Comparison of travel times from quarry blasts with synthetic travel times calculated in 1-D and 3-D models of the Dobrá Voda locality (work in progress)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Partition Modelling Approach to Tomographic Problems Thomas Bodin & Malcolm Sambridge Research School of Earth Sciences, Australian National University.
Advertisements

Upper mantle of the Bohemian Massif (Central Europe) studied by surface waves from Kurile Islands M8.1 and M8.3 earthquakes Petr Kolinsky Jiri Malek Institute.
Body and Surface Wave Seismic Tomography for Regional Geothermal Assessment of the Western Great Basin Glenn Biasi 1, Leiph Preston 2, and Ileana Tibuleac.
A parametric study of frequency sweep rate of chorus wave packets E. Macúšova (1), O. Santolík (1,2), P. Décrèau (3), D. A. Gurnett (4), J. S. Pickett.
Locating the Epicenter of an Earthquake
DISCRIMINATING SMALL EARTHQUAKES FROM QUARRY BLASTS USING PEAK AMPLITUDE RATIO - Vmax/Hmax MA, S., EATON, D., & DINEVA, S. Department of Earth Sciences.
RECEIVER FUNCTIONS analysis for Vs profiles and Moho depth estimations Andrea Licciardi (1,2) Nicola Piana Agostinetti (1) (1)Geophysics Section, Dublin.
1 Xuyao Zheng Institute of Geophysics of CEA. 2 Outline 1.Motivation 2.Model and synthetic data 3.Calculation of Green functions 4.Pre-stack depth migration.
Coda attenuation analysis of Zagreb area, Croatia Iva Dasović, Marijan Herak and Davorka Herak Andrija Mohorovičić Geophysical Institute Department of.
1-D Zaid AlMusallam SAGE 2004 Synthetic Seismic Model.
Seismo-Acoustic data analysis at I34MN Mongolia - Songino Seismo-Acoustic data analysis at I34MN Mongolia - Songino RESEARCH CENTRE OF ASTRONOMY AND GEOPHYSICS.
Lecture 4. Interpolating environmental datasets
Locating the Epicenter
UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment Department of Geophysics and Geothermics A. Agalos (1), P. Papadimitriou (1), K. Makropoulos.
EU project Advanced industrial microseismic monitoring (AIM) First annual meeting, Bratislava.
Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague Origin of earthquake swarms in West Bohemia inferred from observations of non-doble-couple components in.
Double-difference earthquake relocation of Charlevoix Seismicity, Eastern Canada implication for regional geological structures Meng Pang.
H. Sadi Kuleli, W Rodi, Fuxian Song, M. Nafi Toksoz Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,MA,
A Short Primer on Earthquake Magnitudes Alan Kafka Weston Observatory Department of Geology and Geophysics Boston College.
RESOLVING FOCAL DEPTH WITH A NEAR FIELD SINGLE STATION IN SPARSE SEISMIC NETWORK Sidao Ni, State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute.
Mr.Santosh Kumar Scientist Web:
Effect of Velocity Models on the Accuracy of Earthquake Hypocenters Sudipta Sarkar, Youshun Sun, M. Nafi Toksöz Earth Resources Laboratory Massachusetts.
Propagation of surface waves from the Greek earthquakes across Europe R. Gazdova 1,2, P. Kolinsky 1, J. Malek 1 & PASSEQ working group 1 Academy of Sciences.
Shear wave velocity structure estimation using surface waves of different wavelengths Petr Kolínský Department of Seismology Institute of Rock Structure.
1 The Earth’s Shells Quantitative Concepts and Skills Weighted average The nature of a constraint Volume of spherical shells Concept that an integral is.
Focal Mechanisms of Micro-earthquakes in the Little Carpathians - the Influence of the Model and of the Source Time Function Used AIM Second Annual Meeting.
MICRO-SEISMICITY AND FOCAL MECHANISMS IN THE MALÉ KARPATY MTS., SLOVAKIA Lucia Fojtíková, Václav Vavryčuk, Andrej Cipciar, Ján Madarás.
THE INVERSE PROBLEM OF RECONSTRUCTING A TSUNAMI SOURCE WITH NUMERICAL SIMULATION T.Voronina Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics.
Present-day tectonic stress determined from focal mechanisms in the seismoactive area Dobrá Voda V. Vavryčuk, L. Fojtíková.
The January 2010 Efpalio earthquake sequence in Western Corinth Gulf: epicenter relocations, focal mechanisms, slip models The January 2010 Efpalio earthquake.
6th Nationwide Anthropological Survey of Children and Adolescents 2001 Bláha P.*, Vignerová J.** *Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague National.
