience DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Career Award Review Criteria (3 of 5) Research Plan: Scientific and technical merit of the research question, design and methodology Relevance of the proposed research to the candidate‘s career objectives Appropriateness of the research plan to the stage of research development and as a vehicle for developing the research skills described in the career development plan DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Career Award Review Criteria (4 of 5) Mentor(s), Consultants(s), Collaborator(s): Qualifications, funding, and statement by Mentor(s), collaborators, and/or Consultants Environment and Institutional Commitment to the Candidate: Assurance that minimum 75% effort will be devoted to research and related activities Capable faculty and research facilities Assurance that institution intends for the candidate to be an integral part of its research program DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

Career Award Review Criteria (5 of 5) Additional Review Criteria: Protection of Human Subjects Inclusion of Women, Minorities, and Children Care and Use of Vertebrate Animals Biohazards Additional Review Considerations: Responsible Conduct of Research Select Agents Resource Sharing Plans Budget and Period of Support DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos

About Grants http://grants.nih.gov/grants/about_grants.htm Receipt & Referral Grants Basics Grants Process Overview Peer Review Pre-Award Process Plan Your Application DBRW chief = Kay Lund, Economic analysis = Misty, Ryan, Policy = Jennifer, Henry and Lisa- Photos Post-Award Monitoring and Reporting How to Apply