Please indicate your gender Male Female Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 64 of 120

What is your current status? Solicitor Barrister In-house counsel Government representative or Embassy Staff Student Other Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 66 of 120

Do you think the ECT will have significance in ensuring future energy security? Yes No Unlikely Don’t know Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 69 of 120

Do you think Russia will ratify the ECT in the next 5 years? Yes No Depends Unlikely Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 78 of 120

Would ratification by Russia contribute to positive developments in the current EU/Russia relationship? Yes No Unlikely Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 92 of 120

Would Russian ratification of the ECT lead to an increase of foreign energy investments in Russia? Yes – certainly or probably No – certainly not or probably not Don’t know Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 96 of 120

Would Russian ratification of the ECT lead to an increase of Russian energy investments abroad? Yes No Don’t know Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 67 of 120

Does the ECT provide sufficient investor protection in the energy industry? Yes No Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 90 of 120

In your view, does the ECT offer a higher level of protection than an average BIT? Yes No Don’t know Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 96 of 120

Does the ECT strike a good balance between investor protection and state sovereignty/regulatory powers? Yes No As good as can be expected Don’t know Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 92 of 120

Do you think that Article 17 has been interpreted correctly? Yes No – it should be easier for States to invoke Article 17 No – it should be more difficult for States to invoke Article 17 Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 84 of 120

Should a State be required to take any further action in order to invoke Article 17? Yes – individual notification to investors Yes - notification in Official Gazette Don’t know Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 89 of 120

The ECT has more than 50 member states; does the investment part of the ECT have a potential to serve as a model for a multilateral investment treaty? Yes No Maybe Unlikely due to change in states’ view of investment protection Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 89 of 120

Can the ECT serve as a basis for an Article 26 arbitration claim by an EU investor against an EU Member State? Yes No Maybe Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 65 of 120

Do you think the European institutions will take steps to prevent intra-European disputes from being dealt with under the ECT? Yes No Maybe Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 67 of 120

Is it likely that we will see disputes where the European Community, as opposed to an EU member state, will be a respondent? Yes No Maybe Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 65 of 120

Do you think the Article 24 ‘Exceptions’ contributes to the acceptability of the ECT on the political level? Yes No Maybe Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 66 of 120

Does the ECT require renegotiation in order to accommodate the concerns of states that are currently disinclined to accede to it and to remedy any existing problems with its application? Yes No Don’t know Copyright owned by the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. 71 of 120