Czech Republic Coordinator: Institute of Geophysics AS CR (IG), Prague Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics AS CR (IRSM), Prague Institute of Physics.
Václav Vavryčuk Rosalia Daví Institute of Geophysics, Academy of Sciences, Praha Seismic network calibration for retrieving accurate.
Accurate Image Based Relighting through Optimization Pieter Peers Philip Dutré Department of Computer Science K.U.Leuven, Belgium.
Interpolation and evaluation of probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) patterns using different methods by: tarun gill.
Anomalous Vp/Vs ratios in the focal zone of West/Bohemia earthquake swarms T. Fischer1,2, T. Dahm3 (1) Institute of Geophysics, Czech Academy of Sciences.
Joint 3D relocation of earthquakes by surface and borehole data
Felt earthquake in the Little Carpathians Mts. source zone (March 5th, 2012) and related seismic activity in the area AIM third annual meeting October.
10.4 Studying Earth’s Interior Key Idea: Scientists use data from seismic waves to learn about the structure of Earth’s interior.
Focal mechanisms and moment tensors of micro-earthquakes in the Malé Karpaty (Little Carpathians) Mts., Slovakia Lucia Fojtíková 1, Václav Vavryčuk 2,
Small-aperture seismic arrays: instruments and detectability Jiří Málek, Milan Brož and Jaroslav Štrunc Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics AS CR,
The influence of lateral permeability of the 660-km discontinuity on geodynamic models of mantle flow. Annemarie G. Muntendam-Bos 1, Ondrej Cadek 2, Wim.
Earthquake source modelling by second degree moment tensors Petra Adamová Jan Šílený Geophysical Institute, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
Václav Vavryčuk, Fateh Bouchaala, Tomáš Fischer Institute of Geophysics, Prague High-resolution fault tomography from accurate locations and focal mechanisms.
Aim: How can we locate the epicenter of an Earthquake?
Continuous wavelet transform of function f(t) at time relative to wavelet kernel at frequency scale f: "Multiscale reconstruction of shallow marine sediments.
Two types of quantum turbulence: mechanically VS thermally driven 4 He superflow in a channel Simone Babuin, Mathias Stammeier, Miloš Rotter, Ladislav.
Alexandra Moshou, Panayotis Papadimitriou and Kostas Makropoulos MOMENT TENSOR DETERMINATION USING A NEW WAVEFORM INVERSION TECHNIQUE Department of Geophysics.
Central Mining Institute
Measurement of Dynamic Properties of Viscoelastic Materials
The International Symposium on the Anaerobic Microorganisms
Locating the Epicenter of an Earthquake
Moment tensor inversion using observations of unknown amplification
On Optimization Techniques for the One-Dimensional Seismic Problem
- an example of the Jan Mayen Mw 6.8 of August 30, 2012 earthquake
Václav Vavryčuk Institute of Geophysics, Prague
Creating a Conference Poster
4 min of arrival difference = 2,600 km
Prof. Carolina Ruiz Department of Computer Science
Locating the Epicenter of an Earthquake
Aim: How do you locate earthquakes?
Earthquakes.
When does the P wave arrive? 08:08:00
Petrophysical study of Szolnok Formation, Endrod Gas Field, Hungary
Locating the Epicenter of an Earthquake
Directivity of tsunami generated by subduction zone sources
Interpolating Surfaces
The role of seismic tomography for the Earthquake Early Warning system
Ilyin I., Travnikov O., Varygina M.
Prof. Carolina Ruiz Department of Computer Science
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of travel times from quarry blasts with synthetic travel times calculated in 1-D and 3-D models of the Dobrá Voda locality (work in progress) P. Bulant*, M. Brož**, J. Sekereš*** *Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Department of Geophysics, Czech Republic **Institute of Rock Structure and Mechanics, Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic ***PROGSEIS, s.r.o., Trnava, Slovak Republic AIM meeting, Praha, 29-30.9.2011

Dobrá Voda locality on a map

Dobrá Voda on a geological map

Data for the P-wave velocity model P-wave velocity data given in the form of a very sparsely sampled 3-D velocity model consisting of 7 x 8 x 8 discrete values of P-wave velocity. The data grid is rectangular, but strongly irregular in the depth. The values of velocity are “based on profile measurements and well data”. Data for the S-wave velocity model S-wave velocity data given on the same grid of 7 x 8 x 8 discrete values.

Models suitable for ray tracing, model construction method - smooth continuous models parametrized by B-splines construction of a velocity model by data fitting with minimization of the Sobolev norm of the model composed of second velocity derivatives Resulting models based on the velocity data - 1-D smooth P- and S-wave velocity model - 3-D smooth P- and S-wave velocity model

Resulting 1-D P-wave velocity model

P-wave rays in resulting 1-D model

Resulting 3-D P-wave velocity model - 23 km

Resulting 3-D P-wave velocity model - 15 km

Resulting 3-D P-wave velocity model - 10 km

Resulting 3-D P-wave velocity model - 5 km

Resulting 3-D P-wave velocity model - 0 km

New data – travel times from quarry blasts - ordinary quarry blasts (for the stone production) - origin time measurements in the quarries - travel times measured by seismic stations of the regional network - 5 quarries measured until 9/2011 (Buková, Hubina, Čachtice, Jablonica, Trstín)

Map of the quarries in the locality

Quarries with blasts measured until 9/2011 Čachtice Hubina Jablonica Buková Trstín

Čachtice quarry blast – march 2011

Čachtice quarry blast – march 2011

Čachtice quarry blast – march 2011

Čachtice quarry blast – march 2011

Čachtice quarry blast – march 2011

Čachtice quarry blast – march 2011

Buková – recorded P-wave travel times

Čachtice – recorded P-wave travel times

Hubina – recorded P-wave travel times

BU+CA+HU – recorded P-wave travel times

Buková – recorded S-wave travel times

Čachtice – recorded S-wave travel times

Hubina – recorded S-wave travel times

BU+CA+HU – recorded S-wave travel times

Repeated travel-time measurements Buková 10.9.2007 & 2.11.2010 Hubina 2.11.2010 12:14 & 12:39 Maximum relative travel-time differences < 4%

Comparison of measured and synthetic P-wave travel times Buková 10.9.2007 & 2.11.2010 measured 1-D synthetic rel. dif. (%) 3-D synthetic Špačince 4.69 4.26 -9.51 4.76 1.51 Dobrá Voda 2.00 2.99 39.87 2.71 30.35 EBO 4.93 4.65 -5.79 5.25 6.32 Plavecké Podhradie 2.56 3.02 16.57 2.76 7.70 Lakšár 3.17 3.42 7.45 3.33 4.85 Hradiště 1.97 2.88 37.62 2.60 27.80 Katarínka 1.81 2.72 40.24 2.48 31.14 Lančár 3.12 4.18 29.16 3.90 22.39 Pustá Ves 3.31 4.34 26.92 4.06 20.36 Smolenice 0.74 0.87 15.56 15.74 Buková 0.37 0.16 -77.90 0.14 -89.54

Comparison of measured and synthetic travel times Buková quarry m. 1-D % 3-D Špačince 4.69 4.26 -9.51 4.76 1.51 Dobrá Voda 2.00 2.99 39.87 2.71 30.35 EBO 4.93 4.65 -5.79 5.25 6.32 Plavecké Podhradie 2.56 3.02 16.57 2.76 7.70 Lakšár 3.17 3.42 7.45 3.33 4.85 Hradiště 1.97 2.88 37.62 2.60 27.80 Katarínka 1.81 2.72 40.24 2.48 31.14 Lančár 3.12 4.18 29.16 3.90 22.39 Pustá Ves 3.31 4.34 26.92 4.06 20.36 Smolenice 0.74 0.87 15.56 15.74 Buková 0.37 0.16 -77.90 0.14 -89.54

Conclusions - number of measured travel times from quarry blasts is growing - good repeatability => one measurement for each quarry sufficient - 3-D model gives better agreement with measured travel times than 1-D model - large travel-time errors => models not precise enough Plans - record travel times from as many quarries as possible - update the 3-D model using the measured travel times (include the measured travel times from quarry blasts into the velocity data fitting)